CA Criminal Drug Case

[Mosey]

SheStone wrote:

<quoted text>
So far Deutsch's report is the only one I have seen mention that.
She has been inaccurate before.
I don't even recall her being charged with that. I guess I will have to go look.
Anyone else remember Eroshevich being charged with giving placebos?
TIA/JMO

Hi SheStone~

I don't recall eroshevich giving Anna a placebo either. Although I'd read somewhere (maybe from reports of Maurice Brighthaupt's testimony?) that she or he would get rid of pills. I thought maybe that could account for some of the hundreds of pills missing. But hearing again on videos last night, the nannies claim Anna was given 6-10 pills every four hours then it made sense so many were "missing."

Also, I'd go with your (and Baloney's) interpretation of the transcripts being from Sept. 2009. I was simply confused about the dates and you are far more versed when it comes to legal matters. I appreciate your input and insight more than you know (as well as a few others.)

I'm very pleased to hear there will be a criminal trial. Now, we wait some more but not too long, thank God.

[Makes u go hmmm]

SheStone wrote:

<quoted text>
So far Deutsch's report is the only one I have seen mention that.
She has been inaccurate before.
I don't even recall her being charged with that. I guess I will have to go look.
Anyone else remember Eroshevich being charged with giving placebos?
TIA/JMO

I apologize in advance if someone already answered this. I'm a few pages back.

Overt Act 40

Between 9/11/06 and 1/26/07, KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH gave placebos to ANNA NICOLE SMITH.

[Global]

For No Shame wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you. I told you she was full of self-aggrandizing bullshit.

Well, I kinda know him too. I saw him on TV. Does that count?

[Mosey]

Sarah wrote:

Ok enough is enough, Yes Wilma is welcome at my site as well as anyone else.
The only difference is we won't allow anyone to post BS about posters which seems to became the norm here on topix ,instead of discussing the cases.
We allow people no matter who the are to grieve Mr O'quinn's death.It doesn't matter if you knew him or not it's called respect for a man that has done a lot for many people.
You see it doesn't matter who is the best when it comes to the cases or who is grieving harder then whom. What matters is 2 people were lost in a horrible accident yesterday and 2 people died useless deaths in these case's.

Hi Sarah~

I mentioned often about John O'Quinn's passing and didn't say much about Johnny Cutliff. Mybad.

My condolences and prayers are also with his family and loved ones.

You're right; TWO [more] people useless deaths and it really doesn't matter who is grieving more than another. May they all rest in peace.

[SheStone]

It is time for me to go. Good night all.

[For SheStone]

For SheStone wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks, SheStone.
So it looks like different degrees of homicide are subject to limitation statutes.
Since Florida said how it proceeds will hinge on the outcome in CA, keeping in mind that the CA investigation took 2-1/2 years, I can only hope that the states are working together toward one great big strategic end.

Adding to the above...

I don't know if The Law will ever be able to prove Stern and the doctors intentionally set out to kill Anna, but they did kill her. Sort of like a drunk driver doesn't intend to kill anybody; but if not for his reckless actions, someone ends up killed.

In Daniel's case, I don't think anyone was fooling around there. I believe he was outright murdered. His death came about just a little too conveniently and, even if he did experiment with drugs, it's quite a leap to assume he would go and overdose on methadone.

But his death launched the endgame for Anna. Keeping her in a state of stupefaction served no purpose but to keep her quiet.

Why would they take her to Florida if they were keeping her stoned in the Bahamas? Of all the places they could have become regular partiers, why would they choose a place on foreign soil? It all sounds like a big setup.

[Mrs Marple]

Dink wrote:

Well thank GOODNESS she didn't give her PLACEBOS!!!! Imagine THAT???? lol

-------

And to think they are illegal. I had no idea!

[If you only knew]

For No Shame wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you. I told you she was full of self-aggrandizing bullshit.

You and DDs are so full of sh!t. You have no idea what Vices relationship with JOQ was up until the time he died. Those depos are over a year old. And yes, she was included as being called his friend. They had a lot in common. Their charity and warm feelings and desire to help Virgie Arthur.

You people make me sick. Everything is a contest or something to dissect. And that is so very disrespectful to the deceased. Talk about his achievements or anything but this fighting over something you know nothing about is beyond disgusting. Shame on you.

[Trixie]

here is a cool video of O'Quinn and in it at the end he asks his girlfriend a question.
You can hear pure joy in his voice talking about his cars and telling his memories of his dad.
:)
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Predictable]

DDs wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi Dink
No but a lot of articles mentioned him. They add him in the list of damaging evidence against the criminals.
Pointing to his statement he never seen anyone take so many pills.
So .. in a way .. he hit one star in the galaxy. All he needs now is a guitar to play when he whines.

not really. the a*****e only pointed the finger to Kapoor not Kris nor HKS. Naz is there for a reason. LB blamed Anna for Daniels death in the inquest and now he's blaming Anna and Kapoor and saving the good doc and Howie.

[Smoke]

Makes u go hmmm wrote:

<quoted text>
I apologize in advance if someone already answered this. I'm a few pages back.
Overt Act 40
Between 9/11/06 and 1/26/07, KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH gave placebos to ANNA NICOLE SMITH.

And is that per Moe's testimony in favor of her while Naz was looking on and so Sadow could tear him apart hence they're working together? Howard and Dr. Kris are still together.

[Pipe dream let it go]

For SheStone wrote:

<quoted text>
I hope Florida gets it in gear and acts soon, too. I hope they decide to throw caution to the wind and go for the charge that has no statute of limitations.
The only charge I'm interested in is a possible homicide charge.
Do you know offhand if the different degrees of homicide have a statute of limitations? For example, is there a limitation to how long a DA can go after someone for negligent homicide? Or is homicide "homicide," regardless of the degree, and therefore the statute of limitations would not apply?

Pipe dream. Florida has washed it hands of this regardless of the preplanned reports they were "reexamining" the case. The Seminoles will never mention this again IMO.

[WHAT]

No Shame wrote:

Not the time to be nasty wrote:
<quoted text> She is grieving, give her a freaking break.
From Deposition of J. O'Quinn
Q. Did Don Clark associate anyone to help out in his investigation?
A. Not to my knowledge.
Q. You never met anyone by the name of Wilma?
A. One more time? What?
Q. Did you ever meet anyone by the name of Wilma that was in any way assisting Mr. Clark?
A. No. Is that a female name?
Q. It sounds like it to me.
A. But no.
Depostion of W. Vice
Q You never talked to John O'Quinn prior to March 27, 2007, did you?
A No.
Q Have you ever talked to John O'Quinn?
A Yes.
Q When was the last time?
A February '08.
MR. MCFALL: That's going to be after -- don't talk about anything after
MR. WOOD: Hang on.
MR. MCFALL:-- March 27, 2007.
MR. WOOD: That's not the –
MR. MCFALL: I take that back. She can answer about -- yeah, the Order says you can ask about O'Quinn.
Q (BY MR. WOOD) What did you talk to Mr. O'Quinn about in February 2008?
A Nothing. I just met him for the first time and never seen him again.
Q Where were you?
A Here.
Q You just happened to be here in the office meeting with Don?
A Yes.
Q About what?
A About this case.
Q And just happened to meet him in the hallway, said hello?
A He came into Don's office.
Q And did y'all talk about anything other than cordialities?
A No, we talked a little bit about this.
Q What did he say?
A I don't remember.
Q Did you ever tell Rita Cosby that John O'Quinn had intentionally called Howard a murderer so that Howard would sue him and he could then depose Howard Stern?
A No, I did not.
MS. MCNAMRA: Objection –
Q (BY MR. WOOD) You deny that under oath?
A Yes.
Q Did you ever make any statement to Rita Cosby that John O'Quinn wanted to depose Howard so that he could develop a case for wrongful death against him?
A I never said that.
Q Never said that to Rita? Never said anything at all about John O'Quinn intentionally calling Howard a murderer? You never mentioned anything about that at any time to Rita Cosby; is that true?
A That's true.
Q Never happened, did it?
A Never happened.
Q According to you.
A I –
Q Right?
A You're asking me and I said never happened.
Q So other than Mr.-- you don't remember the specifics that Mr. O'Quinn talked about on February the 8th?
A No, I don't.
Q Do you remember anything that you said to him specifically?
A Not really.
Q Does that mean no?
A No.
Q Do you remember anything Don Clark said?
A He introduced me to him.
Q Anything else that you recall Mr. Clark said?
A Just pleasantry stuff, that was it.
Q You don't have any information whatsoever about what John O'Quinn had been told prior to March 27, 2007 about the Anna Nicole Smith case or the Daniel Smith death, do you?
A No.

I thought she said she met JO after all was said and done. She was with Don in florida and JO didn't know that? She said recently that she finally met JO and now says they shared a bond with both having no family. WTH? Wannabe?

[Fanciulla]

Pipe dream let it go wrote:

<quoted text>
Pipe dream. Florida has washed it hands of this regardless of the preplanned reports they were "reexamining" the case. The Seminoles will never mention this again IMO.

I believe that California can ascertain jurisdiction through federal agencies.

Here is an example:

Some crimes have national significance and, to reflect the public interest, their investigation and prosecution will fall to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and/or the Department of Justice. This creates tensions between the two systems because the individual states in which aspects of the criminal activity have taken place may wish to assert jurisdiction over that part, whereas the federal authorities will wish to consolidate the wrongdoing across several states into a single trial.

One significant result of the concurrent jurisdiction between state and federal courts (and in some cases between different state courts) is that an individual who violates both state and federal law, or the laws of multiple states, can be separately charged and tried in each jurisdiction. Thus, a resident of Virginia who defrauds a Florida resident through the mail may be tried in Virginia state court and in a Florida state court, and in a federal court in either Florida or Virginia.

==========

Other aspect that need to be look into is if in effect the Seminole sovereing territory had jurisdiction over the investigation. Thechically, Anna died at a hospital that falls into state and federal jurisdiction, she was not pronounced dead at the Hard Rock Hotel, she was pronounced dead upon arrival at the Memorial Rigional hospital, the hospital is located in Hollywood, Florida in South Broward County.

http://www.broward.org/medical/070223_2_scene...

[DDs]

Predictable wrote:

<quoted text>
not really. the a*****e only pointed the finger to Kapoor not Kris nor HKS. Naz is there for a reason. LB blamed Anna for Daniels death in the inquest and now he's blaming Anna and Kapoor and saving the good doc and Howie.

Not really what? I said a lot of articles added Birkhead in their list for damaging testimony. And they did. And finally thanks to Deutsch, anyone that picks up the AP did.:)

Larry Birkhead, who fathered Smith's daughter, Dannielynn, said when she was being weaned off methadone at a hospital, Stern helped her sneak extra doses from a contraband bottle.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-anna-...

Larry Birkhead, the father of Smith's young daughter, said he never saw anyone take as many medications as Smith.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/A...

Larry Birkhead, the father of Smith's young daughter, said he never saw anyone take as many medications as Smith.
http://www.kansascity.com/402/story/1540118.h...

Larry Birkhead, the father of Smith's young daughter, said he never saw anyone take as many medications as Smith.
http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2009-10-3...

[chalkoutline]

she always lies wrote:

<quoted text>
She said so much that was not true and caught so many times, I think she doesn't even remember all her lies, but I know we all do and why is she not here to answer questions as she said she would? must be the only answer for that is just chalk it up to more lies after lies on her part.

Hey, leave me out of it!

:)

[Windi-]

http://www.topix.com/forum/who/anna-nicole-sm...

new thread

[Lucy Gooooosy]

cee cee wrote:

She makes me sick...
flip to pic 7 and check out her demeanor as she headed into court. Like she really cared for anyone but her self.
http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/Anna-Nicole-Smi...
Delighted these creeps will be sweating bullets.

Delighted as well!

[Faye]

CEe-Cee-Soon they will be sweating more than bullets-best not drop the soap! Ha

[DIBBS]

A trial in LA wrote:

After it was announced that the three will stand trial, Anna Nicole Smith's mother Virgie Arthurs said she was 'thrilled' with the court's ruling.
A friend of Virgie revealed: "She is absolutely thrilled with the judge's decision. All she has ever wanted is justice."
http://splashnewsonline.celebuzz.com/2009/10/...

HALELUJAH !!
This is what it's been ALL about ALL along, the bringing of Anna's killers to justice.

I don't even like Jerry Brown but bless his soul for making this possible!!!

Long ago we predicted both Sterns and Rose in jail. That day is on its way.