Benghazi Impeachment Suddenly Not So ...

Benghazi Impeachment Suddenly Not So Far-Fetched

There are 28 comments on the New Media Journal story from May 6, 2013, titled Benghazi Impeachment Suddenly Not So Far-Fetched. In it, New Media Journal reports that:

On October 27th, 2012, only days before the presidential election, I wrote : "If Barack Obama is reelected, will he face impeachment over Benghazi -- a yet more unpleasant and far more wrenching result than to lose an election? "It could happen -- and in my estimation should happen -- the way revelations are playing out over the bloody terror ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at New Media Journal.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#1 May 6, 2013
The BenghaziDECEPTION has witnesses, today.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#2 May 7, 2013
Could be another Iran-Contra thing.
Standby for "warehouse cache of weapons for Syrian rebels" story.
Washington knew something. Why else would a drone transmitting live feed during the assault be taking place?
Why is Stevens not cosidered assinated but murdered?
Why was Steven's wife not there? Because he knew what was going on and knew she would be safer away from the Embassy.
Why did the nearby Special Ops guys get told to Stand Down?
Yup! A lot more than meets the eye here, folks.
fscott

Corrales, NM

#3 May 7, 2013
I have no doubt that the administration has tried everything to kill this story and hide the truth. The question is what is the truth. The two people with the most to lose are Obama and Clinton that alone makes it very interesting.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#5 May 7, 2013
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
Could be another Iran-Contra thing.
Standby for "warehouse cache of weapons for Syrian rebels" story.
Washington knew something. Why else would a drone transmitting live feed during the assault be taking place?
Why is Stevens not cosidered assinated but murdered?
Why was Steven's wife not there? Because he knew what was going on and knew she would be safer away from the Embassy.
Why did the nearby Special Ops guys get told to Stand Down?
Yup! A lot more than meets the eye here, folks.
ummmm....the drone wasn't there for the whole attack. it was flown there to gather intel for the rescue operation once the attack was known by the white house and pentagon.

why would Steven's wife go with him to the consulate? that would have been very irregular...

no-one was ever told to stand down.

you have been lied to. the facts are out there, spend some time and research them.

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#8 May 7, 2013
Impeach Obama? Never happen. The liberal lame stream media won't stand for it. They have too much invested in him to see this occur. They will continue the lies and deceptions to the American people to protect the man they sold their collective souls too.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#9 May 7, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>ummmm....the drone wasn't there for the whole attack. it was flown there to gather intel for the rescue operation once the attack was known by the white house and pentagon.
Sean Hannity had the drone operator who flew over Benghazi the night of the attack call into his show yesterday. The drone operator says there should still be tape of what the drone recorded from the attack on the consulate and he’s surprised no one has filed a Freedom of Information Request (FOIA) to get it. He said it would absolutely clear up that this was indeed was an attack and not an out-of-control protest. In fact, he said as soon as Susan Rice came out and blamed the protest, he knew they were lying about what they saw. He said it was way to complex to be anything other than a terrorist attack on the consulate. The drone arrived at 5:11 and began providing a video feed to Washington. At 5:41, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton telephoned CIA Director David Petraeus to coordinate. The CIA, which made up most of the US government's presence in Benghazi, had a ten-member security team at its annex and the State Department believed that this team would assist the consulate in the event of an attack.
So, why was the CIA there? Weapons to Syrian rebels?
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>why would Steven's wife go with him to the consulate? that would have been very irregular...
Ambassaders serve all the time with family present. Unless this was isolation duty?
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>no-one was ever told to stand down.
CIA says "no such order" yet witnesses say otherwise. Let's believe the CIA then. Pfft!
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>you have been lied to. the facts are out there, spend some time and research them.
We all have been lied to. Witnesses are being pressured from the Wh to dummy up. Why?

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#10 May 7, 2013
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>Sean Hannity had the drone operator who flew over Benghazi the night of the attack call into his show yesterday. The drone operator says there should still be tape of what the drone recorded from the attack on the consulate and he’s surprised no one has filed a Freedom of Information Request (FOIA) to get it. He said it would absolutely clear up that this was indeed was an attack and not an out-of-control protest. In fact, he said as soon as Susan Rice came out and blamed the protest, he knew they were lying about what they saw. He said it was way to complex to be anything other than a terrorist attack on the consulate. The drone arrived at 5:11 and began providing a video feed to Washington. At 5:41, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton telephoned CIA Director David Petraeus to coordinate. The CIA, which made up most of the US government's presence in Benghazi, had a ten-member security team at its annex and the State Department believed that this team would assist the consulate in the event of an attack.
So, why was the CIA there? Weapons to Syrian rebels?
<quoted text>Ambassaders serve all the time with family present. Unless this was isolation duty?
<quoted text>CIA says "no such order" yet witnesses say otherwise. Let's believe the CIA then. Pfft!
<quoted text>We all have been lied to. Witnesses are being pressured from the Wh to dummy up. Why?
With this Administration's penchant for covering it's azz it wouldn't surprise me if something happened to the witnesses......

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#11 May 7, 2013
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>Sean Hannity had the drone operator who flew over Benghazi the night of the attack call into his show yesterday. The drone operator says there should still be tape of what the drone recorded from the attack on the consulate and he’s surprised no one has filed a Freedom of Information Request (FOIA) to get it. He said it would absolutely clear up that this was indeed was an attack and not an out-of-control protest. In fact, he said as soon as Susan Rice came out and blamed the protest, he knew they were lying about what they saw. He said it was way to complex to be anything other than a terrorist attack on the consulate. The drone arrived at 5:11 and began providing a video feed to Washington. At 5:41, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton telephoned CIA Director David Petraeus to coordinate. The CIA, which made up most of the US government's presence in Benghazi, had a ten-member security team at its annex and the State Department believed that this team would assist the consulate in the event of an attack.
So, why was the CIA there? Weapons to Syrian rebels?
<quoted text>Ambassaders serve all the time with family present. Unless this was isolation duty?
<quoted text>CIA says "no such order" yet witnesses say otherwise. Let's believe the CIA then. Pfft!
<quoted text>We all have been lied to. Witnesses are being pressured from the Wh to dummy up. Why?
where are these witnesses that heard the stand down order? not one...

no, wives do not often travel to consulates with Ambassadors in dangerous contries. if they are in country they would stay at the embassy.

the Drone was not at over the consulate at the beginning of the attack, so your drone operator is clearly lying...he wouldn't be able to know if there was a protest before the attack. we know that there wasn't from the CC tv at the consulate which was recovered after the attack.

you seem willing to believe any obvious lie that suits what you want to hear...

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#12 May 7, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>
you seem willing to believe any obvious lie that suits what you want to hear...
And all this time we've been led to believe that was a liberal trait.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#13 May 8, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>And all this time we've been led to believe that was a liberal trait.
it's a trait of all people blinded by partisanship, no matter their place on the political spectrum.
BandMaster

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#14 May 8, 2013
The democrats are going crazy because they know impeachment is a real possibility for the first ever black American president. It's a shame a good man like Dr Carson wasn't elected instead of the piece of raw sewerage the democrats got stuck with.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#15 May 8, 2013
BandMaster wrote:
The democrats are going crazy because they know impeachment is a real possibility for the first ever black American president. It's a shame a good man like Dr Carson wasn't elected instead of the piece of raw sewerage the democrats got stuck with.
wouldn't you first need the teensiest bit of evidence for any impeachable offense?

those darn rules and facts, all get in the way of you conspiracy fuckwads...
truman

Boise, ID

#16 May 8, 2013
Lmao!You Repubs are so transparent.
You dont give a rats ass about those killed in Banghazi your just grasping at ANYTHING to beat Obama over the head with.
Your Faux Moral outrage is enough to make one gag.
Of course the Repub support in slashing security budgets for embassies is something we just wont discuss right?
why

Oak Hill, WV

#17 May 8, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>ummmm....the drone wasn't there for the whole attack. it was flown there to gather intel for the rescue operation once the attack was known by the white house and pentagon.
why would Steven's wife go with him to the consulate? that would have been very irregular...
no-one was ever told to stand down.
you have been lied to. the facts are out there, spend some time and research them.
Why do you want this buried?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#18 May 8, 2013
truman wrote:
Lmao!You Repubs are so transparent.
You dont give a rats ass about those killed in Banghazi your just grasping at ANYTHING to beat Obama over the head with.
Your Faux Moral outrage is enough to make one gag.
Of course the Repub support in slashing security budgets for embassies is something we just wont discuss right?
I just hope they replace the flowers when they are done dancing on Steven's and the others' graves....

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#19 May 8, 2013
why wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you want this buried?
Nothing to be buried... why do you want to dance on their graves for your partisan witch hunt? are you really that shameless?
Holder

Oak Hill, WV

#20 May 8, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Nothing to be buried... why do you want to dance on their graves for your partisan witch hunt? are you really that shameless?
Why do you want an investigation to be terminated? Do you have something to hide? I think so. Partisan witch hunt? No, partisan cover up.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#21 May 8, 2013
Holder wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you want an investigation to be terminated? Do you have something to hide? I think so. Partisan witch hunt? No, partisan cover up.
what evidence is there of any wrongdoing? I have never said any investigations should be terminated. we had investigations. they showed exactly what everyone already knew.(except you parrots...)
Holder

Oak Hill, WV

#22 May 8, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>what evidence is there of any wrongdoing? I have never said any investigations should be terminated. we had investigations. they showed exactly what everyone already knew.(except you parrots...)
Why are you afraid of investigations?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#23 May 8, 2013
Holder wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you afraid of investigations?
depends on the investigation and why it is being done and what evidence there is for its convening...

Look at the Million$ kenneth starr wasted for his partisan witch hunters looking into whitewater...nothing there, but the wasted years and so much of our tax dollars on nothing for a purely partisan hack job.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jagex Games Studio Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Motorhead drummer Phil Taylor dies (Nov '15) Nov '15 MEhrmantraut 1
News Robots Playing Motorhead (Jan '13) Jan '13 Ranger Ron 1
More from around the web