Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201809 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Big D

Modesto, CA

#204287 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that you associate my post with idiotic statements that have nothing to do with what I actually said only exposes your inability to mount a reasoned response.
Get real big dummy.
You donít get to talk about facts until you acknowledge the fact that same sex couples are married, legally, and recognized by the state and federal government as equal to any other marriage.

I am real, you are the one that seems totally clueless about facts.
OhStewOne

Monrovia, CA

#204288 Jul 23, 2013
Your fans have a special message for you:

Oh Tommy Tucker your still a jerk!

I found the one your looking for it's neatly wrapped around your head and neck, tightly
1 post removed
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204290 Jul 23, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
You're like a stuck record... Is every single aspect of your marriage directly related to procreation? Is that the only reason you married your wife? Is that the sole reason that you married?
..
I feel sorry for his wife, I would have married mine whether she could have children or not. I cannot even imagine a marriage where the man only thinks of his wife as a baby producing appliance.
3 posts removed

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204294 Jul 23, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You donít get to talk about facts until you acknowledge the fact that same sex couples are married, legally, and recognized by the state and federal government as equal to any other marriage.
I am real, you are the one that seems totally clueless about facts.
How can they be "equal", when various state marriage laws, including those that deal with annulment, reference the male female sexual union?
heartandmind

Moline, IL

#204295 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Here we go again...
1. I'm talking about marriage identifying with the very roots of human life. You ignore the incredible significance of that fundamental essence.
2. You dumb down marriage to a piece of paper. I'm talking about the past and future life and life giving fruit of marriage, something ss couples have absolutely NO identification with in any way.
3. Moreover, you foolishly attempt to deny the connection between the very existence of life, including homosexuals and marriage. Marriage is the wise constraint of human culture combined with nature's mating behavior to produce the best and safest place for reproduction.
This separation DEMANDED by couples who have zero potential of mutually procreating human life, placed on the only couples best suited to do so. Not just inappropriate, but idiotic.
...and here you go again, repeating yourself.

these facts remain :
1. same sex marriage is legal in several states.
2. prop 8 case findings and decision made by judge walker stands that prop 8 is unconstitutional, per SCOTUS' rulings.
3. DOMA, section 3, is declared unconstitutional by SCOTUS.
4. your opinion disagrees with the previous facts. then again, your opinion does not drive secular law in these united states. so, again, your opinion doesn't really matter.

i'm hoping someday you can get off the broken record so your posts might become interesting and fresh for a change. at least we can all discuss different points.
1 post removed

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#204297 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol
I expose a gay troll attack and you ignore the attack and call my exposť contentious!
Silly queen.
Remember , I'm a redeemed cynic who remains barbarian. Mocking hypocrisy models the Master.
Well, someone's hit the bottle early today.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#204298 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing in my post asserts any such thing.
Go back and read it again. Get someone to help you.
Marriage connects the roots of humanity and the future. SS couples do neither. They are a clear mutation mistake that has no direct connection to past or the future.
So you're now saying that there ARE other reasons that people marry besides children.

And if other reasons exist, then people--including same-gender couples--should be allowed to marry based on those reasons.

You can't say that marriage equals mating/procreation and say that other reasons exist at the same time.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#204299 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you are defending Paul against Christ?
So, you're saying that Christ has encouraged mankind to judge one another and be rude to them--to revile them?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#204300 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Among many other distortions, you dumb down marriage to a contract (how romantic and inclusive of human nature), ignore the essence of marriage to fallaciously equate a duplicate gendered half to marriage, and try to compare natural families with default families that immediately hinder a child's safety and future.
Moreover the selective censoring if my post completely ignores the point that marriage connects humanities past and future. SS couples do neither. They are a defective mutation of mating behavior.
So, you still got nothing!!! Yeah, we know!!!

Well, apart from some flowery talking points that mean absolutely nothing to anyone, other than you.

I love it when you stupid fundies start ranting on in your incessantly long run on sentences trying to shove as much bullshyt as you can!!

"Marriage is owned by those that procreate and half people like yourself can't procreate so neutral colors will be genderless for the non parents that you have because they were omitted from the timeline because your existence isn't happening because gender neutral mating behaviors mean the NAMBLA will want to half marry my sister's genderless coupling during the second coming when you are sent straight to hell for trying to get a piece of paper to translate to the illuminensence of my real marriage and the sacred fruit upon which it will bear is not your ss nature restricted coupling duplicated from Xerox paper because I can't fit all my hatred of you into one sentence so I will end by saying you aren't really married so there, now I hope you cry. Smirk."
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204301 Jul 23, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
How can they be "equal", when various state marriage laws, including those that deal with annulment, reference the male female sexual union?
annulment or divorce means that one person in the marriage wants out, no law exists anywhere where the state steps in and forces an annulment when neither party wants the annulment.

With no fault divorce anyone can divorce anyone for no reason at all.

Here is where I will agree with you, the ability to procreate is the same level of importance to a marriage as no reason at all.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204302 Jul 23, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're now saying that there ARE other reasons that people marry besides children.
And if other reasons exist, then people--including same-gender couples--should be allowed to marry based on those reasons.
You can't say that marriage equals mating/procreation and say that other reasons exist at the same time.
I want to make sure I stay away from whichever church he belongs to

"Do you take this woman to be your child bearing appliance"

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#204303 Jul 23, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're now saying that there ARE other reasons that people marry besides children.
And if other reasons exist, then people--including same-gender couples--should be allowed to marry based on those reasons.
You can't say that marriage equals mating/procreation and say that other reasons exist at the same time.
The above makes no sense. It is simply a childish attempt to divert from the fact that marriage connects us to the roots of humanity, and at the same time births our future. SS couples do neither. Clearly a monumental difference.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#204304 Jul 23, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you're saying that Christ has encouraged mankind to judge one another and be rude to them--to revile them?
Where did I say that?

You never answered how why you defended a gay troll attack I exposed.

And why are such games needed by adults addressing a legitimate cause?
1 post removed

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#204306 Jul 23, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you still got nothing!!! Yeah, we know!!!
Well, apart from some flowery talking points that mean absolutely nothing to anyone, other than you.
I love it when you stupid fundies start ranting on in your incessantly long run on sentences trying to shove as much bullshyt as you can!!
"Marriage is owned by those that procreate and half people like yourself can't procreate so neutral colors will be genderless for the non parents that you have because they were omitted from the timeline because your existence isn't happening because gender neutral mating behaviors mean the NAMBLA will want to half marry my sister's genderless coupling during the second coming when you are sent straight to hell for trying to get a piece of paper to translate to the illuminensence of my real marriage and the sacred fruit upon which it will bear is not your ss nature restricted coupling duplicated from Xerox paper because I can't fit all my hatred of you into one sentence so I will end by saying you aren't really married so there, now I hope you cry. Smirk."
Your relationship has no connection to the very roots of human existence. The reunion of a male and female reflect those roots in a powerful way.

Your relationship births nothing for future humanity. Marriage is mating behavior and humanity joining together to provide the very best for human fruit.

I'm sorry, but all you have is a double mutation mistake relationship. Perhaps 'mutake' would be a better description than marriage?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204307 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The above makes no sense. It is simply a childish attempt to divert from the fact that marriage connects us to the roots of humanity, and at the same time births our future. SS couples do neither. Clearly a monumental difference.
While you spend your time trying to divert people from the fact that same sex couples are indeed married and recognized as such on both the state and federal level.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#204308 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The above makes no sense. It is simply a childish attempt to divert from the fact that marriage connects us to the roots of humanity, and at the same time births our future. SS couples do neither. Clearly a monumental difference.
Here are the facts... Mankind as we know it has been around for about 200,000 years. Marriage has been around for around 4,500. Some say marriage is 10,000 years old; but we have no evidence of that.

People were making babies long before marriage was on the scene. And people still make babies outside of marriage.

There is no evidence that marriage was needed to create offspring and societies for a period of about 190,000 to 195,500 years. And there's no evidence that marriage is necessary to create children now.

So, on what basis do you make the claim that "marriage connects us to the roots of humanity, and at the same time births our future"?

I think that's check and mate...

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#204309 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did I say that?
You never answered how why you defended a gay troll attack I exposed.
And why are such games needed by adults addressing a legitimate cause?
Such questions from the ultimate gamer... You lie about your "facts". You mislead people to believe the drivel you post. When you're backed into a corner, you suddenly change course.

You've been playing games for year. To take a page out of your playbook, you don't even believe half the stuff you post.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#204310 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Your relationship has no connection to the very roots of human existence. The reunion of a male and female reflect those roots in a powerful way.
Your relationship births nothing for future humanity. Marriage is mating behavior and humanity joining together to provide the very best for human fruit.
I'm sorry, but all you have is a double mutation mistake relationship. Perhaps 'mutake' would be a better description than marriage?
Prove that "marriage is mating behavior". Prove that "mating behavior" is the only reason people marry.

Mating MAY take place in marriage, but it's disingenuous to say that all marriages are mating behavior.

So, just prove your comments.

We're waiting...
Sack O Brains

Monrovia, CA

#204311 Jul 23, 2013
Sack O Brains, leave this alone.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204312 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Your relationship has no connection to the very roots of human existence. The reunion of a male and female reflect those roots in a powerful way.
Your relationship births nothing for future humanity. Marriage is mating behavior and humanity joining together to provide the very best for human fruit.
I'm sorry, but all you have is a double mutation mistake relationship. Perhaps 'mutake' would be a better description than marriage?
LOL

Mating behavior has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with a marriage license.

There are no restrictions to mating behavior in general ( people can and do have all kinds of sex regardless of a marriage )

and there are no restrictions on a marriage license with respect to mating behavior

Got anything else cause that didnít fare as well as the Titanic did

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 min Guru 190,128
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 2 min scirocco 182,687
News Julian Castro: Clinton emails a 'witch hunt' 3 min mjjcpa 59
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Chicagoan by Birth 1,233,754
News Obama urges Senate to return to D.C. for NSA vote 5 min Synque 5
News Gay marriage (Mar '13) 6 min Reverend Alan 59,795
News Rand Paul: Republican brand 'sucks' 6 min serfs up 69
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 20 min positronium 328,561
News Riots in Baltimore raise questions about police... 34 min Silent Echo 2,430
News Ireland same-sex marriage 35 min Rosa_Winkel 225
News GOP's fight for 2016 nomination likely to drag ... 1 hr EL Chicano 142
More from around the web