Ohio Slipping Out Of Romney's Reach

Ohio Slipping Out Of Romney's Reach

There are 2840 comments on the ABC News story from Sep 26, 2012, titled Ohio Slipping Out Of Romney's Reach. In it, ABC News reports that:

OHIO NOW LEANS OBAMA: ABC News Political Director Amy Walter notes that today's New York Times-CBS News-Quinnipiac poll is the fourth non-partisan media poll in a row to show President Obama not only ahead by a significant margin, but at or above 50 percent of the vote.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at ABC News.

xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#2606 Nov 15, 2012
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Psssssst....Hey buddy....Come here.....lemmee show you sumthin....
Looky right there, and there, and there, and there...oh, there too.
Right there, in 51 different Constitutions.
Says your plan won't fly in court. Something about the state not being able to endorse a particular religion. Crazy stuff, huh?
Oh...and I've heard that Obama consults with the Joint Chiefs on funding and material/staffing requests...mentioned in the debates even...something about buying less horses and bayonets this year.
wacka wacka wacka
woof
Your dopey eared half-breed doesn't even think they use bayonets anymore.

You don't follow very well either. What's wrong with a community of a specific religion dictating the curriculum? Oh, that's right, CONGRESS. Except that a local school funded by local people has nothing to do with Congress.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2607 Nov 15, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
More left-wing BS. How do you even read those articles unless you're doing so for humor?
Article is written by Ross Gregory Douthat who is a conservative American author, blogger and New York Times columnist

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Douthat

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2608 Nov 15, 2012
UdintBuildThat wrote:
Just the ones who were so damn stupid as to vote for the Marxist.
nothing wrong with being a Marxist, its the ones that are not considered Marxist that area threat.
Duke for Mayor

Lakemore, OH

#2609 Nov 15, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Your dopey eared half-breed doesn't even think they use bayonets anymore.
You don't follow very well either. What's wrong with a community of a specific religion dictating the curriculum? Oh, that's right, CONGRESS. Except that a local school funded by local people has nothing to do with Congress.
Go listen again. He said "as many" if I remember correctly.

You don't understand the 14th Amendment, or the application of individual state Constitutional law, do you?

woof
1 post removed
mapleman

Netherlands

#2611 Nov 15, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
I see, so this wealth redistribution and hatred towards the wealthy comes from the Republican side? DumBama has been on that rant for over three years now. He is fascinated with this number 250 thousand. It seems to be on his mind night and day.
Class envy was not an invention of the conservatives. Class envy is the production of liberals who believe they have every right to another persons money. Liberals believe that all money belongs to government first, and it is their good will on what they allow you to keep.
Who invented the wealthy taken advantage of people who are not? Did liberals invent exploitation of people who aren't wealthy? Here we go again. Someone who is not wealthy defending the wealthy. Why? Let them defend themselves. They don't care about you. That's why CEO salaries are through the roof. Have the wages of workers increased on a similar scale? I don't think so.

It isn't about hate. People are just sick of bending over for the wealthy and their puppet politicians. Wait a minute. I guess you can call it hate. I hate to get anally brutalized by the wealthy. Other Americans feel the same way. Meanwhile, people like you worry about the poor people on stamps or aid. You lost focus as to who the real abusers are.

It's hilarious. You act like your wealth is being redistributed. When you make over $300,000 a year, start complaining about wealth redistribution. Until then, try concentrating on what is in your best interest for once in your life.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2612 Nov 15, 2012
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Deep depression for a week now. Very sad.
woof
No doubt. Have you heard about the Darwin effect? One irate Republican business owner in Florida killed himself when he found out Obama won.
mapleman

Netherlands

#2613 Nov 15, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
You are correct on one thing: we are a nuclear world, and aircraft carriers won't defend us from that--especially after Iran gets their hands on it.
So far, I have not heard one high ranking military person say that our military has too much. What is too much anyway? Who decides that? Shouldn't military experts make that decision, or a community organizer?
As for religion and schools, I believe that if a community is basically Christian, and they want Christianity taught in their schools that they pay for, why should the federal government be allowed to step in and tell them they can't? I feel the same way about a predominantly Jewish Community or an Islamic community.
Well..... what about those one or two students who live in a religious community but don't follow that religion? Let them move if they don't like it. If I decide to purchase a home in a Jewish area, then why would I be outraged that they celebrate their religion anyway they desire? I wouldn't get upset because they have a Star David hanging on a wall at their school or perhaps one on the lawn of city hall.
Of course, maybe I fell that way because I'm conservative. Liberals are miserable people. If they don't like something, then nobody should like it, and they will make sure of it.
Iran isn't building a nuke to use it. It's building a nuke as a deterrent. Using a nuke would ensure Iran's destruction. Contrary to U.S. media propaganda, the leaders are not suicidal. They just want the nuke so they don't end up like Iraq. Iran wants to be more like China. Iran wants to be able to not be interfered with by western interests. Iran doesn't want to be talked down to. Iran wants to be talked to like an equal.

Asking a military person if we have enough military is like asking a porn addict if he has enough porn. Do you honestly expect a person in either case to say no? If you let the guys in your tech department spend money without a set budget, they would bankrupt your business. They would buy every piece of technology that came out. Yeah, I trust the military guys. lol You just take the information they give you and make an informed decision.

The U.S. isn't a majority rule society. It has rules in place to protect minorities(don't just associate this with black people). The religious minority is to be protected as well.

I told you. If we let you guys run the U.S., we will fall far, far, far behind the rest of the world. Christianity being taught in schools as fact? Wow. You guys are the mirror image of the Taliban. That's why when I ask any of you conservatives to find me a society you want to be like, you can't find one modern example. All you have is the past.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2614 Nov 15, 2012
mapleman wrote:
<quoted text>
Iran isn't building a nuke to use it. It's building a nuke as a deterrent. Using a nuke would ensure Iran's destruction. Contrary to U.S. media propaganda, the leaders are not suicidal. They just want the nuke so they don't end up like Iraq. Iran wants to be more like China. Iran wants to be able to not be interfered with by western interests. Iran doesn't want to be talked down to. Iran wants to be talked to like an equal.
Asking a military person if we have enough military is like asking a porn addict if he has enough porn. Do you honestly expect a person in either case to say no? If you let the guys in your tech department spend money without a set budget, they would bankrupt your business. They would buy every piece of technology that came out. Yeah, I trust the military guys. lol You just take the information they give you and make an informed decision.
The U.S. isn't a majority rule society. It has rules in place to protect minorities(don't just associate this with black people). The religious minority is to be protected as well.
I told you. If we let you guys run the U.S., we will fall far, far, far behind the rest of the world. Christianity being taught in schools as fact? Wow. You guys are the mirror image of the Taliban. That's why when I ask any of you conservatives to find me a society you want to be like, you can't find one modern example. All you have is the past.
Exactly. That's called the zero sum game. You can't use it or you lose the game.

Military industrial complex milking the American public, fighting an imaginary enemy in order to justify the expense. That's what the protection racket is all about. It's as old as time.

Instituting Biblical (tribal) law is exactly the same as sharia law. It is an Abrahamic construct. Who's version would prevail? Highly problematic.

Kudos!!!
mapleman

Netherlands

#2615 Nov 15, 2012
Blacktigershark wrote:
<quoted text>
I have heard the term of the angry White male being labelled and abbreviated into the AWM (Angry White Male) syndrome...you can often point out which White men suffer from this syndrome, especially when you observe these White males from a distance, when they are at country bars.
Look for the Confederate bumper stickers, the cowboy boots and hats, the Pilsner, Miller and Molson Canadian bottles, the draft pitchers, the leather chaps (the tighter the leather chaps, the more severe the AWM syndrome is going to be in the subject), the conversations these White males have about conservative ideals, while scapegoating minorities, the belt buckles, the jean jackets with rhinestones on them...it is quite comical, mapleman!
The best is when you say something to one of these intoxicated White males that the other drunk White male at the other end of the bar said something about their mother, or a girl in their clique (or even dare to say that one of these White men isn't a true conservative cowboy, because the other cowboy over there said that he knows for a FACT that he suffers from Red fever or Yellow fever...you get what I'm saying here, right mapleman??? LOL!). This is when you see what social conservatism has to offer, when you sit back and videotape a bunch of White males fighting each other, just because you have brought out their AWM syndrome to the surface...But hey...these social conservatives don't need Obamacare...they are content to walk around with no teeth, while saying that they lost their teeth by trying to uphold their reputations of NEVER having entered into any sort of inappropriate relationship with a minority, or another guy for that matter...ain't that right, xxxrayted? LMFAO!
The Republican party serves the interests of the rich, religious fanatics, and the angry white male. All extremes. It is not the party of balance.

I'm an Independent. While I'm fiscally conservative, I'm socially liberal. Fiscally conservative does not mean fiscally suicidal. I think the average republican who is not rich is advocating fiscal suicide. They are so full of anger that they can't think clearly. It is said that you should never make decisions when you are angry. The Republicans have mastered getting their base angry so that they make choices that are not sensible.

I listen to conservative talk for entertainment. It's funny. I hear these angry white men. They really think they are victims. They refuse to see it is wealthy white men who are sticking it to them. Since they are too impotent to take on the real threat, they turn their anger to the minorities, gay, and people who are in the same financial situation that they are in.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2616 Nov 15, 2012
mapleman wrote:
<quoted text>
The Republican party serves the interests of the rich, religious fanatics, and the angry white male. All extremes. It is not the party of balance.
I'm an Independent. While I'm fiscally conservative, I'm socially liberal. Fiscally conservative does not mean fiscally suicidal. I think the average republican who is not rich is advocating fiscal suicide. They are so full of anger that they can't think clearly. It is said that you should never make decisions when you are angry. The Republicans have mastered getting their base angry so that they make choices that are not sensible.
I listen to conservative talk for entertainment. It's funny. I hear these angry white men. They really think they are victims. They refuse to see it is wealthy white men who are sticking it to them. Since they are too impotent to take on the real threat, they turn their anger to the minorities, gay, and people who are in the same financial situation that they are in.
It is a power game of manipulative forces. I doubt they actually serve anyone. They will throw the fundies and teabags under the bus when it becomes politically expedient to do so.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#2617 Nov 15, 2012
mapleman wrote:
<quoted text>
Who invented the wealthy taken advantage of people who are not? Did liberals invent exploitation of people who aren't wealthy? Here we go again. Someone who is not wealthy defending the wealthy. Why? Let them defend themselves. They don't care about you. That's why CEO salaries are through the roof. Have the wages of workers increased on a similar scale? I don't think so.
It isn't about hate. People are just sick of bending over for the wealthy and their puppet politicians. Wait a minute. I guess you can call it hate. I hate to get anally brutalized by the wealthy. Other Americans feel the same way. Meanwhile, people like you worry about the poor people on stamps or aid. You lost focus as to who the real abusers are.
It's hilarious. You act like your wealth is being redistributed. When you make over $300,000 a year, start complaining about wealth redistribution. Until then, try concentrating on what is in your best interest for once in your life.
Great. Now give me one example how you personally had to "bend over" for the wealthy. Just one. Better still, give me one example of how I had to bend over for the wealthy--or perhaps your neighbor or relative.

What you liberal minded people ignore is that no matter what, we all pay for the so called attacks on the wealthy. Let me give you an example: my employer has to endure the expense of Commie Care. It's going to cost him %20,000. Now, do you really think my employer is going to go to his check book, write out a check for $20,000 to Commie Care?

It doesn't work that way; never will. It's called the food chain. Those on the top don't worry about getting eaten. They just eat more of those below them. So should I expect a raise from my employer after he pays this tax from Commie Care? Should I expect more benefits such as medical or retirement? Or should I expect no raise for the next several years? And what about our customers? Do you think my employer will charge the same rates as he did before Commie Care?

Okay, so now we see the trickle down expense flow chart. It's real, it's been going on for decades, except those who hate the wealthy that refuse to acknowledge it. So my employer freezes my pay, his customers have to absorb the cost, our customer has to pass on that added cost to his product, and you and I pay for that in the store.

But gee! Why should I stick up for the wealthy if I am not wealthy?
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#2618 Nov 15, 2012
mapleman wrote:
<quoted text>
Iran isn't building a nuke to use it. It's building a nuke as a deterrent. Using a nuke would ensure Iran's destruction. Contrary to U.S. media propaganda, the leaders are not suicidal. They just want the nuke so they don't end up like Iraq. Iran wants to be more like China. Iran wants to be able to not be interfered with by western interests. Iran doesn't want to be talked down to. Iran wants to be talked to like an equal.
Asking a military person if we have enough military is like asking a porn addict if he has enough porn. Do you honestly expect a person in either case to say no? If you let the guys in your tech department spend money without a set budget, they would bankrupt your business. They would buy every piece of technology that came out. Yeah, I trust the military guys. lol You just take the information they give you and make an informed decision.
The U.S. isn't a majority rule society. It has rules in place to protect minorities(don't just associate this with black people). The religious minority is to be protected as well.
I told you. If we let you guys run the U.S., we will fall far, far, far behind the rest of the world. Christianity being taught in schools as fact? Wow. You guys are the mirror image of the Taliban. That's why when I ask any of you conservatives to find me a society you want to be like, you can't find one modern example. All you have is the past.
There was a discussion on the radio about government and religion several years ago. The focus was on Cuba. A Cuban immigrant called in to tell what took place when he grew up there.

He stated that Castro would meet all children. He would do this in school with his henchmen. He instructed the children to close their eyes, hold out their hand palms up, and ask God for some candy which the children did. He then instructed them to open their eyes only to observe their hands were still empty. He repeated the experiment except this time, ask Castro for candy. And as the children held their hand out, this minions will fill their little hands with treats.

The teachings of Communist and dictator governments is to train people that there is no higher power than government. There is no God, so don't bother praying. If you need to live, to survive, to endure calamity, you ask government--not God.

In a roundabout way, this is exactly the teachings of our Democrat party. Remove God so that the highest power to rely on is government. It's no wonder why the American Communist Party and major dictators around the globe endorsed DumBama. It's no wonder why we have record government dependents.

Iran has been a pain in our asse for the last 30 years of more. Not once did we ever threaten them. At the same time, they've expressed desire to wipe out Israel. And you think Iran is building nukes for defense? Man are you naive.
Another

Huntsville, AL

#2619 Nov 15, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Your dopey eared half-breed .
racist post.
Another

Huntsville, AL

#2620 Nov 15, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>


.
pile of idiotic assertions.

Since: Aug 12

United States

#2621 Nov 15, 2012
Another wrote:
<quoted text>
pile of idiotic assertions.
.
Typical moocher class whineybaby...
Independent

Portland, TX

#2622 Nov 15, 2012
more wrote:
<quoted text>
made up BS.
90% of people don't know the real meaning of either word. I made that up, but it is more true than your phony "study."
Well, in a way it may be true, I mean, if the kiddies grow up with this now recent aspect of socialism, they won't know what they are missing, thus continue the cycle as it progresses, thus you end with a higher form of progressiveness. You have your freedom that we as a country continue to vote for, slowly decay and you don't even notice it. Obama sucks and I don't give a shit! Who doesn't focking like it! His policies piss me off, and hope we come to our senses in a few yrs and pass legislation to rid ourselves of this liberal/progressive cancer. Stupid uneducated, uninformed, Americans are slowly giving up their liberties to get things they do not have to earn and don't even know it. I am not a republican, or a democrat, just a focking pissed off concerned US Army veteran. We need to do something folks, or we gonna lose her.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2623 Nov 15, 2012
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>Well, in a way it may be true, I mean, if the kiddies grow up with this now recent aspect of socialism, they won't know what they are missing, thus continue the cycle as it progresses, thus you end with a higher form of progressiveness. You have your freedom that we as a country continue to vote for, slowly decay and you don't even notice it. Obama sucks and I don't give a shit! Who doesn't focking like it! His policies piss me off, and hope we come to our senses in a few yrs and pass legislation to rid ourselves of this liberal/progressive cancer. Stupid uneducated, uninformed, Americans are slowly giving up their liberties to get things they do not have to earn and don't even know it. I am not a republican, or a democrat, just a focking pissed off concerned US Army veteran. We need to do something folks, or we gonna lose her.
Nice rant BRO

Keep whining.
Independent

Portland, TX

#2624 Nov 15, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice rant BRO
Keep whining.
Yea, I'll whine, while your lazy pot smoking ass goes and gets a job! Punk! Your gravy train is costing people their jobs and their livelyhood , while you run around in your assless chaps, screaming about how good we are going to have it with the "affordable care act". Go work for a living first and learn what it is to pay for something you do not wish to have, I work my ass off to support my family and don't require handouts, or need govt assistance, unlike you punk, I served my country and do not require payback. My payback is that we all live free, unimposed by some two bit chicago style flap jack communitee organizer who never held a job in his life. So, yea punk, I have a right to whine, I served my country, what have you done for yours? Yea, and if you don't like it, Blow it out your ass! Punk!
Truth

Portland, TX

#2625 Nov 15, 2012
mapleman wrote:
<quoted text>
How is Obama weakening the defenses of America? By cutting some money from the bloated military budget? Please. That's like taking $50 million from Bill Gates and then saying Bill is going to have financial difficulties because he lost $50 million. It's laughable.
The U.S. is an imperialistic power. The only people who buy this "freedom" defending BS are people who don't know what America is about. The last "freedom defending" war was in the 1940s. For American citizens to live the way they do, people in the world have to suffer and be taken advantage of. It's just that simple. Better them than us, right? Spread democracy and consumerism at gunpoint. Anything to open up the market to American banks, corporations, and military contractors. At least be realistic about the world.
The extremes on the Democratic side are more happy than the extremes on the Republican side. The Republican side is all about bitterness. Worrying about other people who have it better than them. That's what it comes down to. People who can't afford the latest whining and complaining about "moochers" who have the latest. You don't see that with environmentalists. They are trying to save the environment. That benefits us all.
Of course your ilk don't see it that way. You honestly think corporations would police themselves. They don't. We need people who are concerned about the environment. The U.S. would be filthy and polluted if the people on the right had their way.
From people obsessed with the environment to people on welfare, Democrats all seem to be happier than biter Republicans. The Republican party is all about hate and intolerance. Take two people who are not on welfare. You are more likely to hear "I wish I had it as easy as those moochers" from a bitter Republican. I can't imagine living such a miserable existence.
" The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.

Since: Aug 12

United States

#2626 Nov 15, 2012
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>Yea, I'll whine, while your lazy pot smoking ass goes and gets a job! Punk! Your gravy train is costing people their jobs and their livelyhood , while you run around in your assless chaps, screaming about how good we are going to have it with the "affordable care act". Go work for a living first and learn what it is to pay for something you do not wish to have, I work my ass off to support my family and don't require handouts, or need govt assistance, unlike you punk, I served my country and do not require payback. My payback is that we all live free, unimposed by some two bit chicago style flap jack communitee organizer who never held a job in his life. So, yea punk, I have a right to whine, I served my country, what have you done for yours? Yea, and if you don't like it, Blow it out your ass! Punk!
.
Hell yes!!! Well worth re posting!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Democratic congressman has heart valve replacem... 2 min CodeTalker 78
News James Comey fired as FBI director 4 min Gotti 2,925
News Trump's repeated claim that he won a 'landslide... 5 min Silent Echo 8,626
News Donald Trump not swayed by G-7 leaders on Paris... 7 min swampmudd 47
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 12 min democrat punisher 2,814
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 17 min CodeTalker 270,686
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 23 min Joy 1,536,434
News New 'Blue Lives Matter' laws raise concerns amo... 10 hr UMoronRACEUMAKEWO... 47
More from around the web