Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10987 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8879 Oct 10, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>I'm wide awake and right. Laugh all you like Danny Boy, the jokes' on you.
I know that, being a leftist liberal and all, you don't want to admit that decades of your "feel good" policies have populated our streets with repeat violent offenders and the mentally unstable (not to mention all of the illegal alien criminals you liberals love so much) who should all be in institutions but complete denial isn't going to solve that problem. You'd rather focus on restricting and abrogating my rights and freedoms even though I've committed no crime. You're the one dreaming if you think that's going to happen without a fight. I'm willing to fight and die for the constitution as it was written and intended. I've laid my life on the line for it before and I have no problem with doing it again but I wouldn't waste the time it would take to spit on your revisionist version.
EXCELLENT !!!
Tray

Ecru, MS

#8883 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
that's your personal opinion.... and what your rights are determined by the courts & legislatures (federal and state), not by some neanderthals trained in constitutional law at Densa college....
scenarios have changed from 200 years ago...hillbilly jack-0ffs are not the militia and "arms" have changed since muskets were the most powerful "armament"...to deny that is pure lunacy born of willful blindness.
Yes the musket was the most powerful "armament" at the time and the founding fathers thought EVERYONE should be able to own the "most powerful armament" available. Their idea was a country by the people for the people, not by the government for the government. The protection of the people and their rights was more important than the protection of the government.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8884 Oct 10, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
The term is "majority rule" and I'm not surprised you have disdain for it. Reactionary extremists usually do.
In a land of freedom and liberty....you know, what this country was founded upon.....the freedom and rights of the few are not subject to the whims of the many without due process. A true democracy is nothing more than mob/majority rule. That is why we have a CONSITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
Storm Warning

De Forest, WI

#8885 Oct 10, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
How much do you want to bet that there's at least one accidental discharge during this event?
more than likely your birth was an accidental discharge

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8886 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
when your rights infringe on my rights, they are removable...
your right to free speech does not give you the right yell fire in crowded theatre when there is no fire... and it does not give you the right to yell "HI JACK" on a plane.....
hence, we have taken your right away, haven't we...grow up dip$-hit.....
Is your mouth taped shut prior to getting on a plane or going into a movie theater so you won't incite a panic? Didn't think so. You are punished AFTER the crime has been committed.....not beforehand.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8889 Oct 10, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Except the majority isn't denying anybody their 2nd Amendment rights.
Except for that whole "shall not be infringed" part.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8890 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
blow it out your a$$...along with your perceived rights....
you violate any of gun control laws, and you will be locked up along with your rights and given a oopy of constitution to read and wipe with ....
So when is 2 year old "little johnny" going to start going door to door and taking guns away...?
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8891 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
when your rights infringe on my rights, they are removable...
your right to free speech does not give you the right yell fire in crowded theatre when there is no fire... and it does not give you the right to yell "HI JACK" on a plane.....
hence, we have taken your right away, haven't we...grow up dip$-hit.....
Let me know as soon as the free exercise of my individual right to keep and bear arms infringes on any of your "percieved" rights.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8894 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
narrowing it down to two cities and claiming laws don't work is typical ignorance... narrow the perimeter and you can skew the data... I am sure I can find a couple of square miles in both cities were there are zero gun homicides and claim gun control measures work 100%....
you have a whole state like Alaska, which is loaded with guns and unrestricted concealed weapons permits, and it is in the top 3 worst crime and violence in the nation...
Those were just two cities off the top of my head. There are many more with high crime rates and strict gun laws.

1) There is no such thing as a "unrestricted concealed weapons permit" in Alaska. You are not required to have a permit in Alaska to carry concealed, and there are a few restriction on where you can carry.
2) The presence or absense of guns is NOT the only thing that drives crime rates. Not by a long shot. Poverty level, diversity if the populace, population density, etc. are all factors. And in Alaska you also have the fact that in some parts, it stays dark for MONTHS at a time, which also leads to higher levels of depression, and I would also be willing to bet that most strong-arm type of crimes such as armed robbery takes place at night also.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8895 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
when your rights infringe on my rights, they are removable...
....
My right to carry an effective self-defense weapon in NO WAY infringes on your rights. No way whatsover. More sensationalistic BULLSHIT from you.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8896 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
violate any of the gun control measures, and you will find out real quickly.....care to test it moron, or you going to hide in your trailer and strut around with a pistol in your boxer shorts with your perceived rights?
Carry concealed...no permit
guns not registered
thousands of rounds of ammunition

I walk the street carrying concealed almost every day...no "little johnny" weasel has the ability to stop me.

AND...it's all legal...you're still an ignorant, lying, criminal POS, extremist, "frustrated control freak".

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8897 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
when your rights infringe on my rights, they are removable...
And if ever I do infringe on ANY of your rights (which would never happen), my rights are only removable through DUE PROCESS. You know, as stated in that darned old Constitution again.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8898 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
keep them behind your door and I don't give a rat's a$$..come out and start waving it in my face, and you will say bye-bye...
Carry concealed, walking the streets...no permit...nothing you, the "little johnny" weasel can do about it.

ROTFLMAO...you ignorant, lying, criminal POS, extremist, "frustrated control freak".

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8899 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
on public property?? because you are part owner?...really moron?...shows how ignorant you are...try taking your guns into a courthouse or federal building or state building...
I will come visit you and laugh thru the glass window..
Concealed carry is allowed in the VA state house with a concealed-carry permit, and it happens ALL THE TIME. Has anyone ever been shot by one of those concealed carriers? Not in any report I have ever been able to find.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8901 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
keep them behind your door and I don't give a rat's a$$..come out and start waving it in my face, and you will say bye-bye...
Since when does crime stop at anyones' property line? And if me carrying a gun in a holster on my hip is "waving it in your face"......TOO F**KING BAD, hoplophobe.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8902 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah, you can argue your case with the public defender to back you up.... bhwhahwhahhahahha....
You have to find me accused of breaking some crime first, dumbass.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8905 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
virginia concealed weapons laws:(courthouse is prohibited).... you are full of $-hit time and time again armedvetard..
Automobile carry:
Vehicle carry is allowed in a secured compartment, or plainly visible without a permit. As of July 1, 2010, a concealed handgun permit is not necessary when carrying a handgun while in a personal, private motor vehicle or vessel and such handgun is secured in a container or compartment in the vehicle or vessel.[Source]
Places off-limits when carrying:
§18.2-308 (O.): Private property when prohibited by the owner of the property, or where posted as prohibited.
§18.2-283: To a place of worship while a meeting for religious purposes is being held at such place, without good and sufficient reason.
§18.2-283.1: Courthouse.
§18.2-308.1 : School property. Exemptions to this statute include a person who has a valid concealed handgun permit and possesses a concealed handgun while in a motor vehicle in a parking lot, traffic circle, or other means of vehicular ingress or egress to the school.
§18.2-287.01 : Carrying weapon in air carrier airport terminal.
I never said courthouse, dumbf**k. I said the VA State House.

Swing and a miss....again.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8906 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
try it dumb f-uk....come to california... we can select a public place and we will test your rights.....hmmmm... what do you say, tarda$$?..you can scream about your rights all the way to lockup....
bring your inflatable doll for company..
Why would I want to come to the land of fruits and nuts??? A place I'm sure you fit right in.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8907 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
virginia concealed weapons laws:(courthouse is prohibited).... you are full of $-hit time and time again armedvetard..
Automobile carry:
Vehicle carry is allowed in a secured compartment, or plainly visible without a permit. As of July 1, 2010, a concealed handgun permit is not necessary when carrying a handgun while in a personal, private motor vehicle or vessel and such handgun is secured in a container or compartment in the vehicle or vessel.[Source]
Places off-limits when carrying:
§18.2-308 (O.): Private property when prohibited by the owner of the property, or where posted as prohibited.
§18.2-283: To a place of worship while a meeting for religious purposes is being held at such place, without good and sufficient reason.
§18.2-283.1: Courthouse.
§18.2-308.1 : School property. Exemptions to this statute include a person who has a valid concealed handgun permit and possesses a concealed handgun while in a motor vehicle in a parking lot, traffic circle, or other means of vehicular ingress or egress to the school.
§18.2-287.01 : Carrying weapon in air carrier airport terminal.
So "little johnny"...what's the Kalifornia statute for that illegal switchblade that you have...?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8908 Oct 10, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
that's your personal opinion.... and what your rights are determined by the courts & legislatures (federal and state), not by some neanderthals trained in constitutional law at Densa college....
scenarios have changed from 200 years ago...hillbilly jack-0ffs are not the militia and "arms" have changed since muskets were the most powerful "armament"...to deny that is pure lunacy born of willful blindness.
BS! That is a FACT, there's no opinion involved and try as you might you cannot change that FACT. When muskets were the most powerful armement they were also the most powerful weapon we would have to face. You suggest that we be restricted to muzzle loaders in defense against modern individual military weapons? Screw you. Now crawl back under your slimy rock and give Satan another hand job.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
George Soros Dec 30 Easy123 1
News Heavy security at Trump Tower not going away an... Dec '16 blushing violet 28
News Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump sp... Nov '16 RushFan666 30
News Russian man convicted of hacking into US busine... Aug '16 Mizike67 5
News Russian man faces US trial in lucrative hacking... Aug '16 Nu Wor Order 4
News Cleveland prepares for RNC convention protests (May '16) May '16 Hostis Publicus 9
News Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offen... (May '16) May '16 Jelly Belly Popcorn 3
More from around the web