Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10989 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#12294 Mar 6, 2014
And if you believe the "nation" and the "governement" are one in the same.....you are sadly mistaken.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12295 Mar 6, 2014
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO!
I never said we are close......I said we are getting closer. BIG difference. And I am no threat whatsoever to "the nation". I, and several million other like-minded individuals, ARE a threat to our elected officials if they wish to keep shoving their socialist agenda down our throats instead of upholding their oath of office to protect and preserve our Constitution. Let them beware.
Okay, not close; just 'closer.' So how close? What does 'closer' mean? Are we months away? Years away? Decades away? If Hillary gets elected, will it be REALLY close then? Define your term.

This is just gunner bluster. Most gunners I know love this kind of tough talk, but they've never stopped for a second to think it through. You're threatening something you have no way of pulling off.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12296 Mar 6, 2014
Armed Veteran wrote:
And if you believe the "nation" and the "governement" are one in the same.....you are sadly mistaken.
I do not.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12297 Mar 6, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, you are correct. I changed the names
..."
Nuf said son. Nice to see you admit that you intentionally deceive in order to advance your agenda.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12298 Mar 6, 2014
Armed Veteran wrote:
And if you believe the "nation" and the "governement" are one in the same.....you are sadly mistaken.
And ^that^ is the most basic and dangerous misunderstanding that too many Americans hold to be true. You are correct. The "nation" most definitely is not the "government".

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12299 Mar 6, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, not close; just 'closer.' So how close? What does 'closer' mean? Are we months away? Years away? Decades away? If Hillary gets elected, will it be REALLY close then? Define your term.
This is just gunner bluster. Most gunners I know love this kind of tough talk, but they've never stopped for a second to think it through. You're threatening something you have no way of pulling off.
ROTFLMAO
You
are
nuts.

I see you also think a timeline in events is a predetermined calendar date. Fool.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#12300 Mar 6, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO!
Your unintentional irony is HILARIOUS! You can't even conceive of a post for yourself! LMAO!
You make yet another mistake in judgement of your opposition.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12301 Mar 6, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Nuf said son. Nice to see you admit that you intentionally deceive in order to advance your agenda.
Not to advance any agenda of mine. To reveal yours.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12302 Mar 6, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
ROTFLMAO
You
are
nuts.
I see you also think a timeline in events is a predetermined calendar date. Fool.
Just trying to get clarity on the meaning of terms. If you all don't want to clarify, I understand.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12303 Mar 6, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
You make yet another mistake in judgement of your opposition.
LOL! Yeah, I don't think so.

I've been dealing with Squash for a long time now. I know EXACTLY what he is.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#12304 Mar 6, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, not close; just 'closer.' So how close? What does 'closer' mean? Are we months away? Years away? Decades away? If Hillary gets elected, will it be REALLY close then? Define your term.
This is just gunner bluster. Most gunners I know love this kind of tough talk, but they've never stopped for a second to think it through. You're threatening something you have no way of pulling off.
That timeline all depends on the actions by our elected officials. And I haven't thought it though???? I have, and am still willing, to put my life on the line for this country in order to protect it against ALL enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. And that oath I took has no expiration date. Can you say the same???

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12305 Mar 6, 2014
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
That timeline all depends on the actions by our elected officials. And I haven't thought it though???? I have, and am still willing, to put my life on the line for this country in order to protect it against ALL enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. And that oath I took has no expiration date. Can you say the same???
So how would it work? You'd storm the capital? You'd pick an elected representative and go to his office with your weapon? Just how do you envision your armed threat to our elected officials would change anything? You think Washington isn't prepared for armed attacks? LOL!

You gunners and your delusions of grandeur are so funny.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#12306 Mar 6, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
So how would it work? You'd storm the capital? You'd pick an elected representative and go to his office with your weapon? Just how do you envision your armed threat to our elected officials would change anything? You think Washington isn't prepared for armed attacks? LOL!
You gunners and your delusions of grandeur are so funny.
You don't think they consider us a viable threat? Why do you think they are making it increasingly harder for law-abiding citizens to obtain legal firearms by increases in background checks, rules on what type of firearm you can own, magazine capacity, etc. you think they are doing it in the interest of "public safety". Please tell me you are NOT that naive.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12307 Mar 6, 2014
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't think they consider us a viable threat? Why do you think they are making it increasingly harder for law-abiding citizens to obtain legal firearms by increases in background checks, rules on what type of firearm you can own, magazine capacity, etc. you think they are doing it in the interest of "public safety". Please tell me you are NOT that naive.
The DHS in fact does consider rightwing domestic extremists, particularly disgruntled ex-military, as a threat to national security. During the Bush years, they looked into that problem and issued a report - a report which sent the rightwing in this country into a hysterical frenzy because it touched a nerve.

If the report wasn't accurate, why do you think there was such immediate and frantic pushback from the right? Do you think it was because the report WASN'T true? Please tell me you are NOT that naive.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#12308 Mar 6, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
The DHS in fact does consider rightwing domestic extremists, particularly disgruntled ex-military, as a threat to national security. During the Bush years, they looked into that problem and issued a report - a report which sent the rightwing in this country into a hysterical frenzy because it touched a nerve.
If the report wasn't accurate, why do you think there was such immediate and frantic pushback from the right? Do you think it was because the report WASN'T true? Please tell me you are NOT that naive.
It was Janet Napolitano that made the statement that veterans should be considered a possible domestic terror threat. It touched a nerve because it wqas COMPLETE BULLSHIT! It was BS then, and it is BS now. We are not a threat to this nation at all. We ARE a threat to bunch of over-reaching, tyrannical, socialist politicians {spit} who are hell-bent on turning this once great country into some type of socialist utopia. Let them (and you) beware.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12309 Mar 6, 2014
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
It was Janet Napolitano that made the statement that veterans should be considered a possible domestic terror threat. It touched a nerve because it wqas COMPLETE BULLSHIT! It was BS then, and it is BS now. We are not a threat to this nation at all. We ARE a threat to bunch of over-reaching, tyrannical, socialist politicians {spit} who are hell-bent on turning this once great country into some type of socialist utopia. Let them (and you) beware.
Napolitano released the report that was commissioned and completed during the Bush administration.

Among things it said:

"[R]ightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment."

Check.

“Rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat.”

Check.

Whenever any fringe group decides that it's uniquely able to identify "over-reaching, tyrannical, socialist politicians {spit} who are hell-bent on turning this once great country into some type of socialist utopia" then they are a real threat to the security of this nation.

In the United States of America you don't get to violently take the law into your own hands just because you think the government has become tyrannical. When you decide you can do that, you've crossed over the line into sedition.

And you are getting close to that line.

“Heightened interest in legislation for tighter firearms...may be invigorating rightwing extremist activity, specifically the white supremacist and militia movements.”

Check.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#12310 Mar 6, 2014
And it wasn't under Bush. Napolitano said in April 2009 under Obama's watch.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#12311 Mar 6, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Napolitano released the report that was commissioned and completed during the Bush administration.
Among things it said:
"[R]ightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment."
Check.
“Rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat.”
Check.
Whenever any fringe group decides that it's uniquely able to identify "over-reaching, tyrannical, socialist politicians {spit} who are hell-bent on turning this once great country into some type of socialist utopia" then they are a real threat to the security of this nation.
In the United States of America you don't get to violently take the law into your own hands just because you think the government has become tyrannical. When you decide you can do that, you've crossed over the line into sedition.
And you are getting close to that line.
“Heightened interest in legislation for tighter firearms...may be invigorating rightwing extremist activity, specifically the white supremacist and militia movements.”
Check.
Still trying to play that LONG DEAD race card, eh Dannyboy? LMAO!!! You can keep beating that putrid rotting corpse, but it ain't getting up.

And when tyranny is the rule of the day......revolution is duty!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12312 Mar 6, 2014
Armed Veteran wrote:
And it wasn't under Bush. Napolitano said in April 2009 under Obama's watch.
Wow, you really know nothing about it, do you? But that doesn't stop you from expressing your opinion, does it? LOL!

Napolitano didn't "say" it. She announced the REPORT.

----------

(U//FOUO)
Rightwing Extremism:
Current Economic and Political
Climate Fueling Resurgence in
Radicalization and Recruitment

7 April 2009
(U) Prepared by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch, Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division. Coordinated with the FBI.

----------

A report that was completed on April 7, 2009, nine weeks after Obama took office, wasn't produced by anyone in the Obama administration. It couldn't have been. Government simply doesn't work that fast.

Of course I'm not surprised how uninformed/misinformed you are about it seeing how you prefer to get your information through the rightwing propaganda machine rather than legitimate sources. LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#12313 Mar 6, 2014
(U//FOUO)
Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and PoliticalcClimate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment

7 April 2009
(U) Prepared by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch, Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division. Coordinated with the FBI.

http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Russian man convicted of hacking into US busine... Fri Mizike67 5
News Russian man faces US trial in lucrative hacking... Aug 14 Nu Wor Order 4
News Cleveland prepares for RNC convention protests May '16 Hostis Publicus 9
News Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offen... May '16 Jelly Belly Popcorn 3
News Man shot outside White House remains in critica... May '16 WeTheSheeple 2
News Secret Service agent shoots armed man outside W... May '16 Bama Yankee 16
News Bill Clinton ditched Secret Service on multiple... May '16 IsTrumpDodgingThis 2
More from around the web