Joe Biden: buy a shotgun, not an assault rifle, to protect your home

Feb 19, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Guardian Unlimited

Joe Biden , the US vice-president, has said Americans should buy a shotgun rather than an assault rifle if they want to protect their homes.

Comments (Page 25)

Showing posts 481 - 500 of584
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Patriot

Nashville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#529
Feb 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
The truck nor the bomb killed them. It was the person who put the truck in motion.
a truck, rifle, or bomb cannot do anything of its own will. They do deadly work when someone misuses them. A tennis racket can be misused to cause harm to someone.

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#530
Feb 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
The truck nor the bomb killed them. It was the person who put the truck in motion.
I suppose you could break it down into parts...the terrorist being the brain, the truck being the legs, the bomb being the fist, something like that.

But the bomb itself had to blow up in order to kill anyone. I could be the worst terrorist known to man and have the biggest truck, but if I parked it in front of a building with no bomb in it, it wouldn't mean a thing.

I think the argument's silly, but I say look at the immediate cause. Bullets kill people, and bombs. Delivery systems and intelligence behind those systems are kind of presupposed.

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#531
Feb 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
They have to attack the tool because they won't attack liberal actions of the past that gave kooks rights.
That's just dishonest.

“So long to you, Righties”

Since: Jan 12

keep suckin' and whiffin'!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#532
Feb 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Patriot wrote:
<quoted text>The truck bomb was used exactly like a kamikaze plane was used against american shipping during WW2 in the pacific theater.Using your logic you would say the plane had nothing to do with bombing the ships..good grief. You can take that to the bank from an eyewitness!
Uh, except that the truck was a rental moving truck, as I recall, a U-Haul? They don't use those much in warfare, I believe.:)
Patriot

Nashville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#533
Feb 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh, except that the truck was a rental moving truck, as I recall, a U-Haul? They don't use those much in warfare, I believe.:)
I do not think it would be much comfort to the deceased nor to their families if one would recite to them the frequency(or lack thereof) U- Haul trucks were used in combat.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#534
Feb 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Patriot wrote:
<quoted text>I think CB thinks the police needed to show up, take the offender by the hand, sit down with him and let the offender tell the police what society has done to make them feel bad about himself.
You would. ha

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#535
Feb 27, 2013
 
Patriot wrote:
<quoted text>a truck, rifle, or bomb cannot do anything of its own will. They do deadly work when someone misuses them. A tennis racket can be misused to cause harm to someone.
And neither can these killers point their finger and kill. It is a combination of the two, one will not kill without the other, so contrary to the NRA's propaganda slogan "guns don't kill people, people do" is misleading.

If you were going to be attacked, would you prefer the tennis racket or an assult type weapon?

How many mass murders have been committed by tennis rackets?

Are you attempting to deflect from the gun issue with this tennis racket thing?

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#536
Feb 27, 2013
 
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>Look at any of the video from Sandy Hook and you can see that all the civilian law enforcement showed up with assault weapons. You want a ban on the defense weapon that civilians use at the worst of times? I don't think the police are going to be happy showing up at a mass shooting with a revolver.
Nope, have no problem with law enforcement having "these military type weapons. They should never be outgunned.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#537
Feb 27, 2013
 
blaster wrote:
<quoted text>
Yey we do, he used two semi auto handguns. Or did you tell yourself that wasnt two rifles they showed pulled out of trunk because lame stream told you what you saw
Wrong, again check the Connectitcut Highway Patrol Reports, Connectitcut Coroner Reports , Connecticut Medical Examiner Reports.

OR show where national news outlets Fox, ABC, CBS or NBC.

I'm pretty certain at least one {?} of these outlets would be headlining the no assult weapons being used to kill these babies?

DO YOU NOT AGREE?

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#538
Feb 27, 2013
 
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
The truck nor the bomb killed them. It was the person who put the truck in motion.
The bomb and truck didn't kill them???

Sure it did, with the combination of the three, one could not have acted in >this action< without the other two. Period.
Say the Truth

North Wales, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#539
Feb 27, 2013
 
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh, except that the truck was a rental moving truck, as I recall, a U-Haul? They don't use those much in warfare, I believe.:)
It was a Ryder.

How about AR-15s? Are they used much in warfare?

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#540
Feb 27, 2013
 
Naughtyrobot wrote:
"The other commonality that no one is talking about is that all of these killers had been prescribed various anti-anxiety, anti-psychotic, anti-depressant and sleep aid drugs."
http://www.chicagonow.com/uncommon-sense/2013...
I assert that the problem is not the inanimate tool.
Or, the sickness could have been far worse?

Do you believe these drugs do more harm than good. If so, you may wish to visit locatiions where people are prescribed medications and see the results in most case where some may "get off" these prescription drugs. Is there abuse, absolutely, but in a majority of cases it make life worth living for those who are mentally handicapped.
xxxrayted

Beachwood, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#541
Feb 27, 2013
 
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>Nope, have no problem with law enforcement having "these military type weapons. They should never be outgunned.
But we should.........
xxxrayted

Beachwood, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#542
Feb 27, 2013
 
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>And neither can these killers point their finger and kill. It is a combination of the two, one will not kill without the other, so contrary to the NRA's propaganda slogan "guns don't kill people, people do" is misleading.
If you were going to be attacked, would you prefer the tennis racket or an assult type weapon?
How many mass murders have been committed by tennis rackets?
Are you attempting to deflect from the gun issue with this tennis racket thing?
We need to protect ourselves, and yes, with assault weapons now that DumBama is letting all those criminals out of jail. LOL!

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#543
Feb 27, 2013
 
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
But we should.........
Yes, when those type weapons are chosen by gun nuts to kill children.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#544
Feb 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
We need to protect ourselves, and yes, with assault weapons now that DumBama is letting all those criminals out of jail. LOL!
Paranoid much?

Those realeased are non-violent illegal aliens who are wasting your precious monies for their incarceration.

You republican conservatives are always crying about people wasting your tax dollars, then when Our Great President Obama saves you money and you object. HHHHMMMMM??????

Which way is it? Save money or whine?

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#545
Feb 27, 2013
 
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>Nope, have no problem with law enforcement having "these military type weapons. They should never be outgunned.
So I ask what is the difference between a Civilian On Patrol (COP) and a civilian in their home or on their land? There is not ONE word in the Constitution about a police force within society. I am a COP in my own home and should have access to ANY weapon allowed to any police force.

“Better Dead than red!”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#546
Feb 27, 2013
 
Thanks Joe! I got one of those too!

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#547
Feb 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Here you go, brainwashed liar:
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/12/19/bushmaste...
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/201...
http://members.jacksonville.com/news/premium-...
Now, since you know the truth, you will have to quit making false claims.
It was a SHOTGUN pulled out of the trunk, incidentally. MORON.
An AR15 is NOT an assault rifle, you idiot! Assault Rifles, by definition, are required to fire more than one bullet with one squeeze of the trigger. True assault rifles have been banned without special permits for many decades. Obama is trying to ban SEMI-AUTOMATIC RIFLES and is LYING by calling them Assault Rifles.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#548
Feb 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>So I ask what is the difference between a Civilian On Patrol (COP) and a civilian in their home or on their land? There is not ONE word in the Constitution about a police force within society. I am a COP in my own home and should have access to ANY weapon allowed to any police force.
Semantics, home owner and cop.

You might consider that scenerio and the Sandy Hook School shooting. If it was possible to ask the shooter's mother {if she hadn't been murdered with those weapons} if she still wisher to have those weapons in her home would she agree with you or argue for stricker gun controls. My opinion, she would wish she had never purchased them and taught her son to shoot.

I have no problem with cops having assult type weapons, but we witness as with this incident what happens when some civillians are given the same armament as professionals. And I'm pretty sure you might be a respoinsibile gun owner but there are a lot who arn't and we see what happens in some of those cases.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 481 - 500 of584
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••
•••