Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10987 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8909 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
blow it out your a$$...along with your perceived rights....
you violate any of gun control laws, and you will be locked up along with your rights and given a oopy of constitution to read and wipe with ....
Screw you scumbag. My rights are not perceived, they are identified in detail by the constitution. I don't violate laws but I will work diligently to repeal your simple minded lunacy. Now crawl back under your slimy rock and contemplate your next incredibly stupid comment.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8913 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
The founders created a democratic republic (not a pure democracy) for that very reason..
The founders created a republic because they knew it would be hard to get everyone in the country together in Philadelphia to vote for every law and measure needed to run the country.

Putting aside: most people did not have the right to vote in the country the FF's put together after the revolution so it could hard be called a democracy of any kind.

There are no pure democracies now and never has been.

You are a moron, Squishy.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8916 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
"I'm crystal clear on my agenda."
I do know when you're proving yourself a liar...again.
So which of these two statements of yours is the lie...?
Statement #1 above....?
or..
Statement #2:
and taking quotes out of context.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8917 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
They made sure that our individual rights and freedoms are not subject to the fickle whims of public opinion.
Did they, Squish?

How did those protections work for the slaves?

Or maybe the FF didn't notice them?

Putting aside your lie that they were considering a pure democracy in the first place.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8918 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't carry it or display it or take it out of the curio cabinet...not an issue.......
Liar...tell that to the DA...lol...you ignorant, lying, criminal POS, extremist, "frustrated control freak".
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8920 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
ignorant, lying, criminal, POS, extremist "frustrated control hillbilly"
ROTFLMAO...you're a criminal and a hypocrate...lol...not mention the ignorant, lying, extremist, POS,'frustrated control freak" part.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8921 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
this is how you expose frauds and blow hards....so much for his perceived 2nd amendment rights...any questions?
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”- Ben Franklin

So again, why would I want to go to a state where the people are dumb enough to let the politicians infringe on their Go-d-given right to provide for their own safety with an effective weapon?

May your chains wear lightly.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8922 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't carry it or display it or take it out of the curio cabinet...not an issue.......
So.....still illegal isn't it?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8923 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
wow... not enough individuals in the army, navy, air force, national guard, marines... wowee....squachtard is a military expert and genius, constitutional law expert, arms expert, and political expert, history expert... how luck can we get to have such mental giant visiting us.....bwhahhahahahahhahaha... .
didn't realize masturbating on the internet makes you so smart.....
Gotta' give credit where credit is due.........this is indeed another incredibly stupid comment. I think you may have just redefined the complete idiot scale. You go scumbag.....

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8926 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Really? Are you that pathetically blind? Gun control measures are aimed at one thing and one thing only; depriving some (or all) American citizens of their 2nd amendment rights. Because you and your fellow anti-gun advocates are too lazy to go after those who deserve to be deprived, you want to deprive everyone. Every gun control measure ever imagined was meant to deprive somebody of 2nd amendment rights. Plain and pimple. To deny that is pure lunacy born of willful blindness.
Seriously, all your beliefs about those of us interested in reducing gun violence in this country are completely and utterly wrong. You are simply allowing your paranoid emotionalism to run away with. Rational debate about reality is impossible when you're exhibiting these sorts of severe thinking errors.

Contra principia negantem non est disputandum.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8927 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Your words, in English;
"I'm crystal clear on my agenda."
"...even I don't know my true agenda..."
One of your statements above, in English, is a lie...YOU are a liar...whether you admit it or not.
Again - your (willful or not) failure to comprehend the English language does not make me a liar.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8928 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
ROTFLMAO..."semantics "...caught you lying again.
Pointing out that you're arguing over the meaning of words and phrases in order to dishonestly portray my position and what I've said is 100% accurate and honest. It's what you're doing because you've lost on the facts.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8929 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
ROTFLMAO...you're a criminal and a hypocrate...
Hypocrate? Is that something you pack all your lies in, you lying mooching frustrated control freak?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8930 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”- Ben Franklin
Slave owner.

Putting aside it isn't a Franklin quote.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8931 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a funny response when you're taking a pounding...lol
The only thing taking a pounding right now is the truth and rational debate by your irrational and dishonest arguments.

You take my words, distort the meaning, attribute the distortion to me, then call me a liar. That's the desperate act of someone who knows they've lost on the facts and now has to resort to mendacious personal attacks to maintain the illusion that he's still relevant.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8932 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<
So again, why would I want to go to a state where the people are dumb enough to let the politicians infringe on their Go-d-given right to provide for their own safety with an effective weapon?
Why would you insist on the right to infringe on the rights of the majority who insist you should not be allowed to sell weapons to felons?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8933 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>BS! Paranoia indicates an unfounded fear or apprehension. There is absolutely nothing unfounded about the apprehension I feel. The anti-gun lobby has a well founded history that completely belies your comment. So this is how you debate? Declare the legitimate concerns of those who oppose your agenda "paranoia" and disregard them? That's dot a debate Danny Boy. That's jut you attempting to declare yourself right in spite of all the facts and evidence. It ain't workin'.......
Your concerns are not legitimate. Your fears are unfounded. Your beliefs are irrational.

Contra principia negantem non est disputandum.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8934 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said that you did say they were not illegal. Why are YOU lying???
Your post..."No, you claimed that the moral issues I identified COULD LEAD to behavior that is against the law, not that those things themselves are against the law.
Because they aren't." (YOUR DENIAL)
Then you tried to blow it off by deflecting away saying that I said something along the lines of "based on", blah blah blah.
I gave you five VERY SPECIFIC examples of where the moral code HAS been codified into law, where you said it hasn't.
The only LIAR here is YOU!
You gave examples of immoral acts being codified into law. That's true.

The dishonest part is your claim that any of the immoral acts I listed have been coded into law or that you've proven they have.

Give it up, son. Your absolute obsession of disagreeing with me no matter what I say has gotten the better of you. I made a truthful and accurate statement and the only way you can claim to have proven it wrong is by substituting in DIFFERENT immoral acts and claim they are equivalent to what I listed.

You've lost this one, kid. At least have the integrity to let it go.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8935 Oct 10, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
"The term is "majority rule" and I'm not surprised you have disdain for it. Reactionary extremists usually do."
YOUR words...NOT mine.
All of those I named...women, Blacks, gays, different religons...have ALL had to fight against "majority rule"...you think they had "disdain" against those that were denying them their rights...?
They fought againt "majority rule" and have won because we don't live under "majority rule". We live in a Democratic Republic that has has a Constitution that protects the rights of the minority againt the infringments of "majority rule".
AND...in your words above...they would be "Reactionary extremists"...and I would be proud to stand with any one or all of them against the likes of YOU that apparently supports "majority rule".
It is impossible for anything to be more ironic than a wingnut gunner lecturing anyone on protecting the rights of the minority.

Simply staggering.

When you begin to portray conservative white males as a minority and claim the reasonable restrictions supported by the majority of the nation rise to the level of discrimination suffered by legitimate minorities, you've crossed over into a whole new realm of irrational persecution complex.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8936 Oct 10, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
on their Go-d-given right
PS: God doesn't give you rights to sell guns to felons.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Heavy security at Trump Tower not going away an... Nov 22 Lawrence Wolf 27
News Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump sp... Nov 7 RushFan666 30
News Russian man convicted of hacking into US busine... Aug '16 Mizike67 5
News Russian man faces US trial in lucrative hacking... Aug '16 Nu Wor Order 4
News Cleveland prepares for RNC convention protests (May '16) May '16 Hostis Publicus 9
News Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offen... (May '16) May '16 Jelly Belly Popcorn 3
News Man shot outside White House remains in critica... (May '16) May '16 WeTheSheeple 2
More from around the web