Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

Mar 29, 2013 Full story: Chambersburg Public Opinion 11,004

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Full Story

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8187 Oct 1, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Like it would really stop at background checks. You gun control advocates always try to set some kind of "harmless and reasonable" precedent with the NEXT infringement already in mind. Then cry foul when those who defend their rights and freedoms don't fall for the diversion. Try again.......fool.
The slippery slope argument is a logical fallacy. It is designed to persuade through fear rather than through facts or logic.
MC Hammer

Chambersburg, PA

#8188 Oct 1, 2013
I sell hammers to everyone without a background check. Kids, adults, murderers, thieves and anyone who has the cash to buy one and as many as they like. One day the liberal dumbasses might figure out that my hammers kill more people then "Assult Rifles and Shot Guns". Please don't tell them, I'll post it here because they can't read to know what I'm saying.
FBI: Hammers, Clubs Kill More People Than Rifles, Shotguns
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/01/03/fbi...
MC Hammer

Chambersburg, PA

#8189 Oct 1, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Like suggesting that you shouldn't be allowed to sell deadly weapons to complete strangers when you could take ten minutes and check if he or she is a felon.
LOL..."Complete strangers"... Moron here is suggesting that you should get to know your customer by taking them out to dinner and a movie and befriend them for weeks before you decide that if they are a worthy customer for you to sell them a gun...Hahahahaha...I bet he would also want you to meet their parents before you go into this committed relationship...(This is why the leftist monkeys should have their nuts cut off; to keep them from breeding other dumbasses).

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8190 Oct 1, 2013
MC Hammer wrote:
I sell hammers to everyone without a background check. Kids, adults, murderers, thieves and anyone who has the cash to buy one and as many as they like. One day the liberal dumbasses might figure out that my hammers kill more people then "Assult Rifles and Shot Guns". Please don't tell them, I'll post it here because they can't read to know what I'm saying.
FBI: Hammers, Clubs Kill More People Than Rifles, Shotguns
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/01/03/fbi...
LOL! What an utterly meaningless comparison.

----------

"Annual FBI crime statistics show that more people are killed with clubs and hammers each year than by rifles or shotguns.

In 2011, there were 323 murders committed with a rifle but 496 murders committed with hammers and clubs. There were 356 murders in which a shotgun was the deadly weapon of choice."

----------

Since when is 496 a greater number than 679?

30 people a day are killed with guns. If less than two of them are by rifles and shotguns, what weapon kills the other 6?(Let's see if you can figure out the answer to that one)
wow

Santa Fe, NM

#8192 Oct 1, 2013
MC Hammer wrote:
/
funny math

In 2011, there were 323 murders committed with a rifle but 496 murders committed with hammers and clubs. There were 356 murders in which a shotgun was the deadly weapon of choice.

rifles & shotguns = 679
hammers and clubs = 496

I guess they forgot to add in the other guns, too. Or any deaths caused by trying to use a gun as a hammer.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8193 Oct 1, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Claiming that guns aren't relevant in a discussion of gun violence is like saying the cars aren't relevant is a discussion of drunk driving. It's the kind of thing you say when you're trying to avoid an honest discussion of the issue.
There is no such thing as "feel good policies that let people escape responsibility for their actions." We punish people in this nation for crime and lock them up when they are a danger to society. We have the largest prison population in the developed world. The claim that gun violence is caused by lack of punishment for criminals is patently false and is nothing more than a tactic to avoid honest discussion of the issue.
There you go again, attempting to tell me what I said. I didn't say the guns "aren't relevant" I said that they are not THE problem. Please try to at least be honest.

Of course as one of the supporters of those "feel good" policies that have so many repeat offenders roaming our streets you would love to deny their existence. Stop locking people up for stupid victimless crimes and make room for the killers. Build more prisons because our prison population isn't nearly high enough judging by the criminals running loose out there. Instead of making some effort to remedy the REAL problem you'd rather take an obtuse, round-a-bout approach and legislate against people who abide by the law and don't commit violent crimes. Go figure...

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8194 Oct 1, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
The slippery slope argument is a logical fallacy. It is designed to persuade through fear rather than through facts or logic.
Sorry Danny Boy but it is not a philosophy, it is an historical fact and the progression is extremely obvious. Facts are that the anti gun lobby NEVER stops attempting to abrogate the 2nd amendment and every success, no matter how minor or harmless seeming, is another step in the direction of the ultimate goal.........total disarmament of the American people. No matter how many laws they get enacted........they will be right back with a new and more restrictive one. They will continue this until there is a total firearms ban and we become a police state.
yes

Santa Fe, NM

#8195 Oct 1, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Like it would really stop at background checks. You gun control advocates always try to set some kind of "harmless and reasonable" precedent with the NEXT infringement already in mind. Then cry foul when those who defend their rights and freedoms don't fall for the diversion. Try again.......fool.
you are paranoid. Deflect from the issues by talking about mental illness and felons, but oppose doing anything.
MC Hammer

Chambersburg, PA

#8196 Oct 1, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! What an utterly meaningless comparison.
----------
"Annual FBI crime statistics show that more people are killed with clubs and hammers each year than by rifles or shotguns.
In 2011, there were 323 murders committed with a rifle but 496 murders committed with hammers and clubs. There were 356 murders in which a shotgun was the deadly weapon of choice."
----------
Since when is 496 a greater number than 679?
30 people a day are killed with guns. If less than two of them are by rifles and shotguns, what weapon kills the other 6?(Let's see if you can figure out the answer to that one)
HAHAHAAA....See I knew you dumbasses couldn't read. Here I'll post it for someone to read to you.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in...

Expanded Homicide Data Table 8
Murder Victims
by Weapon, 20082012

Blunt objects (clubs, hammers, etc.) 2012 = 518

Rifles 2012 = 322

Shotguns 2012 = 303

HAMMERS AND CLUBS BEAT ALL RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS SINCE 2008.

Not only can you not read but you are also dishonest. How about you leave the numbers to someone else.

Keep making it easy.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8198 Oct 1, 2013
MC Hammer wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHAAA....See I knew you dumbasses couldn't read. Here I'll post it for someone to read to you.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in...
Expanded Homicide Data Table 8
Murder Victims
by Weapon, 20082012
Blunt objects (clubs, hammers, etc.) 2012 = 518
Rifles 2012 = 322
Shotguns 2012 = 303
HAMMERS AND CLUBS BEAT ALL RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS SINCE 2008.
Not only can you not read but you are also dishonest. How about you leave the numbers to someone else.
Keep making it easy.
LOL! It's funny when you embarrass yourself like this.

"ALL RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS" = 625
All blunt objects = 518

Only in wingnut land is 518 a larger number than 625.

Not only can't you read, but you can't do math. How about you leave the numbers to someone else.

Who's the dumbass? YOU ARE! LMAO!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8199 Oct 1, 2013
MC Hammer wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHAAA....See I knew you dumbasses couldn't read. Here I'll post it for someone to read to you.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in...
Expanded Homicide Data Table 8
Murder Victims
by Weapon, 20082012
Blunt objects (clubs, hammers, etc.) 2012 = 518
Rifles 2012 = 322
Shotguns 2012 = 303
HAMMERS AND CLUBS BEAT ALL RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS SINCE 2008.
Not only can you not read but you are also dishonest. How about you leave the numbers to someone else.
Keep making it easy.
BTW - I'll ask you again. See if you can answer correctly this time.

Total firearm homicides = 8,653
All rifles and shotguns = 625

How did all those other firearm homicides happen?

Also:
Which number is bigger? 8,653 or 518?

Dumbass.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8200 Oct 1, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry Danny Boy but it is not a philosophy, it is an historical fact and the progression is extremely obvious. Facts are that the anti gun lobby NEVER stops attempting to abrogate the 2nd amendment and every success, no matter how minor or harmless seeming, is another step in the direction of the ultimate goal.........total disarmament of the American people. No matter how many laws they get enacted........they will be right back with a new and more restrictive one. They will continue this until there is a total firearms ban and we become a police state.
LOL! Only in wingnut land are baseless predictions about the future called "facts."

Sorry but your irrational paranoia doesn't make your illogical opinions and beliefs "facts," no matter how strongly you believe them.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8201 Oct 1, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>There you go again, attempting to tell me what I said. I didn't say the guns "aren't relevant" I said that they are not THE problem. Please try to at least be honest.
Of course as one of the supporters of those "feel good" policies that have so many repeat offenders roaming our streets you would love to deny their existence. Stop locking people up for stupid victimless crimes and make room for the killers. Build more prisons because our prison population isn't nearly high enough judging by the criminals running loose out there. Instead of making some effort to remedy the REAL problem you'd rather take an obtuse, round-a-bout approach and legislate against people who abide by the law and don't commit violent crimes. Go figure...
They're not the problem.

They're irrelevant.

Two sentences saying the same thing.

And my preference is to prevent the killings in the first place, not lock killers up after the fact.

For a conservative, you sure do love spending taxpayers' money. How much does an average state pen cost these days? Half a billion dollars. And how much does our state prison cost taxpayers to maintain every year? 39 billion.

How much money do you want to throw at this problem AFTER 30 people are killed every day? Why wouldn't you want to take reasonable measures to reduce the number of dead as well as the cost to maintain the killers?

Do you know the definition of "spendthrift?" LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8202 Oct 1, 2013
Buck Fiden wrote:
<quoted text>It will remain as long as you keep your ears closed.
Yeah, I have no idea what you're talking about.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8205 Oct 1, 2013
yes wrote:
<quoted text>
you are paranoid. Deflect from the issues by talking about mental illness and felons, but oppose doing anything.
No, you fidiot, I am focusing on the issue which is the criminals and psychos out there you've left running free to kill innocent people. YOU and your pals are the ones who think legislating against and inanimate object will change something while leaving the root of the problem free to continue the crime and violence. LMAO! Man, have you been sold a bill of defective goods! LMAO!!

I do not oppose doing "anything". I oppose doing what YOU leftist socialists want to do. I support any law that cracks down on criminals and/or deals with the mentally ill that doesn't restrict, regulate, or abrogate the rights and freedoms of the law abiding.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8206 Oct 1, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
They're not the problem.
They're irrelevant.
Two sentences saying the same thing.
And my preference is to prevent the killings in the first place, not lock killers up after the fact.
For a conservative, you sure do love spending taxpayers' money. How much does an average state pen cost these days? Half a billion dollars. And how much does our state prison cost taxpayers to maintain every year? 39 billion.
How much money do you want to throw at this problem AFTER 30 people are killed every day? Why wouldn't you want to take reasonable measures to reduce the number of dead as well as the cost to maintain the killers?
Do you know the definition of "spendthrift?" LOL!
"Not the problem" and "not relevant" are not the same thing to anyone but you. If a killer uses a tool to kill someone the tool is relevant but the killer is the problem. Clear enough for ya?

If you want to stop the killing before it happens.........don't put that repeat violent offender back on the street again. Anything else is just staring into a crystal ball and peddling BS.

How much are the lives lost at Sandy Hook and the other mass shootings worth? Stop spending money on illegal aliens who should be deported, stop spending money on a welfare system that is nothing more than a big give-away, and start spending money on cleaning up our streets. There are millions of welfare frauds and illegal aliens living in this country at the tax payers expense. Eliminate all of that and spend the money on criminal/psycho control. It ain't rocket science.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8209 Oct 1, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
no gun access, no one dead.. simple
Timothy McVeigh didn't use a gun......over 168 dead.
Nineteen hijackers on 9/11/01 didn't use guns..........almost 2,977 dead.

You were saying???

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#8210 Oct 1, 2013
correction: 168 dead and 2,077 dead, respectively (not "over" or "almost")

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8212 Oct 1, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Timothy McVeigh didn't use a gun......over 168 dead.
Nineteen hijackers on 9/11/01 didn't use guns..........almost 2,977 dead.
You were saying???
He may have been saying that after the OK bombing we regulated access to ammonium nitrate, but after somebody murdering a dozens of first graders we do nothing.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#8213 Oct 1, 2013
Buck Fiden wrote:
<quoted text>And you do? Not hardly, little runt.
ROFLMAO!

You're positively defining the meaning of "dumbass."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Secret Service Panel: Build Bigger Fence Around... Fri Sunshine 2
Street Artist SABO Blasts Lena Dunham, Bill Cli... Dec 8 Anonymous 1
Guard fired after Obama visit: I'm not a convict Nov '14 SirPrize 6
Gainer Mooted as Next Secret Service Director Nov '14 Le Jimbo 25
Police: Obama faced threats during Indiana visit Oct '14 nightcruiser49 1
Secret Service director faces grilling over sec... Oct '14 Mr Johnson 139
Another Secret Service SNAFU: Fake congressman ... Oct '14 Bama Yankee 1
More from around the web