Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10984 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5893 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked you before to post any questions I have failed to address, and you've posted nothing. Obviously there aren't any.
Shall I list my questions that you've ignored?
LOL!
No there have been several, I just got tired of repeating them every time you dodged answering them. You refused to acknowledge them the first 3 or 4 times they were asked so now you go back and find them ( like you really don't remember the questions....LMAO!) for yourself. You haven't answered because the factual answer contradicts your propaganda. For me to repeat them again would just be a waste of time, you will never answer them truthfully.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5894 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Because of your demonstrated paranoid and reactionary tendencies, I believe you honestly think that.
But you are wrong.
When you've calmed down and think you can be rational, come try to have an adult discussion again.
What about what I stated was paranoid. You are describing more legislation to control who can and can't have access to firearms which will be completely IGNORED by criminals who already have MILLIONS of firearms in their possession, and will only be followed by the law-abiding citizens. It will be creating more hoops they have to jump through just to exercise an inherent right, and based on the unfortunate tragedy of a handful of incidents every year.

Now tell me that is NOT what you are advocating.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5895 Aug 23, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Danny Boy doesn't know the meaning of individual responsibility. He likes to hold ALL firearms owners responsibile for mass shooters, accidents, and such. Even though normal sane and responsible firearms owners vastly outnumber those who break the law. Here is a quote from Ronald Reagan that pretty much says it all.....
"We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions."
- Ronald Reagan -
I see you just can't stop trying your mind reading trick even though it never works and makes you look like a complete idiot. I've never said anything like that, and you know it.

Your Freudian projection is out of control. You pathologically lie about me in post after post while accusing me of doing that. Seek help, friend. You're losing it.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5896 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? That's enough? That's all the training you got?
Come back when you can be serious. Your emotions have gotten the better of you.
My emotions are fully in check (unlike you leftist turds who demand new gun control laws every time an accident happens). Of course I have had other training such as obtaining the right sight picture, breathing control, etc. But that has NOTHING to do with how to handle a firearm safely. That has to do with accuracy. And yes I was being overly simplistic for a reason. And that reason is because that is all you need to understand about safe firearm handling. If one was to follow those very SIMPLE RULES, a firearm accident WOULD NEVER HAPPEN.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5897 Aug 23, 2013
Squach wrote:
Here is a quote from Ronald Reagan that pretty much says it all.....
"We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions."
- Ronald Reagan -
BTW - You act like this is some powerful revelation even though nobody disagrees with this statement or tries to argue with it.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5898 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I've asked over and over and over for solutions from you gunners and none of you has offered any.
And in the fact of reasonable suggestions from other people, all you do is point out how unworkable or un-American they are.
In light of these facts, it is a perfectly reaonable, logical conclusion that you support doing nothing.
But as I have said before - many times - please list the regulations you'd support to reduce gun violence. You said before that you support regulation, but you've consistently refused to name even one.
I believe that's because you support doing nothing and you've said nothing to disprove that belief (except a meaningless blanket denial with nothing to support it).
Tell me about this "law that is directed at the law breakers and doesn't infringe on the law abiding." What law would that be? Can you describe it? Or is that just more hot air designed to dodge the issue?
Here a good regulation to kick it off. How about keeping violent criminals looked up behind bars until they are no longer a threat to the general public. With a recividism rate of over 50% for violent thugs, that would be an EXCELLENT place to start. In fact....let's do that for the mentally ill who are a danger to themselves and others as well.

Sound good?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5899 Aug 23, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>No there have been several, I just got tired of repeating them every time you dodged answering them. You refused to acknowledge them the first 3 or 4 times they were asked so now you go back and find them ( like you really don't remember the questions....LMAO!) for yourself. You haven't answered because the factual answer contradicts your propaganda. For me to repeat them again would just be a waste of time, you will never answer them truthfully.
So nothing?

That's what I thought.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5900 Aug 23, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
What about what I stated was paranoid. You are describing more legislation to control who can and can't have access to firearms which will be completely IGNORED by criminals who already have MILLIONS of firearms in their possession, and will only be followed by the law-abiding citizens. It will be creating more hoops they have to jump through just to exercise an inherent right, and based on the unfortunate tragedy of a handful of incidents every year.
Now tell me that is NOT what you are advocating.
That is NOT what I am advocating.

What are YOU advocating? Doing nothing? Do you have some suggestions or is all you're capable of is standing on the sidelines and criticizing everything everyone else suggests?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5901 Aug 23, 2013
St. Louis girl, 15, killed by brother who found shotgun in home, police say

ST. LOUIS • A 20-year-old man with mental disabilities apparently accidentally shot and killed his 15-year-old sister Thursday afternoon in St. Louis, police say.

The man told police he didn’t know the gun was real, according to authorities.

St. Louis Police Lt. John Green said that the man and his family moved into a home in the 4600 block of San Francisco Avenue a few days ago, and that the man had found a shotgun — spray-painted gold — hidden behind a dresser. The gun belonged to a friend of the family and was there when the family moved in, Green said. The shooter’s mother told police she had tried to hide the shotgun.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-...

----------

The gunners just shrug and walk away because there's nothing that could have possibly prevented this.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5902 Aug 23, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Here a good regulation to kick it off. How about keeping violent criminals looked up behind bars until they are no longer a threat to the general public. With a recividism rate of over 50% for violent thugs, that would be an EXCELLENT place to start. In fact....let's do that for the mentally ill who are a danger to themselves and others as well.
Sound good?
How do you propose making violent criminals "no longer a threat to the general public?" Will just living in a cell accomplish that or will it take some sort of rehabilitation?

We stopped locking up mentally ill people 50 years ago and the violent crime rate has decreased. Your proposal makes no rational sense.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5903 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
St. Louis girl, 15, killed by brother who found shotgun in home, police say
ST. LOUIS • A 20-year-old man with mental disabilities apparently accidentally shot and killed his 15-year-old sister Thursday afternoon in St. Louis, police say.
The man told police he didn’t know the gun was real, according to authorities.
St. Louis Police Lt. John Green said that the man and his family moved into a home in the 4600 block of San Francisco Avenue a few days ago, and that the man had found a shotgun — spray-painted gold — hidden behind a dresser. The gun belonged to a friend of the family and was there when the family moved in, Green said. The shooter’s mother told police she had tried to hide the shotgun.
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-...
----------
The gunners just shrug and walk away because there's nothing that could have possibly prevented this.
So blame the mother for leaving the gun where her mentally ill son could find it. What legislation would have prevented this?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5904 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you just can't stop trying your mind reading trick even though it never works and makes you look like a complete idiot. I've never said anything like that, and you know it.
Your Freudian projection is out of control. You pathologically lie about me in post after post while accusing me of doing that. Seek help, friend. You're losing it.
Hey Danny Boy! I was talking about you not to you. So now you're going to attempt to project your projection on to others as well? Isn't that a bit redundant.....even for you? ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5905 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you propose making violent criminals "no longer a threat to the general public?" Will just living in a cell accomplish that or will it take some sort of rehabilitation?
We stopped locking up mentally ill people 50 years ago and the violent crime rate has decreased. Your proposal makes no rational sense.
By leaving them locked up until they are no longer violent or dead. PERIOD. How exactly do you plan on rehabbing someone who is a violent criminal???

And are suggesting alink between releasing the mentall ill and crime rates going down???

And my proposal makes PERFECT sense. If some people are a danger to the general public, put them in a place where they will NOT be a danger to the public. I can't explain it any simpler than that.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5906 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
So nothing?
That's what I thought.
No, that's what you answered.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5907 Aug 23, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
So blame the mother for leaving the gun where her mentally ill son could find it. What legislation would have prevented this?
LMAO!

It's like I can read minds or predict the future...
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
The gunners just shrug and walk away because there's nothing that could have possibly prevented this.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5908 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you propose making violent criminals "no longer a threat to the general public?" Will just living in a cell accomplish that or will it take some sort of rehabilitation?
We stopped locking up mentally ill people 50 years ago and the violent crime rate has decreased. Your proposal makes no rational sense.
And yes...someone locked up in a jail cell, AWAY FROM THE GENERAL PUBLIC, is no longer a threat to the general public. If they want to act like animals....lock their ass up like one. I don't give a shit if they are rehabbed or not. Let 'em rot.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5909 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
That is NOT what I am advocating.
What are YOU advocating? Doing nothing? Do you have some suggestions or is all you're capable of is standing on the sidelines and criticizing everything everyone else suggests?
Doing nothing?

What part of locking up the violent and dangerous, and educating the young do you not understand???

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5910 Aug 23, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Hey Danny Boy! I was talking about you not to you. So now you're going to attempt to project your projection on to others as well? Isn't that a bit redundant.....even for you? ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!
To me or about me - you were still projecting.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5911 Aug 23, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Here a good regulation to kick it off. How about keeping violent criminals looked up behind bars until they are no longer a threat to the general public. With a recividism rate of over 50% for violent thugs, that would be an EXCELLENT place to start. In fact....let's do that for the mentally ill who are a danger to themselves and others as well.
Sound good?
Danny Boy has rejected this course of action on numerous occasions. He's too wrapped up in the liberal policies that keep putting criminals and psychos back out on the streets to commit more crimes over and over. You have suggested the same logical solution that I did when I first started posting here. Liberal leftists like Danny Boy simply refuse to hear of it. They prefer to hold all of society responsible and legislate against EVERYBODY rather than take aim at the root of the problem, which is all of those psychos and criminals walking free among us.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5912 Aug 23, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
By leaving them locked up until they are no longer violent or dead. PERIOD. How exactly do you plan on rehabbing someone who is a violent criminal???
And are suggesting alink between releasing the mentall ill and crime rates going down???
And my proposal makes PERFECT sense. If some people are a danger to the general public, put them in a place where they will NOT be a danger to the public. I can't explain it any simpler than that.
Okay, incarceration for life for every violent criminal. Sounds expensive, but at least you've suggested SOMETHING.

No, I'm not suggesting a link. I'm saying it's a terrible idea with no evidence to support it's need or effectiveness.

The problem with your "lock em up and throw away the key" approach is that it's been tried and it didn't work. One reason that it didn't work is because previously non-violent people become violent. And often its unpredictable.

So even if every previously violent person went away, there will still be an ever increasing number of newly violent people. Eventually you'll run out of jails and money and the rate of violence will be unchanged.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Secret Service investigating effigy of Presiden... (Jan '10) Jun 21 Trumpenstein bank... 44
News Secret Service relaxes marijuana policy in bid ... Jun 2 RushFan666 6
News Men wanted for allegedly taking over $30K from ... May '17 Belinda 1
US Secret Service Clothes (Sep '06) May '17 nikonnicky 28
News Russian hacker faces decades in prison Apr '17 USA Today 3
News Secret Service: Man planned to kidnap first dog (Jan '16) Apr '17 alina 7
News Oklahoma state senator plans to resign followin... Mar '17 Dakoter 44
More from around the web