Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

Mar 29, 2013 Full story: Chambersburg Public Opinion 11,004

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Full Story

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12421 Mar 11, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems like your gripe is with FP. He's the one who brought up the issue.
Ummmmm no. No gripe with FP. And, if what you wrote in your post before this one is true about you being satisfied with the constitution, then that begs the question of why you are trying to change it?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12422 Mar 11, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummmmm no Dan. It is not reading comprehension that was the culprit. It was my assumption of where you were coming from based on previous claims from you that we need to rewrite our founding documents. Well that, and the fact that I read just your one post before responding.
So no, I comprehend fine when I read, although I am having a little trouble finding any of those white words that you mention. All the words on my screen are black.
Whew <wipes brow> I am glad we cleared that up.
Several things...

First, don't assume. You know what they say.

Second, I never said we need to rewrite our founding documents. Where did you get that from?

And third, within my one post that you read was the post I was responding to. It was all there for you (if you'd take time to read instead of leaping to conclusions based on your assumptions), in clear black and white.

See, the words are black. The background is white. Black and white. It's a common phrase - I'm surprised it's new to you. Must have something to do with your reading handicap that you've never come across it before.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12423 Mar 11, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummmmm no. No gripe with FP. And, if what you wrote in your post before this one is true about you being satisfied with the constitution, then that begs the question of why you are trying to change it?
Except that I'm NOT trying to change it and I've never said anything like that. Which begs the question - where did you even get that idea?

Go re-read FP's posts again. Read slowly this time. Hopefully you can then learn where the discussion of hypothetically creating a new Constitution today began. Here's a hint: it wasn't me.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12424 Mar 11, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
So no, I comprehend fine when I read, although I am having a little trouble finding any of those white words that you mention. All the words on my screen are black.
Here - let me help you. Here's a verbal description of reading black and white (trying to save you the trouble of trying to read for comprehension).
&fe ature=kp

You only have to listen to the first 20 seconds. Shouldn't be too taxing. LOL!

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12425 Mar 11, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Several things...
First, don't assume. You know what they say.
Second, I never said we need to rewrite our founding documents. Where did you get that from?
And third, within my one post that you read was the post I was responding to. It was all there for you (if you'd take time to read instead of leaping to conclusions based on your assumptions), in clear black and white.
See, the words are black. The background is white. Black and white. It's a common phrase - I'm surprised it's new to you. Must have something to do with your reading handicap that you've never come across it before.
Well gee Dan, a simple "I accept your apology", would have been sufficient.
It is you who displays this reading comprehension thingy now.

BTW, when you write "pretty much satisfied", it implies there is something you wish to change, AND you have written incessantly here that we need to abolish and or infringe by a rewrite of the 2nd amendment.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12426 Mar 11, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Here - let me help you. Here's a verbal description of reading black and white (trying to save you the trouble of trying to read for comprehension).
You only have to listen to the first 20 seconds. Shouldn't be too taxing. LOL!
You said "black and white words" All the words are black. Only black.
So, you have no intent of a discussion this AM? You just want to denigrate today? Is that it Dan?

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12427 Mar 11, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Except that I'm NOT trying to change it and I've never said anything like that. Which begs the question - where did you even get that idea?
Go re-read FP's posts again. Read slowly this time. Hopefully you can then learn where the discussion of hypothetically creating a new Constitution today began. Here's a hint: it wasn't me.
"Except that I'm NOT trying to change it and I've never said anything like that."
Really? You ARE here supporting changing the 2nd amendment.

" where did you even get that idea?"

From you Dan. You are here "debating" the need to rewrite the 2nd amendment. You now meant to tell us that when you wrote those posts, you were just lying?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12429 Mar 11, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Well gee Dan, a simple "I accept your apology", would have been sufficient.
It is you who displays this reading comprehension thingy now.
BTW, when you write "pretty much satisfied", it implies there is something you wish to change, AND you have written incessantly here that we need to abolish and or infringe by a rewrite of the 2nd amendment.
Sorry, I must have missed the apology part of your self-justifying post. LOL!

I have never written anything about abolishing or rewriting the 2nd Amendment. Are you lying or did you misread something that leads you to actually believe that?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12430 Mar 11, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
You said "black and white words" All the words are black. Only black.
So, you have no intent of a discussion this AM? You just want to denigrate today? Is that it Dan?
Oh, I see. You misunderstood the phrase because of you inability to get beyond elementary school literal understanding of words. LOL! No biggie - I'm used to it.

And you came here this morning throwing insults. I'm just responding in kind. If you want it to stop, simply change what you're doing.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12431 Mar 11, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
"Except that I'm NOT trying to change it and I've never said anything like that."
Really? You ARE here supporting changing the 2nd amendment.
" where did you even get that idea?"
From you Dan. You are here "debating" the need to rewrite the 2nd amendment. You now meant to tell us that when you wrote those posts, you were just lying?
I never posted anything advocating for rewriting the 2nd Amendment. Never.

If you find one that you think says that, please point it out so can explain it in words that you can comprehend. LOL!

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12432 Mar 11, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I never posted anything advocating for rewriting the 2nd Amendment. Never.
If you find one that you think says that, please point it out so can explain it in words that you can comprehend. LOL!
How about you simply write the words right now which you think I will comprehend, that spell out what you are doing here in a discussion concerning the right to keep and bear arms, and you have taken up in opposition to those of us who are determined to see to it that the 2nd stands as written?
Go ahead sir, make your case.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12433 Mar 11, 2014
Squach wrote:
Socialist provocateurs use deliberate misinterpretation, misdirection, deflection, propaganda, and lies to create confusion and indecision among the uninformed so they can further their agenda with a minimum of resistance.
One must stay focused and undistributed by their hollow rhetoric. Constant vigilance is the price of freedom. Ignoring the threat presented by socialism in America is ignoring the rapid erosion of your personal liberty and freedom
.
The "common good" can only be achieved by free individuals willingly working together for a common goal. It cannot be legislated and enforced by a socialist "nanny state"
.
Remember, the purpose of the Constitution is to restrict the government..........not the people.
Well I certainly wish to avoid being "distributed". <chuckle>
Mornin' Hairy.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12434 Mar 11, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
How about you simply write the words right now which you think I will comprehend, that spell out what you are doing here in a discussion concerning the right to keep and bear arms, and you have taken up in opposition to those of us who are determined to see to it that the 2nd stands as written?
Go ahead sir, make your case.
So you couldn't find any posts that support your assertion, could you?

Why am I not surprised?

Oh yeah - because you always make shit up about me and argue with it rather than what I've actually said. It's your entire MO with me.

LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12435 Mar 11, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I certainly wish to avoid being "distributed". <chuckle>
Mornin' Hairy.
Oh, so you understood that, did you?

Yet "black and white words" is beyond your comprehension for some reason.

Hmmm, must have something to do with WANTING to understand. I guess you prefer to not understand (or deliberately misunderstand) what I write. LOL!

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12436 Mar 11, 2014
Squach wrote:
Socialist provocateurs use deliberate misinterpretation, misdirection, deflection, propaganda, and lies to create confusion and indecision among the uninformed so they can further their agenda with a minimum of resistance.
One must stay focused and undistributed by their hollow rhetoric. Constant vigilance is the price of freedom. Ignoring the threat presented by socialism in America is ignoring the rapid erosion of your personal liberty and freedom
.
The "common good" can only be achieved by free individuals willingly working together for a common goal. It cannot be legislated and enforced by a socialist "nanny state"
.
Remember, the purpose of the Constitution is to restrict the government..........not the people.
The "common good" can only be achieved when each and every common individual is strong and free.
Any attempt to stifle or suppress an individual or a group of individuals and their freedoms, to "promote the common good" ... or conversely... any attempt to promote an individual or group of individuals and their freedoms to "promote the common good", is to deny rights and freedoms of fellow citizens.
The "playing field" has already been leveled by decree. All we need do is have the courage to live up to the standards as set forth in that decree;
"We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal ..."

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12437 Mar 11, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
So you couldn't find any posts that support your assertion, could you?
Why am I not surprised?
Oh yeah - because you always make shit up about me and argue with it rather than what I've actually said. It's your entire MO with me.
LOL!
No Dan, it is because I am not interested in playing that game today.
I will ask you once more.
Will you just simply make your case, and explain right here, right now, what it is you wish to change concerning the right to keep and bear arms?

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12438 Mar 11, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, so you understood that, did you?
Yet "black and white words" is beyond your comprehension for some reason.
Hmmm, must have something to do with WANTING to understand. I guess you prefer to not understand (or deliberately misunderstand) what I write. LOL!
No Dan, it is because you wrote "black and white words" The WORDS are ONLY black ... ALL of them.
The glass is not either half full or half empty Dan. It is both half full AND half empty.

Now, had you wrote; "you can not read what's right there in black and white" you would actually comminucate what you are trying to comminucate sir.

Good God man, are you totally devoid of reading comprehension AND humor this morning?

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12439 Mar 11, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I certainly wish to avoid being "distributed". <chuckle>
Mornin' Hairy.
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, so you understood that, did you?
. LOL!
Yes. Hairy says what he means with straight tongue.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12440 Mar 11, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
No Dan, it is because I am not interested in playing that game today.
I will ask you once more.
Will you just simply make your case, and explain right here, right now, what it is you wish to change concerning the right to keep and bear arms?
Obviously game playing is all you're interested in this morning. But I'm in a good mood, so I'll play along for a little.

I don't wish to change the 2nd Amendment. The 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms, like all our rights, is not an unlimited right. I take issue with pro-gun extremists who claim that ANY regulation of firearms is an infringement of the 2nd Amendment.

And THAT"S what I want to change - the common perception that any regulation is unconstitutional and that steps to keep the nation safe from gun violence is an infringement on liberty.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12441 Mar 11, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
No Dan, it is because you wrote "black and white words" The WORDS are ONLY black ... ALL of them.
I know - you were being petty and playing childish games. That's what you've been about all morning.

And then you accuse me of doing what you're doing when all I've done is met you on the field you chose to play on. Like I said - if you want to stop, then stop. Don't criticize me for simply responding in kind.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Guard fired after Obama visit: I'm not a convict Nov 4 SirPrize 6
Gainer Mooted as Next Secret Service Director Nov 1 Le Jimbo 25
Police: Obama faced threats during Indiana visit Oct '14 nightcruiser49 1
Secret Service director faces grilling over sec... Oct '14 Mr Johnson 139
Another Secret Service SNAFU: Fake congressman ... Oct '14 Bama Yankee 1
Secret Service Director Julia Pierson resigns a... Oct '14 inbred Genius 24
Secret Service director resigns under fire Oct '14 Viet Nam Vet 1

US Secret Service People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE