Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10987 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10089 Nov 3, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I've slapped the snot out of you, fraud.
No one is waiting for you to say you were wrong.
Yeah, you're a real legend alright,(in your own mind). The only "snot" you've ever "slapped" out. Is your dogs when it was stealing your last bone.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10090 Nov 3, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
And then there's the list of states which have lax gun controls that make up most of the top ten spots of homicides:
1 Alaska: 20
2 Louisiana: 19.5
3 Wyoming: 18.8
4 Arizona: 18
5 Nevada: 17.3
5 Mississippi: 17.3
7 New Mexico: 16.6
8 Arkansas: 16.3
9 Alabama: 16.2
10 Tennessee: 15.4
State Total murders

California 1,790
Illinois 452
Maryland 398
New York 774
District of Columbia 108 (The state of Maryland borders D.C. on three sides)

Gee, those states with very strict 'gun control' measures don't seem to be faring that well. WHY IS THAT?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#10091 Nov 3, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
There's NOTHING to "debate" O' treasonous sycophant. For: "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."
It is >you< and your fellow treasonous sycophants that are the "entirely irrelevant" ones. But of course you lack the mental capacity to see that, much less acknowledge it.
ROFLMAO!

Thank you for proving my point. I love it when you do that. Especially when you don't even know it. LMAO!

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10092 Nov 3, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO!
Thank you for proving my point. I love it when you do that. Especially when you don't even know it. LMAO!
Just as senseless as ever I see. Keep up the bad work, trash-can-dan.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10093 Nov 3, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Totally and utterly IRRELEVANT,
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

~stomp stomp stomp~

MOMMY! tell barefoot2626 the list of states with the highest homicide rates is IRRELEVANT when I am talking about homicide rates! Especially since they are all states with poor gun co0ntrol regulations!

WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! His numbers are always better than mine!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10094 Nov 3, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."
~stomp stomp stomp~

WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

Mommy! Tell Barefoot2626 that **MY** Second Amendment is what the founding fathers MEANT TO SAY!

That counts, right?

WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! All the words that Barefoot2626 got from the real one are extra!

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#10095 Nov 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
How The NRA Made It Easier To Bring Guns Into Airports
Over the last decade, the NRA has repeatedly lobbied against airport firearm restrictions. According to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, states including Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin either expressly allow firearms in specific sections or only prohibit firearms in airports beyond checkpoints.
And in California in 2012, the NRA formally opposed Assembly Bill 2182, which would have required a person be arrested if they brought a firearm into the airport and ban them from entering in the future. The bill never moved from committee. More recently, bills introduced in Virginia, Georgia, and Ohio would allow people to carry their weapons inside.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/11/03/2...
The anti-gun lobby loves to introduce bills that, on the surface, look reasonable but hidden deep in the body of that bill is wording that would lead to prohibitions far beyond the proclaimed intent. Then the anti-gun lobby loves to portray those who opposed their sneaky attempt to slide one past the American people as "gun crazed maniacs" who oppose even the most reasonable gun control measures. The fact that the NRA, many hunting organizations, and intelligent individuals take the time to read those bills in their entirety and then oppose them based on their hidden agenda really pisses the gun-grabbers off. While I am not a member of the NRA and don't necessarily always agree with them....the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#10096 Nov 4, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
~stomp stomp stomp~
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Mommy! Tell Barefoot2626 that **MY** Second Amendment is what the founding fathers MEANT TO SAY!
That counts, right?
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! All the words that Barefoot2626 got from the real one are extra!
No, the second amendment says exactly what it means. You may have all of the words but the meaning has completely escaped you. You are also the one attempting to add meaning that isn't there. The meaning was and is to RESTRICT GOVERNMENT from infringing on the right of the people and you are attempting to use it to give government power to restrict the people. You've got it totally backwards.......which, of course, is how you approach everything....arse first. Try again.......

Since: Jun 08

Not Waynesboro or Hagerstown

#10099 Nov 4, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's bordered by states that have the least, StupidAzz.
You haven't been to DC so I will tell you: there aren't roadblocks to keep out the guns you are happy to sell to felons, wife beaters, terrorists, and complete strangers.
As we have stuffed up your azz a number of times already: laws don't prevent crimes, they provide punishments for sots like you who have that kind of moral turpitude.
Please educate yourself on the People's Republic of Maryland and their gun grabbing laws.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10100 Nov 4, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
State Total murders
California 1,790
I think it's hilarious that MORONS are unable to understand why a state that has 39 million people in it would be at the top of a list when compared to a state with less than a million people.

How stupid could one be?

Put it tis way... so stupid that 2ndAmRight has to change his aliases on frequent occasions because of the stupidity he as accumulated.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10101 Nov 4, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>The anti-gun lobby loves to introduce bills that, on the surface, look reasonable
While the gun gnutter lobby fights laws that makes sense for 90 percent of America.

Let's see: the majority of Americans insist all gun sales should require background checks, and NRA insists people should be able to sell guns to anyone they damn well please.

On the surface... it looks like the gun gnutters are wacko special interest lobby that are fighting a common sense law.

But on deeper examination... it looks like common sense and the gun gnutters are a wacko special interest lobby that are fighting a common sense law.

On the day that Adam Lanza- a gun gnutter- went into a public school and shot 20 children- many of them ten times or more, carrying a assault weapon with large capacity magazines so he didn't have to waste time reloading- the NRA was fighting a law which made it unlawful to carry firearms into public schools in Michigan.

Another law that looks like common sense to people who have common sense.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10102 Nov 4, 2013
GenPatton wrote:
<quoted text>
Please educate yourself on the People's Republic of Maryland
Why don't you grow up?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10103 Nov 4, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>No, the second amendment says exactly what it means.
I guess that's why gun gnutters like to start in the middle of it?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10104 Nov 4, 2013
Squach wrote:
You may have all of the words but the meaning has completely escaped you.
It hasn't escaped Justice Scalia or the Supreme Court whose quote has been posted here many dozens of times: that like all amendments, the can be restrictions on the Send Amendment.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10105 Nov 4, 2013
Squach wrote:
The fact that the NRA, many hunting organizations, and intelligent individuals take the time to read those bills in their entirety and then oppose
The NRA opposes all of them, including laws that 90 percent of Americans support.

It is interested in keeping itself preserved, to always have a bogeyman for which that can collect money from saps which pays its board millions of dollars in salaries.

SAPS.

Since: Jun 08

Not Waynesboro or Hagerstown

#10106 Nov 4, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you grow up?
Thank you, you can't refute my statement.

Have a great day!

Banned

“This town is nuts...”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#10107 Nov 4, 2013
You can't regulate gun sales between private individuals without creating a national registry of all firearms, which is specifically illegal. It's illegal because a national registry is potentially the first step of any future movement by the government to disarms all Americans. If that day ever comes then Americans will no longer be free and all those who have fought and died to protect our rights will have died for nothing.

Is that what you want?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#10108 Nov 4, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
the source of your constitutional law degree, year and college?
Densa college is not accredited....
Bumped your head again, didn't ya? My level of education and the degrees I posses are none of your business. Suffice it to say that anyone with a third grade education is capable of making a complete fool of you. Try again.....

Banned

“This town is nuts...”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#10109 Nov 4, 2013
Liberals and those who support more gun control fail to see the fact that the purpose of the Second Amendment is to ensure that the government doesn't infringe on any of our rights.

I know you think that armed citizens wouldn't stand a chance against the Federal government so there's no need for armed militias, but you haven't put much thought into what would actually happen if a large segment of our nation's citizens took up arms against the government. All you see in your simple minds is a few people firing shotguns at military tanks while f-14 fighter jets drop bombs on them. Thats not how it would happen.

First, it would almost be impossible for the military to use any large weapons to defend itself against armed citizens on US soil because of their inability to distinguish militia from other citizens. Look at what has happened in Iraq and Afghanistan. Our military could never "win" the wars over there because they couldn't identify their enemy.

But the biggest advantage an armed militia would have over the government is the fact that as soon as the government decided to use weapons against American citizens they will have lost the war already. If they enact policy that leads to a large number of Americans to take up arms against them it would turn our entire country upside down, not to mention our economy. The government would have everything to lose and nothing to gain.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10110 Nov 4, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
~stomp stomp stomp~
MOMMY! tell barefoot2626 the list of states with the highest homicide rates is IRRELEVANT when I am talking about homicide rates! Especially since they are all states with poor gun co0ntrol regulations!
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! His numbers are always better than mine!
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed."

"IRRELEVANT" indeed.

As for the rest of your errant spewings:

FBI: Chicago passes New York as murder capital of U.S.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/w...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Heavy security at Trump Tower not going away an... Nov 22 Lawrence Wolf 27
News Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump sp... Nov 7 RushFan666 30
News Russian man convicted of hacking into US busine... Aug '16 Mizike67 5
News Russian man faces US trial in lucrative hacking... Aug '16 Nu Wor Order 4
News Cleveland prepares for RNC convention protests (May '16) May '16 Hostis Publicus 9
News Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offen... (May '16) May '16 Jelly Belly Popcorn 3
News Man shot outside White House remains in critica... (May '16) May '16 WeTheSheeple 2
More from around the web