Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10952 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#11395 Jan 3, 2014
2ndAmRIght wrote:
More drool from the cowardly 'satan', the name-stealing punk.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#11396 Jan 3, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
SO WHAT?
YOU DIDN'T ADMIT YOU MADE A MISTAKE in your first post and you moved the goalpost to another post and pretended that I wouldn't notice!
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHA!
YOU were the one who wouldn't let it go, Shug: you could have just said YEAH I made a typo and it would have been over RIGHT THEN.
But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...
So here you are again: are you going to let it go, shug?
Yet even more LIES.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11397 Jan 3, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
Lies, LIES and more LIES.
Yes but Topix says that you are allowed to post here.

They can't hire someone full time to delete your messages, it seems.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#11398 Jan 3, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes but Topix says that you are allowed to post here.
They can't hire someone full time to delete your messages, it seems.
No. More like Topix needs someone dedicated enough to expose all of the lies that you post.

How much did the devil promise you for your soul, communist-demoonRat-LIEneral?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#11399 Jan 3, 2014
I think we can all agree that this is a good step...

----------

White House announces two new 'executive actions' on guns

The Obama administration is proposing two more executive actions that it says will help prevent individuals who are prohibited from having a gun for mental health reasons from obtaining a firearm.

The Department of Justice, arguing that current federal law contains terminology about mental health issues that is too vague, proposed a regulation that would clarify who is ineligible to possess a firearm for specific situations related to mental health, like commitment to a mental institution.“In addition to providing general guidance on federal law, these clarifications will help states determine what information should be made accessible to the federal background check system, which will, in turn, strengthen the system's reliability and effectiveness,” the administration said in a fact sheet distributed to reporters.

The second executive action, proposed by the Department of Health and Human Services, would allow some medical organizations more leeway to report “limited information necessary to help keep guns out of potentially dangerous hands” to the federal background check system.“The proposed rule will not change the fact that seeking help for mental health problems or getting treatment does not make someone legally prohibited from having a firearm,” the White House added.

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/03...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#11400 Jan 3, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
I think we can all agree that this is a good step...
----------
White House announces two new 'executive actions' on guns
The Obama administration is proposing two more executive actions that it says will help prevent individuals who are prohibited from having a gun for mental health reasons from obtaining a firearm.
The Department of Justice, arguing that current federal law contains terminology about mental health issues that is too vague, proposed a regulation that would clarify who is ineligible to possess a firearm for specific situations related to mental health, like commitment to a mental institution.“In addition to providing general guidance on federal law, these clarifications will help states determine what information should be made accessible to the federal background check system, which will, in turn, strengthen the system's reliability and effectiveness,” the administration said in a fact sheet distributed to reporters.
The second executive action, proposed by the Department of Health and Human Services, would allow some medical organizations more leeway to report “limited information necessary to help keep guns out of potentially dangerous hands” to the federal background check system.“The proposed rule will not change the fact that seeking help for mental health problems or getting treatment does not make someone legally prohibited from having a firearm,” the White House added.
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/03...
MEANINGLESS:

"Disobedience or evasion of a Constitutional Mandate cannot be tolerated, even though such disobedience may, at least temporarily, promote in some respects the best interests of the public."--Slote vs. Examination, 112 ALR 660

"The basic purpose of a written constitution has a twofold aspect, first the securing to the people of certain unchangeable rights and remedies, and second, the curtailment of unrestricted governmental activity within certain defined fields."--DuPont v. DuPont, Sup. 32 Ded. Ch. 413; 85 A 2d 724.

We The People are free to disregard the dictates of the traitor-in-chief at will. And to push for his removal from office on charges of treason.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11401 Jan 3, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
No. More like Topix needs someone dedicated enough to expose all of the lies that you post.
Happy to see it.

Who did Newtown vote for in the 2012 election?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#11402 Jan 3, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Happy to see it.
Who did Newtown vote for in the 2012 election?
Gumby.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#11403 Jan 3, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Happy to see it.
Who did Newtown vote for in the 2012 election?
I left out his running mate Pokey.
2ndAmRIght

Los Angeles, CA

#11404 Jan 3, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
I left out his running mate Pokey.
http://skreened.com/render-product/o/c/e/ocei...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11405 Jan 3, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
"Disobedience or evasion of a Constitutional Mandate cannot be tolerated, even though such disobedience may, at least temporarily, promote in some respects the best interests of the public."--Slote vs. Examination, 112 ALR 660
"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.[United States v.] Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."

Justice Scalia
This Century
Heller Decision
from the Supreme Court of the United States
SUPREME COURT is top dog

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11406 Jan 3, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
We The People are free to disregard
You don't have the balls to disregard the jaywalking sign if a cop is watching.

You are so gay you sneeze glitter.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#11407 Jan 3, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't have the balls to disregard the jaywalking sign if a cop is watching.
You are so gay you sneeze glitter.
Not quite, communist-demonRat-LIEberal. I don't walk lock-step to the tune of treasonous 'masters' like you do.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#11408 Jan 3, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.[United States v.] Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."
Justice Scalia
This Century
Heller Decision
from the Supreme Court of the United States
SUPREME COURT is top dog
Utterly NULL and VOID:

"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."

The hire servants are not permitted to tell We The People, their rightful MASTERS, what we can and cannot bear. If they they do, we can disregard them at will.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#11409 Jan 3, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
MEANINGLESS:
"Disobedience or evasion of a Constitutional Mandate cannot be tolerated, even though such disobedience may, at least temporarily, promote in some respects the best interests of the public."--Slote vs. Examination, 112 ALR 660
"The basic purpose of a written constitution has a twofold aspect, first the securing to the people of certain unchangeable rights and remedies, and second, the curtailment of unrestricted governmental activity within certain defined fields."--DuPont v. DuPont, Sup. 32 Ded. Ch. 413; 85 A 2d 724.
We The People are free to disregard the dictates of the traitor-in-chief at will. And to push for his removal from office on charges of treason.
I guess I really meant that all we reasonable, sensible people can agree that's a good step.

Obviously reactionary extremists like yourself - who believe ANY regulation of guns is unconstitutional and want everybody, including the mentally ill, to have unlimited access to any weapon and as much ammo as they want without any regulation whatsoever - aren't going to agree.

IOW - I was addressing rational, patriotic Americans who aren't pathologically obsessed with guns.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#11410 Jan 3, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess I really meant that all we reasonable, sensible people can agree that's a good step.
Obviously reactionary extremists like yourself - who believe ANY regulation of guns is unconstitutional and want everybody, including the mentally ill, to have unlimited access to any weapon and as much ammo as they want without any regulation whatsoever - aren't going to agree.
IOW - I was addressing rational, patriotic Americans who aren't pathologically obsessed with guns.
What you "guess" and what you "mean" are irrelevant. And you aren't "addressing" the supreme soviet here in America, you communist-demonrat-LIEberal.

If somebody is so mentally ill then why are they allowed on the streets in the first place?(Other than to help push the demonrat agenda).

If they are free, then they have just as much right and duty to provide for their own protection as anyone else does. Don't like it? Move to one of your communist 'safe havens'.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#11411 Jan 3, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
What you "guess" and what you "mean" are irrelevant. And you aren't "addressing" the supreme soviet here in America, you communist-demonrat-LIEberal.
If somebody is so mentally ill then why are they allowed on the streets in the first place?(Other than to help push the demonrat agenda).
If they are free, then they have just as much right and duty to provide for their own protection as anyone else does. Don't like it? Move to one of your communist 'safe havens'.
Right. That's what I said - you want everybody, including the mentally ill, to have unlimited access to any firearm and as much ammo as they want without any regulation whatsoever.

And that is an extremist, fringe opinion that the vast, vast majority of Americans categorically reject.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11412 Jan 3, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
I don't walk lock-step to the tune of treasonous 'masters' like you do.
You are a balless whiny bytch who spends his life from sun up to sun down on the internet mooching off SSI wondering why his ugly fat wife left him to the guy picking up scrap metal for a living.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11413 Jan 3, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."
{click}
2ndAmRight wrote:
MEANINGLESS:
United States Constitution, 2nd Article of Amendment, "Restrictive" clause:
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#11414 Jan 3, 2014
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. That's what I said - you want everybody, including the mentally ill, to have unlimited access to any firearm and as much ammo as they want without any regulation whatsoever.
And that is an extremist, fringe opinion that the vast, vast majority of Americans categorically reject.
No, just cowardly and treasonous communist-demonRat-LIEberals "categorically reject". Fortunately, the sound thinking Americans care about our less fortunate neighbors that are afflicted. So we block cowardly freaks such as yourself from afflicting them any more.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Dems: Did EPA security staffer steer contract t... Mar '18 Used to be a demo... 2
News Secret Service: Man shoots himself outside Whit... Mar '18 YouDidntBuildThat 13
News Watauga bookkeeper pleads guilty to embezzlemen... Feb '18 John 1
News TPD Seeks Man Suspected Of Passing Counterfeit ... Feb '18 terrorheartland 1
News Called to a spot near the White House, DC fire ... Jan '18 Watson 1
News Murder suspect Ager Hasan extradited back to Ca... Jan '18 snow on the way f... 1
News Secret Service interviews person over manure se... Dec '17 Retribution 3