Sarcastically labeling a list of distinctions as 'poetry' and slandering it's content as prejudice is not a reasoned argument.Poetry and prejudice aside, marriage remains a fundamental right of the individual.
Attach whatever extra meaning you choose to your own marriage. Others will do the same.
The law recognizes marriage remains a fundamental right of the individual, even when procreation and sex are impossible. Gender is not a valid legal restriction.
Nor is calling completely normal aspects of marriage 'extra'.
Censoring marriage to a manipulation of law is obviously the tactic of a rat to gain access through a sewer pipe.
In the end, absolutely nothing you said changes the distinctions I listed one iota. Not one.
Even with your fraudulent abuse of the law, the simple, obvious common sense factors I note disrupt and destroy your fantasy.