Except when one method of "interpreting" the evidence actually works and makes successful predictions, it's a good indication that it could well be correct.<quoted text>
I'm not denying any truths. There are none in this case to deny. The tens of thousands, or even tens of millions, of little bits of evidence is still subject to INTERPRETATION. The evidence does not support anyone in this case.
More primitive being? Primitive, my friend, is relative. I want to know the truth, too. But no one has it yet when to comes to the origin of life. The universe is a very mysterious place, and the more we learn, the more mysterious, and LARGER, it gets.
Oh, and just in case? We still don't give a damm about your frakking UFO aliens.