Hill Dems want more love from Obama

Hill Dems want more love from Obama

There are 56 comments on the Politico story from Feb 4, 2013, titled Hill Dems want more love from Obama. In it, Politico reports that:

President Barack Obama and his top advisers have declared that they're done playing "the inside game" in Washington, but one crucial Democratic constituency - his former colleagues in Congress - say the president shouldn't deep-six a strategy that he only half-heartedly tried in his first term.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Politico.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#2 Feb 4, 2013
They will have to get aboard AF 1 to get anything from Obama. He' off again on another meaningless 2 million dollary speech about taking down the second amendment.
conservative crapola

Bethlehem, PA

#3 Feb 4, 2013
au contraire wrote:
Again, no proof, just bullshit, from the tampon princess in drag.

AUtistic-cry-a-thon: Day 90

hahahahahahahaha
Responsibility

Redwood City, CA

#4 Feb 4, 2013
au contraire wrote:
.
Jumbles, dear, it must be frustrating for you folks that instead of a bush-baby holing up cutting brush in Texas, this President is speaking to the people!

Awwww schucks!

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#5 Feb 4, 2013
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Jumbles, dear, it must be frustrating for you folks that instead of a bush-baby holing up cutting brush in Texas, this President is speaking to the people!
Awwww schucks!
He has a twitter account, 5 major media outlets carrying his water, and most major newspapers. Did someone delete the press room in the White House for Obama's second Oval Office he is building.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#6 Feb 4, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, no proof, just bullshit, from the tampon princess in drag.
AUtistic-cry-a-thon: Day 90
hahahahahahahaha
Is the U.S. government getting ready for a war we don’t know about?
And, if that’s why Washington is stockpiling massive amounts of ammunition (hollow points, by the way), why is Homeland Security doing the buying instead of the Defense Department?
I have some theories.
Many of you will remember a story I broke a long time ago – about presidential candidate Barack Obama’s little-noticed announcement that, if elected in 2008, he wanted to create a “civilian national security force” as big, as strong and as well-funded as the Defense Department.
Here’s what he actually said at a campaign stop in Colorado July 2, 2008:“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Want to make sure you and your family are fully protected? Check out our self-defense section in WND’s Superstore.
Could what we see happening now in the Department of Homeland Security be the beginning of Obama’s dream and our constitutional nightmare?
We’ve learned more about Obama’s vision since then. Maybe it’s time for a review:
• He made the campaign promise to build this $439 billion domestic army, but all references to the initiative were inexplicably deleted from the copy of his speech posted on his website while others mysteriously disappeared from transcripts of the speech distributed by the campaign. That was strange – and ominous.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/why-is-government-...

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#7 Feb 4, 2013
Why Do Liberals Want your Guns.........So you can't fight back silly.

Is the U.S. government getting ready for a war we don’t know about?

And, if that’s why Washington is stockpiling massive amounts of ammunition (hollow points, by the way), why is Homeland Security doing the buying instead of the Defense Department?

Many of you will remember a story I broke a long time ago – about presidential candidate Barack Obama’s little-noticed announcement that, if elected in 2008, he wanted to create a “civilian national security force” as big, as strong and as well-funded as the Defense Department.

Here’s what he actually said at a campaign stop in Colorado July 2, 2008:“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”


Could what we see happening now in the Department of Homeland Security be the beginning of Obama’s dream and our constitutional nightmare?
We’ve learned more about Obama’s vision since then. Maybe it’s time for a review:

• He made the campaign promise to build this $439 billion domestic army, but all references to the initiative were inexplicably deleted from the copy of his speech posted on his website while others mysteriously disappeared from transcripts of the speech distributed by the campaign. That was strange – and ominous.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/why-is-government-...
Net Result

Sun City, AZ

#8 Feb 4, 2013
Hill Dems want more love from Obama?
Especially the gay ones - They want to be screwed hard in the rear like most of the country is getting from Obama.
They must feel left out.
Don't worry, you fairy dems - You will get yours in the end when the townspeople show up with the torches and pitchforks.
conservative crapola

Whitehall, PA

#9 Feb 4, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>
Another AU lecry, none reply.

The tulsa wimpering continues..........Day 90.
Your Ex

United States

#10 Feb 4, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Is the U.S. government getting ready for a war we don’t know about?
And, if that’s why Washington is stockpiling massive amounts of ammunition (hollow points, by the way), why is Homeland Security doing the buying instead of the Defense Department?
I have some theories.
Many of you will remember a story I broke a long time ago – about presidential candidate Barack Obama’s little-noticed announcement that, if elected in 2008, he wanted to create a “civilian national security force” as big, as strong and as well-funded as the Defense Department.
Here’s what he actually said at a campaign stop in Colorado July 2, 2008:“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
Want to make sure you and your family are fully protected? Check out our self-defense section in WND’s Superstore.
Could what we see happening now in the Department of Homeland Security be the beginning of Obama’s dream and our constitutional nightmare?
We’ve learned more about Obama’s vision since then. Maybe it’s time for a review:
• He made the campaign promise to build this $439 billion domestic army, but all references to the initiative were inexplicably deleted from the copy of his speech posted on his website while others mysteriously disappeared from transcripts of the speech distributed by the campaign. That was strange – and ominous.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/why-is-government-...
You wouldn't be so paranoid if everyone wasn't out to get you...
http://factcheck.org/2008/11/obamas-national-...

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#11 Feb 4, 2013
The WhiteHouse should be invited to speak about gun violence in CHICAGO.

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#12 Feb 4, 2013
And, Bill not open at the Koch funeral with a comedy bit.
conservative crapola

Whitehall, PA

#13 Feb 4, 2013
RayOne wrote:
The WhiteHouse should be invited to speak about gun violence in CHICAGO.
Why? boom boom lapierre would only defend it.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#14 Feb 4, 2013
Despite some very vacuous comments on this thread by the usual fringe-right suspects, I think Obama should take some shmoozing lessons. He probably has a distaste for the insincerity of small talk, but a teaspoon of sugar...etc.etc.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#15 Feb 4, 2013
Your Ex wrote:
<quoted text>
You wouldn't be so paranoid if everyone wasn't out to get you...
http://factcheck.org/2008/11/obamas-national-...
I guess Obama saying something in a speech on vidio isn't proof. You are a hoot. Fact check prints what the White House tells them to print, just like the MSM.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#16 Feb 4, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
Despite some very vacuous comments on this thread by the usual fringe-right suspects, I think Obama should take some shmoozing lessons. He probably has a distaste for the insincerity of small talk, but a teaspoon of sugar...etc.etc.
He should have got that living at Bill Ayers house.......as well as bomb making.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#17 Feb 4, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
Why? boom boom lapierre would only defend it.
So tell us wiseass, why do you hate your country and its constitution.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#18 Feb 4, 2013
I love all these liberals fighting the second amendment, the fifth amendment and the first amendment. Yep, just like 1994.
conservative crapola

Whitehall, PA

#19 Feb 4, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>
Like your posting rush dickless and bullshitmountain news facts(?), AUbama?

hahahahahahahahaha

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#20 Feb 4, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>He should have got that living at Bill Ayers house.......as well as bomb making.
Your straitjacket too tight? Talk too your keeper before you lose more oxygen.
Your Ex

United States

#21 Feb 4, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>I guess Obama saying something in a speech on vidio isn't proof. You are a hoot. Fact check prints what the White House tells them to print, just like the MSM.
If you took off the tinfoil hat, your head wouldn't overheat so much and you could think more clearly.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News News Trump on unarmed Clinton guards: 'Let's se... 2 min spocko 755
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min USAsince1680 1,432,460
News Why it Matters: Minimum wage 3 min southern at heart 105
News Trump calls on GOP to improve African-American ... 3 min Oh No You Di-nt 1,334
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 4 min Big C 18,398
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 4 min valerie 395,605
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 4 min Chicagoan by Birth 243,630
News Police in riot-hit Charlotte say shooting victi... 2 hr Fred Herbert 623
More from around the web