You truly seem to be missing the point in more than one way.<quoted text>
My understanding is that it’s no longer in the appeals court’s hands. It now in the CA supreme court’s hand.
I don’t see how you can say that its stern/Dr. E who is desperately attempting to twist and turn the law Since it’s the DA who brought it to the CA Supreme Court when their initial VICTORY with the appeals court wasn’t good enough for them.
At the end of the day I still believe that after everything is said and done the most Howard will get is misdemeanors. Think about how much longer this has been dragged out- literally years. and how much more tax payer’s money has been wasted and the stress has been put on Howard’s elderly parents- all because the DA is afraid they won’t get their giant headlines,“ANNA NICOLE SMITH’S BOYFRIEND/LAWYER FOUND GUILTY OF MISDEMEANORS!!! THE DA WINS!!!!!”
It reminds me of that episode of Southpark when Canada goes on strike and Canada finally “wins” with getting coupons to some restaurant and bubble gum
First you seem to want to overlook that Stern and Eroshevich broke the law and in doing so lead to or at the very least contributed to the deaths of two people.
Second you seem to overlook the big picture that the Appeals Court opinion on the double jeopardy issue if left unchallenged would be a negative precedent not just affecting this case but other future cases. This is why the DA appealed to the CA Supreme court.