The President has failed us

The President has failed us

There are 381274 comments on the Times News story from Jun 9, 2012, titled The President has failed us. In it, Times News reports that:

This week, I decided to list the reasons I would not vote for Barack Obama in the next election.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Times News.

“It's quiet, can you hear it?”

Since: Oct 07

Whassup,USA

#99134 Feb 1, 2013
I gotta get my non-political 2 cents in before they nuke the thread to Cyberia.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#99135 Feb 1, 2013
Jay wrote:
<quoted text>
**********
Yup. Posts are being deleted back to one hour ago.
I thought I'd find you here. Never the less, OZ has been gone for some time, perhaps name changed, but it don't sound like it. Definitely - someone is pull some crap!
It's the mail man ;0)
1 post removed

“American & Cowgirl by Birth”

Since: Jan 13

Dodge City, KS

#99137 Feb 1, 2013
You have no idea who I am or why I'm on here.

Whomever is messing with these sites are committing an interstate felony. Can be prosecuted for Federal & Interstate offenses. When a poster from one state replies to a poster in another state you are bound and obligated to laws of each containing state regarding cyber offenses.
Jay

Paris, TN

#99138 Feb 1, 2013
You guys can mark clueless all you want, but they are deleting posts on Fox Debate. There was some good stuff posted on that site, informative and educational, and some jackass decided for us what they wanted us to read. What Nazi this is, we have yet to find out!

And, that's a fact! Not clueless or nuts. Fact!!!

“Try Reuters.”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#99139 Feb 1, 2013
Jay wrote:
You guys can mark clueless all you want, but they are deleting posts on Fox Debate. There was some good stuff posted on that site, informative and educational, and some jackass decided for us what they wanted us to read. What Nazi this is, we have yet to find out!
And, that's a fact! Not clueless or nuts. Fact!!!
Frankly, both of ya' are hyped up on some kind of paranoia. You've brought your complaints to the wrong place. TOPIX, itself, is pulling posts, not posters. If AL/HOH/and whatever else name she uses is losing posts from a thread left and right, it's because she continuously violates the TOS, and somebody has her number. The other night on this thread, it appeared possibly that some sympathic Topix employee came by to try and have a dialogue with her. She shut that person down immediately by calling them a Libtard - although he/she had said nothing that would even indicate political position.

So, whatever happened "over there" has nothing to do with anybody over here. We'd love her to be happy as a clam "over there". Really. We would.
Jay

Paris, TN

#99140 Feb 2, 2013
NTRPRNR1 wrote:
<quoted text>Frankly, both of ya' are hyped up on some kind of paranoia. You've brought your complaints to the wrong place. TOPIX, itself, is pulling posts, not posters. If AL/HOH/and whatever else name she uses is losing posts from a thread left and right, it's because she continuously violates the TOS, and somebody has her number. The other night on this thread, it appeared possibly that some sympathic Topix employee came by to try and have a dialogue with her. She shut that person down immediately by calling them a Libtard - although he/she had said nothing that would even indicate political position.
So, whatever happened "over there" has nothing to do with anybody over here. We'd love her to be happy as a clam "over there". Really. We would.
**********

You missed the whole point, "NTRPRNR1" if they can do it there for little or no reason to everyone, they can do it here. So there is no real over there or over here. It's a public forum where everyone has a right to post. Or do you own this site? Never the less, just because you don't like what someone says, is this not still a free country, with differences of opinion? Or do the people on this side of the "over here" own this joint?

See? I don't think so!

Oh, and by the way; there's nothing that she posts that's any worse than some on there...meaning "over there." In fact, there is slander and plenty of violations, but those people are never booted. See what I'm sayin'?

“Try Reuters.”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#99141 Feb 2, 2013
http://www.openmarket.org/2013/02/01/the-new-...

The New National Identification System Is Coming

by David Bier on February 1, 2013

After the election, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who is leading the Democrats immigration push, told NBC News that one of his top priorities was to “make sure that there is a non-forgeable document” for all employees. After years of pushing for one, Sen. Schumer may have broken through GOP opposition.“We’re going to have to come up with something, but the principle we all agree on,” Sen. Chuck Schumer said this week....Even worse than a physical card, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Social Security Administration (SSA) has created an electronic national ID called electronic employment verification (EEV). The current rendition is known as E-Verify, which has combined DHS’s immigration database with the SSA’s database, containing your name, address, legal status, work authorization, and social security number. The Senate immigration bill will mandate all employers use E-Verify to check the immigration status of their employees. Right now, employers can voluntarily submit the employee’s name and number to check if they match the name and number in the system. If the names or numbers don’t match, you must take further steps to prove your identity at SSA offices.(cont.)

“Try Reuters.”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#99142 Feb 2, 2013
Jay wrote:
<quoted text>
**********
You missed the whole point, "NTRPRNR1" if they can do it there for little or no reason to everyone, they can do it here. So there is no real over there or over here. It's a public forum where everyone has a right to post. Or do you own this site? Never the less, just because you don't like what someone says, is this not still a free country, with differences of opinion? Or do the people on this side of the "over here" own this joint?
See? I don't think so!
Oh, and by the way; there's nothing that she posts that's any worse than some on there...meaning "over there." In fact, there is slander and plenty of violations, but those people are never booted. See what I'm sayin'?
Whoaa! Slow down a second. I do NOT want anybody's right to free speech impeded. I'm trying to help you understand how her posts could have been stripped from the thread. Did she violate a TOS? Somehow she must have. Did she receive a warning before it happened? I don't know.

I had my own posts stripped from this thread last night, and the reason used was that they had been reported as spam. The Mod indicated that if you put up two or three posts in a row fast, they might be considered spam. BS as far as I'm concerned, but that's what I was told. Is there a magic number for "how fast" or "slow"? Who knows. But, NOBODY over here is responsible for HOH's posts being yanked. Why doesn't she ask a Mod why her posts were pulled?

“Peace”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#99143 Feb 2, 2013
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>There are some here that would. I know those. I can see them when I look at them right between the eyes and see deeper.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =8_5zXI8xCvMXX
I was being bad when I said you weren't American or believed in the Constitution. Not good.
But here you're being bad ..... well really much worse then I was.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#99144 Feb 2, 2013
Jay wrote:
<quoted text>
**********
You missed the whole point, "NTRPRNR1" if they can do it there for little or no reason to everyone, they can do it here. So there is no real over there or over here. It's a public forum where everyone has a right to post. Or do you own this site? Never the less, just because you don't like what someone says, is this not still a free country, with differences of opinion? Or do the people on this side of the "over here" own this joint?
See? I don't think so!
Oh, and by the way; there's nothing that she posts that's any worse than some on there...meaning "over there." In fact, there is slander and plenty of violations, but those people are never booted. See what I'm sayin'?
LOL

Why are you getting on Ntr? She didn't boot anyone. She is as free to here opinion of that poster as the next person.

I think YOU missed the point...calling the wrong persona a "libtard" may get you banned.

It's really pretty simple. ;)

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#99145 Feb 2, 2013
Jmo of course. ;)

“Try Reuters.”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#99146 Feb 2, 2013
_White American_ wrote:
<quoted text>I was being bad when I said you weren't American or believed in the Constitution. Not good.
But here you're being bad ..... well really much worse then I was.
It seems like a threat, does it not? He says it isn't, but that doesn't register on the truth-o-meter.

“Peace”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#99147 Feb 2, 2013
Jaxxon wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey WA.
I saw that you had asked several questions about the discussion we were having last night and I would love to examine all of this and exchange ideas, but you need to understand that my point last night was just to examine what the proposal actually said.
There are parts that I agree with, some parts I think might cause a problem in the current political environment and some I might not agree with at all.
All of that would be worked out as we talk about it and consider the possible ramifications of each piece of the proposal.
I wasn't taking sides pro or con. I was simply determined that it be put out there for discussion despite the obvious impediments Topix tried to place in the path of that conversation.
I would love to discuss it Jax. Which is why I replied to some of what you posted. But remember that I don't expect to agree with all your views or all of any other posters. I'm sure some we will agree about though. That's all good and will help to open up the discussion on the thread which it should be. I'm looking forward to expressing our different views on here. So I'm ready when you are.
Jay

Paris, TN

#99148 Feb 2, 2013
NTRPRNR1 wrote:
<quoted text>Whoaa! Slow down a second. I do NOT want anybody's right to free speech impeded. I'm trying to help you understand how her posts could have been stripped from the thread. Did she violate a TOS? Somehow she must have. Did she receive a warning before it happened? I don't know.
I had my own posts stripped from this thread last night, and the reason used was that they had been reported as spam. The Mod indicated that if you put up two or three posts in a row fast, they might be considered spam. BS as far as I'm concerned, but that's what I was told. Is there a magic number for "how fast" or "slow"? Who knows. But, NOBODY over here is responsible for HOH's posts being yanked. Why doesn't she ask a Mod why her posts were pulled?
*********

Ok, thanks for your decent reply. Wish I could answer what you asked, but I don't know why some nasty vile posts get left on there that don't even apply to the subject and others who leave links to sites that have relevent and informative subjects are suddenly deleted. Thing is in the last two hours everything is gone from the Fox Debate site. Nothing on there was in violation that anyone could tell. Just comments in return.

This is what I'm saying. I did not mean to imply that anyone posting was doing this, only that it doesn't make sense.

Thanks again.

“Peace”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#99149 Feb 2, 2013
Phurhankey Jahonsuninski wrote:
<quoted text>
You aren't the one who decides what spam is either.
Geesh get off of it all right all ready. The mods decided it wasn't spam after taking a second look at it. Ok....No Spam.

“American & Cowgirl by Birth”

Since: Jan 13

Dodge City, KS

#99150 Feb 2, 2013
NTRPRNR1 wrote:
<quoted text>Frankly, both of ya' are hyped up on some kind of paranoia. You've brought your complaints to the wrong place. TOPIX, itself, is pulling posts, not posters. If AL/HOH/and whatever else name she uses is losing posts from a thread left and right, it's because she continuously violates the TOS, and somebody has her number. The other night on this thread, it appeared possibly that some sympathic Topix employee came by to try and have a dialogue with her. She shut that person down immediately by calling them a Libtard - although he/she had said nothing that would even indicate political position.
So, whatever happened "over there" has nothing to do with anybody over here. We'd love her to be happy as a clam "over there". Really. We would.
This is your story?
This is YOUR story!

I'ts NOT just my posts being removed, it's mine PLUS several of the other Conservatives. As for the rest of your story, I have no idea of what you are talking about.

Thanks for your input.
HoH

“Peace”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#99151 Feb 2, 2013
Jay wrote:
<quoted text>
*********
Ok, thanks for your decent reply. Wish I could answer what you asked, but I don't know why some nasty vile posts get left on there that don't even apply to the subject and others who leave links to sites that have relevent and informative subjects are suddenly deleted. Thing is in the last two hours everything is gone from the Fox Debate site. Nothing on there was in violation that anyone could tell. Just comments in return.
This is what I'm saying. I did not mean to imply that anyone posting was doing this, only that it doesn't make sense.
Thanks again.
It's never made sense to the long time posters either. I guess some things are just inscrutable.

“Peace”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#99152 Feb 2, 2013
NTRPRNR1 wrote:
<quoted text>It seems like a threat, does it not? He says it isn't, but that doesn't register on the truth-o-meter.
Agreed that's why he says it that way. It gives him a little wiggle room...very little.

“Peace”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#99153 Feb 2, 2013
NTRPRNR1 wrote:
http://www.openmarket.org/2013/02/01/the-new-...
The New National Identification System Is Coming
by David Bier on February 1, 2013
After the election, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who is leading the Democrats immigration push, told NBC News that one of his top priorities was to “make sure that there is a non-forgeable document” for all employees. After years of pushing for one, Sen. Schumer may have broken through GOP opposition.“We’re going to have to come up with something, but the principle we all agree on,” Sen. Chuck Schumer said this week....Even worse than a physical card, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Social Security Administration (SSA) has created an electronic national ID called electronic employment verification (EEV). The current rendition is known as E-Verify, which has combined DHS’s immigration database with the SSA’s database, containing your name, address, legal status, work authorization, and social security number. The Senate immigration bill will mandate all employers use E-Verify to check the immigration status of their employees. Right now, employers can voluntarily submit the employee’s name and number to check if they match the name and number in the system. If the names or numbers don’t match, you must take further steps to prove your identity at SSA offices.(cont.)
It's really looking to me like the immigration reform plan will have real teeth in it this time around. If done correctly undocumemted will equate to unemployed.
Jay

Paris, TN

#99154 Feb 2, 2013
X -Man- wrote:
Jmo of course. ;)
**********

Hey X Man, I'm not on anybody. I was simply making a point in response to what AL said. The Fox Debate is ancient, and lots of people come and go, but if you want to talk about name calling such as "libtard" come on over and listen-up.

JMO, too.

8)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Donald J Trump, our next president 1 min flack 47
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 1 min Rose_NoHo 10,695
News North Carolina's rush to bigotry 1 min woodtick57 2,130
News Republicans downplay Trump rally unrest in Cali... 2 min Trumping On 252
News Elephants perform for final time at Ringling Bros. 3 min woodtick57 12
News In America, atheists are still in the closet (Apr '12) 5 min onetwoxyz 50,939
News Violence follows California Trump rally, about ... 5 min Cat74 276
News "I have never seen negatives that high," says a... 33 min woodtick57 61
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 1 hr Cornelius Scudmister 222,790
More from around the web