Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10984 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

local yocal

Chambersburg, PA

#55 Apr 8, 2013
The grossly ignorant dolt that calls himself Dan the man is unable to comprehend Thomas Jefferson. The other grossly ignorant dolt that calls himself nuggin has to resort to name calling when he has no answer. You are a White conservative that wants to go back to the 1950's. That what the dolt nuggin accuses everyone of when he has no answer. Nuggin can't you come up with something intelligent? Your bud, dan can't figure out what Thomas Jefferson is saying. What we got here are two dolts in a pod.
local yocal

Chambersburg, PA

#56 Apr 8, 2013
Two dolts in a pod is a play on two peas in a pod. Thought i best describe it because the dolts are somewhat clueless. Ya Hoo! Theres danny the dolt and nuggin the nut. YA HOO i sure am funny today.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#57 Apr 8, 2013
local yocal wrote:
The grossly ignorant dolt that calls himself Dan the man is unable to comprehend Thomas Jefferson. The other grossly ignorant dolt that calls himself nuggin has to resort to name calling when he has no answer. You are a White conservative that wants to go back to the 1950's. That what the dolt nuggin accuses everyone of when he has no answer. Nuggin can't you come up with something intelligent? Your bud, dan can't figure out what Thomas Jefferson is saying. What we got here are two dolts in a pod.
So no answer?

I didn't think so.

LOL!

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#58 Apr 8, 2013
Jorge wrote:
It will feel good to angrily gather to denounce proposed federal gun laws and support local lawmakers who want to nullify them.
Unfortunately, after the rally when everyone goes home feeling satisfied with their public display of defiance, the fact will remain that states can't nullify federal laws.
For a finale, you can point your guns at one another's empty heads, and let 'er rip!

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#59 Apr 8, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
How much do you want to bet that there's at least one accidental discharge during this event?
Probably more than one, is they get fully aroused.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#61 Apr 8, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Support for nullifying federal law isn't support for the Constitution since it is unconstitutional.
This gathering is a display of allegiance to a particular INTERPRETATION of the Constitution, not allegiance to the Constitution itself. It's an allegiance to a fetishized version of the 2nd Amendment where any regulation is interpreted as a violation and where people who support reasonable regulation are demonized.
Seconded!

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#62 Apr 8, 2013
GenPatton wrote:
That is you reading, not everyone agrees with it.
Is the Constitution a living document?
Just barely. You guys are beating it to death.
local yocal

Chambersburg, PA

#63 Apr 8, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
So no answer?
I didn't think so.
LOL!
dolty dan, i don't know what your asking me for answers for. I'm just having fun by funnin with you and nuggin. David already answered you, i sure can't help it that you didn't understand his answer. Maybe you should go back and reread it REAL SLOW i think you and nuggins have met up with someone that has more of a brain then the two of you put together and evryone else on these here topix.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#64 Apr 8, 2013
Nerd Rage wrote:
Scalia Suggests ‘Hand-Held Rocket Launchers’ Are Protected Under Second Amendment
Scalia’s across-the-board defense of weapon-carrying laws is not new, having been at the heart of his majority opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller, which protected an individual’s right to possess firearms. However, his nonchalant suggestion that private citizens could legally carry rocket launchers so long as they’re “hand-held” suggests just how willing he is to protect an armed nation.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/07/29/6...
Because shoulder-fired rockets don’t shoot down airplanes (reprise)
Scalia believes the test is your right to own a weapon depends on your ability to carry it — to “bear” it, in other words. There’s no room here for consideration of a weapon’s lethality, dangerousness, or complexity
http://left.mn/2012/12/because-shoulder-fired...
Certain judges, like Scalia, and his handpuppet Thomas, are embarrassments to the Court. They can be no more impartial than Chris Christie can be anorexic.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#65 Apr 8, 2013
Nerd Rage wrote:
<quoted text>
No one on this planet would ever think that you know more about law then Scalia. This is just another example of you being a dumbass. Get a job, lazy pos.
Scalia does know the law, just enough to distort it.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#66 Apr 8, 2013
Just Popn In wrote:
<quoted text>
Please enlighten me as to where I threatend violence. Or, is it the fact that I consider myself to be conservative that you automatically think so...
Then you do see it as a reasonable assumption.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#67 Apr 8, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You left out half the words. Why did you do that?
Didn't you know? David is a well regulated militia unto himself.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#68 Apr 8, 2013
local yocal wrote:
<quoted text>Ya Hoo! Lookee here! We have another grossly ignorant dolt
Quit crying for attention! Your doltishness is duly noted.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#69 Apr 8, 2013
local yocal wrote:
<quoted text>dolty dan, i don't know what your asking me for answers for. I'm just having fun by funnin with you and nuggin. David already answered you, i sure can't help it that you didn't understand his answer. Maybe you should go back and reread it REAL SLOW i think you and nuggins have met up with someone that has more of a brain then the two of you put together and evryone else on these here topix.
I asked YOU the question, dipshit.

Why can't YOU answer?

Nevermind. The reason is obvious. LOL!

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#70 Apr 8, 2013
local yocal wrote:
Two dolts in a pod is a play on two peas in a pod. Thought i best describe it because the dolts are somewhat clueless. Ya Hoo! Theres danny the dolt and nuggin the nut. YA HOO i sure am funny today.
And a big round of "duh" for the "humor" of local yocal! Stay local, my pinheaded friend.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#71 Apr 8, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, educate me. Why do you pro-gun crusaders always omit the first half of the amendment? What are you trying to avoid?
You really should try to keep up with the conversation. The discussion was about restrictions on the government. The part that was quoted is the part that restricts the government from infringing. It isn't a matter of avoidance; it's focusing on the facts. If you weren't just chafing at the bit to play your simpleminded word games you'd be able to understand. Now go ahead and start with your erroneous definition of militia and all the other BS.
local yocal

Chambersburg, PA

#72 Apr 8, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Quit crying for attention! Your doltishness is duly noted.
Well gooollllleeee. I sure am gettin attention.:-) why you even made a point of two posts and dan the dolt paid attention to me to. So who is the real dolt. Surely ain't me. Its the two fools who say i need attention and then GIVE IT TO ME! Now is that dum or what? Dan the dolt is afraid of David thats why he comes after me.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#73 Apr 8, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>You really should try to keep up with the conversation. The discussion was about restrictions on the government. The part that was quoted is the part that restricts the government from infringing. It isn't a matter of avoidance; it's focusing on the facts. If you weren't just chafing at the bit to play your simpleminded word games you'd be able to understand. Now go ahead and start with your erroneous definition of militia and all the other BS.
Squach [sic]! Welcome back!

I'd love to talk, but you still have your head up your ass, so I can't understand a word you're saying.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#74 Apr 8, 2013
local yocal wrote:
<quoted text>Well gooollllleeee. I sure am gettin attention.:-) why you even made a point of two posts and dan the dolt paid attention to me to. So who is the real dolt. Surely ain't me. Its the two fools who say i need attention and then GIVE IT TO ME! Now is that dum or what? Dan the dolt is afraid of David thats why he comes after me.
Still nothing?

My God, you really are an imbecile, aren't you?

LOL!
local yocal

Chambersburg, PA

#75 Apr 8, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Still nothing?
My God, you really are an imbecile, aren't you?
LOL!
just like squach said, you like to play your simple minded word games. I wasn't even talkin to you and you want me to answer a question that David already answered. You are the imbecile. You just didn't understand the answer david gave you so you start on me. I reckon you are trying to divert how dum you looked and tryin to put it on me. You really are a dolt ain't ya. You seem to forget that everyone here has read the posts and probably wonderin the same thing...why is dan asking yocal for an answer? That's cause dan is a dolt. YaHoo! Yippe i a dan is afraid of david ya hoo! Scardy cat dan YA HOO!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Russian hacker faces decades in prison Fri USA Today 3
News Secret Service: Man planned to kidnap first dog (Jan '16) Apr 19 alina 7
News Oklahoma state senator plans to resign followin... Mar '17 Dakoter 44
News Man who drove suspicious car near White House i... Mar '17 RustyS 1
News Secret Service laptop containing Trump Tower ev... Mar '17 Cordwainer Trout 7
News White House intruder was on grounds for 15 minu... Mar '17 Texxy 1
News Poop scooper gets probation for using fake IDs,... Mar '17 CodeTalker 3
More from around the web