Area gun sales, fears rising

Nov 14, 2012 Full story: North Port Sun 7,569

Gun stores in Charlotte County have experienced increased sales since Election Day as local gun owners brace for an anticipated restriction of gun laws following the re-election of President Barack Obama.

Full Story

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#4078 Jan 31, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Unlike you, I'm not "interpreting" to make the situation fit.

The most obvious thing is people like you only focus on those gray areas and try to "patch it" and offer it as "evidence."

You keep repeating the same things and I suspect, to convince yourselves you're right.
Provide instances of me "interpreting" to make a situation fit.

Provide instances of me only focusing on those gray areas and trying to "patch it" and offer it as "evidence."

Any redundancy is meant to penetrate hard heads, such as your own.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#4079 Jan 31, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Really? Then I wonder why they haven't gone through the syg hearing? And O'Mara keeps postponing the speedy trial?

If what you idiots are saying is true, this incident would have been a done deal months ago....

... yet it's the defense that keeps dragging it out.

The one thing you people just can't get around is the dead body. That's your biggest road block and one you continue to avoid.

You may not see it even though that's the central point to this entire event.
Lmao. Lets revisit this after the trial. Or will you run for the hills if it doesn't turn out the way you want it to?

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#4080 Jan 31, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Well, we know for a fact News Corps subsidiaries were running illegal operations, don't we?

After all, there were a number of British officials who quit and Rebekkah Brooks (and her husband?) are still under indictment.

Not to mention the shutting down of News of the World and Murdoch's so called "disappointment."
Not the ones in the United States. Provide proof of US subsidiaries being found guilty of running illegal operations.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#4081 Jan 31, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Provide instances of me "interpreting" to make a situation fit.
Provide instances of me only focusing on those gray areas and trying to "patch it" and offer it as "evidence."
Any redundancy is meant to penetrate hard heads, such as your own.
http://www.topix.net/forum/us/ politics/T2C1K7L9V8G4K8TS8/pos t4039

You can "claim" what you want. That's your approach to this event.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#4082 Jan 31, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Lmao. Lets revisit this after the trial. Or will you run for the hills if it doesn't turn out the way you want it to?
lol! You know what's funny? Many of the Romney supporters disappeared after Nov 6. I suspect they simply changed their names in shame.

However, I notice you're asking if I want to revisit "...if it doesn't turn out the way I (sic) want it to."

You're injecting your opinion again. I only said I want justice to run its course. So clearly, you've already taken a side.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#4083 Jan 31, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>What else could make someone so stupid?
I think being a liberal simply appeals to those with double digit IQs. At least that's who the liberal leaders are able to recruit and prepare with propaganda. The problem is that when faced with facts that debunk their propaganda, that double digit IQ can't come up with anything beyond 1. Ignore the facts. 2. Deflect from the facts. and 3. If all else fails, insult the bearer of the bad news.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#4084 Jan 31, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Not the ones in the United States. Provide proof of US subsidiaries being found guilty of running illegal operations.
I never made the claim you're accusing me of son.

Again, you're injecting your position to make your point.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#4085 Jan 31, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Why? I'm waiting for justice to take its course. If you're interested, you're free to look into it and draw whatever conclusion you so desire.
I'm glad we agree. Although your actions haven't matched your statement here.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#4086 Jan 31, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Not the ones in the United States. Provide proof of US subsidiaries being found guilty of running illegal operations.
You know? You made me wonder where things stood today so I had to check.....

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/nov/20/n...

"News Corp exposed to growing legal threat following charges for tabloid duo

Charges for Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson raise prospect that News Corp could be prosecuted under US anti-bribery laws

Share 234
inShare8
Email

Ed Pilkington and Dominic Rushe in New York
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 20 November 2012 16.49 EST

Rupert Murdoch
The charges complicate the rehabilitation of Rupert Murdoch's son James as a possible successor to lead News Corp. Photograph: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

The new round of criminal charges brought in the UK against former senior News International editors has once again raised the prospect that Rupert Murdoch's New York-based parent company may be prosecuted under US anti-bribery laws, and complicates the rehabilitation of his son James as a possible successor to lead the global media empire.

The charges brought against Rebekah Brooks, who ran Murdoch's newspaper holdings in Britain, Andy Coulson, former editor of the now defunct News of the World, and two other former News International employees exposes the parent News Corporation to possible action under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The FCPA exists to prosecute US-domiciled companies for acts of bribery and corruption that they might commit abroad.

An official of the British ministry of defence, Bettina Jordan Barber, also faces trial for allegedly receiving 100,000 from Murdoch's tabloid newspapers for information that led to a series of published stories. The allegation that money passed hands clearly falls within the legal remit of the FCPA.

Mike Koehler, professor of law at Southern Illinois school of law and author of the blog fcaprofessor.com , said the charges "would be hard for the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission to ignore. We have been hearing allegations for a year and a half now, now we clearly have charges against high ranking officials at a foreign subsidiary," he said...."

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4087 Jan 31, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Speaking of stupid son, do you have that definition of yours for a "215 suspect?"
Or did you lie again?
Just as soon as you show me when and where you proved me wrong..........LOL

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4088 Jan 31, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Thanks for your idiotic opinion son.
But keep trying to "explain" things as you believe they should be.
Please show us one high profile murder case that was not drawn out..........

ooops ya cant can ya.....

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4089 Jan 31, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Lmao. Lets revisit this after the trial. Or will you run for the hills if it doesn't turn out the way you want it to?
After the trial she will be busy burning down her neighborhood looting their neighbors businesses and acting like animals....

So she will not have time to respond

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#4090 Jan 31, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text> http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/T2C1K7...

You can "claim" what you want. That's your approach to this event.
So you post the last 5 hours of this thread?
Point out a single, or multiple post of mine which provide instances of me "interpreting" to make a situation fit.
Provide instances of me only focusing on those gray areas and trying to "patch it" and offer it as "evidence."
Any redundancy is meant to penetrate hard heads, such as your own.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4091 Jan 31, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
I think being a liberal simply appeals to those with double digit IQs. At least that's who the liberal leaders are able to recruit and prepare with propaganda. The problem is that when faced with facts that debunk their propaganda, that double digit IQ can't come up with anything beyond 1. Ignore the facts. 2. Deflect from the facts. and 3. If all else fails, insult the bearer of the bad news.
Typical sheeples..........Baaaaaaaaaa all the way to the slaughter house.....

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#4092 Jan 31, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! You know what's funny? Many of the Romney supporters disappeared after Nov 6. I suspect they simply changed their names in shame.

However, I notice you're asking if I want to revisit "...if it doesn't turn out the way I (sic) want it to."

You're injecting your opinion again. I only said I want justice to run its course. So clearly, you've already taken a side.
No, you really need to work in your interpretive skills.
I said let's revisit it after the trial. There was no qualifier that we would revisit it only if it didn't turn out the way you wanted.
I asked if you would head for the hills if it didn't turn out the way that you wanted.

Keep grasping at straws and attempting to put words in my mouth. I'll be here to point it out, and show your cowardly MO.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#4093 Jan 31, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Just as soon as you show me when and where you proved me wrong..........LOL
lol! Already have son.

But this thing you have with the "215 suspect," you should clearly be able to tie it in to Zimmerman and your position.

You can provide that link, right son? Or did you lie again? Or are you just plain stupid this time?

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#4094 Jan 31, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I never made the claim you're accusing me of son.

Again, you're injecting your position to make your point.
Where do you think the basis of this thread is? The UK? The rest of the world?
You certainly implied it. I called you on it.
Plain and simple.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#4095 Jan 31, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Just as soon as you show me when and where you proved me wrong..........LOL
Wouldn't Martin have been a 13P instead of a 215?

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4096 Jan 31, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Already have son.
But this thing you have with the "215 suspect," you should clearly be able to tie it in to Zimmerman and your position.
You can provide that link, right son? Or did you lie again? Or are you just plain stupid this time?
More than happy to provide a link just as soon as you show us when and where you proved me wrong..........ROTFLMAO
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#4097 Jan 31, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Please show us one high profile murder case that was not drawn out..........
ooops ya cant can ya.....
lol! Why should I prove YOUR claim son?

Why can't you prove YOUR claim?

Oh that's right! You're a proven liar!

Woohoo!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barack Obama Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Portlandia 1,153,474
McAuliffe wants to ban gifts and trips for lawm... (Mar '09) 10 min Sierra 16
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 13 min Varsity Visitor 293,277
Obama's plan: 'Deport felons, not families' 35 min spocko 587
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 36 min KiMerde 2,815
Obama: Racism, bias in US will take time to tackle 38 min spocko 250
Ben Carson: Race Relations Have 'Gotten Worse' ... 39 min spocko 612
More from around the web