Opposition forms against Bush's fish ...

Opposition forms against Bush's fish farm, drilling plans - Ft....

There are 1 comment on the Fort Bragg Advocate-News story from Jul 17, 2008, titled Opposition forms against Bush's fish farm, drilling plans - Ft..... In it, Fort Bragg Advocate-News reports that:

President George W. Bush's administration is making its biggest effort to date to allow corporate development of the ocean for fish farms, oil drilling and wave energy.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Fort Bragg Advocate-News.

leonardo de vinchi

Vallejo, CA

#1 Jul 20, 2008
It is very difficult to see how a fish farm could be attached to an oil rig that is several miles off of the Northern California Coast. The nets or pens that confine the farmed fish could not survive the battering they would get off of the coast of Northern California.

It is true fish farms pollute the bottom. But that is a red herring so to speak.

What exactly is wrong with an oil rig which has pumped all the oil in its area being turned into a wind mill platform --- other than, of course, it might be owned by a corporation heaven forbid. If not for corporations like Chevron, how would the trucks that deliver the food that you eat be powered? With dried mushrooms? Or maybe the residue of weed?

The reporter, or is he writing an editorial, it is hard to tell, writes: "... European governments are increasingly subsidizing energy development and insisting on local control of local resources..." But adds that President Bush is in favor of market solutions. Not so fast Mr hartzell.

The United States first started subsidizing wind and solar energy after the first energy crisis in 1973. These subsidies have lasted for decades. California has subsidized solar for up to 50 percent of the price of the equipment.

Mr Hartzell is totally in a fog about the way projects get funded.

If we want to be paying ten dollars a gallon for gas in a few years, then by all means we should submerge ourselves in the paranoid mantras Mr Hartzell trys to foist upon us.

If we want to continue seeing 700 billion dollars fly out the window to the Middle Eastern suppliers every year, four times the yearly cost of the war in Iraq, then we should block every oil well, sink every wave energy proposal, veto every wind mill in the ocean, and nix every power line to link solar furnaces to cities. Then in a few years we will see our standard of living equalize with Mongolia.

If on the other hand we want to remain the leading economy in the world, we will tear down burdensome laws that slow down the deployment of ocean projects sometimes for 20 years. If we streamline some of our laws, we could see a decline in the price we pay for energy and a lot of that energy could be clean.
Unless the Charters and Hartzells of the world reign supreme.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Advocate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Quality Auto Group closes doors (Oct '08) Apr '16 sad 26
How to handle a Cyber-bully (Nov '13) Nov '13 ononothimagin 20
News School board interested in moving forward with ... (Dec '12) Dec '12 Former 1
News Carpentersville parent wants answers about drug... (Jan '12) Jan '12 Cville resident 1
News Malloy's first year in the eye of the storm (Dec '11) Dec '11 the big stink 1
News Day by day family events in Berkshire and Benni... (Sep '11) Sep '11 Tara 1
News NYC Gay Man Brutally Assaulted by Six Teens (Mar '11) Mar '11 Vincent Ward 58