Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#1095039 Mar 11, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If you like segregation & racism, move to Alabama.
If you like pollution from burning coal, move to West Virginia.
If you hate gays, move to a state where bigotry is accepted.
If he likes mindless robots, he can move in with you!

Since: May 11

Carlisle, PA

#1095040 Mar 11, 2014
harmonious wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why does your stupid, ignorant , retarded ass keep blaming Bush for the budgets passed while he was president?
Imbecile.
I have never commented on a Bush budget other than to discuss his off budget spending and that having a budget is not a cure all.

Bush had 6 years of Republican Congresses & never vetoed any of the budgets regardless of their deficits.

Presidents have great influences over the budgets.

The point, dumbass, was that no President submits a budget & it passes without scrutiny & changes by Congress.

When you fricking bozos run around screaming " OMG OMG Obama's budgets never passed" you demonstrate your ignorance of the budget process.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#1095041 Mar 11, 2014
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
My son helps more people in an hour than you will in your whole miserable self centered life.
Cough, cough....

You mean your son helps the Socialist Party destroy the USA.

Provide one simple example of how he has helped anyone.

Waiting...

Since: May 11

Carlisle, PA

#1095042 Mar 11, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
IRAs are for average working people, not for the "wealthy"....as if that matters....
loser boozehounds like you never have enough money to fund an IRA....
Galt, being dumber than sh*t, doesn't get the subject is the use of Roth IRA's to avoid estate taxes.

Since: May 11

Carlisle, PA

#1095043 Mar 11, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Dave lies as usual, because the PA sales tax excludes food and clothing, the bulk of most retail purchases......
California taxes both, and at a higher rate.....
When Flscktard threw out that 5%, he made no claim as to what is taxed & what is not.

Food is typically 15-20% of family budgets. So you decreased sales tax rate by 15% and added 15%-20% more taxable and you think that will fund the state?
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1095044 Mar 11, 2014
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
The original Religious Freedom Restoration Act passed in the US House of Representatives and the US Senate 97 to 3 before being signed into law by then-President Bill Clinton in 1993.
Arizona's bill clarified a few points in the already existing law to further protect religious freedoms in light of the furor by progressive liberals over the issue of gay marriage.
Eleven constitutional scholars said the Arizona law had been “egregiously misrepresented by many of its critics” and though not all supported the legislation, in the letter they stated, "all of us believe that many criticisms of the Arizona law are deeply misleading.”.
The federal government and 18 states have Religious Freedom Restoration Acts on their books. More than 12 other states have interpreted their state constitutions to provide similar protections to religious individuals.
This is just another progressive liberal/communistic tactic to control the people using gay marriage as a tool.
Oh, by the way, your village called....
The bill wasn't about gay marriage nitwit! As a matter of fact the words "gay", "lesbian" or "same sex marriage" don't even appear in the bill. The bill was useless because under Arizona state law it's already permissible to discriminate against gays except in Phoenix, Flagstaff and Tucson which have ordinances prohibiting discrimination against gay and lesbians. Perhaps those ordinances were the real targets. It would also permit Muslims to discriminate against Christians and Jews or any religious person to discriminate against adherents of another belief. SB 1062 wouldn’t do anything. But, it may well be taken by people as saying,“Hey, we can go ahead and discriminate more.” It does seem to want to let people discriminate in situations where they can’t now.
Who are these eleven constitutional scholars Carol? Once again you're making a claim without anything to back it up.
Don't try to get cute with me Carol, you just don't have the chops for it.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1095045 Mar 11, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
When Flscktard threw out that 5%, he made no claim as to what is taxed & what is not.
Food is typically 15-20% of family budgets. So you decreased sales tax rate by 15% and added 15%-20% more taxable and you think that will fund the state?
You left out a part. If you can't pay for the government you have with the money you get cut the government till you can.
$0.20 sales tax.$0.12 local,$0.05 state and $0.03 federal
If you notice most of the tax is local. The state and federal governments would not need to be as large because the power would shift back to local government as the Founding Fathers envisioned it. Putting the power back in the local governments hands where they would be more responsive to the needs of that community and held to the fire for their decisions is the way this country is supposed to be run. Period!!!!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1095046 Mar 11, 2014
Emeem wrote:
<quoted text>
Saddam Hussein had Al Qaeda wiped out of Iraq BEFORE dumbass Bush invaded the country.
You really aren't very smart, just a frightened little chicken running around yelling the sky is falling.
A real world fact you ignorant buffoons cannot accept is, it didn't matter where we went to fight them. They were going to come wherever we went and fight us. I can just hear you treasonous frauds whining and wailing if Bush did what you suggest and left Saddam Hussein in his rear with a rebuilt war machine and took advantage of the US being concentrated in Afghanistan, moving his army into Saudi Arabia again to take the oil fields. Besides, Saddam Hussein had his own terrorist network going. You'd know this if you weren't indoctrinated with all the propaganda lies the Democrats invent to hide their treason.

So, since it's unarguable the Islamist jihad was going to come to wherever we went to fight us, you have to answer this question:

It's 9/12(2001). You're the President. What do you do?
Do you:
A) Surrender to the Islamist jihad? Or;
B) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles into their general direction? Or;
C) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and you're stupid enough to expect something different to happen? Or;
D) You do something different that gives you a better chance of crusing the Islamist jihad like Bush did in Iraq?

If you choose D) do something different, what do you do?

You actually have to say what you would have done to answer the question.

When bush left office, there were no Al Qaeda in Iraq. Since Obama was named President, Al Qaeda has taken over western Iraq.... and attacked us in Benghazi, and are bombing every village and city in Afghanistan, and have grown to be bigger and more powerful than they ever were in their history, and have invaded Syria and are fighting a full-scale war with the Syrian army.

So, what would you have done on 9/12(2001)?
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#1095047 Mar 11, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Galt, being dumber than sh*t, doesn't get the subject is the use of Roth IRA's to avoid estate taxes.
Galt never said anything negative about the Roth IRA after death you idiot.

God! When are you going to learn how to understand what you read. He simply pointed out that you pay income tax up front so the government gets their money then:

http://www.topix.com/forum/chicago/TI79GCO8VK...

God are you dumber than sh*t, DumbDave.

People make a post and say one thing, yet you consistently go off on a tangent.

Got ADHD DumbDave? Yep!
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1095048 Mar 11, 2014
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Just for the record, you're the one using the racial slurs. Lyndon Johnson did as well in private.
I'd not only vote for a black republican conservative who had the best interests of the entire country at heart but a black republican conservative woman who had the best interests of the entire country at heart.
If Condi Rice could be convinced to run against Hillary - or Biden - or whoever the Democrats exalt to deity status in 2016, I'm sure you'd support her 100% because of the color of her skin and/or her gender.
Correct?
Hypocrisy is thy name, dem.
Sure you clueless twit, anyone with half a brain would vote for the person who as National Security Advisor totally ignored the warnings from the intelligence establishment that this country would be attacked, just like her boss did.
You're an idiot Carol!
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#1095049 Mar 11, 2014
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
My son helps more people in an hour than you will in your whole miserable self centered life.
Hey STUPID!

You mean your son helps the Socialist Party destroy the USA.

Provide one simple example of how he has helped anyone.

You can't, lying worthless commie.

Waiting...
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1095050 Mar 11, 2014
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you support a black republican woman or any black republican in the White House? Yes or no?
Either answer the question or can the blatant hypocrisy.
It would depend entirely on their political philosophy not their race or gender, stupid. Right now I can't think of one black or woman Republican I would support. We're not all as shallow as you are Carol.
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1095051 Mar 11, 2014
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not only do you insist on proving yourself the poster child for all rude and crude liberals, but Senator Barack Obama quit after only two years as a junior senator.
Hypocrisy is still thy name, dem.
Being elected to higher office isn't the same as quitting you cretin.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1095052 Mar 11, 2014
Just when you think the show is about to end, another clown enters the big top.
Vivek Murthy has he same qualifications to be Surgeon General a Obama has to be President. That would be none. He's never managed a hospital. In fact, he's never even managed a department in a hospital. He's got a grand total of (drum roll) eight ears practicng medicine .. I'm assuming it was medicine he was practicing and not putting leeches on patients and bleeding them, which would be easy to believe after listening to his rants about guns being inanimate objects while at the same time being evil.
"Doctors for Obama" had to change their name after Obama's name became routinely associated with narcissistic lawlessness and treason.
Anyone qualified to be Surgeon General would institutionalie Obama for extreme narcissistic egomaniacal delusional halucinations about their own grandeur and their ambition to become dictator.

Guns aren't the problem. Democrats with guns are a routine problem. Just ask the dead at Sandy Hook, Aurora, Columbine, Virginia Tech, Fort Hood, etc., etc., etc.
They deserve a vote. Let's ask them if they wished there was someone on their side that had a gun when those Democrats began their executions of defenseless people.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1095053 Mar 11, 2014
This one size fits all government is a communist's wet dream. That is not the way this country was founded or envisioned.

The Tenth Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights to further define the balance of power between the federal government and the states. The amendment says that the federal government has only those powers specifically granted by the Constitution. These powers include the power to declare war, to collect taxes, to regulate interstate business activities and others that are listed in the articles.

Any power not listed, says the Tenth Amendment, is left to the states or the people. Although the Tenth Amendment does not specify what these “powers” may be, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that laws affecting family relations (such as marriage, divorce, and adoption), commerce that occurs within a state’s own borders, and local law enforcement activities, are among those specifically reserved to the states or the people.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1095054 Mar 11, 2014
We still haven't aswered this question:

Why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States in Benghazi?

... why stop now.

How did CNN know what the lie would be before the attac began?

Why did Hillary lie to Congress, lie to the entire country, and lie to Ty Woods' father while she was standing right in front of Ty Woods' casket?

What evidence did the White House or State Department have of any "spontaneous demonstration" that was the principle elemet of Obama's lie?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1095055 Mar 11, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If you like segregation & racism, move to Alabama.
If you like pollution from burning coal, move to West Virginia.
If you hate gays, move to a state where bigotry is accepted.
If you like Obama, move to the south side of Chicago.
... and you better take some guns and a lot of ammo with you. You'lll need it.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#1095056 Mar 11, 2014
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
It would depend entirely on their political philosophy not their race or gender, stupid. Right now I can't think of one black or woman Republican I would support. We're not all as shallow as you are Carol.
No, you are just the clueless moron that says stuff without having a clue!

Tell us again how Sweden was doing "just fine" on their 5th day of riots, you idiot?
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1095057 Mar 11, 2014
harmonious wrote:
<quoted text>
But Bush cut taxes for the rich, didn't he douchebag? Your stupidity and lies exposed.
Bush signed off on tax cuts passed by the GOP controlled Congress at his bequest moron.
Please state anything in my post that's a lie. You can't because they're all verifiable facts.
You're an idiot!
angel

Boise, ID

#1095058 Mar 11, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
A real world fact you ignorant buffoons cannot accept is, it didn't matter where we went to fight them. They were going to come wherever we went and fight us. I can just hear you treasonous frauds whining and wailing if Bush did what you suggest and left Saddam Hussein in his rear with a rebuilt war machine and took advantage of the US being concentrated in Afghanistan, moving his army into Saudi Arabia again to take the oil fields. Besides, Saddam Hussein had his own terrorist network going. You'd know this if you weren't indoctrinated with all the propaganda lies the Democrats invent to hide their treason.
So, since it's unarguable the Islamist jihad was going to come to wherever we went to fight us, you have to answer this question:
It's 9/12(2001). You're the President. What do you do?
Do you:
A) Surrender to the Islamist jihad? Or;
B) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles into their general direction? Or;
C) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and you're stupid enough to expect something different to happen? Or;
D) You do something different that gives you a better chance of crusing the Islamist jihad like Bush did in Iraq?
If you choose D) do something different, what do you do?
You actually have to say what you would have done to answer the question.
When bush left office, there were no Al Qaeda in Iraq. Since Obama was named President, Al Qaeda has taken over western Iraq.... and attacked us in Benghazi, and are bombing every village and city in Afghanistan, and have grown to be bigger and more powerful than they ever were in their history, and have invaded Syria and are fighting a full-scale war with the Syrian army.
So, what would you have done on 9/12(2001)?
How about killing Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan when we had the chance instead of letting 'local tribal leaders' deal with it?
No Al Queada in Iraq When Bush Left Office????
Certainly none of those Foreign Jihadists who flocked there to fight when we invaded were Al Queada right?
After the Obama Admin got done with him there was certainly one LESS on the scene after Bush left office.
How about concentrating on AlQueada and tracking down every last one of them and killing them like the Obama Admin has done a far better job of doing then Repubs ever did.
And all without the sacrifice of thousands of young Service Personel.
Face it moron this is one History Teabaggers are not going to be able to Re-Write at will.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 6 min Valerie 263,159
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 12 min Sperm Lips Mahz 49,896
Ukraine Says Russia Has Invaded 33 min George 233
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 58 min litesong 46,801
Al Sharpton: Obama's Racial Pyromaniac 1 hr X-TREME BIAS 11
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 1 hr NorCal Native 249
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 1 hr Cali Girl 2014 56,031
Obama thanks Congress for vote to aid Syrian re... 2 hr Delbert 116
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 2 hr Cornelius Scudmister 154,006
Hillary Clinton Faces Skeptical Iowa Voters 2 hr xxxrayted 377
Exclusive: Angry with Washington, 1 in 4 Americ... 3 hr barefoot2626 58
•••

US Politics People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••