Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10984 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8917 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
They made sure that our individual rights and freedoms are not subject to the fickle whims of public opinion.
Did they, Squish?

How did those protections work for the slaves?

Or maybe the FF didn't notice them?

Putting aside your lie that they were considering a pure democracy in the first place.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8918 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't carry it or display it or take it out of the curio cabinet...not an issue.......
Liar...tell that to the DA...lol...you ignorant, lying, criminal POS, extremist, "frustrated control freak".
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8920 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
ignorant, lying, criminal, POS, extremist "frustrated control hillbilly"
ROTFLMAO...you're a criminal and a hypocrate...lol...not mention the ignorant, lying, extremist, POS,'frustrated control freak" part.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8921 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
this is how you expose frauds and blow hards....so much for his perceived 2nd amendment rights...any questions?
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.- Ben Franklin

So again, why would I want to go to a state where the people are dumb enough to let the politicians infringe on their Go-d-given right to provide for their own safety with an effective weapon?

May your chains wear lightly.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8922 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't carry it or display it or take it out of the curio cabinet...not an issue.......
So.....still illegal isn't it?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8923 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
wow... not enough individuals in the army, navy, air force, national guard, marines... wowee....squachtard is a military expert and genius, constitutional law expert, arms expert, and political expert, history expert... how luck can we get to have such mental giant visiting us.....bwhahhahahahahhahaha... .
didn't realize masturbating on the internet makes you so smart.....
Gotta' give credit where credit is due.........this is indeed another incredibly stupid comment. I think you may have just redefined the complete idiot scale. You go scumbag.....

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8926 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Really? Are you that pathetically blind? Gun control measures are aimed at one thing and one thing only; depriving some (or all) American citizens of their 2nd amendment rights. Because you and your fellow anti-gun advocates are too lazy to go after those who deserve to be deprived, you want to deprive everyone. Every gun control measure ever imagined was meant to deprive somebody of 2nd amendment rights. Plain and pimple. To deny that is pure lunacy born of willful blindness.
Seriously, all your beliefs about those of us interested in reducing gun violence in this country are completely and utterly wrong. You are simply allowing your paranoid emotionalism to run away with. Rational debate about reality is impossible when you're exhibiting these sorts of severe thinking errors.

Contra principia negantem non est disputandum.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8927 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Your words, in English;
"I'm crystal clear on my agenda."
"...even I don't know my true agenda..."
One of your statements above, in English, is a lie...YOU are a liar...whether you admit it or not.
Again - your (willful or not) failure to comprehend the English language does not make me a liar.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8928 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
ROTFLMAO..."semantics "...caught you lying again.
Pointing out that you're arguing over the meaning of words and phrases in order to dishonestly portray my position and what I've said is 100% accurate and honest. It's what you're doing because you've lost on the facts.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8929 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
ROTFLMAO...you're a criminal and a hypocrate...
Hypocrate? Is that something you pack all your lies in, you lying mooching frustrated control freak?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8930 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.- Ben Franklin
Slave owner.

Putting aside it isn't a Franklin quote.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8931 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a funny response when you're taking a pounding...lol
The only thing taking a pounding right now is the truth and rational debate by your irrational and dishonest arguments.

You take my words, distort the meaning, attribute the distortion to me, then call me a liar. That's the desperate act of someone who knows they've lost on the facts and now has to resort to mendacious personal attacks to maintain the illusion that he's still relevant.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8932 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<
So again, why would I want to go to a state where the people are dumb enough to let the politicians infringe on their Go-d-given right to provide for their own safety with an effective weapon?
Why would you insist on the right to infringe on the rights of the majority who insist you should not be allowed to sell weapons to felons?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8933 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>BS! Paranoia indicates an unfounded fear or apprehension. There is absolutely nothing unfounded about the apprehension I feel. The anti-gun lobby has a well founded history that completely belies your comment. So this is how you debate? Declare the legitimate concerns of those who oppose your agenda "paranoia" and disregard them? That's dot a debate Danny Boy. That's jut you attempting to declare yourself right in spite of all the facts and evidence. It ain't workin'.......
Your concerns are not legitimate. Your fears are unfounded. Your beliefs are irrational.

Contra principia negantem non est disputandum.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8934 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said that you did say they were not illegal. Why are YOU lying???
Your post..."No, you claimed that the moral issues I identified COULD LEAD to behavior that is against the law, not that those things themselves are against the law.
Because they aren't." (YOUR DENIAL)
Then you tried to blow it off by deflecting away saying that I said something along the lines of "based on", blah blah blah.
I gave you five VERY SPECIFIC examples of where the moral code HAS been codified into law, where you said it hasn't.
The only LIAR here is YOU!
You gave examples of immoral acts being codified into law. That's true.

The dishonest part is your claim that any of the immoral acts I listed have been coded into law or that you've proven they have.

Give it up, son. Your absolute obsession of disagreeing with me no matter what I say has gotten the better of you. I made a truthful and accurate statement and the only way you can claim to have proven it wrong is by substituting in DIFFERENT immoral acts and claim they are equivalent to what I listed.

You've lost this one, kid. At least have the integrity to let it go.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8935 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
"The term is "majority rule" and I'm not surprised you have disdain for it. Reactionary extremists usually do."
YOUR words...NOT mine.
All of those I named...women, Blacks, gays, different religons...have ALL had to fight against "majority rule"...you think they had "disdain" against those that were denying them their rights...?
They fought againt "majority rule" and have won because we don't live under "majority rule". We live in a Democratic Republic that has has a Constitution that protects the rights of the minority againt the infringments of "majority rule".
AND...in your words above...they would be "Reactionary extremists"...and I would be proud to stand with any one or all of them against the likes of YOU that apparently supports "majority rule".
It is impossible for anything to be more ironic than a wingnut gunner lecturing anyone on protecting the rights of the minority.

Simply staggering.

When you begin to portray conservative white males as a minority and claim the reasonable restrictions supported by the majority of the nation rise to the level of discrimination suffered by legitimate minorities, you've crossed over into a whole new realm of irrational persecution complex.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8936 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
on their Go-d-given right
PS: God doesn't give you rights to sell guns to felons.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8937 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Individual rights that belong to the people do not end at the doorstep...the property line...the city line...the county line...or the State line.
Yeah, I know analogies are too complex for you to understand. And I'm sure it hurts your feelings whenever you can't comprehend what's being said. It's probably better to just be quiet in those circumstances rather than posting something that removes all doubt about your ignorance.

LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8938 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Which in this country have NEVER proven to reduce anything. Chicago and DC have some of the strictest gun control laws in the country. Have they reduce the crime in those cities??? Not by a long shot. You are stumping for gun control alws that you are hoping AMY reduce crime without any proof whatsoever that it actually will.
<quoted text>
But that's the thing...you are NOT in the center of public opinion. No matter how you want to believe it.
<quoted text>
If being a constitutional conservative (you know, by NOT trying to add words to the Constitution which are NOT there) makes me a "rightwing extremist" in your book, then that is a badge I will wear with PRIDE!
We've been through all this. Patchwork laws don't work. The most legitimate comparison is nations where there are national standards.

When my opinion is the same as a majority of Americans, then I certainly am in the center of public opinion. My views on gun safety are moderate and centrist by any honest assessment.

No, having extremist reactionary beliefs and opinions that are far, far out of the historic mainstream of American life is what makes you a rightwing extremist.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8939 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Freedom, liberty, and the US Constitution (how it was written).
The entire reason the Constitution has survived for as long as it has is because it is NOT allowed to be influenced by the political whims of the day. That is also the reason it was made extremely difficult to amend. If you want to amend the USC, then go out and get the required votes and state approvals that are required. But be prepared to be confronted by those like me AT EVERY TURN, and we won't be wanting to play patty-cake about our position. Good luck in your endeavor.
Wow. Hard to believe one person can be this confused and misinformed about the history of Constitutional interpretation in this nation.

I guess when your base is misinformation, all the conclusions and arguments you make are bound to be wrong. This explains a lot about you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Scene & Heard: VP Mike Pence on Sanibel Tue we the people 2
News Secret Service investigating effigy of Presiden... (Jan '10) Jun 21 Trumpenstein bank... 44
News Secret Service relaxes marijuana policy in bid ... Jun 2 RushFan666 6
News Men wanted for allegedly taking over $30K from ... May '17 Belinda 1
US Secret Service Clothes (Sep '06) May '17 nikonnicky 28
News Russian hacker faces decades in prison Apr '17 USA Today 3
News Secret Service: Man planned to kidnap first dog (Jan '16) Apr '17 alina 7
More from around the web