Area gun sales, fears rising

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Isn't it great when you jump in the middle of a discussion, you simply take a side and attack the position you oppose without thinking and has no bearing on the issue at hand, son?

Must be your upbringing.

You are a troll that most just ignore

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>What comments would that be son?

The troll does not Remember what she posted

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Son, based on your argument, if the prosecutor said at trial he was there to show that Zimmerman murdered Martin, you'd complain that he was using it as proof.

Better still, I even POSTED an excerpt and you clearly didn't understand it....

"...Lester seemed most concerned about phone calls between Zimmerman and his wife while he was in jail that showed they knew of the tens of thousands of dollars he collected. The judge said Zimmerman and his wife talked about using the money to pay for his bond...."

You obviously did read the article.

So make up whatever you want without the facts son. That's up to you.

Wrong again

They were ignoring you troll

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Allegations?

"...George ZimmermanÂ’s attorney Mark OÂ’Mara has said the couple was confused and fearful when they misled court officials about how much money they had. A call and email to him Tuesday werenÂ’t immediately returned...."

O'Mara is arguing in front a judge son. He's NOT denying anything. He's "explaining"... that is, making excuses for his client.

It's the facts against your opinions.

You're clearly not looking at this with an open mind.

Open mind is something you know nothing about

[Fed Up]

Immigrant Warns Us About Obama (great video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>Already done son. You're a proven liar anyway.

But you can't show us when or where

More and more just ignore you everyday

Soon you will be forced to rant at your own post

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Oh, snookums. You're such an idiot!

You are the one making a fool out of yourself

More and more have seen you are nothing but a troll and can't back up anything you say..........LOL

When and where troll???

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! You should follow your own advice son.

And just ignore a troll like you????

I enjoy baiting you into making a fool of yourself

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! What's the matter son? Looking for friends to "protect" you?

I love comic cons!

Just having another laugh at you

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Why would a grand jury be required son?

Yes we know you are too stupid to know..........

A grand jury would have seen the lack of evidence on the prosecutions side and the evidence on the defenses side and Zim would have walked

But then the animals would have started burning down their houses

So that is why a jury is needed

[eternal cynic]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! I didn't flip flp son. That's YOUR position.
If it gets to trial, great! But I've heard the same from many "conservative" backers of Romney and and they disappeared within a week after Nov 6.
What I find even more interesting is YOUR position that YOU'RE deciding not to respond because it's a waste of time. You must think a debate has a "winner" and a "loser." The decision is something that is coming and may not even be related to a trial.
You're feelings of superiority are all your own. And that's fine.... that's your right.
But I'm still waiting for this case to be played out. You, otoh, feel you already have ALL the information YOU require in order to make a decision... again, that's fine. That's all on you.

At least you allow for the possibility the case may never make it to trial. I don’t believe that will happen, but it is possible.

[eternal cynic]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Allegations?
"...George Zimmerman’s attorney Mark O’Mara has said the couple was confused and fearful when they misled court officials about how much money they had. A call and email to him Tuesday weren’t immediately returned...."
O'Mara is arguing in front a judge son. He's NOT denying anything. He's "explaining"... that is, making excuses for his client.
It's the facts against your opinions.
You're clearly not looking at this with an open mind.

Do you know what an allegation is?

[eternal cynic]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>Spell checking seems fine.

On the correction yes. The first post spell check changed my typo on applicable to application.

[Here Is One]

eternal cynic wrote:

<quoted text>At least you allow for the possibility the case may never make it to trial. I donÂ’t believe that will happen, but it is possible.

It must go to trial

Even after a jury finds Zim not guilty the riots will be bad

If it never made it to a jury that would be fuel for even more riots

They would claim the slave owners let Zim walk

[Yeah]

eternal cynic wrote:

<quoted text>
At least you allow for the possibility the case may never make it to trial. I don’t believe that will happen, but it is possible.

lol! I've ALWAYS allowed for that option.

As I've said, I find it curious O'Mara keeps postponing the syg hearing.

[Yeah]

eternal cynic wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you know what an allegation is?

Well clearly if there was one, O'Mara was conceding it. So he must not feel it is an allegation.

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! I've ALWAYS allowed for that option.

As I've said, I find it curious O'Mara keeps postponing the syg hearing.

They will continue to postpone it an Zim will not testify

Very typical of high profile cases

Wanting the animals to calm down before any trial

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>Well clearly if there was one, O'Mara was conceding it. So he must not feel it is an allegation.

Once again you show you don't have a clue about what is going on

Tell us again how the burden of proof is on O'Mara not the prosecution

[Yeah]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again you show you don't have a clue about what is going on
Tell us again how the burden of proof is on O'Mara not the prosecution

Why son?

[Yeah]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again you show you don't have a clue about what is going on
Tell us again how the burden of proof is on O'Mara not the prosecution

... after all, you won't even post ONCE what a 215 suspect is.

Obvious you're not as intelligent as YOU believe you are!