Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10987 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6873 Sep 14, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>In that case the law should be 17, the minimum age for service in the military and also the minimum age for militia service. Seems logical to me.
Another good point.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6874 Sep 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do not have the right to sell deadly weapons to any Tom DICK or Harry that staggers into your garage sale, dooshbag.
Really?
How you intend to stop him?
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6875 Sep 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Especially when DOOSHBAGS like yourself are all to willing to sell them to them, eh?
The speed limit on the freeway here is 70 MPH. There will always be people disregard it.
Why have any laws at all, dooshbag?
Ninety percent of Americans want required background checks.
Nine percent of Americans are felons.
Felons don't want background checks...
75 MPH elsewhere.

Correction #1 - 90% is incorrect. You lump all the "positive" responses into one and imply what is not factual.

Correction #2 - Nine percent of Americans are CONVICTED felons. There are many more felons out there. If that were not true, there would be no such thing as a "most wanted" list.

Oh my, you made ONE true statement. "Felons don't want background checks..."
Addendum #1 - Felons AVOID background checks, and so do criminals that are not felons.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#6876 Sep 14, 2013
Damn! Something really stinks! Oh, it's just that foul smelling, mangy, toothless old guard dog again. They should at least fine Danny Boy for letting the nasty old cur run loose.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6877 Sep 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess then 18 year olds should be allowed to drink, eh?
If we send them into the teeth of war as adults at 18, to defend our rights and freedoms, then YES by God, they should be also be granted any and all other "benefits" of adulthood. They've earned it.
They are not 18 year old "children" as the Trayvonites proclaim.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#6878 Sep 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you would, you lying sack of [email protected]
Hasn't happened yet in the almost 50 years I have been on this planet, so it's nothing more than Pure PROJECTION on your part. PERIOD.

Ans still waiting on you to provide the law that says I can't.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#6879 Sep 14, 2013
And

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#6880 Sep 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
How many do you want to see, StickyLips?
I'll let you off easy....show me just one.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#6881 Sep 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, he his assertion is wrong.
"a little off" is gun gnutter for: he was wrong.
Anything else, dear?
Do you want to pretend the ammo can't be used by police and Home Security, too?
The federal govt does NOT purchase ammo for LOCAL law enforcement, dumbass. Try again.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6882 Sep 14, 2013
AnswersRus wrote:
I vividly recall the fight to get the legal age lowered to 18 since 18 year old citizens were being shipped out to die in Nam at that age.
Nineteen, actually. For the most part, as far as the draft was concerned.

Na na na na nineteen, nineteen, nineteen.
Na na na na nineteen, nineteen, nineteen.

And usually black, since whites had fewer problems getting into college or had political connections to get them into the National guard.

Or access to doctors who could point to ass pimples like those sported by your pal Rush Limpballs.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6883 Sep 14, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
The federal govt does NOT purchase ammo for LOCAL law enforcement, dumbass. Try again.
I am responsible for what I say, not for what you have to make up to try to make your point, SpoogeSponge.

PS: Fed police are police.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6884 Sep 14, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Hasn't happened yet in the almost 50 years I have been on this planet, so
So what?

Adam Lanza NEVER shot anyone for the first twenty years of his life.

If you never sell a firearm, then ANY restriction on selling firearms has NO restriction on you, SpoogeSponge.

Ninety percent of Americans understand why there should be background checks on all sales because of dumbazzes like yourself who'd sell them to any Tom DICK or Harry that staggers into their garage sale.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6885 Sep 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, he his assertion is wrong.
"a little off" is gun gnutter for: he was wrong.
Anything else, dear?
Do you want to pretend the ammo can't be used by police and Home Security, too?
I asserted that the feds are buying up civilian ammo.
I am correct.
Home Security? Seems to me that the point was that DHS is buying it Mr. Foot.
D -epartment
H -omeland
S -ecurity

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6886 Sep 14, 2013
AnswersRus wrote:
<quoted text>
75 MPH elsewhere.
And 55. and 65. and 80.

You aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer, bigot.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6887 Sep 14, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
Ans still waiting on you to provide the law that says I can't.
Still waiting for you to put something on the table when I do, but I've done that several times before and we both know that you a a big m/f c/s lying b*h that likes to run his sticky mouth and never back it up.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6888 Sep 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Nineteen, actually. For the most part, as far as the draft was concerned.
Na na na na nineteen, nineteen, nineteen.
Na na na na nineteen, nineteen, nineteen.
And usually black, since whites had fewer problems getting into college or had political connections to get them into the National guard.
Or access to doctors who could point to ass pimples like those sported by your pal Rush Limpballs.
Incorrect.
The age was 18, the argument was for adulthood status at 18. The drinking age was lowered to 18, just like I said.
I was there Mr. Foot. I know how old we were when our draft cards were issued and the lottery was held.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6889 Sep 14, 2013
AnswersRus wrote:
<quoted text>
75 MPH elsewhere.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
And 55. and 65. and 80.
You aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer, bigot.
And 60, and 45, and any other MPH as conditions dictate.
Show me the words in my post that says it is only 75 MPH elsewhere Mr. Foot. You said it was 70 MPH in your area. I simply said it is 75 MPH in mine.

Sharpen your own knife Mr. Foot.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6890 Sep 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Still waiting for you to put something on the table when I do, but I've done that several times before and we both know that you a a big m/f c/s lying b*h that likes to run his sticky mouth and never back it up.
He did Mr. Foot. He challenged you to post the law that proves your claim.
You can't. It does not exist.
Then you pull your classic name calling acronyms nonsense when you get stuck on a call.
Entertaining.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6891 Sep 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am responsible for what I say, not for what you have to make up to try to make your point, SpoogeSponge.
PS: Fed police are police.
"PS: Fed police are police."
That may be true, your claim however implied that the local police are feds. They are not.
Your direct claim was that the feds supply local police with ammo. That is incorrect.

Hone your literary knife Mr. Foote, You're cutting yourself up rather nastily this morning.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6892 Sep 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
So what?
Adam Lanza NEVER shot anyone for the first twenty years of his life.
If you never sell a firearm, then ANY restriction on selling firearms has NO restriction on you, SpoogeSponge.
Ninety percent of Americans understand why there should be background checks on all sales because of dumbazzes like yourself who'd sell them to any Tom DICK or Harry that staggers into their garage sale.
It is impossible to enforce on every sale. Your mission is a fool's errand Mr. Foot.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
George Soros Dec 30 Easy123 1
News Heavy security at Trump Tower not going away an... Dec '16 blushing violet 28
News Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump sp... Nov '16 RushFan666 30
News Russian man convicted of hacking into US busine... Aug '16 Mizike67 5
News Russian man faces US trial in lucrative hacking... Aug '16 Nu Wor Order 4
News Cleveland prepares for RNC convention protests (May '16) May '16 Hostis Publicus 9
News Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offen... (May '16) May '16 Jelly Belly Popcorn 3
More from around the web