Obama's 'cautious' approach on ISIS i...

Obama's 'cautious' approach on ISIS is panned

There are 11 comments on the WISN-TV story from Aug 31, 2014, titled Obama's 'cautious' approach on ISIS is panned. In it, WISN-TV reports that:

After President Barack Obama said he didn't yet have a strategy for ISIS in Syria, even a Democrat on Sunday criticized the President's approach to fighting the extremist terror group.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WISN-TV.

Charlie McQuane

Peoria, AZ

#2 Aug 31, 2014
hoppy Late-per DAY!! ontel outside Topix;-000
Charlie McQuane

Peoria, AZ

#3 Aug 31, 2014
DOTSter didnt working sTopix!! ;-000h, gooooooodknite;)
Deo Vindice

Sacramento, CA

#4 Sep 1, 2014
Those are Barack "just-call-me-Hussein " Obama's homeboy muslim terrorists.

TO ALL PATRIOTS, PASS THIS ON VIA E-MAILS, ETC, TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.

http://www.examiner.com/article/cia-now-admit...

P.S.
Before Hussein commandeered his way into the White House, he met a bunch of Arabs (terrorists?)
in Chicago.
After they introduced themselves, he replied, "just call me Hussein".
fyi

Teague, TX

#5 Sep 1, 2014
At least Germany is acting, not much but better than nothing (but what about the Ukraine, the real threat to Europe and the world):

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/ger...
USA Today

Burlington, WI

#6 Sep 1, 2014
Obama's "cautious" approach? Cautious of what? Cautious of committing American lives is good if we fear we cannot beat the enemy. Cautious of spending American dollars is good if we fear the enemy has more money than we do. Caution may be thought necessary if we fear offending so-called Arab allies, who may be supportive of the enemy surge. Caution is good if we are confused and don't know which direction to turn. And if we're confused, we might take a hint from the United Kingdom, and enact stringent internal security measures. Or do we need caution for fear of offending radical elements in our midst?

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#7 Sep 1, 2014
Obama is not being cautious. He's clueless!
First he calls for a war plan, then he says he has no strategy and finally says force is not the solution!
So, now he doesn't need a war plan any more?
And what about that strategy, Big O?
Any clues on what the objectives are? Knowing those would be helpful in forming an effective strategy, don't ya think? What's that? You haven't decided on what the objectives are either?
Yeah. Clueless.
1 post removed
Deo Vindice

Sacramento, CA

#9 Sep 1, 2014
SirPrize wrote:
Obama is not being cautious. He's clueless!
First he calls for a war plan, then he says he has no strategy and finally says force is not the solution!
So, now he doesn't need a war plan any more?
And what about that strategy, Big O?
Any clues on what the objectives are? Knowing those would be helpful in forming an effective strategy, don't ya think? What's that? You haven't decided on what the objectives are either?
Yeah. Clueless.
You got that right!

Of all absurdity, pittbull face and ebonics expert, Maxine Waters, and Harry Reed called Obama a military genius, the greatest military mind ever.
There are many democRATS who actually believe this.
Sgt Common Sense

Denver, CO

#10 Sep 2, 2014
This must be driving the Repubicans crazy.
Until Pres. Obama issues his decision, the Repblicans don't know what to be against!!
fyi

Teague, TX

#11 Sep 2, 2014
SirPrize wrote:
...First he calls for a war plan, then he says he has no strategy and finally says force is not the solution!
Force is the only solution, the strategy is to kill IS fighters, a great deal of deliberation gives IS time to strenthen. The entire U.S. foreign policy establishment needs to read some history, and start dealing with the real world, not the world they imagine.
fyi

Teague, TX

#12 Sep 2, 2014
ISIL will be easy to defeat compared to the Tsar.

http://news.yahoo.com/russia-repeating-georgi...

He doesn't need to infiltrate terrorists, he has nukes in bombers and on ICBMs. Europe and the USA delay action (economic sanctions are a joke and meaningless to the Tsar) and loose face, influence and territory every day. Keep in mind that you will not have a 2nd Amendment remedy when you are subject to the Tsar.
the Light

El Paso, TX

#13 Sep 2, 2014
Sgt Common Sense wrote:
This must be driving the Repubicans crazy.
Until Pres. Obama issues his decision, the Repblicans don't know what to be against!!
He's made his decision, and that is to do nothing. We keep telling you idiots -Obama's out to destroy America. How is it you still don't see it?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Investigations into Russia to continue after Fl... 1 min Norcross hacked 145
News Graham: Trump must punish Russia for election i... 1 min Hostis Publicus 9
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Copout 1,496,697
News Is the media "the enemy"? Pentagon chief weighs in 1 min Cordwainer Trout 5
News Democrats react to Michael Flynn's resignation 4 min Jgfdsvb 419
News Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn r... 4 min huntcoyotes 321
News Senate on track to confirm Scott Pruitt as EPA ... 4 min Hostis Publicus 23
Donald J Trump, our next president (Mar '16) 6 min huntcoyotes 2,534
News Trump's repeated claim that he won a 'landslide... 17 min Obama who 5,828
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 23 min dP cassie 412,532
News Dem rep: Steve Bannon 'is a stone cold racist' 26 min Lawrence Wolf 36
More from around the web