Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

Mar 29, 2013 Full story: Chambersburg Public Opinion 11,003

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Full Story

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#8954 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>So is making conclusions about gun control in America based on Japan or any other country. Glad you finally realize that fact.
That's not what I said. Please try to be honest.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8955 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>No you are completely and utter deceived if you believe that. The pattern set by the anti-gun lobby is very real and extremely visible to all.
Ninety percent of Americans want universal background checks.

They are tired of idiots like you demanding special rights to sell to complete strangers.

The pattern is: Americans want this law and the gun lobby moves in with money and threats and subverts the will of the overwhelming majority.

Wipe your chin, Squishy.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8956 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
So is making conclusions about gun control in America based on Japan
Paraphrase: the preferred ammunition of the gun gnutter.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8958 Oct 10, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Slave owner.
Putting aside it isn't a Franklin quote.
It was a reply to the PA governor on Nov. 11, 1755.

http://www.bartleby.com/73/1056.html

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8959 Oct 10, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Except of you're gay and want to get married. Then it's perfectly fine, right?
Your hypocrisy is staggering.
BTW - you're not an oppressed minority. Your claiming that status is outrageously offensive.
Well, since "marriage" is a religious institution, if you want to marry your boyfriend, take it up with the church. If you want to get hitched in a civil union, by all means do it. No hypocrisy here. I just don't care.

And another LIE on your part....I NEVER claimed to be an oppressed minority. So WTF are you talking about?

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8960 Oct 10, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
Making conclusions about access to guns and suicide in the United States is logically faulty.
Yes it is logically faulty. And you repeat it often considering 19,000+ suicides make up the majority of that 32,000 gun deaths you have claimed repeatedly.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8961 Oct 10, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what I said. Please try to be honest.
I didnít say that's what you said. What I said is the same premise applies and even you should understand that because you just used the premise. Japan is not America and there can be no direct correlation. I guess I'll need to dumb things down a bit for you.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8962 Oct 10, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would you insist on the right to infringe on the rights of the majority who insist you should not be allowed to sell weapons to felons?
I am not infringing on the rights of ANY majority. If they don't want to carry a gun for their own defense, THEY DON'T HAVE TO. But they do NOT get to infringe on MY RIGHT without DUE PROCESS. And I don't give a fuck what they insist.

Why do you continue to make this strawman argument which NO ONE is claiming, fucktard???

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8963 Oct 10, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You gave examples of immoral acts being codified into law. That's true.
The dishonest part is your claim that any of the immoral acts I listed have been coded into law or that you've proven they have.
Give it up, son. Your absolute obsession of disagreeing with me no matter what I say has gotten the better of you. I made a truthful and accurate statement and the only way you can claim to have proven it wrong is by substituting in DIFFERENT immoral acts and claim they are equivalent to what I listed.
You've lost this one, kid. At least have the integrity to let it go.
LYING PIECE OF SHIT!! You said lying wasn't against the law. I gave you two VERY SPECIFIC examples of where LYING was ILLEGAL. Just as with the other examples. Your continued denial does NOT change the fact that you've got NOTHING. And you prove it with each continued denial.

And what you have said has gotten the better of me????? LMAO!!!!!!

Son, you couldn't best me on my worst day, let alone your best day. Your continued denial of what has been presented to you, only to have you claim it is irrelevant and yourself some kind of victor, does NOT mean it is or you are. All it shows is your inability to debate the facts at hand. You . Are. Done.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8964 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a reply to the PA governor on Nov. 11, 1755.
http://www.bartleby.com/73/1056.html
Careful now AV, you're tossing around those historical facts again. Notice how all of the gun-grabbers stopped posting after your validating link? Ya think one or more of their heads exploded or something?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8965 Oct 10, 2013
Here are a couple more historically factual quotes:

"Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American... The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state government, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people" (Tench Coxe, Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788)

"On every question of construction (of the Constitution) let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed." (Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, June 12, 1823, The Complete Jefferson, p. 322)
Penisaurus Rex

London, UK

#8968 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm a retard!
Yeah. Tell us something we don't already know about yourself.

:-))

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8969 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a reply to the PA governor on Nov. 11, 1755.
Wasn't.

http://www.lawfareblog.com/2011/07/what-ben-f...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8971 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, since "marriage" is a religious institution
Civil.

Why people go to courts and get licenses, Sticky.

Sure, you didn't and you pretend it's a real marriage.

Wipe your chin.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8973 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
Thomas Jefferson
owneed hundreds of human beings and kept them in chains.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8975 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
Here are a couple more historically factual quotes:
"Congress have no power to disarm the militia.
So what?

Someone posting an opinion 230 years ago- not the first, not the last.

So what?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8976 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
If you want to get hitched in a civil union,
Civil union isn't isn't the same as a marriage.

SpoogeSponge.

Boyfriend's belt buckle knocking against the brain pan, eh?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8977 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Careful now AV, you're tossing around those historical facts again.
Repeating something you find on the internet doesn't make it a fact, Squishy.

Do you want to see a picture of a WWII bomber found on the backside of the moon?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8978 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
Japan is not America and there can be no direct correlation.
Guns deaths are gun deaths and you can compare gun deaths in America to those in Japan just as you can compare gun deaths in Atlanta to Chicago.

PS: thanks for pointing out Japan isn't America, though.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8979 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not infringing on the rights of ANY majority.
You infringe when you sell your guns to complete strangers and when you insist others have that same "right".

Do notice the quote marks.

The majority of Americans- the vast majority- have more sense.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Police: Beware of bogus bucks Sep 1 Fait 1
Talk of the Sound Exclusive: President Obama Co... Aug 29 stenbrian333 1
Wayne Meddaugh seeks office for Clerk of Superi... Jul '14 Alex Harris 1
Multiple Hess Gas Stations Hit By Skimmers Jul '14 Lio 13
Restaurant operator P.F. Chang's confirms credi... Jun '14 carey529 1
Greenfield woman could be facing fe... Jun '14 Hassan al Madji 8
Survey: Cybercrime on the rise May '14 commentard 1
•••

US Secret Service People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••