Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 37128 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

Casey

Saint Paul, MN

#32606 Mar 29, 2014
Trigger wrote:
A friend traveled to the south pole as a manual laborer.
He talked to "scientists" while there and asked them if they agreed with "Global Warming".
Their response was interesting. They said if they didn't support Global Warming they would not be at the south pole because they would not get a grant from the Government if they didn't support Global Warming.
So all this Global Warming IS junk science, politial junk..
A friend of mine knows your friend. Says he makes up stories to support his stance. Basically a pathological liar.

So your posts Are straight garbage, pure junk.

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#32607 Mar 29, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
http://www.c2es.org/blog/gulledgej/sixth-inde...
Of course, no amount of evidence is going to change the mind of a conspiracy theorist once he's made his mind up...
There is no evidence, merely conjecture, speculation, theories and mostly flat out lies.

Wise up, dummy.

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#32608 Mar 29, 2014
frontporchreactionary wrote:
"Methane emissions come from a variety of sources. Municipal solid waste landfills, for example, emit gas — approximately 18 percent of the U.S.’s total methane emissions in 2012, according to White House statistics. That same year, 28 percent of methane emissions was attributed to the oil and natural gas sectors. Ten percent of U.S. methane emissions came from coal mining, and nearly 36 percent came from agriculture (of which cow flatulence is a contributing factor). Those emissions are only projected to increase through 2030 if additional action is not taken, the White House’s methane reduction plan says, warning of its negative effect on a warming world.
“Every ton of methane in the atmosphere has a global warming effect that is more than 20 times greater than a ton of carbon dioxide,” the plan said.“Thus, methane reductions yield important climate benefits, particularly in the near term.”
With its strategy, Utech says the White House hopes to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 90 million metric tons in 2020 — the pollution equivalent of approximately 474 million cars." Everything You Need To Know About The White House&#65533;s New Plan To Cut Back On A Powerful Greenhouse Gas http://thkpr.gs/1iIc1D6 via @climateprogress
All that hot air exuded from Il Douche's fat yap isn't helping the situation, he should STFU, as should the rest of you shreiking chicken littles.

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#32609 Mar 29, 2014
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
All this says is that you manual labor friend couldn't understand what the scientists were saying. Or he has your agenda in mind when he asked the questions and filtered the answers to fit.
The ACTUAL scientists do not have to be interrogated by the janitor. They publish WELL documented facts in prestigious journals.
I prefer scientists who are truthful, you prefer liars:

Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical - Forbes
www.forbes.com/.../peer-reviewed-survey-finds... ;
Forbes
Feb 13, 2013 - They are skeptical that the scientific debate is settled regarding the IPCC .... Just like calling AGW “deniers” instead of skeptics, of which is what ...

s there a scientific consensus on global warming?- Skeptical Science
www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scien... ;
Skeptical Science
A Skeptical Science peer-reviewed survey of all (over 12,000) peer-reviewed ... "Only [a] few abstracts explicitly reject or doubt the AGW (anthropogenic global ...

The 10 Most-Respected Global Warming Skeptics - Business Insider
www.businessinsider.com/the-ten-most-importan... ;
Business Insider

The only thing that is settled is that you're a lunkhead.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#32610 Mar 29, 2014
harmonious wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no evidence, merely conjecture, speculation, theories and mostly flat out lies.
An accurate summary of what you have, reflected in the number of independent enquiries that say the same.

http://www.c2es.org/blog/gulledgej/sixth-inde...

Even Inhofe had to recognise this and STFU.
Follow The Money

United States

#32611 Mar 30, 2014
Global Warming is simply a scam to siphon grant money. Nothing more.
algore

Mena, AR

#32612 Mar 30, 2014
jared wrote:
THE CASE FOR BIODIESEL......obese people can upon their demise significantly aid the environment by giving their bodys to rendering companys prior to having their remains cremated......case in point is muchelle obama.....each cheek of her huge ass could be converted to about 3 gallons of biodiesel fuel........and just think how much biodiesel could be obtained from the breasts of the typical obese walmart shopper....it is environmentally wrong to bury obese people....just cook out the grease and cremate the bony residue........and make gollons of biodiesel fuel
i applaud ur plan.......biodieses from the obese people is a great idea........and the quantity in muchelles ass is nearly correct......

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#32613 Mar 30, 2014
Follow The Money wrote:
Global Warming is simply a scam to siphon grant money. Nothing more.
http://www.climatechangedispat ch.com/global-warming-scientis ts-scrap-real-science-bow-befo re-president-obama-instead.htm l

has to be the money....
Trigger

Minneapolis, MN

#32614 Mar 30, 2014
Casey wrote:
<quoted text>
A friend of mine knows your friend. Says he makes up stories to support his stance. Basically a pathological liar.
So your posts Are straight garbage, pure junk.
The young man telling what he was told by is a Liberal. But he has an inquisitive mind and asked questions to get to the bottom of "Global Warming". At the bottom of the earth no less.
litesong

Everett, WA

#32615 Mar 30, 2014
gritty mushy trigger wrote:
The young man telling what he was told by is a Liberal.
Sleazy, slimy steenking toxic topix AGW denier liars pretend science is anti-business, oil & re-public-lick-un propaganda, because sleazy, slimy steenking toxic topix AGW denier liars know anti-science business, oil & re-public-lick-un propaganda.
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#32616 Mar 30, 2014
litesong wrote:
psst... no one reads your blather... no matter how many threads you post on.

Take your meds... ALL of them.
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#32617 Mar 30, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
An accurate summary of what you have, reflected in the number of independent enquiries that say the same.
http://www.c2es.org/blog/gulledgej/sixth-inde...
Even Inhofe had to recognise this and STFU.
"Senator Inhofe’s statement about the report seems to indicate that he accepts its findings. Having been denied an opportunity to use the CRU emails to claim that scientists have manipulated data or squelched scientific debate, the senator limited his remarks to issues of foot dragging on FOIA requests."

"seems to indicate that he accepts"?
How squishy can one get?

From the press release, SENATE EPW MINORITY RELEASES REPORT ON CRU CONTROVERSY:

The Minority Staff of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works released a report today titled, "‘Consensus' Exposed: The CRU Controversy." The report covers the controversy surrounding emails and documents released from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU). It examines the extent to which those emails and documents affect the scientific work of the UN's IPCC, and how revelations of the IPCC's flawed science impacts the EPA's endangerment finding for greenhouse gases.

The report finds that some of the scientists involved in the CRU controversy violated ethical principles governing taxpayer-funded research and possibly federal laws. In addition, the Minority Staff believes the emails and accompanying documents seriously compromise the IPCC-based "consensus" and its central conclusion that anthropogenic emissions are inexorably leading to environmental catastrophes.

In its examination of the controversy, the Minority Staff found that the scientists:

- Obstructed release of damaging data and information;
- Manipulated data to reach preconceived conclusions;
- Colluded to pressure journal editors who published work questioning the climate science "consensus"; and
- Assumed activist roles to influence the political process.

"This EPW Minority Report shows that the CRU controversy is about far more than just scientists who lack interpersonal skills, or a little email squabble," said Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. "It's about unethical and potentially illegal behavior by some of the world's leading climate scientists.

"The report also shows the world's leading climate scientists acting like political scientists, with an agenda disconnected from the principles of good science. And it shows that there is no consensus-except that there are significant gaps in what scientists know about the climate system. It's time for the Obama Administration to recognize this. Its endangerment finding for greenhouse gases rests on bad science. It should throw out that finding and abandon greenhouse gas regulation under the Clean Air Act-a policy that will mean fewer jobs, higher taxes and economic decline."

http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...

Warmists keep making up shyt.
1 post removed
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#32619 Mar 30, 2014
litesong wrote:
Need a daily reminder?

Meds.. take them. ALL of them.
1 post removed

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#32621 Mar 30, 2014
Mothra wrote:
- Manipulated data to reach preconceived conclusions;
What evidence does the report present for this claim?

"Another independent inquiry, headed by Sir Muir Russell, is investigating allegations that the scientists in the CRU scandal manipulated climate change data.2"

Minority Staff February 2010

The Muir Russell report of course concluded in July 2010 that there was *no* evidence scientists manipulated data.

Which is why in 2011 Inhofe had to say “In our review of the CRU e-mails, we did not find any evidence that NOAA inappropriately manipulated data … or failed to adhere to appropriate peer review procedures.”
Warmists keep making up shyt.
As usual projection, the only tactic deniers seem to have: they accuse others of what they know are their own failings. Very psychologically revealling, mostly of a juvenile intellect.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#32622 Mar 31, 2014
There's never been an exprimental test of climate change mitigation; that's how you can tell its a hoax and man made catastrophic climate change is pseudoscience.

Since: Dec 06

Charlie's

#32623 Mar 31, 2014
LIbEralS wrote:
I'll take that as a YES.
Take it as you want, I still bet 5 at one on manmade climate imbalance and plenty problems because of ocean level rise

Since: Dec 06

Charlie's

#32624 Mar 31, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
There's never been an exprimental test of climate change mitigation; that's how you can tell its a hoax and man made catastrophic climate change is pseudoscience.
In Europe, coal use endangered forests with acid rains in the 1970th , we saw the forests recovery with the stoppage of many coal mines and coal industrial use.
LIbEralS

Minneapolis, MN

#32625 Mar 31, 2014
"We have a closing window of opportunity," she said. "We do have choices. We need to act now."

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/global-warming...

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#32626 Mar 31, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
There's never been an exprimental test of climate change mitigation; that's how you can tell its a hoax and man made catastrophic climate change is pseudoscience.
"When reason is against a man," said Thomas Hobbes, "a man will be against reason." The Republican Plan To Invalidate Scientific Research http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/22769-the-...
litesong

Everett, WA

#32627 Mar 31, 2014
obscener wrote:
one of the worst winters in years...... on a brink of an Ice-Age..
AGW enhanced warm fronts have strongly pushed into the North Pole millions of square kilometers for 4+ months, such that NOT one day has been as low as normal temperatures. Also, temperatures have been as high as 16degC(29degF) over normal temperatures. So much energy is in the NP millions of square kilometers, that cold Arctic fronts are powerfully pushed to the south, pouring cold over populated regions of Canada & the U.S.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min RoxLo 1,565,713
News U.S. Democrats take aim at big companies in eco... 4 min fact checker 10
News By a 2-to-1 margin, Americans prefer Obamacare ... 5 min IMpeach Now 396
News 'Let Obamacare fail,' Trump says after GOP plan... 6 min Dee Dee Dee 78
News Can Trump pardon anyone? Himself? Can he fire M... 6 min Retribution 72
News House to consider ban on transgender surgery fo... 7 min Democraps 222
News Rudderless Democratic Party 7 min phony headlinez 2
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 8 min bad bob 16,937
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 21 min CodeTalker 279,920
News Democrats, civil rights group aim to block Trum... 9 hr RoxLo 147
More from around the web