Yes, the killing of bin Laden was a serious blow to our national security, wasn't it? How about the additional troops Obama sent to Afghanistan? Did that "deplete" our national security? How about the high ranking Al Queda members that have been targeted and killed during the Obama administration? How exactly does the killing of terrorists hurt our security?<quoted text>No where did I say Bush had no responsibility. I know it is your and Obama's favorite scapegoat but you can't keep making excuses for the liberals that continually depleat our national security as Obama is doing now.
And yes, you did say that Bush had no responsibility. When I pointed out that the terrorists were here training and planning during the first few months of Bush's term, you replied that the attacks would never have happened if not for Clinton's failures. So who is doing the "scapegoating" here? You right winger always claim that Bush "kept us safe from terrorism". No, stupid, he didn't. He was the president, and by your own admission, he was responsible for national security, when the 9/11 attacks happened. So tell me, why didn't Bush keep American safe from the 9/11 attacks?
Let me guess. Your answer will contain the word "Clinton", won't it?