Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

Mar 29, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Chambersburg Public Opinion

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Comments (Page 416)

Showing posts 8,301 - 8,320 of11,004
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9292
Oct 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FormerParatrooper wrote:
As for your background Check question, you can look it up.
It doesn't exist.

You insist that Santa Claus exist and for proof you insist I have to look it up and see for myself.

If I were you, I would be embarrassed to say aloud that I did not support universal background checks for gun sales either.
FormerParatroope r

Eau Claire, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9293
Oct 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You have only avoided admitting you had sex with the Cub Scout who came buy with chocolate bars trying to earn money for summer camp..
Did the seminar group you work for teach you to post ignorant things like that? Your group should learn more effective techniques because the technique you are using does nothing for your argument. The one thing it does is expose the immaturity of a supposed adult.
FormerParatroope r

Eau Claire, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9294
Oct 19, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't.
You are full of cr@p.
You can roll around and stomp your feet all you like.
http://m.topix.com/forum/guns/TT2PK56QHFSQ7P4...

Where I posted what you posted.

You lied again.
FormerParatroope r

Eau Claire, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9295
Oct 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Looking it up is not needed.
Either you support background checks, or you support the current system: you support selling guns to complete total strangers, including gun shows where people who cannot buy guns legally swarm.
I will make it easy for you. I support fixing the current system. I also support removing those from society who pose such risks to public safety they are barred from having a firearm. In that end, there would be no need for a background check because these offenders would not be a part of civilized society.

Do you grasp that?
FormerParatroope r

Eau Claire, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9296
Oct 19, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't exist.
You insist that Santa Claus exist and for proof you insist I have to look it up and see for myself.
If I were you, I would be embarrassed to say aloud that I did not support universal background checks for gun sales either.
It exists, you do not have the integrity to actually look and admit you did not.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9297
Oct 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FormerParatrooper wrote:
Where I posted what you posted.
Your link proves nothing, SpoogeSponge.

Do you want me to link to your posts and insist that you posted?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9298
Oct 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FormerParatrooper wrote:
<quoted text>
I will make it easy for you. I support fixing the current system.
So when I said you support selling firearms to complete strangers, I was right.

And when I offered to apologize if I was wrong about your position and you rolled around stomping your feet posting links to nowhere meaning anything, I was right:

You support selling firearms to complete and total strangers.

And that means: selling to felons, wife beaters, terrorists, and those that are mental risks to society.

I know ... you enjoy playing with yourself, Shug.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9299
Oct 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FormerParatrooper wrote:
In that end, there would be no need for a background check because these offenders would not be a part of civilized society.
Because you know who the future offenders are and you will use the time machine to come back and stop the sale.

Got it.

But in this continuum, we do not have a time machine and we have know way of knowing who lawbreakers might be.

But we do know who lawbreakers are.

And you insist you should be able to sell firearms to complete strangers today.

At gun sales where- in most states- felons flock knowing people like you will be there selling firearms knowing that a time machine is in the works.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9300
Oct 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FormerParatrooper wrote:
<quoted text>
It exists,
Santa Claus does not exist.

I hate to be the one to break it to you.

I know: you can find proof he does on the internet.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9301
Oct 20, 2013
 
SATANISGOD wrote:
<quoted text>
really fu-ktard.... they must not have any bad buys in japan or australia...seems the gun homicides stopped when the guns went away... hmmmm.... so much for your logic.....make sure you wipe
those who defended it ??? exactly who and when is that we defended it.. when we invaded Vietnam or when we invaded Iraq?
Still the patriotic moron, eh squachtard....
You really ARE clueless, aren't ya? This isn't Japan or Australia (where they still have homicides and suicides). This is America where we have created a whole new class of psycho-killers/criminals thanks to the liberal policies you're so fond of. If you want to stop the violence, do like other countries, crush the criminal element and confine the psychos. People like you just can't see the forest for the trees.

BTW, it is not the individual soldiers' choice when and where he fights. He goes where the American People, via congress, send him. Wherever he goes he is ALWAYS fighting for YOU. If YOU don't like or agree with the "when and where", vote different people into congress, don't denigrate the soldier.

FormerParatroope r

Eau Claire, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9302
Oct 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
So when I said you support selling firearms to complete strangers, I was right.
And when I offered to apologize if I was wrong about your position and you rolled around stomping your feet posting links to nowhere meaning anything, I was right:
You support selling firearms to complete and total strangers.
And that means: selling to felons, wife beaters, terrorists, and those that are mental risks to society.
I know ... you enjoy playing with yourself, Shug.
Where did I say I support selling firearms to felons or anyone else that are ineligible? I didn't. You lied.

My posts where you claimed you posted evidence to the bet you made. Which you posted no such evidence. Again you lied.

You can twist and provide conjecture, but you have nothing to support your ignorant assertions.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9303
Oct 20, 2013
 
The leftist liberals want to force the American people to submit to a background check to exercise a Constitutionally guaranteed right but they will do everything they can to strike down any law that requires proof of citizenship at our voting polls. They also say that requiring proof of legal presence in the U.S. to obtain a drivers' license is a big "no-no". Yet they demand that native born American citizens be subjected to a background check in order to exercise their BIRTH RIGHT. Isn't that an oxymoron?
FormerParatroope r

Eau Claire, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9304
Oct 20, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Because you know who the future offenders are and you will use the time machine to come back and stop the sale.
Got it.
But in this continuum, we do not have a time machine and we have know way of knowing who lawbreakers might be.
But we do know who lawbreakers are.
And you insist you should be able to sell firearms to complete strangers today.
At gun sales where- in most states- felons flock knowing people like you will be there selling firearms knowing that a time machine is in the works.
You support letting violent offenders and the mentally ill to roam society where they can continue to violate people. You support letting murders free to kill children. It must be so since you completely ignored the fact I said I support keeping these types from society.

What's the matter? Are you one of the types I support keeping licked from society? Is that why you disagree?
FormerParatroope r

Eau Claire, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9305
Oct 20, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Santa Claus does not exist.
I hate to be the one to break it to you.
I know: you can find proof he does on the internet.
When the extremists like you begin to logically look at the issue and work with others to find solutions, we can make an impact. Until then all you are doing is enabling the criminals and putting the rest of at risk.

My words are lost on you, that I understand. I also understand there are extremists on my side if the issue, which I also point out their ignorance.

You cannot reason with extremists, you can only point out the errors of logic and hope reasonable people prevail.
Tray

New Albany, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9306
Oct 20, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Because you know who the future offenders are and you will use the time machine to come back and stop the sale.
Got it.
But in this continuum, we do not have a time machine and we have know way of knowing who lawbreakers might be.
But we do know who lawbreakers are.
And you insist you should be able to sell firearms to complete strangers today.
At gun sales where- in most states- felons flock knowing people like you will be there selling firearms knowing that a time machine is in the works.
That is exactly right, we have no way of know who will or will not break the law or become killers. The background check in no way can predict the behavior of anyone. No one is a killer till they do it the first time so passing a check can't see who will become a killer. A large portion of those who have killed go on the rest of their lives and never kill again so failing a background check can't predict that either. Thankfully in this country we are innocent until proven guilty and that includes each crime. Even in court when being charged with a recent crime ones past can't be used against them. And once again the MAJORITY of felons are not violent. A 19 year old collage student caught with a small bag of pot is a felon but why should that remove the right to self defense for the rest of their life? In reality on average each of us will commit at least 3 felonies per day and not even know you've broken a law. YES EVEN YOU.
Tray

New Albany, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9307
Oct 20, 2013
 
There are those caught "drunk driving". Very very few are caught the first time or most of the time after being caught once. The vast majority of those who have driven drunk are NEVER caught. It is a small minority of drunk drivers who actually kill or harm anyone while driving drunk. The ONLY way to be sure NO ONE drinks and drives is to eliminate cars. We don't because the benefit out weighs the risks.We still make cars capable of breaking speed limits by vast numbers but we don't charge some one with speeding just because they might speed even if they have been caught speeding before. Even a repeat speeder or drunk can still buy a car and still drive drunk or speed until caught (which is still only the minority of them).
SATANISGOD

Apo, AE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9308
Oct 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Squach wrote:
<quoted text>You really ARE clueless, aren't ya? This isn't Japan or Australia (where they still have homicides and suicides). This is America where we have created a whole new class of psycho-killers/criminals thanks to the liberal policies you're so fond of. If you want to stop the violence, do like other countries, crush the criminal element and confine the psychos. People like you just can't see the forest for the trees.
BTW, it is not the individual soldiers' choice when and where he fights. He goes where the American People, via congress, send him. Wherever he goes he is ALWAYS fighting for YOU. If YOU don't like or agree with the "when and where", vote different people into congress, don't denigrate the soldier.
yes, they had 11 gun homicides vs our 12K.... pretty close numbers, eh....MORON....yes, they have other homicides just like we other ones as well...

he goes where the american people send him?...wow...you do like sheep...so did the Na-zi's..just following orders..so that makes it ok, right?.... and all the one that went Canada because they knew the Vietnam war was BULL$-HIT were the real soldiers. No one was fighting for any of our rights....you might have a case regarding WW2.....but the rest have been personal agendas.
Tray

New Albany, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9309
Oct 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

100,000,000 gun owners have never and will never kill anyone yet they are guilty until proven innocent just because of the actions of a few. Guns are used daily by the owners for protection of their life (which is more useful than the average car owner) but the left believes it is better to have an unarmed victim than risk the injury of the criminal.
SATANISGOD

Apo, AE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9310
Oct 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

FormerParatrooper wrote:
<quoted text>
You support letting violent offenders and the mentally ill to roam society where they can continue to violate people. You support letting murders free to kill children. It must be so since you completely ignored the fact I said I support keeping these types from society.
What's the matter? Are you one of the types I support keeping licked from society? Is that why you disagree?
where exactly and who is supporting violent offenders and mentally ill roaming free?...give us states, counties, cities and examples with credible statistics... in lieu of blanket idiotic assertions pulled from your rectum, because you heard the NRAtards making the same accusations... similar to their claim "why does Obama use armed security to escort his kids to school?"... only total fu-kups like you would ask a question like that....
Tray

New Albany, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9311
Oct 20, 2013
 
SATANISGOD wrote:
<quoted text>
where exactly and who is supporting violent offenders and mentally ill roaming free?...give us states, counties, cities and examples with credible statistics... in lieu of blanket idiotic assertions pulled from your rectum, because you heard the NRAtards making the same accusations... similar to their claim "why does Obama use armed security to escort his kids to school?"... only total fu-kups like you would ask a question like that....
Why does Obama allow guns in school for his kids protections but not ours? Why does Obama want everyone EXCEPT those making the laws to be forced into his Obamacare? YOU support violent offenders when you disarm their victims and make it easy to prey off society. Gun owners support the stopping of repeat offenders by lead poison.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 8,301 - 8,320 of11,004
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••