U.S. efforts stall in capturing suspe...

U.S. efforts stall in capturing suspects in Benghazi attacks

There are 79 comments on the The Washington Post story from Dec 6, 2013, titled U.S. efforts stall in capturing suspects in Benghazi attacks. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

U.S. officials say efforts have stalled to capture about a dozen people secretly charged in the 2012 attack on the American compound in Benghazi that claimed the lives of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last

“My Commander-in-Chi ef!”

Since: Jun 07

Obama got Osama!

#2 Dec 6, 2013
Benghazi? What Benghazi?

Tea-baggers take heed:

As you right-wing idiots are slowly waking to the fact (that I predicted weeks ago) that President Obama and the ACA would fully recover from the bad rollout and website problems, this little gem was posted on TPM.com ; in it they point out just how devoid from reality you guys have been for years.

Fox News’ Election Night Fail

On election night Fox analysts and reporters rightly noted that 2012 had not inspired the kind of captivating campaign that Obama ginned up for victory in 2008. At the start of the night, the Fox News chairman warned commentators participating in his channel’s election coverage:“If things don’t go your way tonight, don’t go out there looking like someone ran over your dog.” Yet the coverage on Fox proved largely dour and depressive.“President Obama will win because he ran a good campaign,” political anchor Bret Baier said early in the evening.“He will not win because of the state of the economy.”
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/fox-news-el...

… and your depression continues. It feels so great to be on the winning side and have the pure pleasure of being able to wallow in you right-wing fools misery.
1 post removed

Since: Mar 09

The Left Coast

#4 Dec 6, 2013
Patty has a point, Obama's a busy guy, he doesn't have time for the little things, he has a website to worry about.

Like Hillary Cliton said, what difference does it make now.
Moochelle and B Hussein O

Southampton, NY

#5 Dec 6, 2013
Obama is a LIAR wrote:
See his Uncle?
He looks just like Moochelle.
Don't insult the President's uncle!
Gravediggers

West Palm Beach, FL

#6 Dec 6, 2013
Mona Charen had a column regarding President Obama's SOCIAL JUSTICE LYING-'LYING FOR JUSTICE' which is being used by him.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/364558/... #!

Obama LIED about his mother being denied healthcare coverage for her disease!

Obama LIED about people being able to KEEP their insurance plan, PERIOD!(This LIE hits too many Americans, in the gut!)

Obama LIED about Benghazi!

Obama LIED about knowing his illegal alien uncle!

-Since his uncle, testified under OATH, stating that Obama LIVED with him; Obama couldn't see his uncle being prosecuted for lying under OATH, so the President had to come clean about his OWN LYING.

Obama LIES.

What ELSE has he lied about, and what ELSE WILL he lie about?

Electing someone who didn't have experience with managing anything, is being felt in this country. The President didn't keep a tight rein on Sebelius...only met with her 1 time since Obamacare was passed. Here is the President prized achievement and he doesn't even monitor it!

It is evident the President is unable to juggle the responsibilities of his job. He can't multitask, is afraid to make decisions, he waffles continually. He shows himself as weak.

The only area were the President is strong is not getting the USA involved in more military action and pushing social justice causes. Other than that, he is not much of a leader. He doesn't have the skill set even after 5 years in office.

Whoever gets elected in 2016 better have a strong game plan- organization, because they will be walking into a White House and government agencies with a high level of disorganization. It probably will take the new president a couple of years to straighten out the chaos.

Can't trust a liar. Americans are learning the HARD way.

NO TRUST!
Cat74

Gilberts, IL

#7 Dec 6, 2013
Of course we can't find the Benghazi killers. They probably have friends in high places. But as long as this thing is going on the worse it looks for Hillary, and the Muslim President. We will get the truth if we have to wait until the Democrats are voted out of office. They are betting we will lose interest, and go away, but we won't.
sandy1

New City, NY

#8 Dec 6, 2013
The real Americans will never lose interest in the truth behind the brutal murders of our people. Obama,hillary and all the liars who had the audacity to think that we were stupid enough to believe that a video caused this are just as guilty as the dirtbags that carried out this heinous crime. The Benghazi victims families deserve justice, and despite the liberals trying to stand in the way of that happening the real Americans will see to it that justice will prevail.
Eric Gustafson

Newport News, VA

#9 Dec 6, 2013
100% agree. Real Americans know the cause of the deaths as outlined in the ARB Review was the Republican Spending cuts and mandate to hire the lowest bidder to provide security at the Benghazi Consulate.

Real Americans know the Republicans with all the allegations and speculation are desperate to change the narrative identifying the Republicans in Congress as the sole reason Ambassador Stevens is dead.
sandy1 wrote:
The real Americans will never lose interest in the truth behind the brutal murders of our people. Obama,hillary and all the liars who had the audacity to think that we were stupid enough to believe that a video caused this are just as guilty as the dirtbags that carried out this heinous crime. The Benghazi victims families deserve justice, and despite the liberals trying to stand in the way of that happening the real Americans will see to it that justice will prevail.

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#10 Dec 6, 2013
...More manufactured outrage over benghazi, by teahadists.

Remember when raygun fdup:

A military commission investigating the Beirut bombing reported to the Reagan administration and Congress on lax security. The commission found that senior military officials were responsible for security lapses and blamed the military chain of command for the disaster. It suggested that there might have been many fewer deaths if the barracks guards had carried loaded weapons and a barrier more substantial than the barbed wire the bomber drove over easily.

241 American soldiers dead.

60 other Americans injured.

Cry us a river over benghazi.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#11 Dec 6, 2013
Marine Corp Pat wrote:
Benghazi? What Benghazi?
psst.. the story is from the Washington Post.

Hardly a bastion of conservative thinking, but I see you're following Obama's lead.

When Obamacare took hits, he took to immigration reform and "income inequality".

So, given queries into Behghazi, you're onto something else.

A tip for you... stay on Topic.... you'll look less the fool.
sandy1

New City, NY

#12 Dec 6, 2013
Eric Gustafson wrote:
100% agree. Real Americans know the cause of the deaths as outlined in the ARB Review was the Republican Spending cuts and mandate to hire the lowest bidder to provide security at the Benghazi Consulate.
Real Americans know the Republicans with all the allegations and speculation are desperate to change the narrative identifying the Republicans in Congress as the sole reason Ambassador Stevens is dead.
<quoted text>
Bs! You lie because your scared that when the truth comes out (and it will) that your messiah and hillary will finally be held accountable! And justice will prevail! And traitors like you should be hung for treason for trying to cover-up for the guilty with lies. Shame on you!
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#13 Dec 6, 2013
Eric Gustafson wrote:
100% agree. Real Americans know the cause of the deaths as outlined in the ARB Review was the Republican Spending cuts and mandate to hire the lowest bidder to provide security at the Benghazi Consulate.
Real Americans know the Republicans with all the allegations and speculation are desperate to change the narrative identifying the Republicans in Congress as the sole reason Ambassador Stevens is dead.
<quoted text>
Still trotting out your tiresome bullshyt I see.

"was not enough security because the budget was cut.”

"State Department officials repeatedly told Congress that a lack of funds was not an issue. Instead, security was hampered because of bureaucratic issues and management failures. In other words, given the internal failures, no amount of money for the State Department likely would have made a difference in this tragedy."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-chec...

Count the Pinocchios.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#14 Dec 6, 2013
sandy1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Bs! You lie because your scared that when the truth comes out (and it will) that your messiah and hillary will finally be held accountable! And justice will prevail! And traitors like you should be hung for treason for trying to cover-up for the guilty with lies. Shame on you!
As "shame" is a value, liberals are not offended by accusing them of having it -- or not.
1 post removed
Eric Gustafson

Newport News, VA

#16 Dec 6, 2013
The Truth has already come out, page 3 of the ARB Review.... What the Republicans are doing in throwing out speculation and false allegations is a desperate attempt to change the narrative from the Official Report.

The Republicans cut spending, and further was Boehner's refusal of Hillary Clinton's request for additional funding for Benghazi and other problem consulates around the globe.

Because you aren't aware of the truth doesn't make the truth any less validate..... it's public information and accessible to the public...... Google ARB Review Benghazi.
sandy1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Bs! You lie because your scared that when the truth comes out (and it will) that your messiah and hillary will finally be held accountable! And justice will prevail! And traitors like you should be hung for treason for trying to cover-up for the guilty with lies. Shame on you!
sandy1

New City, NY

#17 Dec 6, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
As "shame" is a value, liberals are not offended by accusing them of having it -- or not.
Very true. Liberals are a plague that destroys everything good and decent.
Eric Gustafson

Newport News, VA

#18 Dec 6, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
Still trotting out your tiresome bullshyt I see.
"was not enough security because the budget was cut.”
"State Department officials repeatedly told Congress that a lack of funds was not an issue. Instead, security was hampered because of bureaucratic issues and management failures. In other words, given the internal failures, no amount of money for the State Department likely would have made a difference in this tragedy."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-chec...
Count the Pinocchios.
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/2...

"For many years the State Department has been engaged in a struggle to obtain the resources necessary to carry out its work, with varying degrees of success. This has brought about a deep sense of the importance of husbanding resources to meet the highest priorities, laudable in the extreme in any government
department. But it has also had the effect of conditioning a few State Department managers to favor restricting the use of resources as a general orientation. There is no easy way to cut through this Gordian knot, all the more so as budgetary austerity looms large ahead. At the same time, it is imperative for the State
Department to be mission-driven, rather than resource-constrained – particularly when being present in increasingly risky areas of the world is integral to U.S. national security. The recommendations in this report attempt to grapple with these issues and err on the side of increased attention to prioritization and to fuller
support for people and facilities engaged in working in high risk, high threat areas.
The solution requires a more serious and sustained commitment from Congress to support State Department needs, which, in total, constitute a small percentage both of the full national budget and that spent for national security. One overall conclusion in this report is that Congress must do its part to meet this challenge
and provide necessary resources to the State Department to address security risks and meet mission imperatives"
sandy1

New City, NY

#19 Dec 6, 2013
Eric Gustafson wrote:
The Truth has already come out, page 3 of the ARB Review.... What the Republicans are doing in throwing out speculation and false allegations is a desperate attempt to change the narrative from the Official Report.
The Republicans cut spending, and further was Boehner's refusal of Hillary Clinton's request for additional funding for Benghazi and other problem consulates around the globe.
Because you aren't aware of the truth doesn't make the truth any less validate..... it's public information and accessible to the public...... Google ARB Review Benghazi.
<quoted text>
Keep the lies coming, Traitor!
Eric Gustafson

Newport News, VA

#20 Dec 6, 2013
see the light wrote:
Ya, we are really looking for Benghazi killers? We can't find them, because we already know who's responsible and President and former Secretary will never pay.
We found them, they're in Congress sitting with the Republican Caucus. These hearing over the years are a smoke screen intended solely to change that narrative.
Eric Gustafson

Newport News, VA

#21 Dec 6, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
psst.. the story is from the Washington Post.
Hardly a bastion of conservative thinking, but I see you're following Obama's lead.
When Obamacare took hits, he took to immigration reform and "income inequality".
So, given queries into Behghazi, you're onto something else.
A tip for you... stay on Topic.... you'll look less the fool.
That articles if full of wild speculation and crazy acquisitions there is no material facts of any kind in that writing, same with the exaggerations distributed over on Fox Snooze, nothing in terms of factual statements or evidence of any kind, and Issa has been looking for going on 2 years but he's not found nothing in any investigation.

He specializes in making noise and drawing false conclusions void of any factual matter.

How can you spend 5 years investigating and find nothing but baseless chatter?
Eric Gustafson

Newport News, VA

#22 Dec 6, 2013
The Republican spending cuts killed Ambassador Stevens.

Pg 3 of the ARB Review..........
1 post removed

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#24 Dec 6, 2013
What? Another Obama policy/program lacking positive results?
Here's another: Obamacare will be successful once the bar defining success is set low enough. Apparently, fixing some, but not all, bugs in a web-site, did not set the bar low enough.
And another: Obama calls for extending jobless benefits even though he's focused like a laser on jobs.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Trump would deport children of illegal immigrants 4 min rfirma1 508
News In climate bid, Obama stares down melting Alask... 5 min positronium 87
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 6 min Coffee Party 197,141
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Nuculur option 1,278,307
News Judge jails Kentucky clerk for refusing marriag... 7 min Sue Henson 184
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 12 min HILLARY 2016 194,260
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 13 min DanFromSmithville 174,024
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 16 min positronium 341,550
News We have reached the George Wallace stage of the... 28 min Cujo 76
More from around the web