Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10986 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6170 Sep 3, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
And your lies are what we have come to expect from you and other "frustrated control freak".
Like I've said many times before - if you find one, show me.

But you never do.

Hmmmm......

LOL!

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#6171 Sep 4, 2013
Has anyone offered a reasonable and intelligent answer to the question of how gun control measures are going to have any impact at all on the lawless who obtain their guns illegally now and will continue to do so despite any more gun control laws? There's only one correct answer and the gun control advocates don't want acknowledge it.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#6172 Sep 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I've said many times before - if you find one, show me.
But you never do.
Hmmmm......
LOL!
Many, many have been found and you just retreat behind your wall of complete denial. Your MO is plainly obvious to everyone but you.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6173 Sep 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I already know the answer. I was just hoping you had enough integrity to be honest.
I do have integrity, but I wonder what honest answer would that be which you assume and expect of me? That all liberals look alike to me?
I thought one of the answers on the answer sheet would be sure to make you happy. Silly me.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6174 Sep 4, 2013
Squach wrote:
Has anyone offered a reasonable and intelligent answer to the question of how gun control measures are going to have any impact at all on the lawless who obtain their guns illegally now and will continue to do so despite any more gun control laws? There's only one correct answer and the gun control advocates don't want acknowledge it.
Funny how the liberals who control our wildlands and forests know that the best way to fight fire is with fire, but they falter and abandon their beliefs when it comes to other forms of fire. Could it be that they do not wish to put this particular fire out? Could it be that they have adopted a "let it burn" policy on this firearms issue? Could it be that they plan to burn down certain segments of the population to clear ground for their planned replant of a different variety of populace? Is it possible that the powers that currently be, know full well that this approach will fail to meet their stated goals, because their real goals are still hidden?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6175 Sep 4, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Many, many have been found and you just retreat behind your wall of complete denial. Your MO is plainly obvious to everyone but you.
I only deny what isn't true. Every accusation of lying has been either a twisted distortion of what I actually said or has been an unintentional mistake I've made. Not a single instance of an actual lie - ever.

But as you prove with every post, actual, real-world evidence doesn't factor into the formation of your opinions. You believe what you do because it's emotionally satisfying to you, not because it's true.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6176 Sep 4, 2013
AnswersRus wrote:
<quoted text>
I do have integrity, but I wonder what honest answer would that be which you assume and expect of me? That all liberals look alike to me?
I thought one of the answers on the answer sheet would be sure to make you happy. Silly me.
Yep, silly you.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6177 Sep 4, 2013
AnswersRus wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how the liberals who control our wildlands and forests know that the best way to fight fire is with fire, but they falter and abandon their beliefs when it comes to other forms of fire. Could it be that they do not wish to put this particular fire out? Could it be that they have adopted a "let it burn" policy on this firearms issue? Could it be that they plan to burn down certain segments of the population to clear ground for their planned replant of a different variety of populace? Is it possible that the powers that currently be, know full well that this approach will fail to meet their stated goals, because their real goals are still hidden?
Paranoid conspiracy much?

LOL!
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6178 Sep 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Paranoid conspiracy much?
LOL!
Asking if something is possible is a far cry from actually saying that it is true.
That is something you may well benefit from, should you embrace the truth it contains.
Apparently you were not a boy scout. I believe it is far better to think of the possibilities and prepare for them should they turn out to be true, rather than just bury one's head in the sand and insist they are not true, like you do. That is the big motivation in buying insurance of any kind, to prepare for the unlikely possibility. Are you a conspiricy theorist when you buy auto insurance? You are a "safe" driver are you not?
It is OK if you disbelieve any possibility. A natural and self inflicted cull of the herd is preferrable.
AnswersRus

Riverton, WY

#6179 Sep 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Facts are facts and opinions are opinions. Your inability to tell the difference doesn't say a thing about how I portray things.
Yes it does. It says that you have an inability to communicate with the written word. It is your portrayal of your opinions as facts, which is being responded to.

It is a poor writer that blames his readers for missing his points. That is as sure as it is also positive that a poor craftsman blames his tools for piss poor performance.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6180 Sep 4, 2013
AnswersRus wrote:
<quoted text>
Asking if something is possible is a far cry from actually saying that it is true.
That is something you may well benefit from, should you embrace the truth it contains.
Apparently you were not a boy scout. I believe it is far better to think of the possibilities and prepare for them should they turn out to be true, rather than just bury one's head in the sand and insist they are not true, like you do. That is the big motivation in buying insurance of any kind, to prepare for the unlikely possibility. Are you a conspiricy theorist when you buy auto insurance? You are a "safe" driver are you not?
It is OK if you disbelieve any possibility. A natural and self inflicted cull of the herd is preferrable.
Every conspiracy theory is based on taking unlikely and unrealistic possibilities too seriously. The alternate view isn't burying your head in the sand - it's considering reasonable and likely scenarios to explain events. Ever heard of Occam's razor?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6181 Sep 4, 2013
AnswersRus wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it does. It says that you have an inability to communicate with the written word. It is your portrayal of your opinions as facts, which is being responded to.
It is a poor writer that blames his readers for missing his points. That is as sure as it is also positive that a poor craftsman blames his tools for piss poor performance.
The issue isn't' that my words aren't clear. The issue is that you jump to conclusions based on your pre-existing assumptions about me. If your mind wasn't clouded by false assumptions, you could understand my words. And if I'm ever not clear, just ask for clarification. Simple.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#6182 Sep 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I only deny what isn't true. Every accusation of lying has been either a twisted distortion of what I actually said or has been an unintentional mistake I've made. Not a single instance of an actual lie - ever.
But as you prove with every post, actual, real-world evidence doesn't factor into the formation of your opinions. You believe what you do because it's emotionally satisfying to you, not because it's true.
Well with the exception of your attempted use of a partial definition of "lie". The other definitions of "lie" did apply to your posts. So once again, half truths don't help your case.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6183 Sep 4, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Well with the exception of your attempted use of a partial definition of "lie". The other definitions of "lie" did apply to your posts. So once again, half truths don't help your case.
"Partial definition" LOL! That was lame the first time you tried it.

Nobody believes that simply stating something that is false is a lie. Lots of people believe false things and they aren't liars. Everybody knows that stating something that YOU KNOW to be false is what makes it a lie.

And I don't do that. I make mistakes, and when I find out something I said was wrong, I correct it and apologize. That isn't lying - that's having integrity.
Besara

Des Moines, IA

#6184 Sep 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't like the parallel because it makes no sense. If you don't want to make sense, that's totally fine with me. In fact that's what I've come to expect from rightwingers.
It makes total sense. That it went over your head is obvious. It's what I've come to expect from NAMBLA members.
Besara

Des Moines, IA

#6185 Sep 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
It's just not a term associated with entertainers. But it is with politicians, which made me think he didn't know who both men are.
Do you agree that it's easy to confuse Ray Nagin and Kanye West because they're both similarly corrupt?
The term "corrupt" has no occupational limits.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6186 Sep 4, 2013
Besara wrote:
<quoted text>It makes total sense. That it went over your head is obvious. It's what I've come to expect from NAMBLA members.
NAMBLA? You really are a child aren't you?

What is it with rightwingers who habitually go to gay sex insults every time they get frustrated? It's like an obsession with you guys.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6187 Sep 4, 2013
Besara wrote:
<quoted text>The term "corrupt" has no occupational limits.
Really? You don't say!

LOL!

I already explained my thinking. Do you have anything new or is this the best you've got?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#6188 Sep 4, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I only deny what isn't true. Every accusation of lying has been either a twisted distortion of what I actually said or has been an unintentional mistake I've made. Not a single instance of an actual lie - ever.
But as you prove with every post, actual, real-world evidence doesn't factor into the formation of your opinions. You believe what you do because it's emotionally satisfying to you, not because it's true.
No, what I have proven on numerous occasions is that when you are presented with proof of your continuous prevarication you simply prevaricate some more and deny it. When I have been persistent and refused to be distracted by your deflections, lies, twists, and such......you resort to ignoring the issue altogether.

You want an example of your lying? Here ya go:

"Not a single instance of an actual lie - ever."

I've got 5 bucks I'll bet that you already have a long list of deflections, excuses, and redundant lies to reply with. You do realize that refusing to admit that you're a liar doesn't make you any less a liar, don't you? Being another lie it just adds to your already prodigious list of lies.

Here is another example of your lying:

"I only deny what isn't true."

A truth would be that you deny everything you don't agree with.

Try again Danny Boy........

BTW I've found NOTHING satisfying, in any respect, about conversing with you.....ever. So there is another example of your lying. I can go on all day but you will simply deny everything....which is another lie. You just can't help youself.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#6189 Sep 4, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>No, what I have proven on numerous occasions is that when you are presented with proof of your continuous prevarication you simply prevaricate some more and deny it. When I have been persistent and refused to be distracted by your deflections, lies, twists, and such......you resort to ignoring the issue altogether.
You want an example of your lying? Here ya go:
"Not a single instance of an actual lie - ever."
I've got 5 bucks I'll bet that you already have a long list of deflections, excuses, and redundant lies to reply with. You do realize that refusing to admit that you're a liar doesn't make you any less a liar, don't you? Being another lie it just adds to your already prodigious list of lies.
Here is another example of your lying:
"I only deny what isn't true."
A truth would be that you deny everything you don't agree with.
Try again Danny Boy........
BTW I've found NOTHING satisfying, in any respect, about conversing with you.....ever. So there is another example of your lying. I can go on all day but you will simply deny everything....which is another lie. You just can't help youself.
*sigh*

My statement that I don't lie isn't proof of a lie. Just because you have no ability to control what you say doesn't mean I don't. An example where I've knowingly said something false would be an example of a lie. Since you can't find any of those, my statement stands.

And claiming that I deny falsehoods isn't proof of a lie. An example where I denied something true would be proof that statement is a lie, not the mere existence of that statement.

And for someone who doesn't get any satisfaction from conversing with me, you sure are desperate for my attention. I don't respond to you for weeks but you keep coming begging for me to talk to you. Why do you do that if you don't like conversing with me? Are you a masochist?

Or were you lying?

LOL!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Oklahoma state senator plans to resign followin... Mar 23 Dakoter 44
News Man who drove suspicious car near White House i... Mar 19 RustyS 1
News Secret Service laptop containing Trump Tower ev... Mar 18 Cordwainer Trout 7
News White House intruder was on grounds for 15 minu... Mar 17 Texxy 1
News Poop scooper gets probation for using fake IDs,... Mar 15 CodeTalker 3
News Secret Service: Person arrested on White House ... Mar 12 Joe Arpaio 16
president trump personnel office has tapes /... Jan '17 ANNETTE MURDERER 1
More from around the web