Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10984 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8429 Oct 4, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
"academics always couch there conclusions in conditional language because they have enough education and intelligence to know that our cumulative understanding of history is still incomplete.
They also know that our conclusions about history is always tentative because pretty much everything we know still only gives us "strong reason to believe" since the eyewitnesses aren't here to tell us."
And yet...after YOU saying all that and I must presume understand it, YOU make the "black-and-white" comment that this opinion papper is an "inconvenient fact of history".
"You simply don't have the intellect or education to get how ignorant and misinformed this post (which, in your ignorant arrogance you posted TWICE!) makes you look."
Really...?...I'm not the one calling someone's opinion a "fact of history". Do you realize how ignorant and misinformed this shows you to be...?
*sigh*

Something can be a fact yet academics will still use conditional language. Global warming is a fact, yet climate scientists still make statements based on likelihoods. Evolution is a fact, yet scientists still talk in terms of theory.

Keep flailing son. It just shows how desperately ignorant you are.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8430 Oct 4, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Well we both know that isn't happening.
Only you believe it's not happening. LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8431 Oct 4, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
So where are your Supreme Court cases that support the "collective" right argument...?...I asked you that before and you baulked...having problems finding any...?
Really?

Reading comprehension REALLY isn't your thing.

LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8432 Oct 4, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>I have a very clear understanding of American History and the process by which our government was created. Quite obviously much deeper than yours. I've come to recognize this as your M.O. when you can't logically and factually respond. You denigrate others as ignorant and declare yourself some kind of victor. It ain't workin'. You and the leftist liberals are the ones pushing for "revisions" to fit your "revisionist history". Try again.....
I'm sure you honestly believe this.

LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8433 Oct 4, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
"Please do try to be honest."
>Snicker<
You both could heed that advice. I mean, you're not even TRYING to be honest. You're just mindlessly regurgitating the wingnut propaganda you've been spoon-fed and can't be bothered to consider the facts when they're presented to you.

There's no dupe like a willing dupe, son. Hell, you're not just willing - you're positively EAGER.

LOL!

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8435 Oct 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, but your inaccurate inference from the quote I posted does not make me dishonest.
There was nothing inaccurate about my "inference". You know it as well as I do.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8437 Oct 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure you honestly believe this.
LOL!
Yep. I'm sure you desperately wish it wasn't true. LMAO!!!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8438 Oct 4, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>There was nothing inaccurate about my "inference". You know it as well as I do.
Sorry, I implied no such thing. Don't blame me for your faulty reasoning.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8439 Oct 4, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Yep. I'm sure you desperately wish it wasn't true. LMAO!!!
I don't HAVE to wish for that. Just like I don't have to wish water was wet or ice was cold.

LMAO!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8450 Oct 4, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
Oh yeah, because you and your ilk don't know what the hell you are talking about.
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
By the way - nice unprovoked insult.
Why can't you pro-gun folks be civil?
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Not an insult.....an observation backed by several years on these forums. Sorry if you don't realize it.
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Justify it any way you like, it was an unprovoked insult.
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Take it anyway you want. I6104 really don't give a shit.
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I know.
Because you've chosen to make this discussion rude.
But whatever...your choice.
You set the tone friend. Way back in April.

It's a little late to start crying about it now.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8451 Oct 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
*sigh*
Something can be a fact yet academics will still use conditional language. Global warming is a fact, yet climate scientists still make statements based on likelihoods. Evolution is a fact, yet scientists still talk in terms of theory.
Keep flailing son. It just shows how desperately ignorant you are.
We are talking about YOU...making the claim that the Bogus opinion is a "fact of history".

Kinda funny how that name works out huh...?...lol
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8452 Oct 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
Reading comprehension REALLY isn't your thing.
LOL!
You said;

“For more than a hundred years...the Supreme Court, and the lower courts as well, the amendment conferred on state militias a right to bear arms—but did not give individuals a right to own or carry a weapon.”

So I want YOU to show me where the Supreme Court specifically said what you say it said. The case number, the finding and citation will be just fine.

And in response, you said;

“Then do you want me to prove that water is wet and grass is green. Come on - be serious!”

Reading comprehension REALLY isn't your thing, is it...?

Supreme Court Case...?
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8453 Oct 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You both could heed that advice. I mean, you're not even TRYING to be honest. You're just mindlessly regurgitating the wingnut propaganda you've been spoon-fed and can't be bothered to consider the facts when they're presented to you.
There's no dupe like a willing dupe, son. Hell, you're not just willing - you're positively EAGER.
LOL!
"You're just mindlessly regurgitating the wingnut propaganda you've been spoon-fed..."

Wow...I guess I didn't realize that so many different Supreme Court Justices were "wingnuts".

"...and can't be bothered to consider the facts when they're presented to you."

And what post number was that where you "presented facts"...?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8454 Oct 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, I implied no such thing. Don't blame me for your faulty reasoning.
I'm not, I'm blaming you for being deliberately disingenuous.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8455 Oct 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't HAVE to wish for that. Just like I don't have to wish water was wet or ice was cold.
LMAO!
And true is true. The true meaning of the words in our constitution NOT your interpretation made to fit your revisionist history and your socialistic agenda. Face it Danny Boy, you're the one attempting to revise the constitution to fit your ideology and I'm the one standing firm on the true meaning and intent of the founders. This government was not created to control the people, it was created to be controlled by and to serve the people. I know you desperately wish that wasn't true. But guess what.........true is true.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#8457 Oct 4, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
wow.. another constitutional law expert... you are wasting your time masturbating on this forum.. you should be in front of the supreme court...perhaps blowing them underneath the bench...
governments don't control people?....really...so the laws they create are not to control you right?... WOW... look in the mirror and say "F_U-K-TARD"
Didn't control you with a law against switchblades, did they...? Did you get switchblade permit...?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8458 Oct 4, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
wow.. another constitutional law expert... you are wasting your time masturbating on this forum.. you should be in front of the supreme court...perhaps blowing them underneath the bench...
governments don't control people?....really...so the laws they create are not to control you right?... WOW... look in the mirror and say "F_U-K-TARD"
Wow! A little truth really pisses you off, doesn't it? I hear it's nice in North Korea this time of year, you should check it out. You'll fit right in, enjoy the false security of total BBG control, relieve some of your anxieties, and you'll feel better.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8460 Oct 4, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>But your comment deliberately insinuated that the the only reason for the 2nd amendment was to support slavery.
What a shame it is you insist everyone else is as stupid as you are in your inferences.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8461 Oct 4, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama care provides for mental health... you are covered now....you can even study constitutional law and what governments do while in rehab....in lieu of pumping out fictional alice in wonderland wishes...
Come on comrade, I'll start a collection fund. Bet we can drum up one way air fare for ya. Just think, only the police have guns, there is no constitution, no one outspoken about freedom, you'll love it! North Korea or bust! Send me a post card.....ta-ta

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8462 Oct 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! The stupid is STRONG with this one.
Yes, we share 98% of our DNA with chimpanzees and other apes. But if your high school biology teacher told you that means that we CAME FROM apes, he is guilty of malpractice.
We all know what difficulties you have with quotes, SpoogeSponge: you insist you get to infer something which you then insist is a quote.

Take a high school biology class and this time try to pass.

Humans don't come from chimpanzees, chimpanzees and humans share a common origin.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Secret Service investigating effigy of Presiden... (Jan '10) Wed Trumpenstein bank... 44
News Secret Service relaxes marijuana policy in bid ... Jun 2 RushFan666 6
News Men wanted for allegedly taking over $30K from ... May '17 Belinda 1
US Secret Service Clothes (Sep '06) May '17 nikonnicky 28
News Russian hacker faces decades in prison Apr '17 USA Today 3
News Secret Service: Man planned to kidnap first dog (Jan '16) Apr '17 alina 7
News Oklahoma state senator plans to resign followin... Mar '17 Dakoter 44
More from around the web