Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Jane Says

New York, NY

#931682 Jun 25, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
The developing fetus is not a human being until it's born.
and in your case, even after it's born.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#931683 Jun 25, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>

meme.
leftwing codespeak
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#931684 Jun 25, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> No, its not. Scientist have discovered through DNA mapping that as the sperm (1/2 cell) and egg (1/2 cell) merge to form a single cell the DNA is of the cell with no resemblance to the mother's or father's DNA. The DNA of this single cell has all the DNA to create the human that it will grow into. In other words it is a distant and separate life form upon the merger of the sperm and egg. But if you want to kill your future go right ahead.
in other words?

then that's just your opinion.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#931685 Jun 25, 2013
Sources claiming to have had minimal, erratic contact with Edward Snowden have said that hes considering turning himself in after Sarah Palin came to his defense, taking his side on many of the same issues.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#931686 Jun 25, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmmmm
Interesting comment.
Does morality include those yet born or does it only concern those now living?
What would prevent this from being reduced to just situational ethics?
Another thing I love about the "less government" Republicans. They want the government to be the final arbiter in all moral questions as long as it reflects their "morality".
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#931687 Jun 25, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>I thought my father in law was arrested again in Hillary Clinton's home town in Illinois. But NJ evidentally has the same problem.
In Illinois the city of Park Ridge, you can't feed the birds-you can't park a pick up truck EVER on the street-but must purchase a city sticker to park in your own drive or garage-you can't put garbage bags filled with leaves to insulate your house in the winter--even though no one can see them-and you certainly can't have lawn chairs on your front lawn.
Do they actually require purchase of a city sticker to park in your own drive or garage?

Incredible!
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

#931688 Jun 25, 2013
LNC Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't know if "he personally had al Qaeda on the run" but his drone program and the killing of Osama bin laden seem impressive.
Well, that was his claim.

And for him to take all the credit for the hard work that went into finding bin Laden over a five year time span - which Obama had absolutely nothing to do with - and coming off the golf course just in time to see the Seals raid bin Laden's compound after doing what any president would have done and giving them the go ahead was nothing but disgraceful.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#931689 Jun 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Is somebody forcing you to live in Park Ridge?
I don't-my father in law does-funny thing though his property taxes are now more than he paid for his house 40 some years ago. How can that be? only because of big government in a small town. I don't think anyone should retire or live in Illinois. It is never going to be a viable state. I predict it will be the first state to declare bankruptcy.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#931690 Jun 25, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>One easy way to solve this 'problem' is repeal CitizensUnited and end citizens' political action groups from applying for 501(c)(4) status. The I.R.S. won't have to 'close exam' these groups and individual citizens will be given back their private right to donate to political groups that they want to without being pressured by them through 'raise the money' solicitation e-mails and phone call pledge campaigns.
How do you propose to "repeal" a Supreme Court decision?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#931691 Jun 25, 2013
Whatever wrote:
Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act ruled unconstitutional by Supreme Court
I seen that too so I figure Jessie Jackson & Al Sharpton will be out getting their thugs around to democstrate and protest and take it to the streets in Major Metro areas & Washington DC.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#931692 Jun 25, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
I had an ethics professor who was trapped in the same stereotypes as you.
He was wrong and had to adjust my grade up- as it was an opinion paper- and so are you.
Can't answer the question?

Where are you on the death penalty?

I know why you can't answer, you already know it disqualifies you as "pro-life" and you become the more accurate "anti-choice".

Sht like that sticks in the craw of "less government" Republicans, just another reminder that their entire platform is a sham.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#931693 Jun 25, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This is Flack b;laming the Democrats for the Bush recession.
Signed into Law May25th.
Went into effect July 26th.
That .70 cents an hour raise.
less than two months later Bush tells us we are on the verge of a financial meltdown & the worst recession in 80 years starts in December.
Yep that minimum wage did it.
Nor the unfunded Bush Tax cuts
Not record Earmarks
Not doubling the debt
Not two quagmire unfunded wars
Not the unfunded part D expansion to Medicare.
It was that GD .70 cents an hour raise to the minimum wage.
That was the second one numbnuts. Yes a lot of poor people who were just barely holding on lost their jobs. Some of those jobs were helping to pay the bills. It's simple math. If mom and pop have three employees and wages go up they have to let some one go or cut their own standard of living. Which do you think is going to happen.

By the way the government benefits far more from a wage increase than does any individual. Don't forget the unions either.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#931694 Jun 25, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Seriously? You can't see that if Obama had admitted to a terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9/11 after announcing to everyone on the campaign trail he personally had al Qaeda on the run because he killed bin Laden that he wouldn't look ridiculous just weeks before the election?
He just looked ridiculous instead after the election because everyone knew he lied to win the election.
That makes a lot of people angry - reasonable people.
Now there is proof that Hillary Clinton's goal was to establish a permanent fixture of Americans in Libya. Chris Stevens was there to make that happen. Clinton lied, Stevens died.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#931695 Jun 25, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> You think that the affluent Chicago town of Park Ridge with an estimated population of 37,000 is an example of Galt's 'Big Government at your service'? That's like saying miniature poodles are the most vicious attack dogs.
"Big government" refers to intrusiveness and scope and applies at the federal, state, and local level.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#931696 Jun 25, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This is Flack b;laming the Democrats for the Bush recession.
Signed into Law May25th.
Went into effect July 26th.
That .70 cents an hour raise.
less than two months later Bush tells us we are on the verge of a financial meltdown & the worst recession in 80 years starts in December.
Yep that minimum wage did it.
Nor the unfunded Bush Tax cuts
Not record Earmarks
Not doubling the debt
Not two quagmire unfunded wars
Not the unfunded part D expansion to Medicare.
It was that GD .70 cents an hour raise to the minimum wage.
I realize you can't understand what you read but even your libtard ass should be able to understand 'It was a part of the 08 crash'.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#931697 Jun 25, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
The ratio of Republicans to Democrats who supported F&F and were on their payroll is miniscule in comparison.
It was a Republican Congressional hearing in 2004 that tried to rein in F&F. Every single Democrat was outraged.
An attempt at another tax cut which worked the first time was too late the second time when the house of cards had already collapsed.
still doesn't explain how the democrats, who had no control over anything, somehow let Bush's buddies at F&F screw the pooch.

and yes, his buddies. Franklin Raines evidently had a free pass to the Oval Office.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#931698 Jun 25, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
leftwing codespeak
sorry. i'll try to dumb it down so you can keep up.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#931699 Jun 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
"Abortion RIGHTS supporters" would be accurate. Not many people are real supportive of the act of having an abortion, most view it as a trauma.
I'm not necessarily like them, I'm all for voluntary abortion and even voluntary sterilization. As long as there's no coercion involved I think most people who seek an abortion are providing a public service and are looking out for the best interests of an unwanted child.
Those who earn their living providing abortions are "abortion supporters."

Galt agrees with you about the benefits of abortion, but more from the viewpoint of the benefit to society rather than the best interests of the child.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#931700 Jun 25, 2013
mdbuilder wrote:
<quoted text>
The infant is not a fetus if it can survive on it's own. Even that's arguable. Why is a murderer charged with double homicide when he kills a pregnant mother?
Same reason they'd be charged if someone physically forced a woman to have an abortion.
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

#931701 Jun 25, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
nice argument, but i'm pretty sure the right wing nutjobs have been calling birth control the same as an abortion.
so carol...when did you become a liberal?
The percentage of people who consider birth control the same as abortion is more than likely in the one to low two-digit range.

Even devout Catholics use birth control.

Hope that's not the best argument you have.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
US to start talks with Cuba to normalize full d... 3 min Newland 88
Can Obama's presidency be saved? 3 min spocko 945
After CIA torture report: rebuilding a culture ... 3 min dollarsbill 144
Body cameras for cops could be the biggest chan... 4 min Uncle Bob 1,420
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 4 min positronium 293,200
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 5 min Injudgement 165,516
Obama Says Sony - Made a Mistake' Pulling Film 6 min OId Sailor 21
Ben Carson: Race Relations Have 'Gotten Worse' ... 20 min barefoot2626 713
Obama: Keystone benefits for U.S. consumers, wo... 27 min Bury that thing D... 49
US and Cuba move to normalize ties, open embassy 29 min barefoot2626 126
More from around the web