Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

Mar 29, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Chambersburg Public Opinion

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Comments (Page 399)

Showing posts 7,961 - 7,980 of11,018
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8852
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! More of your vivid imagination at work - thinking I was somehow disparaging military service.
As long as you continue to draw conclusions about me based on your imagination rather than what I've actually said, you're going to continue to say stupid shit like this. I recommend you try listening to what I actually say for a change.
"As long as you continue to draw conclusions about me based on your imagination rather than what I've actually said, you're going to continue to say stupid shit like this."

Really...?...did YOU really just say this after posting the fact that you couldn't read or quote what I actually said and twisted it for your own response...?

"I recommend you try listening to what I actually say for a change."

ROTFLMAO...or what...?

Priceless!!!!
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8853
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
it is just a guide on a piece of paper, and subject to any interpretation we choose...and whomever is sitting on the supreme court ....as soon as we get rid of the reagan and bush appointees, we will get the lib agenda moving big time...
we will monitor and control how many farts you shoot during the day...
The "Law of the Land"...;

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States
which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties
made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the
United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and
the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing
in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary
notwithstanding."

...is NOT "just a guide".

"we will monitor and control how many farts you shoot during the day..."

ROTFLMAO...sure you will...you can't even monitor or control the schitt that flows from your mouth now.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8854
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You have a set of paranoid beliefs that are simply not grounded in reality. Your description of me is completely off base. Your description of threats to your liberty are complete fantasy.
And your willingness to resort to violence to defend rights that are under no threat from people you imagine are your enemies is, frankly, dangerous.
And unfortunately, not particularly unusual in the American gun culture. You and people like you make me worry about the future of this great nation.
People like you make me fear for the future of freedom in the great nation. My beliefs are not paranoid but rather based in fact and history. My description of you and the threats I perceive in the path you endorse are accurate and supported by years of observation. You can delude yourself if you want but I, and many others, are not deceived at all. It's been said that America can only be destroyed from within.........people like you who would sacrifice liberty and freedom for an imaginary benefit represent that destruction. I don't "imagine" that you and people like you are my enemies......you declared yourselves my enemy when you started attempting to restrict and abrogate my individual rights and freedoms even though I have committed no crime. If you were attacking the individuals who create the violence specifically without infringing on the rights of every law abiding citizen I'd stand shoulder to shoulder with you. When you attempt to punish me for acts I had nothing to do with......prepare for a fight.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8855
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
The term is "majority rule" and I'm not surprised you have disdain for it. Reactionary extremists usually do.
Thank goodness we don't live in a Democracy huh...?

"Reactionary extremists usually do."

So now you are calling women..."Reactionary extremists"...you are calling Blacks..."Reactionary extremists"...you are calling gays..."Reactionary extremists"...you are calling Catholics or any other religion..."Reactionary extremists"....etc...etc. ..etc...

Everyone but you...is a "Reactionary extremists".

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8856
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Versus wrote:
<quoted text>
You've described =>YOURSELF<= PERFECTLY!!!
:-))
Right. Because I'm the one threatening violence here.

Be serious.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8857
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
"I'm crystal clear on my agenda."
I do know when you're proving yourself a liar...again.
So which of these two statements of yours is the lie...?
Statement #1 above....?
or..
Statement #2:
Your post to Squach,#8674, page #395
I'm wrong about my own agenda and I don't know it? So you read minds now?
No, you couldn't, because even I don't know my true agenda, so reading my mind wouldn't reveal it to you.
So you're really just making shit up about me, aren't you?
LOL!
"...even I don't know my true agenda..."
Good thing for you that lying isn’t a crime…you just proved yourself a liar…again.
Your inability to comprehend English does not make me a liar.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8858
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Majority rule is fine in its place but the constitution protects the rights identified therein forbidding the government from infringing whether by majority rule or any other means. The founders created a democratic republic (not a pure democracy) for that very reason. They made sure that our individual rights and freedoms are not subject to the fickle whims of public opinion. I'm not surprised that you have a problem with that, socialist revisionists usually do.
Except the majority isn't denying anybody their 2nd Amendment rights.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8859
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
BS liar;
"Gun use is already controlled as much as it can be..."
Is what I said...and is NOT the same as what YOU said that I said;
“Guns are not regulated as much as they can be. There's no basis in reality to make that claim.”
"Gun use"...is NOT the same as "guns"...is it...?
How about learning to read and comprehend what is written...NOT what you think or want to be there.
When you've been reduced to arguing about semantics, your argument is clearly lost.

Take a breath and start over. Try to be coherent this time.

LOL!

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8860
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
"As long as you continue to draw conclusions about me based on your imagination rather than what I've actually said, you're going to continue to say stupid shit like this."
Really...?...did YOU really just say this after posting the fact that you couldn't read or quote what I actually said and twisted it for your own response...?
"I recommend you try listening to what I actually say for a change."
ROTFLMAO...or what...?
Priceless!!!!
Seriously, start over. You're lost in the weeds.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8861
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Squach wrote:
<quoted text>People like you make me fear for the future of freedom in the great nation. My beliefs are not paranoid but rather based in fact and history. My description of you and the threats I perceive in the path you endorse are accurate and supported by years of observation. You can delude yourself if you want but I, and many others, are not deceived at all. It's been said that America can only be destroyed from within.........people like you who would sacrifice liberty and freedom for an imaginary benefit represent that destruction. I don't "imagine" that you and people like you are my enemies......you declared yourselves my enemy when you started attempting to restrict and abrogate my individual rights and freedoms even though I have committed no crime. If you were attacking the individuals who create the violence specifically without infringing on the rights of every law abiding citizen I'd stand shoulder to shoulder with you. When you attempt to punish me for acts I had nothing to do with......prepare for a fight.
Nobody is restricting your rights. All this bluster is nothing but paranoia. I know you genuinely believe it, but it's based on falsehoods and fearmongering.

You've been duped, Squash. You have an extremist ideology that isn't based on facts or reality. It's based on fear and paranoia. And no matter how STRONGLY you believe it and no matter how utterly convinced you are that it's all true and no matter how many times you repeat it - it's simply not true.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8862
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank goodness we don't live in a Democracy huh...?
"Reactionary extremists usually do."
So now you are calling women..."Reactionary extremists"...you are calling Blacks..."Reactionary extremists"...you are calling gays..."Reactionary extremists"...you are calling Catholics or any other religion..."Reactionary extremists"....etc...etc. ..etc...
Everyone but you...is a "Reactionary extremists".
You're jumping to conclusions that aren't supported by my statements again. These are your words, not mine.

This is your pattern. You take my words, distort the meaning, attribute the distortion to me, then call me a liar.

I guess when the objective facts and the truth isn't' on your side, that's the only way you can continue in the debate. It's just sad that you don't realize how much like a pathetic loser it makes you look.

LOL!
Tray

Pontotoc, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8863
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
But yet we regulate cars, car ownership, and driving.
Just another in a long line of preventable causes of death that the US regulates. There's no rational reason not to also regulate guns, gun ownership, and gun use.
At least no reason for those who care about their fellow citizens dying needlessly.
No we don't. The ONLY regulation of cars or ANY vehicle is for use on government roads. ANYONE can own a car even drunks and felons. ANYONE can operate a car in any way they they want EXCEPT government roads. Come to the dunes in Baja and you will see many HOMEBUILT vehicles under NO regulation at all, and most areas are government owned but as long as you stay off government roads there is no issue. EVEN the regulation on roads of cars is for the safety of the operator (which I stated before I'm all for better made guns) but no law regulates the use of the car's ability to break those laws. Cars are not limited to speed or ability to kill at the owners whim or be used as a weapon. There is no background check or limitation prior to purchasing a car. Your claim was cars are not used to commit crimes yet that was proven to be a lie so why do you not scream "ban cars"? Be truthful, you only want things banned that you don't like or don't use.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8864
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Tray wrote:
<quoted text> No we don't. The ONLY regulation of cars or ANY vehicle is for use on government roads. ANYONE can own a car even drunks and felons. ANYONE can operate a car in any way they they want EXCEPT government roads. Come to the dunes in Baja and you will see many HOMEBUILT vehicles under NO regulation at all, and most areas are government owned but as long as you stay off government roads there is no issue. EVEN the regulation on roads of cars is for the safety of the operator (which I stated before I'm all for better made guns) but no law regulates the use of the car's ability to break those laws. Cars are not limited to speed or ability to kill at the owners whim or be used as a weapon. There is no background check or limitation prior to purchasing a car. Your claim was cars are not used to commit crimes yet that was proven to be a lie so why do you not scream "ban cars"? Be truthful, you only want things banned that you don't like or don't use.
Fine. You can own any gun you like as long as you don't take it off your property.

Satisfied?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8865
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Except the majority isn't denying anybody their 2nd Amendment rights.
Really? Are you that pathetically blind? Gun control measures are aimed at one thing and one thing only; depriving some (or all) American citizens of their 2nd amendment rights. Because you and your fellow anti-gun advocates are too lazy to go after those who deserve to be deprived, you want to deprive everyone. Every gun control measure ever imagined was meant to deprive somebody of 2nd amendment rights. Plain and pimple. To deny that is pure lunacy born of willful blindness.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8866
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Your inability to comprehend English does not make me a liar.
Your words, in English;

"I'm crystal clear on my agenda."

"...even I don't know my true agenda..."

One of your statements above, in English, is a lie...YOU are a liar...whether you admit it or not.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8867
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
When you've been reduced to arguing about semantics, your argument is clearly lost.
Take a breath and start over. Try to be coherent this time.
LOL!
ROTFLMAO..."semantics "...caught you lying again.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8868
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Seriously, start over. You're lost in the weeds.
That's a funny response when you're taking a pounding...lol

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8869
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody is restricting your rights. All this bluster is nothing but paranoia. I know you genuinely believe it, but it's based on falsehoods and fearmongering.
You've been duped, Squash. You have an extremist ideology that isn't based on facts or reality. It's based on fear and paranoia. And no matter how STRONGLY you believe it and no matter how utterly convinced you are that it's all true and no matter how many times you repeat it - it's simply not true.
BS! Paranoia indicates an unfounded fear or apprehension. There is absolutely nothing unfounded about the apprehension I feel. The anti-gun lobby has a well founded history that completely belies your comment. So this is how you debate? Declare the legitimate concerns of those who oppose your agenda "paranoia" and disregard them? That's dot a debate Danny Boy. That's jut you attempting to declare yourself right in spite of all the facts and evidence. It ain't workin'.......

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8870
Oct 10, 2013
 
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said perjury and false reports to cops aren't crimes. Why are you lying?
I never said murder wasn't against the law. Why are you lying?
I never said child neglect isn't against the law. Why are you lying?
I never said insider trading or cheating on taxes aren't against the law. Why are you lying?
I never said violence and discrimination against minorities aren't against the law. Why are you lying?
You've just told 5 lies. Good thing lying isn't against the law or you'd be in deep shit.
LOL!
I never said that you did say they were not illegal. Why are YOU lying???

Your post..."No, you claimed that the moral issues I identified COULD LEAD to behavior that is against the law, not that those things themselves are against the law.

Because they aren't." (YOUR DENIAL)

Then you tried to blow it off by deflecting away saying that I said something along the lines of "based on", blah blah blah.

I gave you five VERY SPECIFIC examples of where the moral code HAS been codified into law, where you said it hasn't.

The only LIAR here is YOU!
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8871
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You're jumping to conclusions that aren't supported by my statements again. These are your words, not mine.
This is your pattern. You take my words, distort the meaning, attribute the distortion to me, then call me a liar.
I guess when the objective facts and the truth isn't' on your side, that's the only way you can continue in the debate. It's just sad that you don't realize how much like a pathetic loser it makes you look.
LOL!
"The term is "majority rule" and I'm not surprised you have disdain for it. Reactionary extremists usually do."

YOUR words...NOT mine.

All of those I named...women, Blacks, gays, different religons...have ALL had to fight against "majority rule"...you think they had "disdain" against those that were denying them their rights...?

They fought againt "majority rule" and have won because we don't live under "majority rule". We live in a Democratic Republic that has has a Constitution that protects the rights of the minority againt the infringments of "majority rule".

AND...in your words above...they would be "Reactionary extremists"...and I would be proud to stand with any one or all of them against the likes of YOU that apparently supports "majority rule".

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 7,961 - 7,980 of11,018
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••