Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

[heldebeast]

do unto others wrote:

<quoted text>
By the time the trial date gets here, it will have been far past a year since Zimmerman killed Martin.

You got something against due process? or do you just get upset when others are afforded their rights? how's the mayor doing? tell his stupid ass i said hello. oh btw, ask him how much cheese he's making on his side deals.

[Yeah]

Be Truthful Be Free wrote:

<quoted text>
That Idiot sure does.
There is NO reasoning with that bombastic LIAR.

lol! I'd say IT qualifies as a fanatical idiot!

[Yeah]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Duck and dodge..........LOl
But that does not change the FACT that NOBODY can prove the dead punk did not attack Zim........
Zim walks and you cry.......
bomp bomp bomp a black punk bites the dust...

lol! We can certainly prove Zimmerman attacked Martin son.

And that's really what this case is all about.

Of course, you wouldn't know anything about that!

[Yeah]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Every post I post is filled with humor
More from Queen.......
Bomp bomp bomp a black punk bites the dust.

lol! Yes son. Hilarious...

Ludicrous...

Insanely illogical...

Comically stupid...

These are just the ones that come to mind quickly

[Be Truthful Be Free]

American Lady wrote:

I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.
I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.
I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American.

WTH: Some people fear that government will use the military to forcibly disarm the public if gun banning laws get passed. What is your sense of your fellows in the armed forces. Do you think they'd follow orders to forcibly disarm the public?
JB: In my 8 years of service I could probably count on one hand the number of people that I met who would forcibly disarm the American public. The vast majority of American service members that I know and that I served with recognize that the Constitution is what we pledge to obey.
WTH: Do you feel that there will be any retaliation by the Marines for having posted your reply?
JB: I was honorably discharged on July 31st of this year. I'd certainly hope they wouldn't "retaliate" in any way because I am doing my civic duty and keeping myself informed. I think that would go against our motto: "Honor Courage and Commitment"

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/...

Hmmmm....

You're a man who calls yourself "American Lady" ?

[Yeah]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Preamble, yes, 2nd Amendment ,no.
On September 4(1789), the Senate voted to change significantly the language of the Second Amendment by removing the definition of militia, and striking the conscientious objector clause:
The Senate returned to this Amendment for a final time on September 9. A proposal to insert the words "For the common defence", next to the words "Bear Arms" was defeated.
^ Journal of the Senate of the United States of America, Volume 1: pp. 77
http://english.turkcebilgi.com/Second+Amendme...

Son, that's not what it is about.

You shouldn't get involved with things you don't know about... like the US Constitution.

[Yeah]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
I see you cant back up your climbs..........LOl
So why cant you prove that I lied????
Making the claim and that not being able to proves you a liar..........LOL
Bomp bomp bomp........A black punk bites the dust.........

lol! Already have son.

The problem for you is you're playing in an adult world with an ants brain.

[Yeah]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Still waiting..........LOL
tell us why you cant show us any facts that proves the dead black punk did not attack Zim???
As if the jury is shown the facts that prove the punk attacked Zim then Zim walks free..........LOL

lol! Nope. He doesn't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!

[Yeah]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes duck and dodge..........LOL
Bottom line is that NOBODY will be able to prove that the dead perp did not attack Zim

lol! Nope. Doesn't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!

[Be Truthful Be Free]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>Yes duck and dodge..........LOL

Bottom line is that NOBODY will be able to prove that the dead perp did not attack Zim

Angela will prove that Thug Zimmerman murdered Trayvon...

No matter what you say, no matter what I say.

You know, because that's how the legal system works.

[Here Is One]

Be Truthful Be Free wrote:

<quoted text>
You forgot one...
He was normal enough to kill an innocent child who was minding his own business.
And you also need to get your facts straight. Thug Zimmerman did NOT "own a mortgage."
Thug Zimmerman and Shelly was RENTING their resident.
And your opinion as to the Thug having "enough character" to do something is very debatable, OF COURSE.
And the part you speak about the Thug stopping hundreds of people...well, many of them complained to police about that and the aggressive tactics he used.
The Thug has no right to stop anyone...I don't care if he was the Grand Poobah of the Greater Sanford Metropolitan Area. He has NO right to stop ANYONE!
I see he's not trying to do that today.
Hmmmm...you might want to rewrite your post.
HA!

Wrong again.......

The dead perp matched a 215 suspect.........

Zim had all the rights in the world to stop him

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>Son, that's not what it is about.
You shouldn't get involved with things you don't know about... like the US Constitution.

Yea..........LOL

It is about the prosecution being able to prove that the dead punk did not attack Zim like the evidence suggest.......

[Be Truthful Be Free]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>Every post I post is filled with humor

We already know.

Keep up the good work.

WAIT

I need more popcorn, be right back!

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Already have son.
The problem for you is you're playing in an adult world with an ants brain.

Yes but it is invisible to all but you..........ROTFLMAO

Zim walks and you cry

[heldebeast]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! We can certainly prove Zimmerman attacked Martin son.
And that's really what this case is all about.
Of course, you wouldn't know anything about that!

lol....you can't prove a dam thing....lol....the only thing you can prove is "you're an idiot"....lol....far more plausible scenario: Martin attacked Zimmerman and was trying to kill him when the hammer of justice came down.

[Be Truthful Be Free]

Fred Zord wrote:

<quoted text>Innocent child? Where do you get that from? A 17-year-old large, aggressive male was illegally attacking another male, who defended himself appropriately.

You do realize that when a teenager commits a violent crime they are typically tried as an adult - often when they're only 14 or 15, and certainly when they are 17? Trayvon Martin was committing felonious assault and an armed citizen lawfully defended themselves against it.

I'm sorry someone defending themselves is so upsetting to you, but perhaps if you find yourself a victim of unprovoked violent attack you will come to feel otherwise.

You didn't read the facts of the the case, obviously.

[barefoot2626]

Here Is One wrote:

Why are you so scared to post even one fact that proves Zim committed any crime???

Funny how the state of Florida continues to prosecute the pedophile.

It is almost as they are ignoring your e-mails.

[Be Truthful Be Free]

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>If people were smart enough to vote a failed President out of office, all tax cuts would have remained and we would have serious spending cuts that we need. Now Republicans have to play games to try and save this country from disaster. Republicans only control 1/3 of our federal government right now and hardly that this coming year.

Yeah...it's too bad they control 1/3 of our federal government.

What a damn shame.

[Yeah]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Yea..........LOL
It is about the prosecution being able to prove that the dead punk did not attack Zim like the evidence suggest.......

lol! Nope. Doesn't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!

[Yeah]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes but it is invisible to all but you..........ROTFLMAO
Zim walks and you cry

lol! Yaaaaay! Look folks... it talks!