that's correct dip$-hit... the supreme court and congress will decide which guns, ammo, and accessories are covered by the constitution....
the point was that controls work.. which is why criminals and mentally sick or average citizen cannot access rocket launchers, grenades, dynamite or C-4 explosives...
yes, I know, if the president approves it, you can....good luck with that argument moron...
"Miller did not hold that and
cannot possibly be read to have held that. The judgment
in the case upheld against a Second Amendment challenge
two mens federal convictions for transporting an unregistered
short-barreled shotgun in interstate commerce, in
violation of the National Firearms Act, 48 Stat. 1236. It is
entirely clear that the Courts basis for saying that the
Second Amendment did not apply was not that the defendants
were bear[ing] arms not for ... military purposes
but for nonmilitary use, post, at 2. Rather, it was that
the type of weapon at issue was not eligible for Second
Amendment protection:In the absence of any evidence
tending to show that the possession or use of a [shortbarreled
shotgun] at this time has some reasonable relationship
to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated
militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.
307 U. S., at 178 (emphasis added).Certainly,
the Court continued,it is not within judicial notice that
this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment
or that its use could contribute to the common defense.
Looks to me like the court already addressed that by this comment. It also shows support for the protection of those nasty, black so called "assault rifles"...you know, those AR-15 variations and their standard 30 rnd magazines.