Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

[Brian_G]

litesong wrote:

While "brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver",... was paying attention to the V-8, an EV ran over him. It's said, you never hear the bullet that kills you.

Is that a threat?

[litesong]

brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver wrote:

Is that a threat?

Don't have an EV. Anyhow, you've been looking over your shoulder ever since you threatened me four times. One year, you admitted to me you had 3 other threats you made(against other people), that I never accused you of. So you were proud of those 3 threats.

[litesong]

Large lying language wrote:

More confusion from the liberals.

Its no confusion that "Large lying language" is a kkk(ALWAYS SMALL LETTERS) member & a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener.

[PHD]

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
Its no confusion that "Large lying language" is a kkk(ALWAYS SMALL LETTERS) member & a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener.

And you think topix doesn’t know what you publish? Attacks on me won't delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

[PHD]

OK

[litesong]

Largelanguage wrote:

When will litesong finally shut up?

[QUOTE who=""phud fetid feces face fiend""]you think.........[QUOTE]

........ that "phud fetid feces face fiend" & 'large lying language' are stupid, as all toxic topix AGW deniers are stupid. They never were able to get mathematics & science degrees. They never were able to take upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra & pre-calc for their poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.

But, to be sucked into exxon, energy, business & re-pubic-lick-un boardroom, Pee-R, propaganda pablum is the most stupid of all their non-actions of life. To pretend science, where there is no science & they never had science.......to make up science, that is nothing but exxon, energy, business & re-pubic-lick-un boardroom, Pee-R, propaganda pablum is their downfall......... & a long long fall it is. Tho their bloody guts are not sprayed all over concrete floors, their wretched brain cells have seized to function, no longer connected to each other.... yes, a long long fall!

[PHD]

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
........ that "phud fetid feces face fiend" & 'large lying language' are stupid, as all toxic topix AGW deniers are stupid. They never were able to get mathematics & science degrees. They never were able to take upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra & pre-calc for their poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.
But, to be sucked into exxon, energy, business & re-pubic-lick-un boardroom, Pee-R, propaganda pablum is the most stupid of all their non-actions of life. To pretend science, where there is no science & they never had science.......to make up science, that is nothing but exxon, energy, business & re-pubic-lick-un boardroom, Pee-R, propaganda pablum is their downfall......... & a long long fall it is. Tho their bloody guts are not sprayed all over concrete floors, their wretched brain cells have seized to function, no longer connected to each other.... yes, a long long fall!

And you think topix doesn’t know what you publish? Attacks on me won't delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

[PHD]

Ok.

[PHD]

Ok

[PHD]

Ok

[tina anne]

gcaveman1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny thing is, you always make the same old claims and always produce the same old amount of evidence..........0.
Zero.
Zilch.
Nada.
actually, after all.

I have produced it in the past and if you want to see it again then you need to dig for it yourself. But I will be nice and give you a starting point.

http://joannenova.com.au/2012/10/man-made-glo...

http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2012/10/sev...

[PHD]

Yes I do agree its all science fiction.

[gcaveman1]

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
I have produced it in the past and if you want to see it again then you need to dig for it yourself. But I will be nice and give you a starting point.
http://joannenova.com.au/2012/10/man-made-glo...
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2012/10/sev...

Why, Tina, thank you so much for being nice!

I don't remember you producing it in the past. I think you just think you did.

Are these science sites? Are the run by scientists? What kind of scientists are they? Are they physicists? Veterinarians? Medical doctors? Climatologists?

If global warming was disproved in 2008, that news has been well-concealed.

[Wallop10]

gcaveman1 wrote:

<quoted text>

Why, Tina, thank you so much for being nice!
I don't remember you producing it in the past. I think you just think you did.

Are these science sites? Are the run by scientists? What kind of scientists are they? Are they physicists? Veterinarians? Medical doctors? Climatologists?
If global warming was disproved in 2008, that news has been well-concealed.

LOL. Tina gets offended when one calls her on posting 100% right wing anti-science trash.

[PHD]

Wallop10 wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL. Tina gets offended when one calls her on posting 100% right wing anti-science trash.

Much like your--self when you get walloped again and again.How are those tires working for you?

[gcaveman1]

Wallop10 wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL. Tina gets offended when one calls her on posting 100% right wing anti-science trash.

I wish I could offend her so much that she wouldn't bring her dumb ass around here anymore.

[litesong]

gcaveman1 wrote:

I wish I could offend her so much that she wouldn't bring her dumb ass around here anymore.

Whatever happened to dirtling should happen to the rest of the 'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' AGW denier ganghood'. Of course,'tiny-minded anne' is in the hoosegow with the gang.

[gcaveman1]

Associated Press

Two of the Great Lakes have hit their lowest water levels ever recorded, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said Tuesday, capping more than a decade of below-normal rain and snowfall and higher temperatures that boost evaporation.

Measurements taken last month show Lake Huron and Lake Michigan have reached their lowest ebb since record keeping began in 1918, and the lakes could set additional records over the next few months, the corps said. The lakes were 29 inches below their long-term average and had declined 17 inches since January 2012.

The other Great Lakes — Superior, Erie and Ontario — were also well below average.

"We're in an extreme situation," said Keith Kompoltowicz, watershed hydrology chief for the corps district office in Detroit.

The low water has caused heavy economic losses by forcing cargo ships to carry lighter loads, leaving boat docks high and dry, and damaging fish-spawning areas. And vegetation has sprung up in newly exposed shoreline bottomlands, a turnoff for hotel customers who prefer sandy beaches.

<><><>< ><><><> <><><>< ><><>

Don't worry about the government taxing your coal and oil. Global warming is already taxing us!

[HomoSapiensLapto picus]

gcaveman1 wrote:

Associated Press
Two of the Great Lakes have hit their lowest water levels ever recorded, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said Tuesday, capping more than a decade of below-normal rain and snowfall and higher temperatures that boost evaporation... Measurements taken last month show Lake Huron and Lake Michigan have reached their lowest ebb since record keeping began in 1918...

The low water has caused heavy economic losses by forcing cargo ships to carry lighter loads, leaving boat docks high and dry, and damaging fish-spawning areas. And vegetation has sprung up in newly exposed shoreline bottomlands, a turnoff for hotel customers who prefer sandy beaches.
<><><>< ><><><> <><><>< ><><>
Don't worry about the government taxing your coal and oil. Global warming is already taxing us!

Yes, these are probably actual economic costs of AGW/CC. It's just diffcult to "prove" that they're from AGW/CC, so the deniers will keep squawking.

Yes, it's a cost of burning fossil fuels, but it's STILL not reflected in the prices people pay for them. It's being externalized, & other people are paying for it.

The purpose of a revenue-neutral carbon tax is NOT to raise more money for the government, or to make people pay arbitrarily, but to make the REAL costs of burning it clearer. The real costs include all of the above, plus a WHOLE lot more.

[tina anne]

gcaveman1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Why, Tina, thank you so much for being nice!
I don't remember you producing it in the past. I think you just think you did.
Are these science sites? Are the run by scientists? What kind of scientists are they? Are they physicists? Veterinarians? Medical doctors? Climatologists?
If global warming was disproved in 2008, that news has been well-concealed.

Notice how many time in the past two years that it has been mentioned in the news. A search shows that it was not mentioned by the main stream media and only found in fringe sites.

How many of the sites others quote are run by reputable and respected scientist and how many are run by those with an agenda and are biased. It could be said that everyone here is biased. On the other hand history has shown that many have believed in climate change and had man as the cause but expected different results or made predictions that failed to come true. How many like yourself claimed man was causing an ice age back in the seventies. They based there claims on numbers from the 40's, 50's, and 60's and blamed CO2 as the cause. Claimed it was cooling the earth.