Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10987 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5647 Aug 19, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
Way to man up there "Dan the Man"...
Thanks.

It's what people of integrity do.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5650 Aug 19, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
"And like a person of integrity, I apologized for my mistake when a realized it."
That's an interesting way to put it and does explain a lot about you. So basically, even when someone does present you with proof of a fact, unless YOU "realize it", it still isn't fact in your eyes. So you can pick and choose proof...facts...and your own reality.
One question...does everyone wear blinders in your world...?
You didn't present me with proof. You made an assertion, and given your sketchy relationship with the truth, that's not even in the same universe as proof.

I went and looked and found the facts myself. And when I saw I was wrong I admitted it and apologized.

But it's very big of you to respond to my apology with a childish personal attack. Kind of reveals the quality of your character, doesn't it? LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5654 Aug 19, 2013
Right.

Laws don't reduce crime.

They serve no purpose at all.

And serious people advocate for the elimination of all laws.

Blah.

Blah.

Blah.

Grow the hell up, nitwit.
Bella Donna

UK

#5655 Aug 19, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
Right.
Laws don't reduce crime.
They serve no purpose at all.
And serious people advocate for the elimination of all laws.
Blah.
Blah.
Blah.
Grow the hell up, nitwit.
WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?

Are YOU afraid of the answer to THAT question?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5656 Aug 19, 2013
Bella Donna wrote:
<quoted text>
You want truth, do you?
Well, WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?
Bella Donna wrote:
<quoted text>
WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?
Are YOU afraid of the answer to THAT question?
We already had this argument, moron. Back in May, remember?
Highlander wrote:
<quoted text>
Be serious?
Okay, I'll be serious: WHEN was the last time that any man-made law ever stopped anything from happening?
Run along, troll. I already decimated this dipshit argument and there's no reason to do it again.

LOL!
Bella Donna

London, UK

#5657 Aug 19, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
We already had this argument, moron. Back in May, remember?
<quoted text>
Run along, troll. I already decimated this dipshit argument and there's no reason to do it again.
LOL!
WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?

Are YOU afraid of the answer to THAT question?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5658 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
Right.
Laws don't reduce crime.
They serve no purpose at all.
And serious people advocate for the elimination of all laws.
Blah.
Blah.
Blah.
Grow the hell up, nitwit.
Serious people advocate for laws that clamp down on the lawless while having no effect on the honest law abiding citizen. Grow the hell up, nitwit.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5659 Aug 20, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>
Serious people advocate for laws that clamp down on the lawless while having no effect on the honest law abiding citizen. Grow the hell up, nitwit.
Like background checks. They do not prohibit law-abiding citizens from buying guns, but they do succeed at making it much harder for a criminal to get a firearm.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5660 Aug 20, 2013
Bella Donna wrote:
<quoted text>
You want truth, do you?
Well, WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?
Bella Donna wrote:
<quoted text>
WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?
Are YOU afraid of the answer to THAT question?
Bella Donna wrote:
<quoted text>
WHEN was the last time that ANY man-made law stopped anything from happening?
Are YOU afraid of the answer to THAT question?
There's a retarded echo in here.

LOL!

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5662 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Like background checks. They do not prohibit law-abiding citizens from buying guns, but they do succeed at making it much harder for a criminal to get a firearm.
But they DO have an effect on the law abiding citizen. That law abiding citizen is REQUIRED to submit to something in order to exercise a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. That law abiding citizen should be REQUIRED to do nothing more than what he has already done.....abided by the law. Requiring the law abiding to submit to anything in order to be able to enjoy the rights guaranteed by the constitution is an effect.....an undesirable and probably unconstitutional effect. Background checks are nothing more than a custom built opportunity for government to abuse its power. Do you REALLY think criminals obtain their weapons from a source that requires background checks??? If so, you are even more naive and blind to reality than I first suspected.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5663 Aug 20, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>But they DO have an effect on the law abiding citizen. That law abiding citizen is REQUIRED to submit to something in order to exercise a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. That law abiding citizen should be REQUIRED to do nothing more than what he has already done.....abided by the law. Requiring the law abiding to submit to anything in order to be able to enjoy the rights guaranteed by the constitution is an effect.....an undesirable and probably unconstitutional effect. Background checks are nothing more than a custom built opportunity for government to abuse its power. Do you REALLY think criminals obtain their weapons from a source that requires background checks??? If so, you are even more naive and blind to reality than I first suspected.
As long as you believe that everyone is entitled to own any weapon they want without any oversight or regulation whatsoever, it's impossible to hold a rational conversation with you.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5664 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
As long as you believe that everyone is entitled to own any weapon they want without any oversight or regulation whatsoever, it's impossible to hold a rational conversation with you.
Why do you insist on putting words in the mouths of others? Not only is it rude it makes you look like a knee-jerk reactionary fool. I said no such thing and you know it. What I said was that laws enacted to control the lawless should have no effect on the law abiding. Obviously a concept that is totally alien to you. Also one can't help but notice that you have completely ignored my question about where criminals obtain their weapons and how background checks will have any effect at all on the black market. The only people who will be inconvenienced or denied are the LAW ABIDING CITIZENS who submit to a background check while the criminals continue obtaining their guns illegally, business as usual. Criminals don't obtain their weapons through legal means where background checks are required......why would they? They never have in the past.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5665 Aug 20, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Why do you insist on putting words in the mouths of others? Not only is it rude it makes you look like a knee-jerk reactionary fool. I said no such thing and you know it.
You've said as much. Your posts indicate that's what you believe.

So why don't you just clear it up right now? Do you support everyone owning any weapon they want without any oversight or regulation?

Bet you'll dodge it.

LMAO!
Aphelion

Palm Bay, FL

#5666 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You've said as much. Your posts indicate that's what you believe.
So why don't you just clear it up right now? Do you support everyone owning any weapon they want without any oversight or regulation?
Bet you'll dodge it.
LMAO!
Like you dodged their questions. Hypocrite!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#5669 Aug 20, 2013
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Like you dodged their questions. Hypocrite!
Find those lies I told yet?

No?

I didn't think so.

LMAO!

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5670 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You've said as much. Your posts indicate that's what you believe.
So why don't you just clear it up right now? Do you support everyone owning any weapon they want without any oversight or regulation?
Bet you'll dodge it.
LMAO!
If you had paid attention, I've told you and others on this thread numerous times. The 2nd amendment covers all weapons up to and including the individual fire arms carried by the foot soldier. Plain and simple. I have NEVER said or implied anything else no matter what your erroneous mind reading tells you. It has also been ruled By the SCOTUS to be an INDIVIDUAL right, another indicator that it covers INDIVIDUAL arms. No one is talking about rocket launchers and atomic bombs as you hysterical gun grabbers would like the uninformed to believe. According to the wording of the constitution, the purpose of NOT INFRINGING on the right of the people to keep and bear arms it so there will always be an organized militia and a large unorganized militia. Should those militia ever be called to arms the folks who answer will be expected to fill the role of an individual foot soldier. It's all pretty clear to me. Not my fault you live in constant confusion.

And guess what, you've dodged my question once again. I guess I can conclude that you have no intelligent answer and chalk it up as another of your many defeats.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#5671 Aug 20, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Typing words is a behavior. Making statements is a behavior. Making assertions about the world is a behavior. Making claims about what is true is a behavior.
And Squach [sic] has made plenty of delusional statements, assertions, and claims.
How do you not comprehend this? Are you really this ignorant?
BTW - I await your apology for accusing me of lying when it was YOU who was confused.
LOL!...at you.
"Typing words is a behavior. Making statements is a behavior. Making assertions about the world is a behavior. Making claims about what is true is a behavior."

All typed words on a computer monitor...which really has nothing to do with ones "behavior". The words expressed here could only be used as an aid in determining behavior but only if you are personally interviewing the individual. Without actual contact with the individual, YOU have no idea and no way possible to make a "behavioral" determination.

"BTW - I await your apology for accusing me of lying when it was YOU who was confused."

Hole your breath, you seem confused. I never said you lied regarding "he". The lies you made were shown from your own posts...but then if YOU don't realize it, then it isn't a lie...according to you.

So how narrow is that opening between your blinders...?

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#5672 Aug 20, 2013
Take that gibberish to the next tea bag rally, they will love your level of ignorance

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#5673 Aug 20, 2013
bobby6464 wrote:
Take that gibberish to the next tea bag rally, they will love your level of ignorance
Don't worry about the ignorance level of others. Your title of the most ignorant fool on the thread is only challenged by the other voices in your head. Does Danny Boy know you're out of your cage again?

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#5674 Aug 20, 2013
Squach the racial hating tea bag squach box. Your a dumb ass. Go prey for birthers

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Secret Service Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Heavy security at Trump Tower not going away an... 3 hr blushing violet 28
News Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump sp... Nov '16 RushFan666 30
News Russian man convicted of hacking into US busine... Aug '16 Mizike67 5
News Russian man faces US trial in lucrative hacking... Aug '16 Nu Wor Order 4
News Cleveland prepares for RNC convention protests (May '16) May '16 Hostis Publicus 9
News Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offen... (May '16) May '16 Jelly Belly Popcorn 3
News Man shot outside White House remains in critica... (May '16) May '16 WeTheSheeple 2
More from around the web