Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1346809 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

unauthorized_use r

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#718874 Aug 22, 2012
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#718875 Aug 22, 2012
boot the failure BO wrote:
<quoted text>
Haven't you heard?
DENVER—Two University of Colorado professors have devised a model to predict who will win the presidential election under current economic circumstances. The victor, they say, will be Republican Mitt Romney.
The model uses economic indicators from all 50 states to predict the race's outcome. The forecast calls for Romney to win 320 electoral votes out of 538. It says Romney will also win virtually every state currently considered a swing state, including Colorado.
The professors who created the model, Ken Bickers from CU-Boulder and Michael Berry from CU-Denver, say it correctly forecast every winner of the electoral since 1980.
They warn the model does not account for sudden changes in the economy or unexpected developments in states split 50-50. Polls in many states, including Colorado, show a virtually deadlocked race.
Read more: CU forecasters predict a Romney presidency - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/romney/ci_21373080/...
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
You gotta get your news from somewhere besides the "Ed" show.
So when was the last time Romney said anything about the economy?

How about the foreign policy 'model'? Link?

How about the gender 'model'?

How about the minority 'model'?
ARGUING with IDIOTS

Hollywood, FL

#718876 Aug 22, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>Which one is legal?

What does the Constitution say about the Supreme Court?

"The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court..."

Any argument about a legal act is of no concern to me.
Right, so if they make deadly force legal, it would not concern you!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#718877 Aug 22, 2012
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#718878 Aug 22, 2012
ARGUING with IDIOTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Right, so if they make deadly force legal, it would not concern you!
Yes, I'm concerned that Zimmerman will get off.

Stop arguing with yourself.

unauthorized_use r

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#718879 Aug 22, 2012
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#718880 Aug 22, 2012
ARGUING with IDIOTS

Corning, CA

#718881 Aug 22, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, I'm concerned that Zimmerman will get off.

Stop arguing with yourself.
Sorry, didn't notice you wear a helmet.

unauthorized_use r

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#718882 Aug 22, 2012
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#718883 Aug 22, 2012
ARGUING with IDIOTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, didn't notice you wear a helmet.
You caught me. I'm one of those idiots you like to argue with.

Though why you advertise.......
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#718884 Aug 22, 2012

unauthorized_use r

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#718885 Aug 22, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
So when was the last time Romney said anything about the economy?
How about the foreign policy 'model'? Link?
How about the gender 'model'?
How about the minority 'model'?
Actually yes, everything he has put out for his plans are all about economy including repealing health care, plus thats why he brought in Paul Ryan,
foreign policy
http://www.mittromney.com/collection/foreign-...
gender model
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/12/us/politics...
See this iswhy you get so butt hurt when Im around, you ask stupid questions and I bring the volume to high for you to argue.
Obamas foreign policy is give them money we dont have and borrow more from the other countries who want us out of power.
Obamas economic measures (See above)and in his words, "We are just going to keep spending money and raising the debt ceiling so we can borrow more and that way we won't lose any money." Yeah and hows that worked out.
His gender plan is all about taking attention away from the fact hes an idiot and in another 4 years of him none of that will ever matter anyway. THATS what people see when we think for ourselves and stop regurgitating what we see on MSNBC
Tournefort

Richmond, IN

#718886 Aug 22, 2012
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyone that has any knowledge of that couple knows full well their uppity mentality. So it's obvious that you are the one that doesn't know anything about her. But that's consistent with all baggers they are programmed who and what to vote for.
Ha, the forum braggart talking about "uppity mentality".
Too bad, GG ... You sound like some people I went to school with in junior high who were always talking about "The Uppity Rich Kids".
Years later some of them still won't come to class reunions because some of "The Uppity Rich Kids" might be there.

unauthorized_use r

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#718887 Aug 22, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
http://www.thefogbow.com/speci al-reports/social-security-num ber/
Verification results
Code 1
Description SSN not in file (Never Issued)
==========
Hes 48 years old all the way from 2005 to 2008 suggesting all the record was adjusted at the same time recreating the different years records but in the computer still read his birthday according to the computers date clock.
==========
Page 3 is unreadable except what was typed over (gender female / and dates.
==========
So sonic you proved he obtained NObamas true SSI records be it illegally and it is full of discrepancies. Good job, the man sacrificed himself and proved NObama isnt really who he says he is as we knew all along. And you posted it for the world to see LMAO Hollister is the MAN!
DEM LIBERALISM

New York, NY

#718888 Aug 22, 2012
August 22, 2012 | 10:20 am
440Comments
Paul Bedard
Washington Secrets
The Washington Examiner

With an eye on Rep. Todd Akin's "legitimate rape" comments and the GOP's mad dash away from the sinking Missouri Senate candidate, the Democrats are turning their upcoming presidential convention into a pro-choice assault on the Republicans with the help of major abortion supporters.

Just as the Akin crisis was reaching a crescendo, the Democrats on Wednesday announced that three starlets of the pro-choice movement will be featured at the convention, an event that will now drive the liberal charge that the Republicans are anti-women.

Democrats said that they will feature Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parent Action Fund, Nancy Keenan, president of the NARAL Pro-Choice America and Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown University student whose plea for federal birth control funding drew the ire--and a subsequent apology--from Rush Limbaugh.

What's more, the Democrats are expanding their list of women ready to assail the GOP on women's issue, adding Maryland Sen. Barbara Mikulski and actress Eva Longoria to the list that already includes Sen. John Kerry and Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren.

Democrats led by party chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz believe that the Akin controversy--and his refusal to leave the Missouri Senate race--has revived their chances of winning a majority of women in the presidential race, key to re-electing President Obama. On Wednesday, for example, the party turned their homepage over to the affair with the headline: "The GOP is dangerously wrong for women." And with a devilish move, they included pictures of Mitt Romney, running mate Paul Ryan and Akin.

"Romney, Ryan, Akin and the GOP want to take women back to the dark ages," the Democrats add.

THESE DEM ARE A BIG JOKE!!!
American Lady

Danville, KY

#718889 Aug 22, 2012
ARGUING with IDIOTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Right, so if they make deadly force legal, it would not concern you!
Educate-Yourself
The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought
Police No Longer Serve and Protect the Public
by Brent Johnson:

Thomas Paine, one of America’s most influential Founding Fathers, wrote in his brilliant essay, Common Sense, that government at its very best, when it is doing everything right and nothing wrong, is a necessary evil. In other words, Thomas Paine and those (like myself) who share his views on government believe that all governments are inherently evil.
This means that those who work for government are supporting, by their efforts, something evil, and are therefore perpetrating evil. In other words, all bureaucrats, that is, all elected and appointed officials, whether federal, state, city, county or otherwise, are supporting a government that is fundamentally evil. This includes the police.
Did you know that police officers are actually government corporation security guards?... That is because your belief systems have become so entrenched that you likely find it difficult to look at the issue honestly and with clarity. I have lost count of the number of times I have heard someone say,“Most police are good. There are a few bad apples.” I used to agree. However, I no longer believe it to be true.
Police officers, like anyone and everyone who works for any branch or level of government, are bureaucrats. As a bureaucrat, each police officer is the exact product of his or her training - nothing more and nothing less.
The news media are filled with a growing number of incidents of and complaints about police brutality,... who are supposed to protect and defend the general public from precisely these kinds of crimes.
I submit that the reason police break into the homes of innocent citizens and often kill them is because they have been trained to do so. Today, police are trained to regard all citizens as criminals! They are trained that they should shoot first and ask questions later.
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/soldiersofevil...

Police Have No Duty To Protect Individuals
by Peter Kasler
Self-Reliance For Self-Defense -- Police Protection Isn't Enough!
...
It is, therefore, a fact of law and of practical necessity that individuals are responsible for their own personal safety, and that of their loved ones. Police protection must be recognized for what it is: only an auxiliary general deterrent.
Because the police have no general duty to protect individuals, judicial remedies are not available for their failure to protect. In other words, if someone is injured because they expected but did not receive police protection, they cannot recover damages by suing (except in very special cases, explained below)...
Warren v. District of Columbia is one of the leading cases of this type...
About a year later, the United States Court of Appeals interpreted DeShaney in the California case of Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department.[9] Ms. Balistreri, beaten and harassed by her estranged husband, alleged a "special relationship" existed between her and the Pacifica Police Department, to wit, they were duty-bound to protect her because there was a restraining order against her husband. The Court of Appeals, however, concluded that DeShaney limited the circumstances that would give rise to a "special relationship" to instances of custody. Because no such custody existed in Balistreri, the Pacifica Police had no duty to protect her, so when they failed to do so and she was injured they were not liable... and can only win such a suit if a "special relationship" can be shown to have existed, which DeShaney and its progeny make it very difficult to do. Moreover, Zinermon v. Burch [10] very likely precludes Section 1983 liability for police agencies in these types of cases if there is a potential remedy via a State tort action.
http://www.firearmsandliberty.com/kasler-prot...
Razors Edge

Oak Lawn, IL

#718890 Aug 23, 2012
Why is Obama’s well documented and comparatively recent involvement with Chicago Marxists not on the front page of every major newspaper in the United States?”

The simple answer is that the “useful idiots” in the MSM believe it is their job to cover up and provide cover for Obama. If the folks knew that Obama was a dyed in the wool Marxist who seeks to destroy capitalism and America, he would never get more than 10% of the vote. So he has to lie about who he is and what his real intentions are. He has plenty of useful idiots out there to provide cover.

The MSM or State Run Media believe they’ll be part of the elite when Obama’s fundamental transformation is complete. Little do they know how expendable they are.
1 post removed

unauthorized_use r

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#718892 Aug 23, 2012
Razors Edge wrote:
Why is Obama’s well documented and comparatively recent involvement with Chicago Marxists not on the front page of every major newspaper in the United States?”
The simple answer is that the “useful idiots” in the MSM believe it is their job to cover up and provide cover for Obama. If the folks knew that Obama was a dyed in the wool Marxist who seeks to destroy capitalism and America, he would never get more than 10% of the vote. So he has to lie about who he is and what his real intentions are. He has plenty of useful idiots out there to provide cover.
The MSM or State Run Media believe they’ll be part of the elite when Obama’s fundamental transformation is complete. Little do they know how expendable they are.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejm iller/sarah-jessica-parker-cut s-ad-for-obama-fundraising

Check this s@#$ out. Iposted some interesting stuff you might like here myself LOL look for 99ways2die

unauthorized_use r

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#718893 Aug 23, 2012
Razors Edge wrote:
Why is Obama’s well documented and comparatively recent involvement with Chicago Marxists not on the front page of every major newspaper in the United States?”
The simple answer is that the “useful idiots” in the MSM believe it is their job to cover up and provide cover for Obama. If the folks knew that Obama was a dyed in the wool Marxist who seeks to destroy capitalism and America, he would never get more than 10% of the vote. So he has to lie about who he is and what his real intentions are. He has plenty of useful idiots out there to provide cover.
The MSM or State Run Media believe they’ll be part of the elite when Obama’s fundamental transformation is complete. Little do they know how expendable they are.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejm iller/sarah-jessica-parker-cut s-ad-for-obama-fundraising

unauthorized_use r

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#718894 Aug 23, 2012
Razors Edge wrote:
Why is Obama’s well documented and comparatively recent involvement with Chicago Marxists not on the front page of every major newspaper in the United States?”
The simple answer is that the “useful idiots” in the MSM believe it is their job to cover up and provide cover for Obama. If the folks knew that Obama was a dyed in the wool Marxist who seeks to destroy capitalism and America, he would never get more than 10% of the vote. So he has to lie about who he is and what his real intentions are. He has plenty of useful idiots out there to provide cover.
The MSM or State Run Media believe they’ll be part of the elite when Obama’s fundamental transformation is complete. Little do they know how expendable they are.
hold the f@#$ on I gotta DE space the s@#$!. Getting tired a pasting links down for it to spread like that for no damn reason.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News If Donald Trump Was President, Here's What Woul... 3 min Raydot 4,190
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 4 min - Lady Liberty - 370,345
Time to go? (Jun '15) 4 min barefoot2626 7,762
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 5 min syamsu 187,056
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 6 min Dr Guru 207,524
News FBI 'ready to indict' Hillary Clinton, Tom Dela... 9 min woodtick57 786
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 9 min Cornelius Scudmister 213,853
More from around the web