'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Full Story

“Hot C can't explain it...”

Since: Apr 13

...but he'll hold your hand

#99192 May 12, 2013
Opinion: Clinton/Castro 2016?

I know what you’re thinking.

Looking ahead to the 2016 election the day after President Obama was re-elected is pretty much the classic example of the media getting ahead of itself with unlikely fancies. But when do you think Mitt Romney decided he would challenge Obama in 2012? Was it the night John McCain lost or the next morning? It was likely the second he lost the nomination to McCain himself. So looking ahead to 2016 is fair game, and when you do, what you see is a Democratic Party that is ripe for the taking by Hillary Clinton.

RELATED: Record Latino vote key to Obama’s re-election

Now Clinton has repeatedly said she won’t run and plenty of Democrats would also have an eye on 2016. Someone like Andrew Cuomo comes to mind. But during the Democratic National Convention there were reports that his people were asking party heavyweights if they would support Hillary if she runs. The tea leaves were clear: If she’s running, the party will support her, and challengers will melt away.

If Hillary Clinton is running for president in 2016 — she may win or she may lose — but San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro will be her vice presidential nominee.

This is how we get there.

Clinton would come in to the campaign as an experienced, respected leader. Her bonafides are clear, and unlike Obama who was required to select an experienced guiding hand like Joe Biden in 2008, Clinton would be free to choose whoever she likes.

So why Castro? Maybe you weren’t paying attention as the election results rolled in on Tuesday.

The 2012 election proved that 2008 was no fluke. America is a land of changed demographics, less about center-right conventional wisdom and more about ascendant voting groups making their voices heard. Latinos supported Obama’s re-election by a 75 to 23 margin nationally, rejecting the Republican party as currently constituted. These Latino voters — who everyone is talking about now as if this was the first time they ever voted in a presidential election — are 63 percent Mexican-American according to the 2010 Census — and so is Julian Castro.

“Hot C can't explain it...”

Since: Apr 13

...but he'll hold your hand

#99193 May 12, 2013
Castro, the first Latino to give the keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention has a biography to match Obama’s — if not his soaring oratory skills. Castro’s mother was a civil rights activist for Mexican-American rights and he attended Stanford as well as Harvard Law School. Castro is also the youngest mayor of one of America’s 50 largest cities.

In the run up to the election, there was a notion that Latino politicians equal Latino votes. It’s as absurd as expecting all women to vote for Clinton just because she is too. While Republicans have done a better job than Democrats of grooming successful Latino politicians like Marco Rubio, Brian Sandoval and Susanna Martinez, it is an open question as to how Republican Latinos would do in front of a national electorate in light of the party’s tarnished standing with Hispanic voters right now.

But a ticket with a young, charismatic, Latino leader from the party most Latinos have supported in recent elections would be a different story, and the pride and historic nature of the chance to elect the first Latino vice president can not be discounted.

Stephen Nuño, Northern Arizona University political science professor and NBC Latino contributor sees an opportunity for a Clinton/Castro ticket.

“My guess is both parties are looking for ways to bridge the past with the future,” he says.“A Clinton/Castro ticket would certainly fit that role. I don’t think Castro would have a problem with that in four years and with the proper nurturing from the seasoned veterans, he can be a force in national politics.”

Nuño says Castro would have to make careful choices in the next few years because “his biggest problem is determining a pathway up the ladder in a state that is still managing a way to deal with the changing demographics” but that Castro is one of the few Latinos on the Democratic landscape who may actually resonate nationally.

So it all starts to make sense now. Bill Clinton barnstorming for Obama — going wherever the campaign needed him, as often as they asked. As the New York Times wrote, many believe this was about ensuring an optimal environment for Hillary to run as it was about ensuring Obama’s re-election. How do you think Obama might repay the Clintons? One can envision him traveling the country, whipping up the Democratic base and becoming the de facto fundraising cash cow for the Democrats for years to come. Now you have Hillary, with the first African-American president deeply in her corner. In a changing America, the only thing you would need is a strong Latino presence to signal to Hispanic voters that their voices matter and have been heard loud and clear.

Clinton/Castro 2016.
Uncle Tab

United States

#99194 May 12, 2013
Get Real wrote:
Corporate welfare, The middle class paying more taxes than the rich...etc, good old capitalism. Helping the middle class get back on their feet from the devastating damage from the giant corporations and bush regime, SOCIALISM!! COMMUNISM!!.
What freedoms have President Obama taken from us?
The shortest most factual informative post ever posted on this threat!!

It can NOT be disputed!! PERIOD!!

On a scale of 1 to 10 it's a 15!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#99195 May 12, 2013
REALLY wrote:
13 Benghazis on Bush's Watch..
Republicans pushing for a Benghazi investigation entirely ignored the dozen-plus consulate/embassy attacks that occurred when George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were allegedly 'keeping us safe.'"
13 embassy attacks happened under Bush's watch.
In one of these attacks a US diplomat was killed. David Foy was directly targeted by attackers in Karachi, Pakistan, in 2006, and died along with three others.
The most fatal attack took place in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in 2003. 36 were killed including nine Americans.
In another attack on Karachi, 12 were killed and 51 wounded. In Sana'a, Yemen, 16 were killed including an American student. In Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 9 were killed.
Between 2 and 6 people were killed in attacks on US embassies in Calcutta, Islamabad, Tashkent, Istanbul, and Damascus in the years 2002-2008.
Embassies in Athens, Greece, Denpasar, Indonesia, and Sana'a, Yemen were also attacked during Bush's presidency without causing fatalities.
Just where was Daryl Issa???
No one tried to cover them up!

“Hot C can't explain it...”

Since: Apr 13

...but he'll hold your hand

#99196 May 12, 2013
Julian Castro: Mayor of San Antonio

Not the President of Cuba
Not the Cleveland kidnapper

Hopkinsville, KY

#99197 May 12, 2013
Uncle Tab

United States

#99199 May 12, 2013
Also agree that Calvin has owned all of you republicans from day one.

What's even funnier, are all of you jumping on and saying he hasn't made fools if you every day.... That's the same as the political views you and yours are fed everyday..... If you repeat it often enough, it becomes true.

Sorry...... He's smarter and more informed than all of you put together, and all if you put together against him.... You still lose.

But keep telling yourself a everything you Need to to make yourselves look smart.

“Hot C can't explain it...”

Since: Apr 13

...but he'll hold your hand

#99200 May 12, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>No one tried to cover them up!
What cover-up, Dic?
Is the sky falling, too? LMAO

“Hot C can't explain it...”

Since: Apr 13

...but he'll hold your hand

#99201 May 12, 2013
Hillary/ Michele 2016
talk about mass suicide...lol

I like it.

“Hot C can't explain it...”

Since: Apr 13

...but he'll hold your hand

#99202 May 12, 2013
Hillary/ Cal's Retarded Goldfish
could beat...
Paul/ Rubio
Bush/ Cruz
Santorum/(other ass-juice)
Jindal/ Linda Blair <<hehe

(Put Loser Here/(Put Loser Here)2016

Greenville, KY

#99203 May 12, 2013
Calvin_Coolish wrote:
Hillary/ Michele 2016
talk about mass suicide...lol
I like it.
Yeah baby! Me TOO!

Greenville, KY

#99204 May 12, 2013
Hey Uncle Tab, glad your back. Love to see
you and Hot C , fry them up daily.

Mesa, AZ

#99205 May 12, 2013
Calvin_Coolish wrote:
Julian Castro: Mayor of San Antonio
Not the President of Cuba
Not the Cleveland kidnapper
...just arrogant jackass...would really understand ordinary people!
Impeach Oblamer

Lansing, MI

#99206 May 12, 2013
oh please say it isn't so,



Impeach Obama, Top Republicans Say

An attempt is on the cards, agrees commentator

Impeach Oblamer

Lansing, MI

#99207 May 12, 2013
no, please, not our traitor in chief,


Senator Jim Inhofe has proposed Obama's impeachment over the "most egregious cover-up in American history." Speaking on the Rusty Humphries Show, he said "we may be starting to use the I-word before too long."

"The I-word meaning impeachment?" Humphries clarified. "Yeah," said Inhofe. He added that it likely wouldn't happen until after the 2014 midterm elections.

Inhofe joins Mike Huckabee, who predicts that Obama will be impeached over the embassy attack.

Other Republicans constantly hint at impeachment by calling Benghazi "Obama's Watergate," as Sen. Lindsay Graham did last week.
Impeach Oblamer

Lansing, MI

#99208 May 12, 2013
good think oblamer doesn't have anything else in his past that is treasonous, like fast and furious,

Impeach Oblamer

Lansing, MI

#99209 May 12, 2013
what a racist country to impeach a black traitor, we should only go after the white ones,

james green

United States

#99210 May 12, 2013
put in a colored
Oh no

Madisonville, KY

#99211 May 12, 2013
Impeach Oblamer

Lansing, MI

#99212 May 12, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>Okay, since this is the hundredth time you have posted this please allow me to help your dumbass. Socialism and Communism are the exact opposites of each other. A person or a political ruling government cannot be both. Hope this helps you, you ignorant POS.
are you and uncle flabby the same person? there is no possible way two people can be as exactly ignorant as you two are. I am stunned at how intellectually impaired you actually are. You deserve a great big baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa for towing the MSLSD party line,

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Republican Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 4 min replaytime 133,966
US Rep. Grimm pleads guilty to federal tax evasion 10 min jogosdofriv4 6
US and Cuba move to normalize ties, open embassy 2 hr Enter 272
Probe fails to link IRS scandal to White House 2 hr Hooogle It 20
Top Dem: Republicans 'rigging the rules' for ne... 2 hr Hooogle It 8
In 2016, Republicans will be fighting to hold S... 2 hr Hooogle It 20
Obama: We're not at cyber war with North Korea 3 hr Hooogle It 32
More from around the web