US Should - Stop Genocide' in Burma, Kachin Americans Say

Jan 13, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Irrawaddy Newsmagazine

Young Kbrang Aung drove about 20 hours with his Kachin friends to join demonstrations this weekend outside the White House and the State Department's headquarters, more than 1,100 miles from his new home in Omaha, Nebraska.

Comments
1 - 5 of 5 Comments Last updated Jan 14, 2013
Anti-colonists

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jan 14, 2013
 
Genocide? Bullsiht!
What genocide? Which Americans said that?
US knows better, having had Boston Tea Party and fought off German George's English colonists. How come English king was German! Yeah, think about it. Cos real English royal Plantagenet is a sheep farmer in Australia.
America did not like English retaking Burma after leaving it following the Japanese invasion. America wanted Burma to have independence.
Journalists writing about Burma without understanding real Burmese history must be charged with libel against the state of Burma.
Taxas has the right to indepedence. Yet, it does not resort to armed rebellion. Scotland, still English colony, once a kingdom, does not resort to armed insurrection.
Kachins are integral part of Brahma, now Burma or Bamarpyi.
Ignoant journalists must be countered at every step.
Bear hug

Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jan 14, 2013
 
Anti-colonists wrote:
Genocide? Bullsiht!
What genocide? Which Americans said that?
US knows better, having had Boston Tea Party and fought off German George's English colonists. How come English king was German! Yeah, think about it. Cos real English royal Plantagenet is a sheep farmer in Australia.
America did not like English retaking Burma after leaving it following the Japanese invasion. America wanted Burma to have independence.
Journalists writing about Burma without understanding real Burmese history must be charged with libel against the state of Burma.
Taxas has the right to indepedence. Yet, it does not resort to armed rebellion. Scotland, still English colony, once a kingdom, does not resort to armed insurrection.
Kachins are integral part of Brahma, now Burma or Bamarpyi.
Ignoant journalists must be countered at every step.
It's Myanmar, not Burma!

Whose an ignorant dick then eh?
Bear hug

Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jan 14, 2013
 
US Should - Stop Genocide' in Myanmar, Kachin Americans Say..........

But the Yank's won't!
It all comes down to regional politics, and some extent; racism.

The Kachin have roots back to Yunan, China.
No way the Yanks want a self-governing state of Kachin, an ethnic Chinese race.
Am I correct so far, you boys in the Langley basement?
Anti-colonists

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jan 14, 2013
 
Bear hug wrote:
<quoted text>
It's Myanmar, not Burma!
Whose an ignorant dick then eh?
Your ignorance, fcuking asrehole. Burma started as a monarchy 3000 years ago at an ancient city called Tagaung. The original name was Brahma, that of creator god of the Hindu religion. A prince of the Buddha line from Kapilavastu ( India maintains it is today's geographical India and Nepal maintains it is in Nepal, at the Himalayan foothill - as the exact location cannot be determined without scientific archeology) lost in the power struggle for the throne to his brother and headed east towards Tagaung.
Later people from the Yunan province ( Shan-Thai or Tai ethnicity) came in and became new ancient settlers. Burma was known as Brahmadesh ( country of Brahma) in classical India). In Chinese, Burma was or still is known as Mien Tien (possibly heaven's gate). New settlers pronounced Brahma Myrahm, from which is derived Myanmar. But Myanmar is an adjective when applied ti the land of Brahma. It is s noun when applied to a person: like he is a Myanmar ( meaning same as Bamar) ; as a written language, it is an adjective: Myanmar Sar ( sar means letter, alphabet or writing).
From Brahma is derived Burma. From Myramah or Myranmar is derived Myanmar. Literally, for thousands of years Burmese people or Bamars ( that means every indigenius, native of Burma) call it Myanmar Naingngan Taw ( Taw is pronounced Daw).
So it is correct to call Burma Burma. To call it Myanmar is like calling America American.
So fcuk you! Ignorant bsatard.
And fcuk Aung Zaw of Irrawaddy and Zin Linn, ignorant bsatards.
It is correct to revert Rangoon to Yangon, as proclaimed by Emperor Alaungpaya.
Traitor still calls Yangon Rangoon as they like to suck up to the ex-coloniser, who destroyed the royal archives in the Royal Palace of Yadanabon Naypyitaw (taw pronounced as daw). The idea was that a people without history will be slaves.
Not that easy, is it!
Anyway fcuk you. Fcuk yourself, asrehole.
Anti-colonists

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jan 14, 2013
 
Bear hug wrote:
US Should - Stop Genocide' in Myanmar, Kachin Americans Say..........
But the Yank's won't!
It all comes down to regional politics, and some extent; racism.
The Kachin have roots back to Yunan, China.
No way the Yanks want a self-governing state of Kachin, an ethnic Chinese race.
Am I correct so far, you boys in the Langley basement?
Fcuking asrehole. A little knowledge is dangerous. Yunan was quite separate from the rest of China. Thais are also from Yunan. Laotians look very much like ' Bamars'. William the Conquerer dud not make English French or Gaelic.
Kachins are Bamars like everone else despite some differences; they are one of the 135 tribes of Burma.
How come Irrawaddy, whilst promoting disintegration of Burma by federalism sucking uo to Panglong, betraying the great kings of Burma who created a unitary kingdom, now publish slogans that read " you, meaning Burmese government, are killing your own people?
Irrawaddy speaks with fork tongue. Ignorant bsatards, so ignorant and so arrogant and so treasonous and so very stupid not to undetstand that it was the coloniser English of late 19th century who created the ethnic divisions by their divide-and-rule.
And evil Clement Attlee duped Aung San into signing the evil Panglong. Stupid Irrawaddy simply fails to understand that independent sovereign Burma, regardless of type of government, dictatorship, fascist, democratic, communist, military like Spain's Franco,monarchist, whatever , does not have to implement the bondage of Panglong; the timebomb. Nor Burma has to grant Rohingyas Burmese citizenship.
Get the point.
It is treason to invite any alien power to interfere in Burma's internal affairs.Even England must remain silent.
Rebellion is illegal and it is government's duty ti quell rebellion and protect tertitotial integrity of Burma. Get it?
Kachin Ameticans, newly naturalised, can forget Burma and live like Americans; that is their right. But bringing Americans in to invade and colonise Burma is high treason. Behind the protection of US they are committing treason against their home cointry. Why don't they tell Kachin rebels to surrender and play positive politicsl role in the changing Burma for the goid of all.
Fcuk Irrawaddy. Fcuk Demented Voices of Bul
lsihts living on handouts in Norway.
Shameful.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••