Why would you think a logical conclusion based on your expressed position and previous posts would be "illogical"...?<quoted text>
LOL Oh, I see why you're confused. You leaped to the illogical conclusion that my DESCRIPTION of the necessary components to drunk driving (a drunk, a car) was advocating for confiscating cars.
Your thinking and reasoning handicap got the better of you again, didn't it? So sad.
No, I only meant that without a car involved, it can't be drunk driving. I wasn't prescribing a solution. I was describing the situation.
As I've already explained. In terms any person whose mind isn't clouded with irrational paranoia could understand.
Oh wait, I know the answer to this one...because you don't have any idea what your agenda is...right..?
You don't have a clue as to what you want to recommend in regards to guns, gun ownership or gun use.
Only that if a gun wasn't available...gun crime wouldn't exist...right..?
So basically, when you make the same comments in regards to guns...you aren't