Why They Hate Obama

Why They Hate Obama

There are 12489 comments on the The Daily Beast story from Aug 8, 2013, titled Why They Hate Obama. In it, The Daily Beast reports that:

As the Virginia Flaggers loft their Confederate flag in opposition to the 'tyranny' of 2013, Jamelle Bouie argues that racial bias plays at least some part in Obama's collapse in the South.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Daily Beast.

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#8853 Mar 17, 2014
harmonious wrote:
<quoted text>
Says who? You? I have nothing to deny, Bush's tax cuts had the economy humming, even after 9/11. Name one thing Bush did without demorat votes.
Both of the Bush Tax Cuts were passed in a republican Congress USING RECONCILIATION BOTH TIMES YOU FOOL!(Yeah stupid, the same reconciliation used to pass the ACA you guys bitch about!)

Democrats knew the Bush Tax Cuts were a disaster / and were proven right!

"We checked with Grayson's staff, and they said he was referring to the large tax cuts passed in 2001 and 2003. We checked the votes, and both were passed by reconciliation.

The 2001 tax cuts passed 58-33. All the Republican senators (with the exception of John McCain, R-Ariz.) were joined by 12 Democrats to pass the measure. "

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...

Sucks to be so stupid as you one would assume.

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#8854 Mar 17, 2014
harmonious wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what's happening, you're ignorant of the facts and you're still avoiding questions.
That's EXACTLY what's happening you fool!

"On Wednesday, a Nebraska judge struck down a state law that would have allowed TransCanada TRP +1.03% to use the power of eminent domain to seize private land to help construct a short 300-mile segment of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline between Cushing and Steele City, Nebraska.

The law in question, LB 1161, allows Nebraska Governor David Heineman and TransCanada to avoid regulators in siting a crucial portion of the pipeline."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2014/0...

Stupidity and ignorance becomes you.

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#8855 Mar 17, 2014
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I actually research the truth. It is you unfortunately that believes everything told to you.
Of the 47 million on food stamps;
45% are children;
10% are disabled;
9% are the elderly.
Do some research numbnuts - you talk a lot, but never prove anything.
http://www.cbpp.org/files/1-29-13fa.pdf
Read buddy, read!
Debate this, Missy:

How do I qualify for an exemption from the fee for not having health coverage?

Hardship exemptions
If you have any of the circumstances below that affect your ability to purchase health insurance coverage, you may qualify for a “hardship” exemption:

You were homeless.

You were evicted in the past 6 months or were facing eviction or foreclosure.

You received a shut-off notice from a utility company.

You recently experienced domestic violence.

You recently experienced the death of a close family member.

You experienced a fire, flood, or other natural or human-caused disaster that caused substantial damage to your property.

You filed for bankruptcy in the last 6 months.

You had medical expenses you couldn’t pay in the last 24 months.

You experienced unexpected increases in necessary expenses due to caring for an ill, disabled, or aging family member.

You expect to claim a child as a tax dependent who’s been denied coverage in Medicaid and CHIP, and another person is required by court order to give medical support to the child. In this case, you do not have the pay the penalty for the child
.
As a result of an eligibility appeals decision, you’re eligible for enrollment in a qualified health plan (QHP) through the Marketplace, lower costs on your monthly premiums, or cost-sharing reductions for a time period when you weren’t enrolled in a QHP through the Marketplace.
You were determined ineligible for Medicaid because your state didn’t expand eligibility for Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act

.
Your individual insurance plan was cancelled and you believe other Marketplace plans are unaffordable.

You experienced another hardship in obtaining health insurance.

----------

Read carefully the last 2, ANYONE can claim these, there's no enforcement mechanism.

Hopefully this will be the last nail in the coffin of the disaster Obamakare.

https://www.healthcare.gov/exemptions/

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#8856 Mar 17, 2014
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I actually research the truth. It is you unfortunately that believes everything told to you.
Of the 47 million on food stamps;
45% are children;
10% are disabled;
9% are the elderly.
Do some research numbnuts - you talk a lot, but never prove anything.
http://www.cbpp.org/files/1-29-13fa.pdf
Read buddy, read!
Of course there are a lot of children, the children of lazy, worthless, unmarried loafers and lay abouts, like you.

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#8857 Mar 17, 2014
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
Both of the Bush Tax Cuts were passed in a republican Congress USING RECONCILIATION BOTH TIMES YOU FOOL!(Yeah stupid, the same reconciliation used to pass the ACA you guys bitch about!)
Democrats knew the Bush Tax Cuts were a disaster / and were proven right!
"We checked with Grayson's staff, and they said he was referring to the large tax cuts passed in 2001 and 2003. We checked the votes, and both were passed by reconciliation.
The 2001 tax cuts passed 58-33. All the Republican senators (with the exception of John McCain, R-Ariz.) were joined by 12 Democrats to pass the measure. "
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...
Sucks to be so stupid as you one would assume.
learn to read, Blumpkins:

The Bush economy:

"Democrats like to claim the 1990s were a golden age while the Bush years have been disastrous. But as the nearby chart shows, Mr. Bush inherited a recession. The dot-com bubble had burst in 2000, and the economy was sinking even before the shock of 9/11, the corporate scandals and Sarbanes-Oxley. Mr. Bush's original tax-cut proposal was designed in part as insurance against such a downturn."

"However, to win over Senate Democrats, Mr. Bush both phased in the tax rate reductions and settled for politically popular but economically feckless tax rebate checks. Those checks provided a short-term lift to consumer spending but no real boost to risk-taking or business investment, which was still recovering from the tech implosion. By late 2002, the economy was struggling again -- which is when Mr. Bush proposed his second round of tax cuts."

"This time the tax rate reductions were immediate, and they included cuts in capital gains and dividends designed to spur business incentives. As the tax cuts became law in late May 2003, the recovery began in earnest. Growth averaged nearly 4% over the next three years, the jobless rate fell from 6.3% in June 2003 to 4.4% in October 2006, and real wages began to grow despite rising food and energy prices. The 2003 tax cut was the high point of Bush economic policy."

"Nonetheless, the budget deficit did fall mid-decade, as tax revenues soared with the expansion. In fiscal 2007, the deficit hit $161 billion, or an economically trivial 1.2% of GDP. That seems like a distant memory after the bailout blowout of the last few months, but the point is that the Bush tax cuts aren't responsible for the deficits. Before the recession hit, federal tax revenues had climbed above their postwar average of 18.3% of GDP."

You're ignorant and brainwashed, the demorat authored mortgage meltdown crashed the economy.
1 post removed

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#8859 Mar 17, 2014
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
Both of the Bush Tax Cuts were passed in a republican Congress USING RECONCILIATION BOTH TIMES YOU FOOL!(Yeah stupid, the same reconciliation used to pass the ACA you guys bitch about!)
Democrats knew the Bush Tax Cuts were a disaster / and were proven right!
"We checked with Grayson's staff, and they said he was referring to the large tax cuts passed in 2001 and 2003. We checked the votes, and both were passed by reconciliation.
The 2001 tax cuts passed 58-33. All the Republican senators (with the exception of John McCain, R-Ariz.) were joined by 12 Democrats to pass the measure. "
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...
Sucks to be so stupid as you one would assume.
12 demorats and i believe Il douche extended the Bush tax cuts, didn't he moron?

It's not republicans or Bush's fault you're a sorry assed loser who lives in a refrigerator box.

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#8860 Mar 17, 2014
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I actually research the truth. It is you unfortunately that believes everything told to you.
Of the 47 million on food stamps;
45% are children;
10% are disabled;
9% are the elderly.
Do some research numbnuts - you talk a lot, but never prove anything.
http://www.cbpp.org/files/1-29-13fa.pdf
Read buddy, read!
support your 'ho's spawn yourself, we're tired of it.
VN Vet

Richmond, VA

#8861 Mar 17, 2014
foster, you drank the Kool-Aid. The last 2 years of Bush 44 were controlled by your beloved dumbocrats. Fanny and Freddy were the ideas of dumbocrats. ALL the screw-ups are from you liberal "F"-ups. No wonder Putin loves your Obama so much. Just go play golf.

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#8862 Mar 17, 2014
harmonious wrote:
<quoted text>
support your 'ho's spawn yourself, we're tired of it.
Unlike you, I make a very substantial living.

My daughter is currently in a private Catholic college, my son graduates high school next year.

And what I pay in taxes, just property taxes, dwarf whatever you've spent over the last 10 years moron.

I've never spoken ill of you partner - you can't afford the same consideration I see.

You're just a simple POS. Now, SHOO!

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#8863 Mar 17, 2014
harmonious wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course there are a lot of children, the children of lazy, worthless, unmarried loafers and lay abouts, like you.
What a pathetically sad, uncaring individual you are to attack children by saying this of their parents. The majority of whom work.

Look in the mirror - people like you are exactly what's wrong in America.

“bar0ckalypse n0w”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#8864 Mar 17, 2014
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
Both of the Bush Tax Cuts were passed in a republican Congress USING RECONCILIATION BOTH TIMES YOU FOOL!(Yeah stupid, the same reconciliation used to pass the ACA you guys bitch about!)
Democrats knew the Bush Tax Cuts were a disaster / and were proven right!
"We checked with Grayson's staff, and they said he was referring to the large tax cuts passed in 2001 and 2003. We checked the votes, and both were passed by reconciliation.
The 2001 tax cuts passed 58-33. All the Republican senators (with the exception of John McCain, R-Ariz.) were joined by 12 Democrats to pass the measure. "
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...
Sucks to be so stupid as you one would assume.
The Bush tax cuts were good and had absolutely nothing to do with the financial collapse. Bush cuts taxes and revenues rose, because it spurred activity.

Thank you for proving you have no expertise in macro-economics.

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#8865 Mar 17, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bush tax cuts were good and had absolutely nothing to do with the financial collapse. Bush cuts taxes and revenues rose, because it spurred activity.
Thank you for proving you have no expertise in macro-economics.
I never said the Bush Tax Cuts were directly attributable to the 2008 financial collapse moron.

Reading is definitely not your strong suit.

Revenues to the federal government drastically decreased under the Bush Tax policies, while expanding government, but you obviously have no proof to show otherwise, while there are numerous sources that state the contrary to your ludicrous assertion. All while adding to the federal deficit.

"Economic Downturn and Legacy of Bush Policies Continue to Drive Large Deficits"

"Federal deficits and debt have been sharply higher under President Obama, but the evidence continues to show that the Great Recession, President Bush’s tax cuts, and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq explain most of the deficits that have occurred on Obama’s watch — based on the latest Congressional Budget Office projections as well as legislation enacted since we last issued this analysis of what lies behind current deficits and debt.

Though some lawmakers and pundits continue to blame record deficits on the President’s policies in general — and his actions to boost the economy and stabilize the financial system in particular — these policies increase budget deficits only briefly; they will have no significant impact on the long-term problem of large deficits and rising debt.

The deficit for fiscal year 2009 — which began almost four months before President Obama took office — was $1.4 trillion and, at 10 percent of Gross Domestic Product/"

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/...
1 post removed

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8867 Mar 18, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
Answer the question, shoeless.
.
Give me more time, I am still laughing about your claim that you've paid millions of dollars in taxes.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8868 Mar 18, 2014
harmonious wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course there are a lot of children, the children of lazy, worthless, unmarried loafers and lay abouts, like you.
Funny how you - and your Rolodex of aliases find some much time to post here all day long here.
1 post removed

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8870 Mar 18, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bush tax cuts were good and had absolutely nothing to do with the financial collapse..
This from the clown that said with a straight face he has paid millions of dollars and that he taught economics...

Let's see... Bush was handed a budget surplus and the US was paying down the deficeit and then HE decided we didn't need to pay down the deficit (ReaGANOMICS = LARGE FEDERAL DEBT) and pushed through a tax cut and killed the revenue stream.

And then he starts two wars...

GOSH... I wonder what happened to the cost of goverment?
foster

Ashburn, VA

#8871 Mar 18, 2014
VN Vet wrote:
foster, you drank the Kool-Aid. The last 2 years of Bush 44 were controlled by your beloved dumbocrats. Fanny and Freddy were the ideas of dumbocrats. ALL the screw-ups are from you liberal "F"-ups. No wonder Putin loves your Obama so much. Just go play golf.
The last 4 years of financial disaster 0g to 09 were due to reckless Bush policies
foster

Ashburn, VA

#8872 Mar 18, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bush tax cuts were good and had absolutely nothing to do with the financial collapse. Bush cuts taxes and revenues rose, because it spurred activity.
Thank you for proving you have no expertise in macro-economics.
where did the funding come from to support the Tax Cuts?

How was the trillion dollar tax cut paid for?
foster

Ashburn, VA

#8873 Mar 18, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
This from the clown that said with a straight face he has paid millions of dollars and that he taught economics...
Let's see... Bush was handed a budget surplus and the US was paying down the deficeit and then HE decided we didn't need to pay down the deficit (ReaGANOMICS = LARGE FEDERAL DEBT) and pushed through a tax cut and killed the revenue stream.
And then he starts two wars...
GOSH... I wonder what happened to the cost of goverment?
Bush squandered the surplus, cut revenues in, and increased spending. Fiscal disaster!
foster

Ashburn, VA

#8874 Mar 18, 2014
harmonious wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what's happening, you're ignorant of the facts and you're still avoiding questions.
That is exactly the Republican proposal. taking private lands for that pipe line

“bar0ckalypse n0w”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#8875 Mar 18, 2014
foster wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush squandered the surplus, cut revenues in, and increased spending. Fiscal disaster!
Bush tried to lower the rate of growth in fed spending the way barock just did, you dunce.

Bush tried to reform social security, but harry pelosi lied about privatizing the entire program.

You should stick to ad hominem attacks like shoeless or his cellmate tinytony instead of making an idiot of yourself.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 2 min Injudgement 289,063
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Grey Ghost 1,599,754
News Climate Crazies Finally Admit 'We Were Wrong Ab... 6 min Fugsworth 1
News Trump, Democrats reach deal on immigrants 12 min NOPE 59
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 16 min Freedomofexpression 317,414
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 16 min Lyndi 30,595
News Monument madness a leftist cover to crumble Ame... 17 min Mick 1,165
News DACA recipients question future 26 min illegalisillegal 169
More from around the web