Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10987 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10653 Dec 5, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!
Poor GumsShow: lots to cry about, nothing to show for it.
Supreme Court says otherwise, shug.
REALLY?

"The second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed, but this, as has been seen, means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress. This is one of the amendments that has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government, leaving the people to look for their protection against any violation by their fellow citizens of the rights it recognizes, to what is called, in The City of New York v. Miln, 11 Pet. 139, the "powers which relate to merely municipal legislation, or what was, perhaps, more properly called internal police," "not surrendered or restrained" by the Constitution of the United States."--United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

"More especially, it cannot be believed that the large slaveholding States regarded them as included in the word citizens, or would have consented to a Constitution which might compel them to receive them in that character from another State. For if they were so received, and entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens, it would exempt them from the operation of the special laws and from the police regulations which they considered to be necessary for their own safety. It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognized as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went."--Mr. Chief Justice TANEY, U.S. Supreme Court, Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10654 Dec 5, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!
Poor GumsShow: lots to cry about, nothing to show for it.
Supreme Court says otherwise, shug.
REALLY?

"...The Territory being a part of the United States, the Government and the citizen both enter it under the authority of the Constitution, with their respective rights defined and marked out; and the Federal Government [60 U.S. 393, 450] can exercise no power over his person or property, beyond what that instrument confers, nor lawfully deny any right which it has reserved.

"A reference to a few of the provisions of the Constitution will illustrate this proposition.

"For example, no one, we presume, will contend that Congress can make any law in a Territory respecting the establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the people of the Territory peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for the redress of grievances.

"Nor can Congress deny to the people the right to keep and bear arms, nor the right to trial by jury, nor compel any one to be a witness against himself in a criminal proceeding.

"These powers, and others, in relation to rights of person, which it is not necessary here to enumerate, are, in express and positive terms, denied to the General Government; and the rights of private property have been guarded with equal care...."--Mr. Chief Justice TANEY, U.S. Supreme Court, Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10656 Dec 5, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
REALLY?(1856).
Not the remotest connection to the topic.

Help stamp out CenturySpam™!! Flag appropriately!
2ndAmRight wrote:
I'm not the one stuck in the 1800's troll, >you< are.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10657 Dec 6, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not the remotest connection to the topic.
Help stamp out CenturySpam™!! Flag appropriately!
<quoted text>
Perhaps you'd be able to see more clearly if you didn't do so many illicit drugs.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10660 Dec 6, 2013
Irelands own wrote:
Someone sure does spend a lot of time posting imageshack stuff, stuff that no one looks at.
Haven't you figured out that your posts are just bypassed?
Doesn't seem to keep you from posting, dear.

How many tens of thousands of off topic posts does GumsShow post?

How many hundreds of times the exact same post, word for word?

Sometimes the exact same ones dozens of times a day?

Maybe TOPIX can employee a relevancy filter, eh?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10661 Dec 6, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Doesn't seem to keep you from posting, dear.
How many tens of thousands of off topic posts does GumsShow post?
How many hundreds of times the exact same post, word for word?
Sometimes the exact same ones dozens of times a day?
Maybe TOPIX can employee a relevancy filter, eh?
How does it feel never being able to post facts, troll? To always be stuck posting errant speculation? We already know you don't have any shame. But aren't you even humiliated by being proven to be absolutely fallacious about everything you post? Whatever drug(s) you are using. Your posting provides the perfect advertisement against the usage of them. "Just say no", troll.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10664 Dec 6, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT YOU COME IN CONTACT WITH 2ndamright OR ANY OF HIS MANY ALIASES including IrelandsOwn, DO NOT BEND OVER IN FRONT OF HIM UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES . A panel of experts has recently determined that this poor INBRED’S complete inability to attract any attention from either sex has driven him to the rather bizarre behavior of impersonating Americans. He is doing this in the hope of attracting either reverend ted haggard or a priest with a tub of vaseline, to which he hasn’t been successful.
He has now resorted to trying to kornhole his own aliases. This creature can most commonly found on the TOPIX gun threads, erect, spinning around like a dog chasing it’s tail, while trying to get at his own butt. It is also highly recommended that in the case of accidental contact you rinse yourself off with bleach and burn the clothes you were wearing.
More aged spam from the local village brainless wonder.
MC Hammer

Chambersburg, PA

#10669 Dec 6, 2013
Why does the left, anti-gun crowd keep beating this drum on how guns are bad even when they know the facts don't support their dishonesty. I hope they keep pushing on this agenda all the way up until election day.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10670 Dec 6, 2013
MC Hammer wrote:
I hope they keep pushing on this agenda all the way up until election day.
You can count on it.

90 percent of Americans want universal background checks, ten percent of Americans are felons.

And ten percent of Americans don't want background check.

And nine percent of Americans are tea baggers.

And felons can't vote.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10671 Dec 6, 2013
MC Hammer wrote:
Why does the left, anti-gun crowd keep beating this drum on how guns are bad even when they know the facts don't support their dishonesty. I hope they keep pushing on this agenda all the way up until election day.
They will, and then will be squashed like little insignificant bugs.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10672 Dec 6, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You can count on it.
90 percent of Americans want universal background checks, ten percent of Americans are felons.
And ten percent of Americans don't want background check.
And nine percent of Americans are tea baggers.
And felons can't vote.
Hey MC Hammer! THIS is the chief sycophant troll representative here on Topix. It is foul, evil, and vile. It also NEVER puts forth FACTS or TRUTH.(As you can plainly see by the perverse post which I am employing to respond to you).

For instance, this troll is well aware that there has NEVER been "90 percent" of Americans that have wanted more Constitutionally perverse 'gun control'. Yet this filthy and vile evil troll keeps using that [made-up] number.

It's best to just ignore this vile troll. For you don't want it infesting your thoughts.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10673 Dec 6, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey MC Hammer!
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! MOMMY! How come Barefoot2626 has all the facts?

WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HH!

The stuff I make up doesn't make sense and isn't funny!

WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

"Nine in 10 Americans support expanding background checks on gun purchases in a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, an extraordinary level of agreement on a political issue and a finding that's been duplicated in nearly every major public poll."

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10674 Dec 7, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! MOMMY! How come Barefoot2626 has all the facts?
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HH!
The stuff I make up doesn't make sense and isn't funny!
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
"Nine in 10 Americans support expanding background checks on gun purchases in a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, an extraordinary level of agreement on a political issue and a finding that's been duplicated in nearly every major public poll."
The call for stricter gun control has waned since the Newtown, Conn., school shooting at the end of 2012, a Gallup poll released Friday found.

In the days following the school shooting, which killed 20 children and six staff members, 58 percent of those polled wanted stricter gun control. Now, almost a year after the December shooting, that number has dropped to 49 percent.

SPECIAL COVERAGE: Second Amendment and Gun Control

The drop also means the country now is split nearly evenly on whether gun control laws need to be stricter. On the other side of the 49 percent who want stricter laws, 50 percent want laws to either be less strict or kept the same.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10675 Dec 7, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
The call for stricter gun control has waned since the Newtown
~stomp stomp stomp~

Poor DavyQ, can't get past this:

"Nine in 10 Americans support expanding background checks on gun purchases in a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, an extraordinary level of agreement on a political issue and a finding that's been duplicated in nearly every major public poll.

Surveys show broad support spans gun owners and non-gun owners alike, Democrats and Republicans, and even among members of the National Rifle Association, whose leadership is leading efforts to spike the measure from pending legislation."

http://tinyurl.com/approvebackgroundchecks

(clip)

tinyurl.com/approvebackgroundchecks

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10676 Dec 7, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
~stomp stomp stomp~
Poor DavyQ, can't get past this:
"Nine in 10 Americans support expanding background checks on gun purchases in a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, an extraordinary level of agreement on a political issue and a finding that's been duplicated in nearly every major public poll.
Surveys show broad support spans gun owners and non-gun owners alike, Democrats and Republicans, and even among members of the National Rifle Association, whose leadership is leading efforts to spike the measure from pending legislation."
http://tinyurl.com/approvebackgroundchecks
(clip)
tinyurl.com/approvebackgroundchecks
"As a principle, "gun control" isn't popular. But specific gun control laws have national support. Yet, it gets more complicated. Even the term "national support" belies demographic gaps.

"While nearly every demo -- men, women, white, blacks, Democrats, Republicans, north, south -- is more likely to support gun rights today than in the early 1990s, it remains true that fewer than half of the following demographics are clearly anti-gun-ownership-rights, in general: women, blacks, Democrats, and northeast residents. More than 55% of men and Republicans recently told Pew it was more important to protect rights of Americans to own guns."
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10677 Dec 7, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
"As a principle, "gun control" isn't popular
~stomp stomp stomp~

Poor DavyQ, can't get past this:

"Nine in 10 Americans support expanding background checks on gun purchases in a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, an extraordinary level of agreement on a political issue and a finding that's been duplicated in nearly every major public poll.

Surveys show broad support spans gun owners and non-gun owners alike, Democrats and Republicans, and even among members of the National Rifle Association, whose leadership is leading efforts to spike the measure from pending legislation."

(clip)

tinyurl.com/approvebackgroundchecks

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10678 Dec 7, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
~stomp stomp stomp~
Poor DavyQ, can't get past this:
"Nine in 10 Americans support expanding background checks on gun purchases in a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, an extraordinary level of agreement on a political issue and a finding that's been duplicated in nearly every major public poll.
Surveys show broad support spans gun owners and non-gun owners alike, Democrats and Republicans, and even among members of the National Rifle Association, whose leadership is leading efforts to spike the measure from pending legislation."
(clip)
tinyurl.com/approvebackgroundchecks
FROM CNN:

CNN Poll: Support for stricter gun control fades

Posted by
CNN Political Unit

Washington (CNN)- As memories fade from last December's horrific school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, a new national poll indicates that support for stricter gun control laws appears to be fading, too.

According to a new CNN/ORC International survey, 49% of Americans say they support stricter gun control laws, with 50% opposed. The 49% support is down six percentage points from the 55% who said they backed stricter gun control in CNN polling from January, just a few weeks after the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School, where a lone gunman killed 20 young students and six adults before killing himself, in one of the worst mass shootings in U.S. history.

The poll's Wednesday release comes on the same day that 911 tapes from the Newtown shootings are being released....
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/12/...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10679 Dec 7, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
FROM CNN:
CNN Poll: Support for stricter gun control fades
~stomp stomp stomp~

Poor DavyQ, can't get past this:

"Nine in 10 Americans support expanding background checks on gun purchases in a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, an extraordinary level of agreement on a political issue and a finding that's been duplicated in nearly every major public poll.

Surveys show broad support spans gun owners and non-gun owners alike, Democrats and Republicans, and even among members of the National Rifle Association, whose leadership is leading efforts to spike the measure from pending legislation."

(clip)

tinyurl.com/approvebackgroundchecks

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10680 Dec 7, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
~stomp stomp stomp~
Poor DavyQ, can't get past this:
"Nine in 10 Americans support expanding background checks on gun purchases in a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, an extraordinary level of agreement on a political issue and a finding that's been duplicated in nearly every major public poll.
Surveys show broad support spans gun owners and non-gun owners alike, Democrats and Republicans, and even among members of the National Rifle Association, whose leadership is leading efforts to spike the measure from pending legislation."
(clip)
tinyurl.com/approvebackgroundchecks
tinyurl.com/ ???

HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!!!

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10682 Dec 7, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
wonder what this dolt will do when he gets indoor plumbing.....
Why don't you tell us what you will do, "dolt"?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
president trump personnel office has tapes /... Jan 30 ANNETTE MURDERER 1
News Nation-Now 46 mins ago 2:25 p.m.Investigation i... Jan 25 Politically Incor... 2
George Soros Dec '16 Easy123 1
News Heavy security at Trump Tower not going away an... Dec '16 blushing violet 28
News Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump sp... Nov '16 RushFan666 30
News Russian man convicted of hacking into US busine... Aug '16 Mizike67 5
News Russian man faces US trial in lucrative hacking... (Aug '16) Aug '16 Nu Wor Order 4
More from around the web