Hmmmm. So we can't believe Romney when he says he is for the rich, but we have to believe him when he says he is not for the rich? Why believe one over the other? If you believe he is not just for the rich, then what do you think made him change, when and why?That old dog won't hunt, Honey. Romney is not "just for the rich," and anyone with an IQ over 61 knows it. Romney, and Ryan know what they stand for, meant what they said, and Obama, and that old drunk Biden were confused, and cannot defend their first term record.
Is this just another of the common republican statements that we gotta believe Fox News no matter what they say, even when it is gibberish?