Syria vote complicates U.S. fiscal de...

Syria vote complicates U.S. fiscal debate; stop-gap more likely

There are 72 comments on the Reuters story from Sep 1, 2013, titled Syria vote complicates U.S. fiscal debate; stop-gap more likely. In it, Reuters reports that:

A vote in Congress over whether to launch U.S. attacks against Syria is expected to wreak collateral damage - leaving too little time on Capitol Hill to deal with fast-approaching fall deadlines to fund government agencies and raise the debt limit.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Reuters.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#1 Sep 2, 2013
Obama proposal seeks broad war power despite vow of limits...Obama lies again.........shock.
Obama is a Horses Rosette

Sayville, NY

#2 Sep 2, 2013
Well, here's another fine mess you've gotten us into Mr. Oblunder.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#3 Sep 2, 2013
This is the same Congress that approved and advocated our signing a global, Chemical Weapons Ban Agreement....and now, the weasels in Congress aren't sure if they can honor it......Legislative Dishonor, 24/7 on Fox......
Cat74

United States

#4 Sep 2, 2013
Very simply we do not have the money to get involved in another Middle Eastern war. Obama is lying about the limits, and only God knows what else. If you cannot believe the Commander in Chief going in what will he leave in 2017? He does not have the support in Congress yet, and he does not have the support of the American people. This whole thing is to save face, because of is cowardly decisions on Benghazi.
fingiswold

United States

#5 Sep 2, 2013
idiots can't decide which issues to make a stupid decision on, and how best to attack and oppose the president...repuglicans are the enemies of mankind
fingiswold

United States

#6 Sep 2, 2013
Cat74 wrote:
Very simply we do not have the money to get involved in another Middle Eastern war. Obama is lying about the limits, and only God knows what else. If you cannot believe the Commander in Chief going in what will he leave in 2017? He does not have the support in Congress yet, and he does not have the support of the American people. This whole thing is to save face, because of is cowardly decisions on Benghazi.
of course you'd be endorsing it avidly if boooosh were president, or any other rethuglican...your partisan hypocrisy stinks to high heaven

obama doesn't have the support of teabaggers because they want to destroy him...are you that stupid?
Cat74

United States

#7 Sep 2, 2013
The President is stupid. He can't make a decision, and follow through. Syrians are talking about a "Historic American Retreat." Democrats, Leahy, and Rangel both came out against Obama's Syrian attack this morning. The Republicans can sit quiet, and let the Democrats tear each other up.
Tom

Kingsland, GA

#8 Sep 2, 2013
If we are having a problem with our debt or budget, how can we afford Syria?
Cat74

United States

#9 Sep 2, 2013
We can't. The whole idea is crazy.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#10 Sep 3, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
This is the same Congress that approved and advocated our signing a global, Chemical Weapons Ban Agreement....and now, the weasels in Congress aren't sure if they can honor it......Legislative Dishonor, 24/7 on Fox......
Ah yes, another post with nothing to back up the rant.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#11 Sep 3, 2013
fingiswold wrote:
<quoted text>
of course you'd be endorsing it avidly if boooosh were president, or any other rethuglican...your partisan hypocrisy stinks to high heaven
obama doesn't have the support of teabaggers because they want to destroy him...are you that stupid?
Destroy a communist.......you mean your don't. Traitor.
conservative crapola

Easton, PA

#12 Sep 3, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Ah yes, another post with nothing to back up the rant.
You originated that con crybaby tactic. hahahahahaha

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#13 Sep 3, 2013
Cat74 wrote:
The President is stupid. He can't make a decision, and follow through. Syrians are talking about a "Historic American Retreat." Democrats, Leahy, and Rangel both came out against Obama's Syrian attack this morning. The Republicans can sit quiet, and let the Democrats tear each other up.
Obama wants to arm the rebels, with more weapons and more Sarin gas to use on Assad's forces and the innocent. The same as he did in Benghazi.
conservative crapola

Breinigsville, PA

#14 Sep 3, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Obama wants to arm the rebels, with more weapons and more Sarin gas to use on Assad's forces and the innocent. The same as he did in Benghazi.
Like raygun's signature armed the contras? Imagine that.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#15 Sep 3, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
Like raygun's signature armed the contras? Imagine that.
prove it, charges.........crickets.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#16 Sep 3, 2013
fingiswold wrote:
idiots can't decide which issues to make a stupid decision on, and how best to attack and oppose the president...repuglicans are the enemies of mankind
ABCNEWS-WASHPOST POLL: 59% oppose...

PEW: 29% support...

We have a Republic moron..........the people rule, not liberal judges.
conservative crapola

Orefield, PA

#17 Sep 3, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>prove it, charges.........crickets.
On 4 January 1982, Reagan signed the top secret National Security Decision Directive 17 (NSDD-17), giving the CIA the authority to recruit and support the contras with $19 million in military aid. The effort to support the contras was one component of the Reagan Doctrine. The ARMING, clothing, feeding and supervision of the contras became the most ambitious paramilitary and political action operation mounted by the agency in nearly a decade.
A report of the Bureau of Intelligence and Research commissioned by the State Department found Reagan's allegations about Soviet influence in Nicaragua "exaggerated", Congress cut off all funds for the contras in 1985.
With Congress blocking further contra aid, the Reagan administration sought to arrange funding and military supplies by means of third countries and private sources. Between 1984 and 1986,$34 million from third countries and $2.7 million from private sources were raised this way.

Oops, dumbo pasted again...hahahahahahahahahaha

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#18 Sep 5, 2013
fingiswold wrote:
idiots can't decide which issues to make a stupid decision on, and how best to attack and oppose the president...repuglicans are the enemies of mankind
Yes, Obama is the gift that keeps on giving.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#19 Sep 5, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>On 4 January 1982, Reagan signed the top secret National Security Decision Directive 17 (NSDD-17), giving the CIA the authority to recruit and support the contras with $19 million in military aid. The effort to support the contras was one component of the Reagan Doctrine. The ARMING, clothing, feeding and supervision of the contras became the most ambitious paramilitary and political action operation mounted by the agency in nearly a decade.
A report of the Bureau of Intelligence and Research commissioned by the State Department found Reagan's allegations about Soviet influence in Nicaragua "exaggerated", Congress cut off all funds for the contras in 1985.
With Congress blocking further contra aid, the Reagan administration sought to arrange funding and military supplies by means of third countries and private sources. Between 1984 and 1986,$34 million from third countries and $2.7 million from private sources were raised this way.

Oops, dumbo pasted again...hahahahahahahahahaha
So you are saying congress should defund funding and weapons to the rebels in Syria and Egypt.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#20 Sep 5, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
Yes, Obama is the gift that keeps on giving.
How are those 14 swing states working for you, Au Dumbo?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 min Dogen 219,579
News Thousands of demonstrators protest Trump in Atl... 3 min Soetoro 1,200
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Garthok 1,496,497
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 8 min Jacques Ottawa 237,196
News Being conservative is not being racist 11 min Barros con ganas 486
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 15 min Laughing At Trump 258,909
News Trump supporters cheer his combative stance wit... 22 min TRUMP 45 125
Donald J Trump, our next president (Mar '16) 36 min mdbuilder 2,525
News Trump's repeated claim that he won a 'landslide... 49 min Trump won grow up 5,797
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 2 hr -Dont Panic- 412,491
More from around the web