Democrats push election-year Constitution change

Jun 4, 2014 Full story: Fox News 66

The Democratic-led Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday began a long-shot bid at a constitutional amendment that would limit deep-pocketed political campaign donors' influence.

Full Story
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#1 Jun 4, 2014
Liberals try to give the federal government the ability to control speech...........in other words, do away for the first amendment.

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#2 Jun 4, 2014
Ted Cruz Lies and Claims Senate Democrats Will Abolish The 1st Amendment

http://www.politicususa.com/2014/05/28/ted-cr...

Ted Cruz was introducing his evangelical lunatic father at the Christian preacher gathering, Watchmen on the Wall, sponsored by the extremist Family Research Council and combined the Koch-Republican-Supreme Court definition of money as speech with a very healthy dose of Republican fear mongering to influence evangelical fanatics into believing Senate Democrats were abolishing the 1st Amendment.

Two globs of grease, one cuban and one canukian, that are impossible to clean up. LMAO.
1 post removed
serfs up

Ormond Beach, FL

#4 Jun 4, 2014
conservative crapola wrote:
Ted Cruz Lies and Claims Senate Democrats Will Abolish The 1st Amendment
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/05/28/ted-cr...
Ted Cruz was introducing his evangelical lunatic father at the Christian preacher gathering, Watchmen on the Wall, sponsored by the extremist Family Research Council and combined the Koch-Republican-Supreme Court definition of money as speech with a very healthy dose of Republican fear mongering to influence evangelical fanatics into believing Senate Democrats were abolishing the 1st Amendment.
Two globs of grease, one cuban and one canukian, that are impossible to clean up. LMAO.
It has been abolished.
El oh El

Auburn, MA

#5 Jun 4, 2014
conservative crapola wrote:
Two globs of grease, one cuban and one canukian, that are impossible to clean up. LMAO.
Nice to see you not holding back on your sickening racism. At least we all can see you for what you truely are. Good to know you wont ever call anyone out for being a racist because that would then make you a hypocrite.Keep on trollin!
2 posts removed

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#8 Jun 4, 2014
El oh El wrote:
<quoted text>Nice to see you not holding back on your sickening racism. At least we all can see you for what you truely are. Good to know you wont ever call anyone out for being a racist because that would then make you a hypocrite.Keep on trollin!
He done ony troll for gays an carp.

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#9 Jun 4, 2014
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>
He done ony troll for gays an carp.
.....waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...my posts are removed for violating terms of servcie....waaaaaaaaaaaaa
El oh El

Auburn, MA

#10 Jun 4, 2014
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>
He done ony troll for gays an carp.
Its quite sad really. He cries about people posting off topic spam, yet stalks everyone of your posts with off topic taunts and personal attacks. He brags about flagging your posts yet most of his are removed by the Mods. hates on republicans as being "the party of racism" yet is racist in his own posts yet deflects from it when people call him out. Then he cant even admit when hes been exposed.

So sad.
El oh El

Auburn, MA

#11 Jun 4, 2014
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
.....waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...my posts are removed for violating terms of servcie....waaaaaaaaaaaaa
Hmmmm...
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
Still playing toothpix rent-a-cop, because someone else's post, within the guidelines of terms of service, doesn't suit you?.
Hypocrite? Yes.
El oh El

Auburn, MA

#12 Jun 4, 2014
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
.....waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...my posts are removed for violating terms of servcie....waaaaaaaaaaaaa
Ifyou would stay on topic and stop the off topic personal attacks your posts would probably stay online. But we all know you dont have the self control.

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#13 Jun 4, 2014
El oh El wrote:
<quoted text>Ifyou would stay on topic and stop the off topic personal attacks your posts would probably stay online. But we all know you dont have the self control.
You didn't even understand that. LMAO.
El oh El

Auburn, MA

#14 Jun 4, 2014
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't even understand that. LMAO.
Ahhh, exposed again... You see I did get it. It was you trying to bash some one else for doing exactly what you do. Its called a double standard. Its hypocritical (<--- theres that word again, seems to follow you every where you go). You are too ignorant and partisan to see it. The rest of are well aware of your childish troll skills. Think about it.
Gary

Bellingham, WA

#15 Jun 4, 2014
Take the bribery out of politics?
Not fair.
The average citizen has one vote. Your billionaire has
a million votes.
That's the way it should be according to the five fascists (R)
on the Supreme Court.
Cordwainer Trout

Sonora, KY

#16 Jun 4, 2014
Bolshevik Democrats aren't worried about restricting freedom, as they can depend on the multitudinous donations they get from the free money people getting supported by falsified disability claims, SSI and food stamp handouts instead of jobs destroyed by Democrat policies wrecking the economy to a minus one percent growth rate. If there is a Constitutional Amendment needed, it is one disallowing people on the government dole from voting. Democrats have been buying votes for decades and the welfare people and lying SSI recipients are greedy animals and bought votes, who actually don't care what happens to America, their children, or anything else except chips and dope.
El oh El

Auburn, MA

#17 Jun 4, 2014
Gary wrote:
Take the bribery out of politics?
Not fair.
The average citizen has one vote. Your billionaire has
a million votes.
That's the way it should be according to the five fascists (R)
on the Supreme Court.
Im tellin ya,$200 per SS#. That eliminates Citizen United, Unions and billionaires from influencing elections. No PACs. PACs dont have SS#. This way even the poor can donate and have the same monetary impact as the 1%.

the problem is both sides are addicted to $$$$.

How do we break that addiction?

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#18 Jun 4, 2014
El oh El wrote:
<quoted text>Ahhh, exposed again... You see I did get it. It was you trying to bash some one else for doing exactly what you do. Its called a double standard. Its hypocritical (<--- theres that word again, seems to follow you every where you go). You are too ignorant and partisan to see it. The rest of are well aware of your childish troll skills. Think about it.
Again, your obsession with others posts don't matter, 7-named trollboy. Your presence has been ineffective. LMAO.
El oh El

Auburn, MA

#19 Jun 4, 2014
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, your obsession with others posts don't matter, 7-named trollboy. Your presence has been ineffective. LMAO.
Still dodging the fact you got caught being a hypocrite? Its ok. Most children cant admit when they are wrong either.

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#20 Jun 4, 2014
El oh El wrote:
<quoted text>Still dodging the fact you got caught being a hypocrite? Its ok. Most children cant admit when they are wrong either.
99% of toothpix posts are hypocritical. Including the ones from a 7-named troll from massawhogivesashit, who thinks they can change anything. LMAO.
El oh El

Auburn, MA

#21 Jun 4, 2014
Still basing people's locations while hiding your own? I guess we can add COWARD along with hypocrite in describing you
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#22 Jun 4, 2014
El oh El wrote:
<quoted text>Ahhh, exposed again... You see I did get it. It was you trying to bash some one else for doing exactly what you do. Its called a double standard. Its hypocritical (<--- theres that word again, seems to follow you every where you go). You are too ignorant and partisan to see it. The rest of are well aware of your childish troll skills. Think about it.
If it weren't for double standards, liberals would have none.
Cat74

Schaumburg, IL

#23 Jun 4, 2014
Democrats swear to uphold the Constitution, and try to re write it every chance they get. Their word is worthless. They are trying to re write the Constitution, but it won't happen. The Republicans will block any attempt to change any word of the Constitution.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 4 min Los Angeles 200,985
Gingrich: GE 'clever' to avoid corporate taxes (May '11) 4 min swedenforever 114
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Tony Rome 1,111,066
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 7 min DanFromSmithville 116,810
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 10 min Cheech the Conser... 263,481
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 20 min loose cannon 178,225
Michele Bachmann: Obama Won Because He's Black ... (Feb '14) 21 min swedenforever 343
Hillary Clinton Faces Skeptical Iowa Voters 1 hr Hoogle 409
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 2 hr American Lady 154,272
Obama thanks Congress for vote to aid Syrian re... 3 hr Cat74 133
•••

US Politics People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••