Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

Mar 29, 2013 Full story: Chambersburg Public Opinion 11,004

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Full Story

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8831 Oct 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, prove it.
I supported my claim. Now you do the same.
Can you?
Will you even try?
LOL!
You didn't support a damn thing. In fact, I refuted what you claimed with specific examples.

You are definitely a legend on your own mind.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8832 Oct 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
My agenda is moderate and centrist. You're so far right that Genghist Khan looks liberal to you. LOL!
LMAO!!! Not when it comes to gun control, you are not.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8833 Oct 9, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't support a damn thing. In fact, I refuted what you claimed with specific examples.
You are definitely a legend on your own mind.
No, you claimed that the moral issues I identified COULD LEAD to behavior that is against the law, not that those things themselves are against the law.

Because they aren't.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8834 Oct 9, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO!!! Not when it comes to gun control, you are not.
I absolutely am. I am right in the center of American public opinion on the issue.
MC Hammer

Chambersburg, PA

#8835 Oct 9, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
really tard.... show where they went away...I can see where they added severe restrictions to all concealed weapons, no where did I see them go away...except on your fantasy world...
Idiot...How about you Google Chicago is to allow conceal carry. Also look at PA adding the Castle Doctrine within the past 3 yrs. Also look at Colorado repeal over 2nd Amendment fight. Have you been living in a cave?

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8836 Oct 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you claimed that the moral issues I identified COULD LEAD to behavior that is against the law, not that those things themselves are against the law.
Because they aren't.
Lying.....against the law (gave 2 specific example).
Murder....against the law (goes without saying).
Neglect....against the law.(gave specific example).
Greed/Selfishness....against the law (gave specific example).
Hatred/Discrimination....again st the law (gave general example).

Try again, Danny Boy.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8837 Oct 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I absolutely am. I am right in the center of American public opinion on the issue.
BS. You parrot the same mantra as every other uber-left, Socialist gun grabber out there....with enthusiam.

Centrist? LMAO!!!!!!!!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8840 Oct 9, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Lying.....against the law (gave 2 specific example).
Murder....against the law (goes without saying).
Neglect....against the law.(gave specific example).
Greed/Selfishness....against the law (gave specific example).
Hatred/Discrimination....again st the law (gave general example).
Try again, Danny Boy.
I never said perjury and false reports to cops aren't crimes. Why are you lying?

I never said murder wasn't against the law. Why are you lying?

I never said child neglect isn't against the law. Why are you lying?

I never said insider trading or cheating on taxes aren't against the law. Why are you lying?

I never said violence and discrimination against minorities aren't against the law. Why are you lying?

You've just told 5 lies. Good thing lying isn't against the law or you'd be in deep shit.

LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8841 Oct 9, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
BS. You parrot the same mantra as every other uber-left, Socialist gun grabber out there....with enthusiam.
Centrist? LMAO!!!!!!!!
No I don't. I have suggested moderate, centrist ideas to reduce gun violence that are supported by the majority of American citizens.

When your agenda is right in the center of public opinion, you are (or in this case, I am) by definition a centrist.

But from way out there on the righting extremist fringe, you simply don't have the perspective to make an accurate assessment of where the center is. You are light years away from it - you can't even see it from out there.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8842 Oct 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Still dreaming I see.
Come back when you wake up.
LOL!
I'm wide awake and right. Laugh all you like Danny Boy, the jokes' on you.

I know that, being a leftist liberal and all, you don't want to admit that decades of your "feel good" policies have populated our streets with repeat violent offenders and the mentally unstable (not to mention all of the illegal alien criminals you liberals love so much) who should all be in institutions but complete denial isn't going to solve that problem. You'd rather focus on restricting and abrogating my rights and freedoms even though I've committed no crime. You're the one dreaming if you think that's going to happen without a fight. I'm willing to fight and die for the constitution as it was written and intended. I've laid my life on the line for it before and I have no problem with doing it again but I wouldn't waste the time it would take to spit on your revisionist version.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8843 Oct 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, prove it.
I supported my claim. Now you do the same.
He is incapable of admitting wrong.

Even after you proved him wrong.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8844 Oct 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I absolutely am. I am right in the center of American public opinion on the issue.
It's a good thing that the constitution protects our individual rights and freedoms from public opinion and mob rule, isn't it?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8845 Oct 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said perjury and false reports to cops aren't crimes. Why are you lying?
It's what he does when you prove him wrong.

There doesn't have to be any connection to what you just refuted either.

It's amazing but not surprising.

He is also fond of insisting you said something you didn't say and as proof, he will give you three words and tie them to another three words and insist it's a quote.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8846 Oct 9, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>It's a good thing that the constitution protects our individual rights and freedoms from public opinion and mob rule, isn't it?
The term is "majority rule" and I'm not surprised you have disdain for it. Reactionary extremists usually do.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8847 Oct 9, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>I'm wide awake and right. Laugh all you like Danny Boy, the jokes' on you.
I know that, being a leftist liberal and all, you don't want to admit that decades of your "feel good" policies have populated our streets with repeat violent offenders and the mentally unstable (not to mention all of the illegal alien criminals you liberals love so much) who should all be in institutions but complete denial isn't going to solve that problem. You'd rather focus on restricting and abrogating my rights and freedoms even though I've committed no crime. You're the one dreaming if you think that's going to happen without a fight. I'm willing to fight and die for the constitution as it was written and intended. I've laid my life on the line for it before and I have no problem with doing it again but I wouldn't waste the time it would take to spit on your revisionist version.
You have a set of paranoid beliefs that are simply not grounded in reality. Your description of me is completely off base. Your description of threats to your liberty are complete fantasy.

And your willingness to resort to violence to defend rights that are under no threat from people you imagine are your enemies is, frankly, dangerous.

And unfortunately, not particularly unusual in the American gun culture. You and people like you make me worry about the future of this great nation.
Versus

London, UK

#8848 Oct 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You have a set of paranoid beliefs that are simply not grounded in reality. Your description of me is completely off base. Your description of threats to your liberty are complete fantasy.
And your willingness to resort to violence to defend rights that are under no threat from people you imagine are your enemies is, frankly, dangerous.
And unfortunately, not particularly unusual in the American gun culture. You and people like you make me worry about the future of this great nation.
You've described =>YOURSELF<= PERFECTLY!!!

:-))
Marauder

Fairbanks, AK

#8849 Oct 10, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm crystal clear on my agenda. It's you who don't have any idea what it is. You've fabricated an agenda for me out of whole cloth and continue to argue with it rather than with what I've actually proposed.
And I can't help you with your thought disorder. I've plainly explained what I meant. Your decision to ignore it in favor of your imagined meaning is just another symptom of your disorder.
"I'm crystal clear on my agenda."

I do know when you're proving yourself a liar...again.

So which of these two statements of yours is the lie...?

Statement #1 above....?

or..

Statement #2:

Your post to Squach,#8674, page #395

I'm wrong about my own agenda and I don't know it? So you read minds now?

No, you couldn't, because even I don't know my true agenda, so reading my mind wouldn't reveal it to you.

So you're really just making shit up about me, aren't you?

LOL!

"...even I don't know my true agenda..."

Good thing for you that lying isn’t a crime…you just proved yourself a liar…again.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8850 Oct 10, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
The term is "majority rule" and I'm not surprised you have disdain for it. Reactionary extremists usually do.
Majority rule is fine in its place but the constitution protects the rights identified therein forbidding the government from infringing whether by majority rule or any other means. The founders created a democratic republic (not a pure democracy) for that very reason. They made sure that our individual rights and freedoms are not subject to the fickle whims of public opinion. I'm not surprised that you have a problem with that, socialist revisionists usually do.
Marauder

Valdez, AK

#8851 Oct 10, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course you did.
<quoted text>
BS liar;

"Gun use is already controlled as much as it can be..."

Is what I said...and is NOT the same as what YOU said that I said;

“Guns are not regulated as much as they can be. There's no basis in reality to make that claim.”

"Gun use"...is NOT the same as "guns"...is it...?

How about learning to read and comprehend what is written...NOT what you think or want to be there.
Marauder

Valdez, AK

#8852 Oct 10, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! More of your vivid imagination at work - thinking I was somehow disparaging military service.
As long as you continue to draw conclusions about me based on your imagination rather than what I've actually said, you're going to continue to say stupid shit like this. I recommend you try listening to what I actually say for a change.
"As long as you continue to draw conclusions about me based on your imagination rather than what I've actually said, you're going to continue to say stupid shit like this."

Really...?...did YOU really just say this after posting the fact that you couldn't read or quote what I actually said and twisted it for your own response...?

"I recommend you try listening to what I actually say for a change."

ROTFLMAO...or what...?

Priceless!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Secret Service Panel: Build Bigger Fence Around... Dec 19 Sunshine 2
Street Artist SABO Blasts Lena Dunham, Bill Cli... Dec 8 Anonymous 1
Guard fired after Obama visit: I'm not a convict Nov '14 SirPrize 6
Gainer Mooted as Next Secret Service Director Nov '14 Le Jimbo 21
Police: Obama faced threats during Indiana visit Oct '14 nightcruiser49 1
Secret Service director faces grilling over sec... Oct '14 Mr Johnson 120
Another Secret Service SNAFU: Fake congressman ... Oct '14 Bama Yankee 1
More from around the web