Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10987 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#6534 Sep 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! That, my friend, is called Freudian projection.
When you are able to accept that your opinions do not constitute facts, then maybe we can have a serious conversation regarding the poor.
However you appear to prefer childish games and name calling.
YAWN
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#6535 Sep 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
High population areas vote Democratic. How many dying small towns have Republican mayors?
And which area of the country is the poorest? The south. And how do they vote? Republican.
Correlation is not causation, friend. You should have learned that in high school statistics.
High population areas vote Democratic due to the high counts of minorities and welfare recipients. The bread and butter of the Democratic party.

Spin it however you like Dan. At least the voices in your head will agree with you. I'm sure that you learned this long ago.
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#6536 Sep 9, 2013
Oh no ... I used the terms minorities and welfare in the same sentence. I sure hope that Dan will not accuse me of being a racist now. LOL

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#6537 Sep 9, 2013
Gee Danny Boy, that makes three questions you refuse to address. I see a very clear pattern......you're avoiding reality, rationalizing, deflecting, and when all else fails you practice willful blindness and ignore. None of which bring you any closer to the facts.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6538 Sep 9, 2013
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
High population areas vote Democratic due to the high counts of minorities and welfare recipients. The bread and butter of the Democratic party.
Spin it however you like Dan. At least the voices in your head will agree with you. I'm sure that you learned this long ago.
The wealthiest American states and how they vote:

New Hampshire - Blue
Connecticut - Blue
New Jersey - Blue
Maryland - Blue
Alaska - Red
Virginia - Blue
Massachusetts - Blue
Utah - Red
Colorado - Blue
Hawaii - Blue

Gee, anyone see a pattern?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6539 Sep 9, 2013
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
YAWN
You appear to prefer childish games.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6540 Sep 9, 2013
Aphelion wrote:
Oh no ... I used the terms minorities and welfare in the same sentence. I sure hope that Dan will not accuse me of being a racist now. LOL
Are you this disingenuous on purpose or does it just come naturally?
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#6541 Sep 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
The wealthiest American states and how they vote:
New Hampshire - Blue
Connecticut - Blue
New Jersey - Blue
Maryland - Blue
Alaska - Red
Virginia - Blue
Massachusetts - Blue
Utah - Red
Colorado - Blue
Hawaii - Blue
Gee, anyone see a pattern?
Didn't you state:
"Correlation is not causation, friend. You should have learned that in high school statistics. "

I guess we can add hypocrisy to your list.

If you cannot practice what you preach, then your preachings become even more meaningless that first perceived. Good job Dan
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#6542 Sep 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you this disingenuous on purpose or does it just come naturally?
As I stated initially, it appears that childishness is your game of choice. Not surprising, but quite revealing. Keep up the good work

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6543 Sep 9, 2013
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't you state:
"Correlation is not causation, friend. You should have learned that in high school statistics. "
I guess we can add hypocrisy to your list.
If you cannot practice what you preach, then your preachings become even more meaningless that first perceived. Good job Dan
Ahhh, now you suddenly see how meaningless your post was.

Good for you. You CAN learn.

LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6544 Sep 9, 2013
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
As I stated initially, it appears that childishness is your game of choice. Not surprising, but quite revealing. Keep up the good work
YAWN
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6545 Sep 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
No, your claim was that African Americans have been brainwashed to elieve that they can't make it on their own and need the government to take care of them.
...
There is truth.
Embrace it.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6546 Sep 9, 2013
Aphelion wrote:
The Poorest American Cities of 2008 (1-30)
1. Detroit, 33.3% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 52 years
2. Cleveland, 30.5% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 20 years
3. Buffalo, 30.3% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 43 years
4. Newark, 26.1% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 102 years
5. Miami, 25.6% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 52 years
6. Fresno, 25.5% in poverty--Republican Mayor for the last 13 years
7. Cincinnati, 25.1% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 29 years
8. Toledo, 24.7% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 20 years
9. El Paso, 24.3% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 120 years
10. Philadelphia, 24.1% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 57 years
11. Milwaukee, 23.4% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 49 years
12. Memphis, 23.1% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 133 years
13. St. Louis, 22.9% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 60 years
14. Dallas, 22.6% in poverty--Republican Mayor for the last 2 years
14 New Orleans,22.6% in poverty-Democrat Mayor for the last 141 years
16. Atlanta, 22.4% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 130 years
17. Stockton, Calif., 21.6% in poverty--No info available--probably Libs
18. Minneapolis, 21.3% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 35 years
19. Pittsburgh, 21.2% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 21 years
20. Tucson, 20.9% in poverty--No info available--probably Libs
21. Chicago, 20.6% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 78 years
22. Columbus,Ohio 20.1% in poverty-Democrat Mayor for the last 9 years
23. Long Beach, Calif., 19.8% in poverty--No info available--probably Libs
24. Houston, 19.5% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 88 years
25 Los Angeles,19.4% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for "the last 8 years"
26. Baltimore, 19.3% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 42 years
27 San Antonio,19.2% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 38 years
28. Phoenix, 18.9% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 5 years
29. Boston, 18.7% in poverty--Democrat Mayor for the last 79 years
30. Denver, 18.4% in poverty----Democrat Mayor for the last 46 years
Geee anyone see a pattern?
Where is your converse to show the contrast?
What is the national average of poverty percentages?
What is your annual income threshold of poverty?
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#6547 Sep 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you this disingenuous on purpose or does it just come naturally?
Not to mention genius, you may want to review the definition of disingenuous. My statement was not even close ... but then given your propensity to label your opinions as fact its not surprising that you would understand sarcasm.
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#6548 Sep 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahhh, now you suddenly see how meaningless your post was.
Good for you. You CAN learn.
LOL!
No actually I see how meaningless it is to attempt discussion with you.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#6549 Sep 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
No, your claim was that African Americans have been brainwashed to elieve that they can't make it on their own and need the government to take care of them.
That is not only untrue, it is racial stereotyping. My calling it for what it is isn't the same thing at all.
Wrong again, Danny Boy. I did not say all African Americans have been brainwashed. I said it was YOU who has been brainwashed. Nice try, but alas, the shit you are slinging isn't sticking.
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#6550 Sep 9, 2013
That should have been:

"its not surprising that you would not understand sarcasm"

Just to save you (Dan) from some embarrassing childish comment that I am sure would have been coming.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6551 Sep 9, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
The wealthiest American states and how they vote:
New Hampshire - Blue
Connecticut - Blue
New Jersey - Blue
Maryland - Blue
Alaska - Red
Virginia - Blue
Massachusetts - Blue
Utah - Red
Colorado - Blue
Hawaii - Blue
Gee, anyone see a pattern?
What criteria are you using to make that claim? Personal income? Natural resources? What are you using to make that claim of wealth?
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#6552 Sep 9, 2013
AnswersRus wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is your converse to show the contrast?
What is the national average of poverty percentages?
What is your annual income threshold of poverty?
How does the United States measure poverty?
The United States determines the official poverty rate using poverty thresholds that are issued each year by the Census Bureau. The thresholds represent the annual amount of cash income minimally required to support families of various sizes.
The methodology for calculating the thresholds was established in the mid-1960s and has not changed in the intervening years. The thresholds are updated annually to account for inflation.
A family is counted as poor if its pretax money income is below its poverty threshold. Money income does not include noncash benefits such as public housing, Medicaid, employer-provided health insurance and food stamp

How many people were poor in 2010?
In 2010, 15.1 percent of all persons lived in poverty. The poverty rate in 2010 was the highest poverty rate since 1993. Between 1993 and 2000, the poverty rate fell each year, reaching 11.3 percent in 2000.

Poverty guidelines are a simplified version of poverty thresholds and are issued by the Department of Health and Human Services to determine financial eligibility for certain federal programs. For more information on these guidelines, see the 2011 Federal Poverty Guidelines.
http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/11poverty.shtml
&#8195;
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#6553 Sep 9, 2013
AnswersRus wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is your converse to show the contrast?
What is the national average of poverty percentages?
What is your annual income threshold of poverty?
Single Individual
Under 65 years
$ 11,344
65 years & older
$ 10,458
Single Parent
One child
$ 15,030
Two children
$ 17,568
Two Adults
No children
$ 14,602
One child
$ 17,552
Two children
$ 22,113
Three children
$ 26,023

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
George Soros Dec 30 Easy123 1
News Heavy security at Trump Tower not going away an... Dec '16 blushing violet 28
News Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump sp... Nov '16 RushFan666 30
News Russian man convicted of hacking into US busine... Aug '16 Mizike67 5
News Russian man faces US trial in lucrative hacking... Aug '16 Nu Wor Order 4
News Cleveland prepares for RNC convention protests (May '16) May '16 Hostis Publicus 9
News Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offen... (May '16) May '16 Jelly Belly Popcorn 3
More from around the web