Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10984 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5851 Aug 23, 2013
FormerParatrooper wrote:
Imho, the grandfather should be hung.
I'm curious why you think that.

Do you think hanging him would prevent other people from doing the same thing?

Or is would it strictly be a punishment?

Do you think he's not already suffering? That he isn't going to suffer with the knowledge that he killed his grandson for the rest of his life?

And isn't that worse than dying?

What would be the value of hanging him? What purpose would that serve?

This incident makes me furious too. I'm just trying to understand why you think hanging him would be a good thing.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5852 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Fixed that for you.
Coward.
So now you resort to rewriting the posts of others to support your filthy lies? Can't say I'm surprised. That's a tactic that has long been used by idiots on the lunatic fringe when they are hopelessly losing a debate.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5853 Aug 23, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>So now you resort to rewriting the posts of others to support your filthy lies? Can't say I'm surprised. That's a tactic that has long been used by idiots on the lunatic fringe when they are hopelessly losing a debate.
I'm hardly losing the debate. Just the opposite in fact.

I have refuted every one of your arguments with objective facts.

I have answered every one of your questions.

Meanwhile you continue to post debunked nonsense, dodge my questions, and still haven't shown a single instance of my telling a lie (while continuing to call me a liar).

Your desperate flailing is obvious. This post is just another in a long line of diversions and dodges to avoid engaging in honest debate.

But it's hugely entertaining watching you fail with such clueless arrogance. LMAO!

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5854 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm hardly losing the debate. Just the opposite in fact.
I have refuted every one of your arguments with objective facts.
I have answered every one of your questions.
Meanwhile you continue to post debunked nonsense, dodge my questions, and still haven't shown a single instance of my telling a lie (while continuing to call me a liar).
Your desperate flailing is obvious. This post is just another in a long line of diversions and dodges to avoid engaging in honest debate.
But it's hugely entertaining watching you fail with such clueless arrogance. LMAO!
You delude yourself so well.

The debunked nonsense is all yours. Like gun control even comes close to preventing anything. That's been debunked so many times that it's now in reruns on TV Land. Try again Dan the little man.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5855 Aug 23, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>You delude yourself so well.
The debunked nonsense is all yours. Like gun control even comes close to preventing anything. That's been debunked so many times that it's now in reruns on TV Land. Try again Dan the little man.
Hilarious!

Thank you.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5856 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Hilarious!
Thank you.
Don't thank me......the joke's on you.

Try again Danny Boy.......
FormerParatroope r

Greenville, SC

#5857 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
So the senseless shooting of kids is just something we all have to live with? There's nothing to do about it? It's just the cost of having the 2nd Amendment?
Don't try that game, that is not what I said or implied.
Tell me, what legislation would you propose that would determine who has common sense? Be specific.
FormerParatroope r

Greenville, SC

#5858 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm curious why you think that.
Do you think hanging him would prevent other people from doing the same thing?
Or is would it strictly be a punishment?
Do you think he's not already suffering? That he isn't going to suffer with the knowledge that he killed his grandson for the rest of his life?
And isn't that worse than dying?
What would be the value of hanging him? What purpose would that serve?
This incident makes me furious too. I'm just trying to understand why you think hanging him would be a good thing.
He took the life of a innocent child due to irresponsible action. Anyone who kills the innocent due to irresponsible action deserves death.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5859 Aug 23, 2013
FormerParatrooper wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't try that game, that is not what I said or implied.
Tell me, what legislation would you propose that would determine who has common sense? Be specific.
I wasn't playing a game. I was asking a question. Evidently that's not what you believe. You could have just said so.

But by dismissing preventable deaths by simply saying, "You can't legislate common sense," you are certainly implying that there's nothing to be done.

And I wouldn't propose such legislation. In fact I believe I just said that you can't legislate common sense, didn't I?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5860 Aug 23, 2013
FormerParatrooper wrote:
<quoted text>
He took the life of a innocent child due to irresponsible action. Anyone who kills the innocent due to irresponsible action deserves death.
So it's just punishment with no higher purpose? Does that apply to accidents too? They are due to irresponsible actions, so anybody who accidentally kills someone deserves death?

And why hanging? Nobody hangs anyone anymore.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5861 Aug 23, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Don't thank me......the joke's on you.
Try again Danny Boy.......
I was thanking you for proving my point.

And for entertaining me with your clueless arrogance.

LOL!

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5862 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I was thanking you for proving my point.
And for entertaining me with your clueless arrogance.
LOL!
Actually you have it completely backwards as usual. Projection will do that to ya. You were proving my point that you lie, project, fabricate data, and avoid answering pertinent questions. So.......thank YOU for being such a predictable loser.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5863 Aug 23, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Actually you have it completely backwards as usual. Projection will do that to ya. You were proving my point that you lie, project, fabricate data, and avoid answering pertinent questions. So.......thank YOU for being such a predictable loser.
Still waiting for some proof of these accusations.

Anything?

Anything at all?

LOL!

Of course not. Just more blanket, unsubstantiated accusations.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5864 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
And even responsible people trying to train other people to be responsible still shoot people...
And you, in your finite wisdom, believe it is possible to pass some sort of legislation that will prevent things like this from happening or at least reduce them, huh?{snicker}

Please, pray tell, what could possibly prevent ACCIDENTS form happening without completely banning firearms.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5865 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You cannot legislate personal responsibility. But you can legislate access to guns so that irresponsible people can do less damage.
And who determines who is responsible and who isn't? You?

LMAO!!!!

Again....how do you legislatate responsibility???

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5866 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't legislate common sense either. But you can legislate access to guns so that people without common sense can do less damage.
And who determines who has common sense? You???

LMAO!!!

Are you going to have your congressman develop some kind of "common sense" exam in order to exercise a right?

How exactly would that work??

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5867 Aug 23, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
And you, in your finite wisdom, believe it is possible to pass some sort of legislation that will prevent things like this from happening or at least reduce them, huh?{snicker}
Please, pray tell, what could possibly prevent ACCIDENTS form happening without completely banning firearms.
Nothing will prevent accidents from happening. But there are certainly laws that would reduce the opportunity for accidents to happen and bring down the death rate.

But you advocate doing nothing at all, right? Most of the gun deaths in this country are a good thing or completely unpreventable, so the status quo is just fine with you, right?

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5869 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
I wasn't playing a game. I was asking a question. Evidently that's not what you believe. You could have just said so.
But by dismissing preventable deaths by simply saying, "You can't legislate common sense," you are certainly implying that there's nothing to be done.
And I wouldn't propose such legislation. In fact I believe I just said that you can't legislate common sense, didn't I?
You state that he is implying that nothing that can be done, and in the next breath you agree that you can't legislate common sense (which is true). So WTF are you talking about if not outright banning gun posession by the law-abiding in order to prevent ACCIDENTS???

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5870 Aug 23, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
And who determines who is responsible and who isn't? You?
LMAO!!!!
Again....how do you legislatate responsibility???
If a country was serious about reducing the number of gun deaths, they could require training, competency testing, and regular practice in order to buy guns. Accidents would obviously still happen, but with mandatory competency testing on a regular basis, the number would go down.

That's one idea. Do you have any, or are you fine with the status quo 32,000 fellow citizens shot dead every year?

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5871 Aug 23, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing will prevent accidents from happening. But there are certainly laws that would reduce the opportunity for accidents to happen and bring down the death rate.
Such as???

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Men wanted for allegedly taking over $30K from ... May 13 Belinda 1
US Secret Service Clothes (Sep '06) May 8 nikonnicky 28
News Russian hacker faces decades in prison Apr '17 USA Today 3
News Secret Service: Man planned to kidnap first dog (Jan '16) Apr '17 alina 7
News Oklahoma state senator plans to resign followin... Mar '17 Dakoter 44
News Man who drove suspicious car near White House i... Mar '17 RustyS 1
News Secret Service laptop containing Trump Tower ev... Mar '17 Cordwainer Trout 7
More from around the web